main

Microsoft Ends Windows NT Workstation Support

configure   on 30 June 2003 - 05:01 · 44 comments & 8818 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Time is running out for Windows NT 4 Workstation. After Monday Microsoft won't be taking support calls for the venerable operating system.

Part of the put-out-to-pasture plan that Microsoft calls Support Lifecycle -- where aging products go through a several-step process of increasingly-diminished support options -- the move means NT 4.0 Workstation users can turn only to the self-help online support for problem solving as of July 1.

NT 4.0 Server has a longer grace period, thanks to a Microsoft decision in January to extend telephone support and continue to issue security and bug fixes. NT 4.0 Server's drop-dead deadline is now Dec. 31, 2003.

The demise of 'Extended' support for NT 4.0 Workstation means that Microsoft's officially labeling the seven-year-old OS as obsolete. Users will no longer be able to call the pay-as-you-go help desk, nor will the operating system be patched if future bugs and security gaffes surface.

The next Microsoft operating system on the block will be Windows 98. As of Jan. 16, 2004, the now-five-year-old OS will be laid to rest.

Tuesday, however, also marks a milestone for Windows 98. As of July 1, no-charge assisted support for the OS disappears. For-fee support continues for another six-and-a-half months.

News source: CRN - Microsoft Ends Windows NT Workstation Support


"Per-user CALs bring Exchange licensing in line with practice and the rest of Microsoft's products. It is what the market wants," said Mark Levitt, vice president for collaborative computing at research company IDC, in Framingham, Mass.

Per-user licensing "makes total sense," said Peter Pawlak, a lead analyst with independent research firm Directions on Microsoft, in Kirkland, Wash.

"It is a very important thing to make sure companies are getting plain license compliance. I think there was quite a bit of violation. Now once you get a user license for a particular user it does not matter how they get their mail," Pawlak said.

Another new licensing option for Exchange Server 2003 is the $50,000 External Connector license which allows access to the Exchange Server by an unlimited number of nonemployees, Stern said.

Besides adding licensing options, Exchange Server 2003 also allows companies to reduce the number of Exchange servers and save some money. Scalability and remote connectivity have been improved so more mailboxes can be hosted on a single server and remote locations no longer need their own servers, the analysts said.

Also, Microsoft's Mobile Information Server (MIS) has been rolled into Exchange Server 2003. It was previously sold as an add-on to Exchange 2000 Server. MIS allows users to access Exchange via a cell phone, or Pocket PC handheld computer.

For the user of an Exchange-based mailbox, probably the most noticeable enhancement will be the revamped Outlook Web Access client. Accessing e-mail via the Web is almost the same as accessing it from a desktop Outlook client, the analysts said.

Microsoft has finished work on the code of Exchange Server 2003 and the product is on track to be released to volume licensing customers in the third quarter, while retail availability is planned for the fourth quarter, Stern said. Microsoft is planning to announce release to manufacturing (RTM) of Exchange 2003 on Monday, the company said.

"This is the culmination of three years of planning, designing, building and testing," Stern said. "We had the most stringent criteria to date to ensure a great experience for the IT pro all the way to the end user who is accessing Exchange."

Microsoft, of Redmond, Washington, is keen on getting Exchange 5.5 users to upgrade. A host of upgrade tools are included with Exchange Server 2003 to help customers move up, Stern said. Microsoft estimates that between 40 percent and 60 percent of its Exchange customers still runs Exchange 5.5 on the Windows NT 4.0 platform.

Support for Exchange 5.5 will be available through the end of the year; after that a customer will have to buy extended support if needed, Stern said.

Exchange Server 2003 runs on Windows 2000 Server or Windows Server 2003, so customers running NT 4.0 also have to upgrade their operating environment when moving to a newer e-mail server. Some of the features of Exchange Server 2003, such as eight-node clustering and volume shadow copy services, are not supported when used with Windows 2000.

It makes sense for Exchange 5.5 users to upgrade soon after Exchange Server 2003 comes out, IDC's Levitt said.

"It is a no-brainer to do that within six to nine months. Now is the time that Exchange 5.5 is beginning to show its age and it will eventually no longer be supported," he said.

Exchange 2000 Server was released in October 2000. Around 130 million client licenses have been sold so far, Stern said. Exchange competes with products including Lotus Notes from IBM.

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 44 additional comments
(1 reply) #1 philmcneal on 30 Jun 2003 - 05:05
evil just evil
#1.1 [saint dark] on 30 Jun 2003 - 05:14
why? because they stopped supporting a system that is 8 years old?
#2 macrosslover on 30 Jun 2003 - 05:12
about damn time.
(4 replies) #3 xStainDx on 30 Jun 2003 - 05:15
Goodbye and Good Riddance.
#3.1 Jason on 30 Jun 2003 - 06:22
good riddance ? it was the 1st decent OS they made.
#3.2 SomeDork on 30 Jun 2003 - 07:13
It may have been the first "decent" one, but Windows 2000 put it to shame.
#3.3 kal-ky on 30 Jun 2003 - 09:28
For the ones who used NT4, it was a very good OS. No IE integrated and stable what else can you ask for?
I've always enjoyed using it. Sure, it didn't have plug&play and USB support but back then there were no USB devices and once everything was configured and worked it (usually) stayed that way.

The perfect Windows version for me would be: NT4 with plug&play and USB support and other modern technologies support and Cleartype and alpha blending icons.
That's all I need
#3.4 nookadum on 30 Jun 2003 - 14:54
Then you need Windows XP.
#4 macrosslover on 30 Jun 2003 - 05:24
now if we can only get rid of admins who don't patch their systems. i understand there's a testing period, but jesus 6 months or more, that's just SORRY. the internet would be such a better place if they did that....of course the Internet would be a better place if hotmail and others put some real damn filters on their routers and servers to stop the spam, but that's another story lol
(10 replies) #5 Octol on 30 Jun 2003 - 05:51
I have copies of Windows 3.11, NT4, 95, 98. and even 2000 enshrined in an appropriate place on a bookshelf. It's a really good place for them. They each served their purpose in their time, but now they're dead.

May they Rest In Peace.
#5.1 brew crew on 30 Jun 2003 - 15:39
QUOTE
They each served their purpose in their time, but now they're dead


2000 is not dead, it will out live XP just you watch and see
#5.2 JaggedFlame on 30 Jun 2003 - 16:16
I'm already watching XP outlive 2000.
#5.3 Jason on 30 Jun 2003 - 16:47
Sorry but 2000 is in use in more companies that XP.

Maybe 2003 server wiill change this.
#5.4 tony976 on 30 Jun 2003 - 17:29
i don't think i have even seen win xp in a corporate environment yet, well, except at ms canada in missasuagua, anywhere else, its win2k.
win2k will most likley out live xp in a corporate environment.
#5.5 JaggedFlame on 30 Jun 2003 - 17:54
QUOTE
Sorry but 2000 is in use in more companies that XP.


Why are we talking about companies alone? There are more copies of XP in the home user environment, and it is definitely more in use.
#5.6 brew crew on 30 Jun 2003 - 18:25
QUOTE
Why are we talking about companies alone?


Most home users DO NOT pay for their OS's or software for that matter. This is a fact. Most businesses DO pay for their OS's and licensing. So at the end of the day, businesses mean more then home users when it comes to support. FACT
#5.7 JaggedFlame on 30 Jun 2003 - 23:24
QUOTE
Most home users DO NOT pay for their OS's or software for that matter. This is a fact.


Uh, I like how you can just go around claiming these "facts" without backing them up.

Most home users I know buy computers through Dell and HP, who bundle the OS as part of the computer. This results in an extra $50 on the price or whatever, so it's not as if they haven't paid for it.

Just because you might run around cracking or keygenning everything you see doesn't mean most home users do.
#5.8 brew crew on 01 Jul 2003 - 03:08
LMAO, you sir just made my day.

QUOTE
Most home users I know buy computers through Dell and HP, who bundle the OS as part of the computer


Sure they do.
#5.9 JaggedFlame on 01 Jul 2003 - 04:44
QUOTE
Sure they do.


Sorry, kiddo. Joe User doesn't have the smarts to go on IRC and download the Devils0wn version of Windows XP and the key generator that gets around the FCKGW key, to boot. The average home user can't even burn a CD from the ISO image.

Like I said, you're a retard if you assume what you do is what everyone does. "That is a FACT."

And your comment presuming to know more about the people I know than I do just makes my day.
#5.10 brew crew on 01 Jul 2003 - 18:20
QUOTE
you're a retard if you assume what you do is what everyone does


Who made you such a expert on what I do? And who made you an expert to assume that all joe home users aren't as smart as you. You come off as being a wantabee know it all loser. From where I sit your looking pretty stupid and foolish yourself.

F U C K O F F know it all, stop pretending to be better then everybody else, your not as smart as you think you are.

...you know Chicago is not far from here, kid

Last edited by 15787 on 01 Jul 2003 - 18:31
#6 Quick Reply on 30 Jun 2003 - 06:27
does the end of support for windows 98 include ending support for windows 98 se?
#7 trance on 30 Jun 2003 - 06:36
Yes, SE support will also end.
(1 reply) #8 Quick Reply on 30 Jun 2003 - 06:38
edit: nm, im jsut really angry that SE support will end
#8.1 JaggedFlame on 30 Jun 2003 - 16:17
Of course it's going to end. It'll have been 8 years. Time to upgrade, buddy.
(4 replies) #9 tony976 on 30 Jun 2003 - 07:13
does this also cover nt 4 server, i know of a few companies still implementing new enterprise servers, with nt 4 server (as a backup domain server mostly)
or would the hardware oem take over, i mean its still very popular...
#9.1 SomeDork on 30 Jun 2003 - 08:15
Server is still covered until the end of the year.
However, I don't know if "popular" is the right word.
#9.2 tony976 on 30 Jun 2003 - 17:35
whats the right word then? i still see it around more then win2k server... <g>
#9.3 SomeDork on 30 Jun 2003 - 18:05
The population of win2k server far exceeds NT4 server. Stability alone was the major reason to upgrade.
#9.4 tony976 on 30 Jun 2003 - 19:43
maybe its just ibm servers being deployed more with n4 then win2k, at least thats what i see and do out of wearhouse, when customizing rack servers for large corporations.
(6 replies) #10 antny_uk on 30 Jun 2003 - 08:30
I think its a shame that support for an older product should end. Just another way that Microsoft manipulates the market... forcing users to upgrade when they might not need to.
#10.1 Quick Reply on 30 Jun 2003 - 08:35
you can still use nt4 workstation, it's just that they're not gonna help you with it
#10.2 macrosslover on 30 Jun 2003 - 08:52
as he said, you're not forced to do anything, if anything i don't know any other company that supports a product for 6-8 damn years...so MS isn't manipulating anything, they should have dropped support for this and 9x a long time ago, when 2000 came out, but oh well they didn't.
#10.3 RaWShadow on 30 Jun 2003 - 08:57
its 7 years old!!!! After 7 years i think people should know the OS well enough not to need to be calling microsoft.
#10.4 SomeDork on 30 Jun 2003 - 09:06
You're not forced to upgrade. However I don't see Apple, most unix vendors, or um .. anyone else putting out security updates to their older OSs. Before you critique, you might want to consider the competition.
#10.5 Jason on 30 Jun 2003 - 09:20
I think 7 years for workstation and 8 years for server is perfectly fine, you will never get Linux companies supporting their OS's for this long.
#10.6 JaggedFlame on 30 Jun 2003 - 16:17
QUOTE
Just another way that Microsoft manipulates the market...


By offering longer periods of support than any of their competition?

Right.
#11 Larac on 30 Jun 2003 - 10:26
Wow is it really 7 years......
Time to get rid of a few of my workstations in work then
(1 reply) #12 Drestin on 30 Jun 2003 - 12:21
In other news today, 6 more linux distributions went belly up. 133 linux "developers" have stopped answering their hotmail.com accounts. 55,000,000 cars went out of warranty this month and 678,332,234 vcrs, dvd players, radios and clocks passed their 90 day warranty period.

If this wasn't MS it wouldn't have been mentioned. Linux companies don't even support their own products for 30 days; let alone for 7 years!
#12.1 JaggedFlame on 30 Jun 2003 - 12:50
Kinda sad, really, considering support is just about all they can make money off of.
(2 replies) #13 RobertH on 30 Jun 2003 - 13:32
Its a shame

QUOTE

nor will the operating system be patched if future bugs and security gaffes surface.


NT4 remains one of my favourite OS's i dont care about user support, but not fixing security flaws isnt a good thing. I know lots of companies that still use it and have no reason to upgrade - it does everything they need it too so why spend money?

With a business OS like this one MS should keep 'paid' support (7 years was a long free ride) but stoping security patchs is just going to annoy companies that will now be forced to upgrade just bcause MS say their OS is no good anymore. Linux anyone?
#13.1 Jason on 30 Jun 2003 - 14:08
oh yeah Linux, how long is each version supported, is it anywhere near 7 years ?
#13.2 JaggedFlame on 30 Jun 2003 - 16:18
You should have realized the security freeze a long time ago. They said they weren't releasing any more service packs, and stopped SP7. That should have been your clue.

Why is this coming as a surprise to anyone?
#14 RADicaLMMS on 30 Jun 2003 - 22:05
Wallahee... I saw WinNT workstations all over 'Dubai Hospital' (Government Hospital, in U.A.E.) about two weeks ago.

Banks have already started migration to Windows 2000 Mo Mooneeeeeeeey!

Guess thats more Money for Microsoft, from yet another Government, Vicious Circle indeed

Migration's a Bitch
#15 mealbundy on 01 Jul 2003 - 05:07
Thank God!!! Finally its dead! This means my business will pick up. If companies cant call MS, my company will gladly help in these matters.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)