main

AMD overhauls transistors, chips

Toxicfume   on 12 June 2003 - 13:42 · 12 comments & 593 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Thanks to xStaindx for submitting this article in the BPN...Advanced Micro Devices is combing through the scientific cookbook in its quest to improve its chips. The Sunnyvale, Calif.-based chipmaker is examining how to incorporate a wide variety of cutting-edge concepts--strained silicon, multi-gate transistors, replacing silicon with metal in key transistor components--to boost the performance of chips that will hit the market in the second half of the decade.

The race to change the basic structure of microprocessors is a matter of survival, said Craig Sander, vice president of process technology at AMD. Chips are increasingly getting smaller and running at faster speeds, but many of the materials and structures used to make processors these days can't be pushed much more without unleashing unintended consequences.

The gate oxide, for example, one of the crucial components of a transistor, is only about five or six atomic layers thick on current chips, Sander said. Further thinning, without creative changes, will cause electricity to leak, leading to lower battery life, excessive power consumption and potentially dangerous levels of heat inside computers. "More than ever, we are up against power constraints," Sander said. Without manufacturing improvements "we are out of business."

View: The complete article
News source: CNet


Microsoft has been increasing its share in the handheld OS market, recently signing on major manufacturers such as Dell Computer as hardware partners. More than 30 manufacturers currently use various versions of the Pocket PC operating system in handhelds. The software giant remains the No. 2 player in the market, behind Palm.

The handheld market has seen shipments slide over the last couple of quarters, partly as a result of major player Handspring shifting its focus from handhelds to combination organizer-cell phone devices. But other big names such as Dell and Toshiba, which both use the Pocket PC OS in their devices, are slowly filling the void, according to data from research firm IDC.

In the first quarter, Dell shot up to the No. 4 spot, with 6.5 percent of worldwide shipments, from No. 11, and Toshiba picked up 3.6 percent of the market. Toshiba managed to increase shipments 306 percent in the first quarter from the same period a year ago. Handspring fell in the No. 7 spot, with 2.9 percent.

Magneto, the next version of Microsoft's Pocket PC OS, is expected to include improved phone features, such as more intuitive dialing capabilities, and will likely be more flexible so that it can be used in a wider variety of devices such as appliances.

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 12 additional comments
#1 MR_Candyman on 12 Jun 2003 - 14:00
I knew it wa getting close to the time that they couldn't push any further without drastic changes...but this leap will tell which company's really conna come out on top *prays it's AMD*
(2 replies) #2 timbo3 on 12 Jun 2003 - 14:59
AMD needs to do something drastic like put a HUGE cache on the chip. Everyone will buy it.
#2.1 edgrale on 12 Jun 2003 - 15:13
They need to make a new processor that is more efficient than the current one. I know that Athlon beats the P4 at a lower MHz and that's the way they should go.
#2.2 GamblerFEXonlin on 15 Jun 2003 - 17:55
Lower mhz has its drawbacks, the cache is also lower clocked. That means higher latency and less bandwidth for the CPUs instruction registers. I dont know but a xp2400@2200mhz is not as responsive in windows as a p4 2.8ghz. though it could be it had faster RAM and FSB. AMDs new x86-64 chip also is "slow" MHZ compared to P4 but it does have some very interesting enhanchements beside the increased address range (32bit vs 64bit). im not an wintel fan i just want AMD to get even better.

in XP, click start and "help and support", then close it. Start and help and support again; it should now appear instantly without even a 0.5sec delay. The Athlon xp i tested had used 1sec and it had dualchannel config oc to 190mhz. nforce2.

Last edited by 962 on 15 Jun 2003 - 18:00
#3 dismuter on 12 Jun 2003 - 15:07
They sound desperate.
#4 Mav Phoenix on 12 Jun 2003 - 15:56
Sounds like they're spinning their wheels.
(2 replies) #5 Krux on 12 Jun 2003 - 16:55
haha Intel says something similair to this and its all ohhh intel is planning for the future go them AMD says it and there "spinning there wheels"
#5.1 Mav Phoenix on 12 Jun 2003 - 17:23
Well they are behind in the race in a bunch of areas and they are always late to get their products to the public. Oh and learn to quote people without spelling mistakes.
#5.2 MR_Candyman on 12 Jun 2003 - 21:13
Mav phoenix, I don't know where you're comming from really, because I've proven my non-overclocked 2400+ to be faster than a 3.06ghz P4 with 533fsb at almost everything. As far as I'm concerned, AMD is ahead of Intel. Intel makes a larger FSB (which does help I admit) and raise the "speeds" of the processors, which is pretty much just giving the same chip a new sticker touting a higher speed.
(1 reply) #6 fb- on 12 Jun 2003 - 22:19
PR bull****. I'll file this in the 'I'll believe it when I can buy it' category. Companies drop PR releases like this just to get their name out. The technology doesn't exist and won't exist for customer for decades, if at all.
#6.1 JaggedFlame on 13 Jun 2003 - 03:47
Intel said the highest it can go with the current technology is 6 GHz, and we're reaching that mark soon, so I'm betting we'll see it before a decade. I don't think it's just PR anymore, anyway.
#7 dmd3x on 14 Jun 2003 - 21:55
And I hope that both AMD and Intel come up with good solutions, because it's always good for there to be competition.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)