Time is running out for Windows NT 4 Workstation. After Monday Microsoft won't be taking support calls for the venerable operating system.
Part of the put-out-to-pasture plan that Microsoft calls Support Lifecycle -- where aging products go through a several-step process of increasingly-diminished support options -- the move means NT 4.0 Workstation users can turn only to the self-help online support for problem solving as of July 1.
NT 4.0 Server has a longer grace period, thanks to a Microsoft decision in January to extend telephone support and continue to issue security and bug fixes. NT 4.0 Server's drop-dead deadline is now Dec. 31, 2003.
The demise of 'Extended' support for NT 4.0 Workstation means that Microsoft's officially labeling the seven-year-old OS as obsolete. Users will no longer be able to call the pay-as-you-go help desk, nor will the operating system be patched if future bugs and security gaffes surface.
The next Microsoft operating system on the block will be Windows 98. As of Jan. 16, 2004, the now-five-year-old OS will be laid to rest.
Tuesday, however, also marks a milestone for Windows 98. As of July 1, no-charge assisted support for the OS disappears. For-fee support continues for another six-and-a-half months.
News source: CRN - Microsoft Ends Windows NT Workstation Support
Part of the put-out-to-pasture plan that Microsoft calls Support Lifecycle -- where aging products go through a several-step process of increasingly-diminished support options -- the move means NT 4.0 Workstation users can turn only to the self-help online support for problem solving as of July 1.
NT 4.0 Server has a longer grace period, thanks to a Microsoft decision in January to extend telephone support and continue to issue security and bug fixes. NT 4.0 Server's drop-dead deadline is now Dec. 31, 2003.
The demise of 'Extended' support for NT 4.0 Workstation means that Microsoft's officially labeling the seven-year-old OS as obsolete. Users will no longer be able to call the pay-as-you-go help desk, nor will the operating system be patched if future bugs and security gaffes surface.
The next Microsoft operating system on the block will be Windows 98. As of Jan. 16, 2004, the now-five-year-old OS will be laid to rest.
Tuesday, however, also marks a milestone for Windows 98. As of July 1, no-charge assisted support for the OS disappears. For-fee support continues for another six-and-a-half months.
"Per-user CALs bring Exchange licensing in line with practice and the rest of Microsoft's products. It is what the market wants," said Mark Levitt, vice president for collaborative computing at research company IDC, in Framingham, Mass.
Per-user licensing "makes total sense," said Peter Pawlak, a lead analyst with independent research firm Directions on Microsoft, in Kirkland, Wash.
"It is a very important thing to make sure companies are getting plain license compliance. I think there was quite a bit of violation. Now once you get a user license for a particular user it does not matter how they get their mail," Pawlak said.
Another new licensing option for Exchange Server 2003 is the $50,000 External Connector license which allows access to the Exchange Server by an unlimited number of nonemployees, Stern said.
Besides adding licensing options, Exchange Server 2003 also allows companies to reduce the number of Exchange servers and save some money. Scalability and remote connectivity have been improved so more mailboxes can be hosted on a single server and remote locations no longer need their own servers, the analysts said.
Also, Microsoft's Mobile Information Server (MIS) has been rolled into Exchange Server 2003. It was previously sold as an add-on to Exchange 2000 Server. MIS allows users to access Exchange via a cell phone, or Pocket PC handheld computer.
For the user of an Exchange-based mailbox, probably the most noticeable enhancement will be the revamped Outlook Web Access client. Accessing e-mail via the Web is almost the same as accessing it from a desktop Outlook client, the analysts said.
Microsoft has finished work on the code of Exchange Server 2003 and the product is on track to be released to volume licensing customers in the third quarter, while retail availability is planned for the fourth quarter, Stern said. Microsoft is planning to announce release to manufacturing (RTM) of Exchange 2003 on Monday, the company said.
"This is the culmination of three years of planning, designing, building and testing," Stern said. "We had the most stringent criteria to date to ensure a great experience for the IT pro all the way to the end user who is accessing Exchange."
Microsoft, of Redmond, Washington, is keen on getting Exchange 5.5 users to upgrade. A host of upgrade tools are included with Exchange Server 2003 to help customers move up, Stern said. Microsoft estimates that between 40 percent and 60 percent of its Exchange customers still runs Exchange 5.5 on the Windows NT 4.0 platform.
Support for Exchange 5.5 will be available through the end of the year; after that a customer will have to buy extended support if needed, Stern said.
Exchange Server 2003 runs on Windows 2000 Server or Windows Server 2003, so customers running NT 4.0 also have to upgrade their operating environment when moving to a newer e-mail server. Some of the features of Exchange Server 2003, such as eight-node clustering and volume shadow copy services, are not supported when used with Windows 2000.
It makes sense for Exchange 5.5 users to upgrade soon after Exchange Server 2003 comes out, IDC's Levitt said.
"It is a no-brainer to do that within six to nine months. Now is the time that Exchange 5.5 is beginning to show its age and it will eventually no longer be supported," he said.
Exchange 2000 Server was released in October 2000. Around 130 million client licenses have been sold so far, Stern said. Exchange competes with products including Lotus Notes from IBM.

I've always enjoyed using it. Sure, it didn't have plug&play and USB support but back then there were no USB devices and once everything was configured and worked it (usually) stayed that way.
The perfect Windows version for me would be: NT4 with plug&play and USB support and other modern technologies support and Cleartype and alpha blending icons.
That's all I need
May they Rest In Peace.
2000 is not dead, it will out live XP just you watch and see
Maybe 2003 server wiill change this.
win2k will most likley out live xp in a corporate environment.
Why are we talking about companies alone? There are more copies of XP in the home user environment, and it is definitely more in use.
Most home users DO NOT pay for their OS's or software for that matter. This is a fact. Most businesses DO pay for their OS's and licensing. So at the end of the day, businesses mean more then home users when it comes to support. FACT
Uh, I like how you can just go around claiming these "facts" without backing them up.
Most home users I know buy computers through Dell and HP, who bundle the OS as part of the computer. This results in an extra $50 on the price or whatever, so it's not as if they haven't paid for it.
Just because you might run around cracking or keygenning everything you see doesn't mean most home users do.
Sure they do.
Sorry, kiddo. Joe User doesn't have the smarts to go on IRC and download the Devils0wn version of Windows XP and the key generator that gets around the FCKGW key, to boot. The average home user can't even burn a CD from the ISO image.
Like I said, you're a retard if you assume what you do is what everyone does. "That is a FACT."
And your comment presuming to know more about the people I know than I do just makes my day.
Who made you such a expert on what I do? And who made you an expert to assume that all joe home users aren't as smart as you. You come off as being a wantabee know it all loser. From where I sit your looking pretty stupid and foolish yourself.
F U C K O F F know it all, stop pretending to be better then everybody else, your not as smart as you think you are.
...you know Chicago is not far from here, kid
Last edited by 15787 on 01 Jul 2003 - 18:31
or would the hardware oem take over, i mean its still very popular...
However, I don't know if "popular" is the right word.
By offering longer periods of support than any of their competition?
Right.
Time to get rid of a few of my workstations in work then
If this wasn't MS it wouldn't have been mentioned. Linux companies don't even support their own products for 30 days; let alone for 7 years!
nor will the operating system be patched if future bugs and security gaffes surface.
NT4 remains one of my favourite OS's
With a business OS like this one MS should keep 'paid' support (7 years was a long free ride) but stoping security patchs is just going to annoy companies that will now be forced to upgrade just bcause MS say their OS is no good anymore. Linux anyone?
Why is this coming as a surprise to anyone?
Banks have already started migration to Windows 2000 Mo Mooneeeeeeeey!
Guess thats more Money for Microsoft, from yet another Government, Vicious Circle indeed
Migration's a Bitch
Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!
Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.