main

MSN Messenger 6.0 Build 263 Leaks

Tom Warren   on 06 June 2003 - 00:27 · 51 comments & 2519 views

Advertisement (Why?)
The great debate whether or not MSN Messenger 6 build 0263 is "fake" is over this evening on the net. A day of MSN Messenger 6 leaks and general fun has sent everyone dizzy. A source close to Neowin has confirmed this build to be real but missing a US installer.

What this means is that if you decide to run such a build on your system you're stuck with a language you may not understand. You can replace the msglang.dll in the MSN Messenger DIR with an older version and you'll have your nice English language back again.

According to the source who wanted to remain anonymous this build was compiled on 3/6/03 at 15:28:14. As digital signatures in files are near impossible to edit sucessfully we can confirm the build is real.

Please note: Microsoft have requested that no links to Messenger 6 are to be posted here at Neowin so please respect our decision not to post links. Please don't post any links or request links. Thank you.

Screenshot: Previous Messenger 6 Screenshots




TCP breaks down large files into small packets of about 1500 bytes, each carrying the address of the sender and the recipient. The sending computer transmits a packet, waits for a signal from the recipient that acknowledges its safe arrival, and then sends the next packet.

If no receipt comes back, the sender transmits the same packet at half the speed of the previous one, and repeats the process, getting slower each time, until it succeeds.

This means that even minor glitches on the line can make a connection very sluggish. Because Fast TCP uses the same packet sizes as regular TCP, the hardware that carries messages around the net will still work. The difference is in software and hardware on the sending computer, which continually measures the time it takes for sent packets to arrive, and how long acknowledgements take to come back.

This reveals the delays on the line, giving early warnings of likely packet losses. The Fast TCP software uses this to predict the highest data rate the connection can support without losing data.

Since the packets are the same size as those used in TCP, none of the equipment along the internet itself will have to be modified, and no new hardware will be needed on computers receiving the data.

The first practical test of Fast TCP took place in November at a supercomputing conference. Researchers from Caltech, Stanford and CERN near Geneva in Switzerland, sent data 10,000 kilometres from Sunnyvale, California, to CERN at an average rate of 925 megabits per second. Ordinary TCP managed just 266 megabits per second on the same routes.

By ganging 10 Fast TCP systems together, the researchers have achieved transmission speeds of over 8.6 gigabits per second, which is more than 6000 times the capacity of ordinary broadband links.

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 51 additional comments
#1 Xeon™ on 06 Jun 2003 - 00:34
whoa... : interesting
(2 replies) #2 LurkerHere on 06 Jun 2003 - 00:38
*edit* this was made 2 days ago
#2.1 Poser on 06 Jun 2003 - 00:38
june 3rd 2003 at 3:28:14pm
#2.2 LurkerHere on 06 Jun 2003 - 00:40
ok.. himm.. at that time i was watching TBS Superstation
#3 Poser on 06 Jun 2003 - 00:38
hey any credit here

#4 XP-RTM on 06 Jun 2003 - 00:38
great i just downloaded 256
(5 replies) #5 pylesj on 06 Jun 2003 - 00:41
Ill believe it when I see it
#5.1 Electroglitter on 06 Jun 2003 - 00:43
I have it, its real.
#5.2 Poser on 06 Jun 2003 - 00:45
Comment removed for violating Neowins Community Rules
#5.3 LurkerHere on 06 Jun 2003 - 00:47
just a screenshot
#5.4 creamhackered on 06 Jun 2003 - 00:51
Yes Thank you,

And one that contained profanity in it, I don't particulary see why our users would need to read that do you?
#5.5 LurkerHere on 06 Jun 2003 - 00:53
i'll just do that next time
(1 reply) #6 Poser on 06 Jun 2003 - 00:43
No requesting or supplying links, thank you.
#6.1 Gweedo on 06 Jun 2003 - 01:11
Maybe there's a reason your other account was banned. Two posts edited in like 10 minutes.
#7 lwebster on 06 Jun 2003 - 00:44
I aint gonna bother - installing 256 caused too much hastle finding the new all in one patcher. Not waiting around for the next one for minor / non-existent fixes. I'm sticking with 256 til final realease (which to be fair is only a matter of weeks away)
#8 JnCoKiLLa on 06 Jun 2003 - 00:49
No requesting or supplying links, thank you.
#9 net-cruizer on 06 Jun 2003 - 00:54
Well I sure aint going to bother getting this version.
It still seems a bit fishy to me.
All the screenshots I've seen of this new build don't even have the "MSN Messenger .net" image in the "About" window and it's not even an english version.
I would think it's a special version being tested for Chinese or whatever language it is, and is actually the same as the previous build.
#10 slang123 on 06 Jun 2003 - 00:58
I do just about anything for a beta leaked or otherwise... but i dont go as far as using a chinese build for differnces we dont even know with different file versions to get it into english. I'm giving this one a miss
(1 reply) #11 free_loader19 on 06 Jun 2003 - 01:18
LOL...I never was willing to download a beta or "leaked" version of MSN Messenger until I saw the download link was "removed by the request of Microsoft." When the link was removed my rebel side took over and wanted Messenger 6.
By the way, moderators (creamhackered or whoever) out there, when it was removed by their "request," was it really a request, or a threat? .... just wondering. Any information would be helpful, thanks.
#11.1 gameguy on 06 Jun 2003 - 03:25
first they ask nicely. then they demand. then they take you to court.
#12 mipra on 06 Jun 2003 - 01:19
Hehe....well...got to figure it myself
#13 ben_b on 06 Jun 2003 - 01:30
Post removed for violating Neowins rules

Last edited by 98 on 06 Jun 2003 - 01:39
#14 lilhaloshaka on 06 Jun 2003 - 04:38
july 17th id the release right.?.
or do you think they might release ir sooner .?.
(1 reply) #15 lilhaloshaka on 06 Jun 2003 - 04:38
gosh a spelling mistake ..
is*
#15.1 gameguy on 06 Jun 2003 - 04:52
there IS an edit button you know

sometimes i think people purposely make errors, then make a second post just to increase post count...
#16 war on 06 Jun 2003 - 04:45
I don't see any digital signatures!!!!!!!!

Looks pretty fake to me, cant find anything new.
(1 reply) #17 NeoTrunks on 06 Jun 2003 - 05:13
Why does MS only pick on this site. Other sites, (which shall not be named) still have it for download. Oh well. Anyone know when this is officially supposed to go open beta? I thought it was supposed to be open beta in June.
#17.1 gameguy on 06 Jun 2003 - 05:49
i've heard it isn't going to be a public beta.
(6 replies) #18 medion on 06 Jun 2003 - 05:58
hey go to www.iexbeta.com
#18.1 Neobond on 06 Jun 2003 - 10:19
How about you stop spamming
#18.2 idbuythatforadollar on 06 Jun 2003 - 10:52
damn how come they have direct links there, and we cant
#18.3 ben_b on 06 Jun 2003 - 22:38
How come you can post that link and not get it removed, but when I post...
#18.4 ben_b on 06 Jun 2003 - 22:39
*Cough* ieXbeta.com *Cough*
#18.5 ben_b on 06 Jun 2003 - 22:40
...it gets removed?
#18.6 ben_b on 06 Jun 2003 - 22:41
#19 Courage on 06 Jun 2003 - 07:29
Removed for ignoring Neowins Community Rules

Last edited by 2 on 06 Jun 2003 - 10:18
(1 reply) #20 MrBoB on 06 Jun 2003 - 07:44
Removed for ignoring Neowins Community Rules

Last edited by 2 on 06 Jun 2003 - 10:17
#20.1 idbuythatforadollar on 06 Jun 2003 - 08:40
cool site, thanks
#21 souldreamer on 06 Jun 2003 - 08:59
It's real, i have it. But i'll stick with 256.
(4 replies) #22 dekker on 06 Jun 2003 - 09:35
messenger sucks anyway, so why get so worked up about the fact that neowin have no links, maybe theyre part of M$ PR shill system LOL
#22.1 Neobond on 06 Jun 2003 - 10:16
and just maybe:

#22.2 xStainDx on 06 Jun 2003 - 18:22
LOL god damn neobond, share your photo collection. priceless
#22.3 Hawkeye on 06 Jun 2003 - 18:34
Whoo! Al Bundy rocks. Nice one Neobond.
#22.4 Bless HaSHem on 07 Jun 2003 - 12:18
Yea maybe

#23 Fredde87 on 06 Jun 2003 - 11:50
whats new in this release ?
(2 replies) #24 one321 on 06 Jun 2003 - 13:28
I don't really keep up on betas so maybe this is a dumb question. Build 265 was leaked a a little bit ago. Doesn't a higher build number mean a newer build than 263?
#24.1 oqwarrior on 06 Jun 2003 - 14:27
Build 256 was leaked, not build 265.
#24.2 Wadey on 06 Jun 2003 - 16:50
263 is the newest build i believe
(1 reply) #25 Drimacus on 06 Jun 2003 - 20:44
why bother getting a chinese build of messenger? final version will be released in July or something, and i know there will be plenty of betas before that (non chinese)
#25.1 Wadey on 06 Jun 2003 - 23:34
You just replace the msgslang.dll in your program dir with an english language version, then you get this latest build...
Which seems to have more bugs than the last one, lets hope they're gone in time for the next one.
#26 fdiaz2day on 09 Jun 2003 - 14:38
Jeez, MSN 6 is more leaky then a water main break...

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)