Residential broadband users want their internet service providers (ISPs) to take the hassle out of installing, configuring and maintaining antivirus, firewall and parental control products. According to research firms Parks Associates and TeleChoice, a substantial proportion of residential broadband subscribers want network-based protection for their home PC delivered by their ISP.

The study also suggests that attracting new access subscribers with robust, secure services could provide organic growth for service provider revenues. Selling security services to existing access subscribers could also grow revenue and improve customer retention.

"Service providers must adopt strategies that bridge today's need to reinforce acquisition and retention with the growing need to improve protections for residential subscribers against cyber-attack, Our analysis of the Parks data clearly illustrates the opportunity to achieve both goals by selling network-based security services as a value-add to the basic broadband sub." said Claudia J. Bacco, president of TeleChoice.

View: The full story
News source: Vnunet


NAT-T and Firewall Rulesets
Because the new NAT-T code is designed around the IETF RFC 3193 and draft-02 of the IETF NAT-T specification, for these services to run through a firewall, you must open the following ports in the firewall rules:
  • L2TP – User Datagram Protocol (UDP) 500, UDP 1701
  • NAT-T – UDP 4500
  • ESP - Internet Protocol (IP) protocol 50

    Note: This may affect server configurations for third-party gateways.


  • There are 6 additional comments
    Advertisement
    Quote this comment Reply to this comment #1 Posted by Mr. Black on 28 May 2003 - 20:19
    An ISP provides a gateway for you to get onto the Internet. That's why they are called an Internet Service Provider, not an Internet, Security & Antivirus Service Provider.

    Securing your PC from vulnerabilities, viruses & attacks is YOUR responsibility, and should remain rightly so. People always want others to do stuff they should be doing themselves. No wonder other countries don't like us -- they call us lazy, and for one, I believe they have a point.
    Quote this comment Reply to this comment #2 Posted by noll3095 on 29 May 2003 - 01:11
    I don't know if I'd trust Roadrunner with my security...
    Quote this comment Reply to this comment #3 Posted by zivan56 on 29 May 2003 - 02:02
    THis is unrealistic, imagine if they firewalled your connection, no file sharing and other programs would work then.
    Quote this comment Reply to this comment #4 Posted by JetJam on 29 May 2003 - 02:34
    Not...
    Quote this comment Reply to this comment #5 Posted by samxt on 29 May 2003 - 08:47

    I think I'll manage my own security thank you. It would also undoubtedly drive up the cost of an internet connection from ureasonable now, to very unreasonable! That would mean....see ya later isp.
    Quote this comment Reply to this comment #6 Posted by Quick Reply on 29 May 2003 - 08:52
    if antivirus came standard, the prices would go up by at least $120 AUD
    [1]

    Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

    Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.


    Scroll to the Top
    ....
    My Preferences
    ....
    Communicating with server
    Loading
    Please Wait...
    ....
    Loading
     X 
    ....