main

Messenger Plus! Bundling Lop.com

Tom Warren   on 09 June 2003 - 12:19 · 84 comments & 3897 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Messenger Plus!, the add on for MSN Messenger was updated on the 23rd of May. The official word from Patchou (the programs author) was that the updated program contained a sponsorship program. The reason, to generate revenue for the team to cover the vast costs of such a project. However this simple enough add-on which is optional has met the wrath of many of its users.

The Official Messenger Plus! forums has grown into a mass debate over whether or not the program contains "spyware" or "adware". SpywareInfo (a site dedicated to support for spyware applications) has also announced that Messenger Plus! has been bundled with software known as lop.com (Live Online Portal). Lop.com is owned by C2Media who created this software as a simple pay-per-click search portal. The installer turns a user's default web browser into a browser with endless supplies to links to lop.com. For more information on lop.com's software see here. Although this software is optional, the average user installing Messenger Plus! because their friend "said so" will miss the sponsor program as by default it's ticked to install. According to Patchou un-installing Messenger Plus! will remove the adverts but SpwareInfo offer extra help if required.

Read more...

Screenshot: New Messenger Plus! installer
View: Spywareinfo.com


The official word from Patchou is as follows:

"I don't want to be rude but if you boycot version 2.10.36, you're an idiot."

SpywareInfo recommends that users boycott the software and stay as far away from Patchou's Messenger Plus! as possible. I feel that advice is a little over the top considering the sponsor program is optional. Only users of Windows 98/2000 or those with Windows Messenger 5/MSN Messenger 5 are currently installing the latest plus!. For those seeking to use MSN Messenger 6 on Windows XP, the software is incompatible at the moment. Maybe once Patchou and his team have updated this we'll hear even more complaints about the sponsorship program. Who knows.

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 84 additional comments
#1 fdiaz2day on 09 Jun 2003 - 12:29
So, this confirms Tech-Critics report I guess...
(3 replies) #2 dougkinzinger on 09 Jun 2003 - 12:32
nice job Patchou.....thus ends the reign of Plus!.....prepare to be replaced.
#2.1 force2k on 09 Jun 2003 - 18:20
Lop.com =
#2.2 Dj Open Source on 09 Jun 2003 - 20:19
Ya Sellouts in a sense
#2.3 al92lt1 on 10 Jun 2003 - 00:36
The program will still install. Just don't click the box that says "I accept the sponser". Just read in stead of blindly clicking NEXT.
#3 GEKREUZIGT on 09 Jun 2003 - 12:42
Lop.com = THE DEVIL
(5 replies) #4 w_y3k on 09 Jun 2003 - 12:47
Salaam (hi),

I trust PATCHOU and I know he'll never give me SPYWAREz, it can be a mistake (on PATCHOU's side and if it is he will fix it :p)
#4.1 BobSmith on 09 Jun 2003 - 12:52
Patchou is a punk. "vast cost" my butt. He just wants to make money off of his "free" app. I can't blame him for that, but a little more forthrightness would serve him better. After his evidence-less attack on Microsoft for the MSN Messenger 6 beta, I have no respect for him.

Also, Messenger Helper, is a better addon than Messenger Plus ever was.
#4.2 Neobond on 09 Jun 2003 - 13:05
Patchou isn't a punk. A real scam is more like Style-XP back in the day, when it was free and then without warning or announcement to its main supporters (Neowin among them) they started charging for it.

Facing reality and realising stuff costs money is one thing, but scamming your target audience is different and IMO something Patchou hasn't done. If people install this app without first checking what they are installing (just by reading and using your eyes) then they deserve to have crap loaded on their systems.
#4.3 Eduardo on 09 Jun 2003 - 13:43
So, acording to you, we (the technical aware people) may take advantage of the inexperienceds one??

very good
#4.4 BobSmith on 09 Jun 2003 - 13:46
Ah, come on, neobond, you know most people don't read instructions when they install apps. Not that it isn't their fault, but if they trust the author who said it would never have ads and always be free, then they wouldn't have to worry. Charging for the software or adding plus! banners every so often (as one neowinian suggested on his forum) would be far better than the current model.

Anyway, my calling him a punk was some pent up rage about him whining about MSN Messenger 6. Rather than understand the new API, he just went off on Microsoft. A little later after he wised up, he had to recant his words. I just think he's a whiny programmer. He made a cool little app, but it isn't all that and certainly isn't worth the godlike status that his forum members give him.
#4.5 fdiaz2day on 09 Jun 2003 - 13:49
i don't think thats what he meant
#5 Smeg on 09 Jun 2003 - 12:52
i was gonna report this, i guess i shouldn't have given patchou such a long chance to change. what a shame.
(2 replies) #6 Neobond on 09 Jun 2003 - 12:58
oh dear, the reality of cost is suddenly apparent.

I wonder if people realise most popular stuff (like Neowin) also cost "vast amounts" to keep online. Patchou may have gotten greedy I don't know, but I do know that the cost to be able to download MSN Plus! is something even Neowin could not afford. and thats without the time he dedicates to programming it, answering everyones questions and maintaining a site.

Don't be harsh on him ffs these things aren't free, people forget that. It is still freeware and it remains a grand piece of software. People can also stick with 2.10.35 so whats the deal?
#6.1 fdiaz2day on 09 Jun 2003 - 13:10
Well said, I wonder how they'd feel if it wasn't there at all...

If he cant pay for it and it was down they wouldn't like it...so, either way people will dislike it... :/
#6.2 longwilli on 09 Jun 2003 - 13:43
i agree that plus is great but by looks of it it could be on borrowed time if microsoft have there way implimenting some of the main features in plus into messenger 6 i see this only continueing until althere is is a boss protect and add blocker its a shame but with costs of the project and microsoft we could see the end of this ground braking project which really helped develop instant messaging into what it is today
#7 Nickbee on 09 Jun 2003 - 13:04
Everyone seems to be hijacking the internet by charging for software and access to things these days. As a hard-nosed Communist, I dont believe in paying for software, lol.
#8 Zennith on 09 Jun 2003 - 13:06
Well said Neobond. As the above mentioned news said, it's OPTIONAL. You can choose not to install it. So why are you people attacking patchou like a pack of Hyenas?
(2 replies) #9 icie on 09 Jun 2003 - 13:11
I agree with Neobond. If they are stupid people who just click through installation without checking or knowing anything, they deserve it anyway. Not that they would actually notice.
#9.1 divertom15 on 09 Jun 2003 - 18:44
I agree with that too but on the other hand i think it should have a big button or message or something to let you choose to installthe spyware it or not. Regardless of the spyware messenger plus! wont last long anyway if they cant get it to run with msn messenger 6
#9.2 el22 on 10 Jun 2003 - 02:55
QUOTE (#9.1 by )
Regardless of the spyware messenger plus! wont last long anyway if they cant get it to run with msn messenger 6

Urh...

Messenger Plus is being tested with MSN6, compatibility is already done (private testing phase currently). patchou is now working on adding new features to plus for the upcoming 2.5 release.
(3 replies) #10 Jaz on 09 Jun 2003 - 13:19
i don't blame him however i won't be using Plus again, especially if MS are starting to listen to users and see that things like PLUS! are popular and they take heed and include them as standard (bring on the DOJ).

howver i'm sure patchou could just cut costs, most of the tech type irc networks will prolly have people who will host it and i'm sure alot of people would give up some bandwith for allowing it to be downlaoded.
#10.1 fdiaz2day on 09 Jun 2003 - 13:27
good idea, mirrors are always good...
#10.2 SMG on 10 Jun 2003 - 01:41
Bandwidth costs were never a problem for him because there were dozens of people, including myself, that made a mirror for plus using own own bandwidth.

I however took down my mirror, because I will not support spyware, no matter what the excuses are. I even tested the spyware for myself.

The spyware in question kept prompting me to install other software, it had a toolbar, redirected all my home/search pages and google.com to lop.com, not to mention all the porn links everywhere. I followed a few links, and I can assure you that EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM was a SCAM. There was a thing called "Kazaa Gold" which is a pay rip-off of kazaa lite. One of the "fast diplomas" things attempted to hijack outlook express to get my email address (it is possible) and one of those work from home sites had this logo on the left that said "safe business approved organisation" or something, that quite obviously i have never heard of because it doesn't exist, and it even listed a bunch of scams, eg. the nigerian colonial scam, to try and get you on thier side. A few other sites contained the VeriSign logo, that only linked to www.verisign.com, instead of the "click to verify" thing. And a few others prompted to run unsigned activex components.

Another thing to mention to is that Patchou chose such bad timing for this, because at the same time he's going "oh i need moral support to make an msn6 compatable version". But as far as I'm concerned, he doesn't need moral support since I'm not going to use his msn6 version anyway because of the spyware (besides, msn6 has chat logging)

Oh, and I can also say that it was the cost of living that made him go spyware (he gave up his job to develop plus 24/7), but noneoftheless, spyware is the lowest form to make money.
#10.3 el22 on 10 Jun 2003 - 03:08
Actually, download mirrors are not the problem. The website is what uses more bandwidth. (but that's not the only reason for trying to earn money from Plus...)
(3 replies) #11 longwilli on 09 Jun 2003 - 13:34
i know he has to make some money to cover costs but loop.com is indeed the devil and there must be better ways to acumilate revenue through donations
#11.1 el22 on 10 Jun 2003 - 02:57
Yes, but for that people actually HAVE to donate. He can't invent donators. He is unemployed. He makes free software. He runs a free website that receives 135,000 unique visits a day and tons of monthly bandwidth. How should he pay that? With 3 donations per month of USD 10 each? Don't think so...
#11.2 longwilli on 10 Jun 2003 - 13:07
that was just one of the many ways, you have even mentioned one yourself the fact that he gets so many users, he could easily add banners infact he has a popup already.
#11.3 el22 on 10 Jun 2003 - 17:01
The site already has banners (in a search-form way) and popups. Still, not enough...
#12 astrokat on 09 Jun 2003 - 13:38
I just installed Plus off of a clean format (because of LOP.com I received via the web), and I rebooted my computer and it was back!!!! I WAS SO PISSED!!!!! Next time I should read the change log, but I wasn't expecting it!!! Thank god I found the unintsaller. Adware and Spy Bot completely missed it. It also fux0rs dns settings some how .. and stops certain images from loading in IE. the LOP uninstaller fixes this, but adware does not. =(
#13 nXP_151 on 09 Jun 2003 - 13:40
Hmmmm no wonder I receive that annoying would u like to play Casino online dialog box, the toolbar on my IE and explorer

#14 gar3th_uk on 09 Jun 2003 - 13:42
It took me ages to get rid of lop.com from my system after it sneakly installed itself... I say Bad, very Bad! I'll make sure not let it do it again!
(1 reply) #15 Sholin on 09 Jun 2003 - 13:52
Its not his fault your unable to uncheck you agree, I guess you should all learn how to read before complaining, Patchou also pays over $600 in server related charges just to keep Plus! avalible, he needs to get the money somewhere. The site alone, excluding the acctually msgplus file (which isn't even currently hosted on the servers) goes though about 15 - 20 gigs a day.
#15.1 Flip_Kid on 09 Jun 2003 - 15:22
Why doesn't he switch hosts then... off the top of my head, I can name 2-3 different (stable, fast) hosting providers that are less than 1/3 of the charges you say he's currently paying for the 600gb of bandwidth used per month.

Or are these numbers made up?
#16 Jason on 09 Jun 2003 - 13:52
Why shouldn't he charge for his time, it isn't a crime.
#17 naap51stang on 09 Jun 2003 - 13:58
Oh great.........just what I need........a bunch of friends of mine who use me as their IT department LOL......calling me saying they installed this and removed it and can't get rid of the ads. Geez! I about pulled my hair out the last time this lop.com thing popped up.....sorry, no pun intended!
Actually, I have converted a lot of my friends that were using MSN to switch to Trillian as their IM client. Yeah, it dosen't have all the bells and whistles of the others, but it does allow you to connect to all the chat clients with ONE program. A feature that everyone seems to like. Keeping track of ONE client on the desktop instead of several

(1 reply) #18 bangbang023 on 09 Jun 2003 - 14:02
I don't blame him for this but he also has to realize now that he will lose users.
#18.1 Sholin on 09 Jun 2003 - 14:02
The question is then, what is better. Loosing a few users, or abandoning messenger plus?
#19 jack_oneill on 09 Jun 2003 - 14:18
I recently tried to install Messenger Plus! to my computer as I was using Messenger 5.0 and each time I shut messenger off the program would vanish, so finally out of frustration I uninstalled it and after reading that he's gone and climbed into bed with one of the worst offenders in the spyware/ad business I'm glad that I did. I can understand why he did it because having to develop new versions of programs is expensive, but I can't support who he did it with. Shortly after I uninstalled Messenger Plus I found dMSN and it works fantastic, although there are somethings that it can't do at the present time, although hopefully it may just come to that. C2 Lop is one of the biggest pieces of crap that can be installed on a computer and since they are making it next to impossible to uninstall anyone with half a brain will stay as far away from the thing as possible unless you like having links to online gambling, adult sites and the like.
#20 Yakkob on 09 Jun 2003 - 14:39
lol@n00bs who click on Automatic Install

You only have yourselves to blame.

It's not as though he was hiding it..It's on the news on the frontpage..

ffs...give the guy a break.

(3 replies) #21 lammmetak on 09 Jun 2003 - 14:39
well maybe there's gonna be a msn plus 2 lite version just like with kazaa
or he releases a version wich is free of adds but cost u something
#21.1 Yakkob on 09 Jun 2003 - 14:43
*edited* Hateful post.

--configure

Last edited by 52 on 10 Jun 2003 - 11:25
#21.2 longwilli on 09 Jun 2003 - 15:59
lol
#21.3 configure on 10 Jun 2003 - 11:26
It's optional.
(1 reply) #22 Darkness2k on 09 Jun 2003 - 14:48
Thanks to whoever said about "Messenger Helper"... It at least manages to remove the advert from build 263 of MSN Messenger 6. (Thats about all it does mind, shame the auto-response messages don't work)
#22.1 Nodiaque on 09 Jun 2003 - 15:13
hmmmm... patch..... don't you know patch?

mess.be
(4 replies) #23 Ibrim on 09 Jun 2003 - 15:09
This is not good interface design...



There are only so many words I can draw out of my vocabulary to say how awful it is.
Patchou should take the effort to clearly re-enforce what is being installed... loop.com

The dialogue should follow the standard format users expect when information of importance is displayed. The question mark or yellow caution box icon are one way of denoting important information. Another would be halting the install process until user action is taken, An agree button for instance.

A small check box which installs spy-ware by 'default' is not sufficient.

If Patchou is worried Messenger Plus! users wont make the effort to specifically install the junker add ons then he should contemplate other advertising streams.

Further more, Patchou doesn't have to keep coding Messenger Plus. There is no gun pointed at his head. He made the choice to expose Messenger Plus to a wide range of users. If he finds Messenger Plus that stressful and financially un-fulfilling, he should drop it and get a job at Macy's.


#23.1 Yakkob on 09 Jun 2003 - 15:13
QUOTE
Further more, Patchou doesn't have to keep coding Messenger Plus. There is no gun pointed at his head.


Likewise You don't have to accept the installation of the Sponsor software. There aint no gun pointed to your head either.
#23.2 Ibrim on 09 Jun 2003 - 15:43
Let me guess you think great software installs spy ware by default.

Who do you work for? KaZaA?

#23.3 SMG on 10 Jun 2003 - 01:56
actually, the tickbox is ticked by default
#23.4 nookadum on 10 Jun 2003 - 03:35
OMG, what is wrong with that interface? It clearly states "I accept, install the sponsor". HOW IS THAT NOT A GOOD INTERFACE? If you can't read, I'd understand, but COME ON.
(1 reply) #24 Nodiaque on 09 Jun 2003 - 15:09
Even if you choose not to install, I'm sure it's bundle with spyware anyway
#24.1 Sholin on 09 Jun 2003 - 15:43
QUOTE (#1.0 by )
Even if you choose not to install, I'm sure it's bundle with spyware anyway

It's not, its 100% clean if you uncheck the box
#25 BobSmith on 09 Jun 2003 - 15:10
The direct link for Messenger Helper is http://218.241.74.61/en/default.asp

I like them a lot better than Messenger Plus. Since I didn't find any of their features (Helper or Plus) useful other than logging, though, MSN Messenger 6 does everything I need. On the MSN 6 subject, check out http://www.lparky.com/beta/MSNMessenger6/Default.aspx There's a link to modify v6's log to display links and emoticons.
(1 reply) #26 Nodiaque on 09 Jun 2003 - 15:17
hmm... I though it was the msn 6 compatible release
#26.1 longwilli on 09 Jun 2003 - 16:00
no there isn't one yet
#27 astrokat on 09 Jun 2003 - 16:40
LOP Uninstaller - if you get OWNZED BY lop.com, download that file. I must admit that the uninstaller is almost as shady as the installer .. but it works.
(1 reply) #28 reaper1576 on 09 Jun 2003 - 16:43
messanger plus messed my pc up cos the lop.com stuff had to clean install after removing plus never gonna use that app again after that lot of ppl i know have stopped using it by who needs it now with MSN6 looks like MS aretaking note of what ppl are asking for on the wm5 beta news groups with the features
#28.1 el22 on 10 Jun 2003 - 03:01
Ok... if you shoot this gun you have in your hand, you kill yourself. If you drop it, you survive. So you would just press next and kill yourself, blaming the gun?

Do you have something in there? Think. It's O P T I O N A L.

READ before you sign... it will save you lot of trouble during your offline life...
#29 antsy on 09 Jun 2003 - 18:16
Lop.com LMAO I used to have that untill Ad-Aware Abliterated it

P.S. I didnt install it deliberately I seam to remember it was only a few weeks before I moved to Mozilla.

Last edited by 24235 on 09 Jun 2003 - 18:22
#30 mipra on 09 Jun 2003 - 18:37
I trust Patchou. However, this is kinda annoying for sometimes
#31 Matthey on 09 Jun 2003 - 18:55
Do You Want Remove LOP.COM S h i t?

Go to http://lop.com/new_uninstall.exe
(3 replies) #32 Monkeh on 09 Jun 2003 - 20:02
"The reason, to generate revenue for the team to cover the vast costs of such a project."

What vast cost? Is he hiring the google pigeons to do his work or something? IMO it's just an act of g r e e d.
#32.1 Hova on 09 Jun 2003 - 20:47
Cost for server, downloads of the program, stuff like that. Read Neobonds post.
#32.2 el22 on 10 Jun 2003 - 03:02
QUOTE (#32.0 by )
Is he hiring the google pigeons to do his work or something?

Sort of

Nah, really. He serves lots of bandwidth per month, he receives thousands of visits per day to his site (135,000 uniques approx.), he is unemployed and he has to eat. Any other question?

Would you like to be working for free? Go then, learn C++ and make me a program.
#32.3 nookadum on 10 Jun 2003 - 03:37
How is it greedy? He's trying to make money of off his OWN work. There's no greed in that.
(1 reply) #33 Zeni on 09 Jun 2003 - 20:37
OMG.... I thought Mess.be was installing this **** on my comp, I didn't think it was Plus..... this is seriously the most annoying spyware ever, at least he could have put something easier to remove, like gator.
#33.1 el22 on 10 Jun 2003 - 03:04
Lol... can you think a bit?


IT'S OPTIONAL!... uncheck the box and install!....
(1 reply) #34 lj300 on 09 Jun 2003 - 21:53
use older versions then
#34.1 el22 on 10 Jun 2003 - 03:04
Why? Just don't install the sponsor software...
#35 DJ Specs on 09 Jun 2003 - 22:04
#36 CheeseCow on 09 Jun 2003 - 22:14
Well, I don't use it, but it seems like it is just OPTIONAL, so it's possible to avoid.
I think this is the danger with freeware projects, when they become overly successful, and expensive to maintain, it's easy to include adware/spyware or go shareware.

I'm just glad there is OpenSource as well.
(3 replies) #37 al92lt1 on 10 Jun 2003 - 01:46
A lot of discussion here about a NON ISSUE. Look at the screenshot, JUST DON'T CHECK THE BOX !!!. The program will still install fine WITHOUT the LOP/Adware/Spyware. The instructions explain this quite clearly.
#37.1 Ibrim on 10 Jun 2003 - 03:59
It is an ISSUE. The box is CHECKED by DEFAULT!!!

Allot of users who don't pay attention to the install, because they are used to installing prior versions Messenger Plus, click through the dialogues.

Patchou has a certain level of trust from Messenger Plus users. They don't expect to have to monitor the install for a vicious trojan. Patchou picked the wrong sponsor.

If you did install the Messenger Plus sponsor, it takes a system restore or system reinstall in order to get rid of the spy-ware.

If people had to specifically check the box to install the sponsor then there wouldn't be an issue because nobody would be willingly choosing to install LOP spyware.

Everyone who's telling people not to check the box is retarded. People should be UNCHECKING the box.
#37.2 nookadum on 10 Jun 2003 - 08:41
It's still the users' fault since THEY DON'T PAY ATTENTION TO THEIR INSTALLATION PROCEDURES. So Patchou isn't the one to blame. He's just trying to make money off something HE made, and there's nothing wrong with that.
#37.3 Yakkob on 10 Jun 2003 - 09:21
QUOTE
It is an ISSUE. The box is CHECKED by DEFAULT!!!


It's only an issue if you didn't uncheck it.

Duh!
#38 nookadum on 10 Jun 2003 - 03:41
As al92lt1 said above, READ THE ****ING BOX. If you uncheck the box, it will STILL INSTALL WITHOUT THE SPYWARE.
(1 reply) #39 BigBlueBall on 10 Jun 2003 - 04:37
Yeah, yeah, YEAH... RTF(BOX) they say. But hell, we've become conditioned to accept those lame TOS agreements like another Pavlovian dog salivating at the bell. I'll be that 90% of the people installing it didn't even read it... then just clicked install and accepted the "LOP-Me!" defaults!

Is Patchou to blame? Hell no. He deserves to pay his bills as much as the next guy... maybe more!

But the interface IS a poor design because it comes disguised as the usual "just-click-yes-or-don't-bother-installing" dialogue that we usually see with every other application out there. It's designed to prey upon our innate inattentiveness.

Yes, technically, we should always read the fine print. But seriously, do you? Everytime?

Also, when I installed MP!2 I did briefly read the message, and thought "hell, why not accept the sponsor? He deserves some coin for his efforts." Little did I know I'd get crap like images getting blocked and other nasty side effects. This LOP crap really sucks. It's not just a "sponsor" in an innocent sense of the word. It's like introducing your grandma to Larry Flynt. Leaves a very bad after taste.

I trust Patchou, and don't think for a moment that he tried to pull one over on anyone. I doubt he even really realized what he was getting into when he jumped in bed with C2Media. But now it's damage control time.

Patchou, more power to ya man, but please... PLEASE drop C2Media and get a legitimate, reputable sponsor!?
#39.1 el22 on 10 Jun 2003 - 17:06
QUOTE (#39.0 by )
Yes, technically, we should always read the fine print. But seriously, do you? Everytime?

Yes, technically, we don't always read the fine print. But seriously, is it Patchou's fault?

If you won't even bother on reading the 2 lines of text that the dialog has on top, at least read the "YES, I AGREE, INSTALL THE SPONSOR" bit.