main

Big Blue and Adobe to Secure PDFs

cheekymonkey   on 11 July 2003 - 00:00 · 5 comments & 729 views

Advertisement (Why?)
IBM is expected to announce a partnership with software maker Adobe Systems to boost security in documents created with Adobe's Acrobat software.

Forms and other documents created in the portable document format (PDF) used by Acrobat will be able to tap into the security chip included on all recent IBM desktop and notebook PCs. Among other purposes, IBM's "embedded security subsystem" can be used to store the electronic-signature data, providing an extra level of security compared to more typical systems that store signatures on a PC's hard drive.

"The fundamental value of that security chip is that it can be used to create a secure repository on that PC to protect any kind of information... including digital signatures," said Stacy Cannady, product manager for client security at IBM. "If you put that kind of information on the hard drive somewhere, there's a possibility people can find it and steal it. If you use the security chip, it's the same thing as picking up that chip and taking it with you."

Adobe has added a wealth of new interactive features to the latest version of Acrobat, including support for adding digital signatures to forms and other PDF documents.

News source: Yahoo News UK




Thanks to the neowin community for thier continued support, we value any and all comments or sugggestions. You may direct comments or suggestions to us via our contact form.

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 5 additional comments
#1 memodude on 11 Jul 2003 - 00:03
Yeah, Adobe Reader 6 is warm. I just hope these new secure PDF's (not the normal ones, the IBM ones in this article) can be viewable on non-IBM PCs, except without the features dependent on the IBM chip.

Too bad Neowin doesn't have v6 MSN smileys yet, cuz I'm (yn).
#2 Ricardo Clérigo on 11 Jul 2003 - 00:09
smells a little bit like hailstorm perhaps?
(2 replies) #3 dougkinzinger on 11 Jul 2003 - 01:49
What's 'Abobe'??????????????
#3.1 cheekymonkey on 11 Jul 2003 - 07:41
Thanks for that fella... corrected.
#3.2 dougkinzinger on 11 Jul 2003 - 11:13
np

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)