main

VIA ships KT600 chipset for Athlon XP 3200+

Daniel Fleshbourne   on 19 June 2003 - 12:12 · 14 comments & 670 views

Advertisement (Why?)
VIA has begun shipping its Apollo KT600 chipset for 400MHz frontside bus Athlon XP processors, and has signed 20-odd mobo makers to use the product.

The KT600 north bridge chip provides AGP 4x/8x, 266-400MHz FSB support and incorporates VIA's FastStream64 400MHz DDR SDRAM controller which, according to VIA, "uses an expanded array of prefetch buffers to reduce latency in the memory controller, extending performance at a lower transistor cost than dual channel implementations". The chip can cope with up to 4GB of DDR memory. The chipset includes the VT8237 south bridge, which provides Serial ATA with RAID support (offering RAID 0, 1 and 0+1), parallel ATA (up to four devices), VIA's Vinyl six-channel audio sub-system and the eight-channel Gold version, plus support for up to eight USB 2.0 ports, 56Kbps modem and 10/100Mbps Ethernet. Both chips connect across VIA's 8x V-Link 533MBps bus.

View: The full story
News source: The Reg


The keyboard is significantly smaller than that of the original Treo. The keys have a dome shape to them intended to make typing with thumbs easier. It has an integrated digital camera and will be able to send pictures via wireless e-mail. It will also play MP3 music files. The only thing we see missing is Bluetooth, and that can easily be added in a later model if the market demands it.

It will run Palm OS 5.2 and will come in versions for both GSM and CDMA wireless phone networks. On the CDMA side, you can expect Sprint PCS to be a major carrier--as it has carried the Treo 300 for some time and has a history with Handspring.

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 14 additional comments
#1 Spyder on 19 Jun 2003 - 14:31
ahhhhh VIA. never again. they could give it to me free and I wouldn't take it.. so long as the stipulation was I had to use it and not sell it
(1 reply) #2 zivan56 on 19 Jun 2003 - 15:29
VIA is not so bad, the only thing is everything is crawling slow untill you install the software for it.
#2.1 Spyder on 19 Jun 2003 - 15:47
i hear ya. but that was my problem. it was slow and if I installed any 4in1 package (i tried many versions), windows would start to bluescreen randomly on boot up.

i realize not everyone experiences problems with VIA and actually likes it, but not me..never again.
#3 paulhaskew on 19 Jun 2003 - 16:32
no problems here...
(1 reply) #4 Mathieu on 19 Jun 2003 - 17:58
VIA has always been good to me


If you know how to setup your PC
#4.1 Fedr0 on 19 Jun 2003 - 18:11
LOL!
#5 sodapop on 19 Jun 2003 - 18:25
So if you guys don't like VIA, What chipset do you use?. SiS, Nforce?
#6 Samoa on 19 Jun 2003 - 18:59
Via does right by me.I have had no problems. Have seen it be better than Nforce in many regards.
#7 RangerLG on 19 Jun 2003 - 19:13
I am using the 266A chipset and have had zero problems with it. I personally think the performance of the nForce2 boards is better, but I am definately intersted in this 600. Makes me wonder why they bothered with the 400A.
#8 Bud on 19 Jun 2003 - 20:25
Havent had any problems with my Asus A7V8X and Via KT400. I'm very pleased with the stability and performance.

I dont think Via ahould have wasted their time releasing the KT400A being the KT600 is superior to it and only 2 or 3 mobos came out with the chip. AFAIK
#9 paulhaskew on 19 Jun 2003 - 22:19
ok ok, i take it back, just recently i had a via board die on me... its only 3 years old... but it got a hella lot of use, and its running conditions were less than nominal

but hey... still got 7 other computers to play with...
#10 georgi55 on 20 Jun 2003 - 01:01
Those who do not like VIA, go check out Ali chipsets and you will run back to VIA :p
#11 nullie on 20 Jun 2003 - 02:21
Never had any probs with VIA chipsets, running a KT133 chipset now for over two and a half years without any problems. I would choose VIA over nVidia, actually. IMO nVidia is a PC chipset noob, and it shows with all the bugs (sound/sata issues, corrupt BIOS's, etc), and all the driver problems. VIA is stable, fast, maturity.
#12 sodapop on 20 Jun 2003 - 03:29
I'll admit, My mother bought my little brothers a soyo board and a celeron chip. I put it all together and installed the newest via drivers for the thing and so far it's ok.

There were a couple problems with a few games but I think that was normal. (Bugs in the game).

Or maybe you guys were talking about just the via drivers for amd?

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)