main

ITunes for Windows: Coming Soon?

malebolgia   on 16 June 2003 - 22:47 · 33 comments & 1876 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Apple Computer remains on track to deliver a Windows version of its ITunes Music Store by the end of the year, a senior executive confirmed last week.

Apple's director of marketing consumer applications Peter Lowe confirmed the plans in an interview with a top digital-media analyst.

Lowe said: "There is a broad set of stuff that needs to be supported. We are working away at it and are on track to deliver it by the end of the year. Developing Windows software can be a challenge at the best of times, as there are so many configurations of Windows PCs and connectivity peripherals."

A former nuclear safety engineer, Lowe discussed the success of the service: "It has been more successful than we hoped. Some of our music partners hoped for a million sales in the first month. We sold over three million tracks in the first month."

Lowe added that demand for the new IPod has been extremely strong--the company sold 26,000 units through its U.S. retail stores in the first week of release.

News source: PC World


Clawing his way in

Using Wolverine's razor-sharp claws to hack and slash through enemies consumes much of the game play, but strategy and stealth are also required to infiltrate high-security locations.

The title is divided into six "acts," each of which includes three or four levels of game play. Visually, the game is played from a cinematic "over the shoulder" third-person perspective. Wolverine travels to different parts of the world to fight enemies, solve puzzles, and collect key power-ups and other items.

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 33 additional comments
#1 antsy on 16 Jun 2003 - 22:50
#2 slang123 on 16 Jun 2003 - 22:57
If its anything like quicktime i wouldnt get excited
(6 replies) #3 Trade Wind on 16 Jun 2003 - 23:01
I echo slang123's comment. I'm not excited until I can test it out and see if it is as much of a dog as Quicktime is!

That said, I'm more excited about the forthcoming competing service from MSN Music. Both the LATimes and MSNBC have reported that MSN has been showing off their music download service to a variety of music executives.

If this is true, when Microsoft rolls out this service...I think we can pretty much say that this isn't Microsoft copying Apple, as it takes longer than 7 weeks (since Apple launched their iTunes music store) to develop a service like this and show it off to music executives. Microsoft has been working on this for awhile, but Apple beat them to the starting gate.
#3.1 dp123 on 16 Jun 2003 - 23:50
And it's still not out, so we are talking about many months, not 7 weeks. And MS certainly knew about Apple's service well before we did so...

But I agree it won't be a copy because WMP is already a mess and won't easily incorporat the service, there isn't an end-to-end solution like Apple has with the iPod, it is going to be tied to MSN, and it's going to have expiry dates and other more restrictive DRM probably... not to mention possibilities like a subscription vs. purchasing, etc...
#3.2 Trade Wind on 17 Jun 2003 - 02:19
Sure, Microsoft knew that competitors would bring this type of store to market. Why? Because the music labels gave the same terms to -everyone-, not just Apple.

We don't yet know the specifics of the MSN music store, but I hope it isn't a rehash of the pressplay/musicnet subscription platforms.

Those new Media2Go devices that Microsoft is promoting are an interesting end user device to consumer content from the MSN music store. Looks to me like a decent end-to-end solution to me. Microsoft will have a platform for partners to build sweet devices with. Apple's is, well, Apple's. Repeating their age-old mistakes of the past while Microsoft repeats their success hopefully.
#3.3 PeterTHX on 17 Jun 2003 - 04:45
Hmph.

Liquid Audio beat them ALL. YEARS ago.
#3.4 Trade Wind on 17 Jun 2003 - 08:39
Hey Peter,

Beat them all at what exactly? ;-)
#3.5 superfula on 18 Jun 2003 - 01:21
Sorry dude, your wrong. The record company isn't the one setting the deal. Apple went to them and gave them and ultimatum, essencially. APPLE set the terms. In fact, it was on the front page news here not too long ago.

M$'s success? You mean how they copy/steal technology from everyone? Or how they screwed the computer companies for years by pressuring them to use only windows in the computers? I don't see Apple making many mistakes. What they HAVE done is the exact opposite of what M$ has done. Apple actually comes out with new stuff while M$ regurgitates everyone else's stuff. So you have Apple...successful because of legal business practices, or you have M$, successful because of illegal practices. Which, on an odd coincidence, is a similar scenario to Apple music store vs kazaa, et al. In the end, the legal business practices will ALWAYS come out on top.
#3.6 JaggedFlame on 18 Jun 2003 - 17:54
QUOTE
You mean how they copy/steal technology from everyone?


I'll give you ten bucks if you can prove that nothing in Visual Studio .NET and Office 2003 is innovated by Microsoft.

Oh, and you mean like how Apple stole this idea from Liquid Audio? Oh, but you'll probably say "Apple improved on it." Well, Microsoft improves on everything, too. What's your point?

QUOTE
Or how they screwed the computer companies for years by pressuring them to use only windows in the computers?


And you think Apple doesn't do the same thing?

QUOTE
So you have Apple...successful because of legal business practices, or you have M$, successful because of illegal practices.


Have you actually read the suit and determined which practices, exactly, were illegal? You might find that almost nothing that got Microsoft where it is now was illegal.

You said in another thread that Windows XP wasn't 64-bit. With statements like that, I don't expect you to be able to back up any of your statements like the above at all.
(8 replies) #4 macrosslover on 16 Jun 2003 - 23:04
either way, they both will ultimately fail until they eliminate all means of getting music for free off the internet which is virtually impossible.
#4.1 vettimdorr on 17 Jun 2003 - 02:52
since when was selling 500,000 songs a week to only a potential 10-5% of the computer users out there considered a failure?

They're already successful and it'll be an even bigger success when it rolls around for windows.
#4.2 insurgent on 17 Jun 2003 - 03:24
I wonder how much of those sales could be attributed to the fanatical macintosh fan base and that fan base wanting to *finally* see Apple come through with something successful? I thought the Music Store was real awesome too, until I sold my Mac and got a PC with *real* P2P programs again. Since then, I've not really thought about the Store or missed it that much, to be honest. And I use XPlay with my iPod, so I probably won't use iTunes for Windows anyways. I found an alternative method for Quicktime on my PC, and I'm not looking forward to any half-ass Mac programs cludging up my system.

#4.3 macrosslover on 17 Jun 2003 - 03:26
long term success....it's still enjoying it's honeymoon period. but when it comes to windows and IF it has no other legal competition that will be the ultimate test won't it??? will people choose kazaa over itunes or vice versa. no matter where you stand on the legality of kazaa and the other p2p services, if Apple, MS, and the RIAA wants these services to succeed for anything more than a few months, then the only way they can do that is to completely eliminate the free file-sharing services.

and besides word is starting to spread (true or not) that the quality of the AAC songs sucks. that might deter some people, it might not only time will tell, but assuming apple maintained 3 million songs a month for a year, that's 36 million dollars in revenue and let's say being very nice, 18 million in profit. 18 million dollars??? that's a joke, yes profit is profit but it's going to take more than 18 million dollars to save Apple. now if they port it to windows and make money and start making like 70 million in PROFIT that's another story but i doubt it will be that successful only because the free services aren't going anywhere anytime soon.
#4.4 Wickedkitten on 17 Jun 2003 - 07:58
thats funny as hell considering how much flaming you used to do with for such a "half-assed" company
#4.5 insurgent on 17 Jun 2003 - 12:06
The thrill wore off, and I realized how inferior Apple really is. Guess it just takes longer for some people. Chalk it up to a learning experience, but Macs really do seem to be computers for people too stupid to use a PC. Talk about boring hunks of pretty plastic. But I guess they are great if you just *have* to have a system that matches your carpet, or you want a system that looks like a billboard attached to a childs bicycle helmet, or a little cube chock full of obsolescence that looks more like it belongs in a kitchen cupboard. Ok, I'll stop...

#4.6 Wickedkitten on 17 Jun 2003 - 14:16
QUOTE (#4.5)
#1 Posted by insurgent on 17 Jun 2003 - 13:06
       

The thrill wore off, and I realized how inferior Apple really is. Guess it just takes longer for some people. Chalk it up to a learning experience, but Macs really do seem to be computers for people too stupid to use a PC. Talk about boring hunks of pretty plastic. But I guess they are great if you just *have* to have a system that matches your carpet, or you want a system that looks like a billboard attached to a childs bicycle helmet, or a little cube chock full of obsolescence that looks more like it belongs in a kitchen cupboard. Ok, I'll stop...



yeah stop cos judging by most of the old flames you used to do in the name of apple, you're just making an even bigger idiot of yourself
#4.7 superfula on 18 Jun 2003 - 01:13
If it makes you feel good to post such rediculous comments, that's fine. But they are wrong. I think every Mac user here at Neowin is a recent switcher, which means we are all very well aware of how a windows pc works. So go chant your mantra somewhere else where someone cares. Just because you don't understand how a Mac works doesn't mean it's less of a product. With OSX being easier to use than windows, what exactly does that say about you...
#4.8 JaggedFlame on 18 Jun 2003 - 17:55
What does it say about you when you force everyone to agree with you that OS X is easier to use? It is not easier to use for a lot of people. Get over it.

And yes, we're not allowed to not use Macs without "not understanding how a Mac works." Right.
(1 reply) #5 Makki on 16 Jun 2003 - 23:09
Old news
#5.1 pctuk on 17 Jun 2003 - 08:17
Not for all of us moron.
(4 replies) #6 Danrarbc641 on 16 Jun 2003 - 23:41
Please Apple, don't let this be a POS like Quicktime for Windows
#6.1 TrekXP on 17 Jun 2003 - 01:37
quicktime for mac isnt the greatest thing ever either lol!
#6.2 giantsnyy2002 on 17 Jun 2003 - 02:33
its so much better than the windows version... i mean a LOT better.

no flicker, and fullscreen
#6.3 el22 on 17 Jun 2003 - 22:33
QUOTE (#6.2)
its so much better than the windows version... i mean a LOT better.

no flicker, and fullscreen

Quicktime for WIndows has fullscreen (yes, it sucks, but it still has it )

ctrl+f in the quicktime window (i dont know if it works in older versions)
#6.4 JaggedFlame on 18 Jun 2003 - 17:55
You have to pay for fullscreen in QuickTime for Windows.
#7 psw on 17 Jun 2003 - 02:45
QUOTE
Apple's director of marketing consumer applications Peter Lowe confirmed the plans in an interview with a top digital-media analyst.

Lowe said: "There is a broad set of stuff that needs to be supported. We are working away at it and are on track to deliver it by the end of the year. Developing Windows software can be a challenge at the best of times, as there are so many configurations of Windows PCs and connectivity peripherals."


i like this. maybe people will understand and not blame MS for all their problems. Apple now understands it !
#8 KevinRGood on 17 Jun 2003 - 03:24
Quick Time is like Quite Time for me. ITunes is like ITune out for me.
#9 g33kb0y on 17 Jun 2003 - 04:03
Ya, I'm really gonna hop onto this...boy, Apple sure has done a great job of impressing me with their Apple-to-Windows products. Quicktime. *phew* That blew me away...literally...after I TOOK A GUN TO MY HEAD FROM ALL THE FLICKERS.

Ok, but seriously...if this product is anything like the previous two major releases of quicktime, then you can forget about me using iTunes for Windows. But, I will give it a shot...and at least give it a fair chance. That's the least I could do, right?
#10 kemical on 17 Jun 2003 - 11:43
i still like kazaa =
#11 ripgut on 17 Jun 2003 - 17:27
apple just sucks i wouldnt dream of using this
#12 indiedude on 17 Jun 2003 - 21:01
hmm, everyone just assumes that its only going to be used for file sharing (more like file BUYING) but iTunes for the Mac is a good piece of software in my oppinion, however we'll see if its just as good for the PC *sigh* i look forward to hooking up my iPod to it
#13 Phillip on 18 Jun 2003 - 08:45
can't wait...
#14 westcoastguy on 19 Jun 2003 - 06:10
i got the new alpha version of itunes for apple for windows, its not that bad, simple, nice typical apple layout and features. give it a try,

heres the url: http://www.osbetas.com

you must register which is free and quick then go to all files, you will see it there. at osbetas.

if anyone has any new links to new alpha or beta soft when they come out, can ya email me please at westcoastguy@msn.com. i can share them for you or hide them in a great place. its all up to you. a sharing community

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)