main

Internet Explorer 6 SP1 Update

aco   on 15 July 2003 - 04:56 · 19 comments & 3357 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Thanks LonghornXP2006. When you try to download a file with Internet Explorer from a Web server, you may receive the following error message:

"Internet Explorer cannot download FileName from WebServer."

This behavior occurs because the content disposition header for the file stream is greater than approximately 150 bytes and the Latin character set is equal to 150 characters. This behavior may occur if the content disposition header is formatted with a non-Latin character set, such as Japanese or Russian.

For example, a 17-character content disposition header in the Japanese character set is 153 bytes because the UTF-8 encoding scheme uses 9 bytes to represent a single Japanese character, but it uses only 1 byte in the Latin character set.

This update applies to Internet Explorer 6 SP1 with the following operating systems:
  • Windows XP, XP SP1
  • Windows 2000 SP2, 2000 SP3
  • Windows 98SE, Me, NT4 SP6a
Download: Internet Explorer 6 SP1 Update: Error Message: "Internet Explorer Cannot Download a File"
View: MSKB Article - 816868
News source: Microsoft Download Center


In June, Dillman cited the cost of tags as one factor in favor of concentrating on pallets, saying only pallet-level tracking could deliver returns at today's tag prices. She also noted that readers were too large and bulky for practical shelf-level use. "From the retailer perspective, it's still expensive," AMR Research analyst Paula Rosenblum says. "It's not just about the chips; it's about the readers, and they're not cheap."

A Gillette spokesman declined to comment on the canceled program but said the company expects to work with Wal-Mart on the tagging of pallets and cases. Gillette is continuing its research on item-level tagging and has trials under way with U.K. supermarket chain Tesco plc and German retailer Metro AG.

Wal-Mart isn't the first company to scale back an RFID pilot project. In April, Italian clothing manufacturer and retailer Benetton Group decided to re-evaluate a plan to deploy RFID tags in its clothing, following threats of boycotts from consumer and privacy advocacy groups. Those critics worry that tags in apparel could be used to violate individuals' privacy, such as by tracking the movements of buyers in and out of stores.

It's unlikely Wal-Mart canceled its trials primarily for privacy reasons, AMR's Rosenblum says, since privacy isn't an issue with disposable items such as razor blades.

Nonetheless, RFID advocates know they'd better take privacy concerns seriously, even on shipping containers the consumer never sees. It's a technology most people only vaguely understand, and news coverage often exaggerates its capabilities. "There's a tangible level of concern about privacy, which I completely understand," Ellis says. Supporters argue that a more efficient, RFID-enabled supply chain will benefit consumers through lower costs and better availability of goods. Says Ellis: "It would be a real shame if all this noise around item-level tagging cools down what could be a real beneficial development for the supply chain."

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 19 additional comments
(1 reply) #1 LonghornXP2006 on 15 Jul 2003 - 04:59
yay, my name on the front page
#1.1 empty on 15 Jul 2003 - 05:14
show-off
#2 finalcoolman on 15 Jul 2003 - 06:18
Yay, another update coming on to Windows Update this Wednesday then.
#3 ripgut on 15 Jul 2003 - 07:33
when is sp2 out?
(10 replies) #4 kal-ky on 15 Jul 2003 - 09:32
Are people still using that old, outdated, non W3C compliant browser? I thought most would have switched to Mozilla or Mozilla Firebird. Hell, even Opera is better than IE.

Last edited by 12210 on 15 Jul 2003 - 15:23
#4.1 Unforgiven on 15 Jul 2003 - 11:08
Yes, better, although Opera crashes once an hour when browsing the web
Never experienced it with IE tho...
#4.2 kal-ky on 15 Jul 2003 - 11:37
While I don't use Opera, I can say Mozilla and Mozilla Firebird are very stable and crashes rarely. It's at least as stable as IE.
#4.3 cork1958 on 15 Jul 2003 - 12:26
Been switched to Opera for a long time now. Since version 5 in fact. If it wasn't for the windows update site, I would NEVER use IE. Opera NEVER crashes on me.
#4.4 JaggedFlame on 15 Jul 2003 - 14:36
QUOTE
I thought most would have switched to Mozilla or Mozilla Firebird. Hell, even Opera is better than IE.


Are people still using that slow, ugly, non-native widgets browser? I would have thought most users would have gotten pissed off like myself and at least five other people I know.

If that's your cup of coffee, fine. Don't be fooled into thinking Mozilla's perfect, or even usable for some people.
#4.5 antareus on 15 Jul 2003 - 15:13
People use what works for them.

Most people don't know, nor care about W3C compliance.

Using a non mainstream browser doesn't make a political statement either. Please quit deluding yourselves.
#4.6 kal-ky on 15 Jul 2003 - 15:25
Maybe so, most people don't care about W3C compliance, but some do and that's a good thing. The web has to be open, no company in the world may force their standards upon users. The web must be open, so it must be seen the same with any brower, not only IE.
#4.7 kal-ky on 15 Jul 2003 - 15:27
> People use what works for them.

That is so wrong, people use what is forced upon them. IE comes free with Windows that's what they use. Imagine if Mozilla or Opera would come with Windows, would people download IE and install it?

I've installed Mozilla on several computers for people. They don't even know IE exists (I hide it) and they're perfectly happy with Mozilla.
#4.8 Jugalator on 16 Jul 2003 - 02:02
QUOTE (#4.4)
Are people still using that slow, ugly, non-native widgets browser? I would have thought most users would have gotten pissed off like myself and at least five other people I know.

If that's your cup of coffee, fine. Don't be fooled into thinking Mozilla's perfect, or even usable for some people.

lol, yeah, those native widgets are the best part of IE, since with those you can't customize the interface...

For your information:
Mozilla: http://themes.mozdev.org/themes/ie.html
Opera: http://my.opera.com/customize/skins/img/148.png

This is exactly the good part about "ugly non-native widgets". That you can make it look pretty much exactly like IE if that's what you prefer.

Don't be fooled into thinking those widgets were only made for the purpose of looking non-standard and "ugly". It's all about flexibility.
#4.9 JaggedFlame on 16 Jul 2003 - 03:21
QUOTE
lol, yeah, those native widgets are the best part of IE, since with those you can't customize the interface...


That's the last thing I want to do. If I want to skin my computer, that's just it. I skin the OS. Not just the browser. I'll install WindowBlinds and have everything skinned, thank you very much.

QUOTE
That you can make it look pretty much exactly like IE if that's what you prefer.


No, you can't. I've tried to do this, and the context menus are still ugly, the buttons are still not *quite* on par with native widgets, and parts of it are still slow.

QUOTE
Don't be fooled into thinking those widgets were only made for the purpose of looking non-standard and "ugly". It's all about flexibility.


Excuse my French, but what the hell is your point? I said that Mozilla is not the solution for everyone. How am I getting fooled into anything? If you want flexibility, I'm not stopping you. Just don't force it onto me.

QUOTE
That is so wrong, people use what is forced upon them. IE comes free with Windows that's what they use.


Yeah, guess what: Netscape Navigator was forced upon me when I was first introduced to computers, and I ended up using it for all of a month.
#4.10 JaggedFlame on 16 Jul 2003 - 03:23
And kal-ky: honestly, just quit posting if all you're going to do is talk about Mozilla every time a new IE patch comes out. I'm sure you get pissed when people start bashing Mozilla every time a new release comes out. There are times to have this debate, and now is not one of them.
(1 reply) #5 Michael Lerner on 15 Jul 2003 - 10:27
ah fudge, won't let me install cause the patch hasn't been logo tested.
#5.1 I8PP on 15 Jul 2003 - 15:12
It installed fine...no error about logo tested. Besides, isn't that only for drivers?
(1 reply) #6 Jeffrey on 15 Jul 2003 - 15:25
Windows XP, XP SP1
Windows 2000 SP2, 2000 SP3
Windows 98SE, Me, NT4 SP6a

Second Edition only?
#6.1 Hawkeye on 15 Jul 2003 - 17:55
As much as peope would like to believe it, Windows 98 and Windows 98SE are not the same thing, and their support periods are not the same. Support for Windows 98 (First Edition) has ended already, just as it has ended for Windows 95. Support for Windows 98SE will still be going on for a very short time longer.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)