main

Next-Generation Secure Computing Base Explained

Tom Warren   on 06 June 2003 - 12:29 · 10 comments & 1290 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Learn more about Microsoft's Next-Generation Secure Computing Base (NGSCB): new security technology for the Microsoft Windows platform. Explore the resources on this page to discover how NGSCB can help create a more trustworthy computing environment.

Microsoft today added an array of explanations to it's resources site to help explain what 'palladium' is. It includes an overview of the technology, a technical FAQ and the various authentication ideas of the software and hardware of NGSCB.

It's worth a long read to anyone who is interested in this new technology likely to debut in the next Windows Operating System, Longhorn.

View: View Product Information : Next-Gen Secure Computing Base
News source: Microsoft-watch




TCP breaks down large files into small packets of about 1500 bytes, each carrying the address of the sender and the recipient. The sending computer transmits a packet, waits for a signal from the recipient that acknowledges its safe arrival, and then sends the next packet.

If no receipt comes back, the sender transmits the same packet at half the speed of the previous one, and repeats the process, getting slower each time, until it succeeds.

This means that even minor glitches on the line can make a connection very sluggish. Because Fast TCP uses the same packet sizes as regular TCP, the hardware that carries messages around the net will still work. The difference is in software and hardware on the sending computer, which continually measures the time it takes for sent packets to arrive, and how long acknowledgements take to come back.

This reveals the delays on the line, giving early warnings of likely packet losses. The Fast TCP software uses this to predict the highest data rate the connection can support without losing data.

Since the packets are the same size as those used in TCP, none of the equipment along the internet itself will have to be modified, and no new hardware will be needed on computers receiving the data.

The first practical test of Fast TCP took place in November at a supercomputing conference. Researchers from Caltech, Stanford and CERN near Geneva in Switzerland, sent data 10,000 kilometres from Sunnyvale, California, to CERN at an average rate of 925 megabits per second. Ordinary TCP managed just 266 megabits per second on the same routes.

By ganging 10 Fast TCP systems together, the researchers have achieved transmission speeds of over 8.6 gigabits per second, which is more than 6000 times the capacity of ordinary broadband links.

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 10 additional comments
(1 reply) #1 Tom Servo on 06 Jun 2003 - 12:33
System Message: User FUD Post Counter reset to zero.
System Message: Restarted counting.
#1.1 Jason on 06 Jun 2003 - 14:01
Agreed.
#2 Jugalator on 06 Jun 2003 - 14:21
Whaaat?? So the nexus-aware security chip can't interfer with NGSCB-unaware software since it's not involved in the OS' decision to load or not load a NGSCB-unaware application, hardware driver, etc? You can still use Winamp on Longhorn and it allows me to play pirated music?

But what am I now going to complain about!?!?

Sincerely,
Your Average Personal Rights Zealot
#3 Tom Servo on 06 Jun 2003 - 14:54
Noone else surprised that this hasn't hit sites a la Slashdot or againsttcpa.com yet?
#4 Max on 06 Jun 2003 - 21:44
The only next generation I want to see involves Jean-luc Picard - and he sure as hell was not a Nazi, unlike Microsoft in their implementation of palladium.
#5 Tom Servo on 06 Jun 2003 - 23:11
Oh, we got a WINNER! First idiot on list!

On a more personal note... DID YOU EVEN FRICKIN' READ THAT FAQ?!?
(1 reply) #6 GreasyP on 07 Jun 2003 - 05:02
Actually, that did answer a lot of questions I had about the whole Palladium thing. I do have one major concern, though, mentioned near the bottom of the FAQ: this stuff will be patented by Microsoft. Frankly, I would feel 500% more comfortable with it if it was an open standard implementable by anyone. What about other OS's that want to talk to this security hardware? They're left out in the cold because Microsoft has the patent rights. Not cool.
#6.1 Jason on 07 Jun 2003 - 14:20
MS are a profit making company, if others want access then they should have to buy licences.
#7 Tom Servo on 07 Jun 2003 - 20:09
Did you EVER see a technique in use that isn't patented? Even your so called open standards for entertainment (MPEG1, MPEG2, MP3, AC3 etc blah woo), all are patented.
#8 Joshie on 09 Jun 2003 - 07:07
Haha, it's fantastic how quiet the comments area is on this post.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)