The music industry has won at least 871 federal subpoenas against computer users suspected of illegally sharing music files (search) on the Internet, with roughly 75 new subpoenas being approved each day, U.S. court officials said Friday.
The effort represents early steps in the music industry's contentious plan to file civil lawsuits aimed at crippling online piracy.
Subpoenas reviewed by The Associated Press show the industry compelling some of the largest Internet providers, such as Verizon Communications Inc. and Comcast Cable Communications Inc., and some universities to identify names and mailing addresses for users on their networks known online by nicknames such as "fox3j," "soccerdog33," "clover77" or "indepunk74."
The Recording Industry Association of America (search) has said it expects to file at least several hundred lawsuits seeking financial damages within the next eight weeks. U.S. copyright laws (search) allow for damages of $750 to $150,000 for each song offered illegally on a person's computer, but the RIAA has said it would be open to settlement proposals from defendants.
News source: Fox News
The effort represents early steps in the music industry's contentious plan to file civil lawsuits aimed at crippling online piracy.
Subpoenas reviewed by The Associated Press show the industry compelling some of the largest Internet providers, such as Verizon Communications Inc. and Comcast Cable Communications Inc., and some universities to identify names and mailing addresses for users on their networks known online by nicknames such as "fox3j," "soccerdog33," "clover77" or "indepunk74."
The Recording Industry Association of America (search) has said it expects to file at least several hundred lawsuits seeking financial damages within the next eight weeks. U.S. copyright laws (search) allow for damages of $750 to $150,000 for each song offered illegally on a person's computer, but the RIAA has said it would be open to settlement proposals from defendants.
The campaign comes just weeks after U.S. appeals court rulings requiring Internet providers to readily identify subscribers suspected of illegally sharing music and movie files. The 1998 Digital Millennium Copyright Act permits music companies to force Internet providers to turn over the names of suspected music pirates upon subpoena from any U.S. District Court clerk's office, without a judge's signature required.
In some cases, subpoenas cite as few as five songs as "representative recordings" of music files available for downloading from these users. The trade group for the largest music labels, the Washington-based RIAA, previously indicated its lawyers would target Internet users who offer substantial collections of MP3 song files but declined to say how many songs might qualify for a lawsuit.
"We would have to look at historic trends, but that is a very high number," said Alan Davidson of the Center for Democracy and Technology, a civil liberties group that has argued against the subpoenas. "It doesn't sound like they're just going after a few big fish."
Music fans are fighting back with technology, using new software designed specifically to stymie monitoring of their online activities by the major record labels.
A new version of "Kazaa Lite," free software that provides access to the service operated by Sharman Networks Ltd., can prevent anyone from listing all music files on an individual's machine and purports to block scans from Internet addresses believed to be associated with the RIAA.
Many of the subpoenas reviewed by the AP identified songs from the same few artists, including Avril Lavigne, Snoop Dogg and Michael Jackson. It was impossible to determine whether industry lawyers were searching the Internet specifically for songs by these artists or whether they were commonly popular among the roughly 60 million users of file-sharing services.
The RIAA's subpoenas are so prolific that the U.S. District Court in Washington, already suffering staff shortages, has been forced to reassign employees from elsewhere in the clerk's office to help process paperwork, said Angela Caesar-Mobley, the clerk's operations manager.
The RIAA declined to comment on the numbers of subpoenas it issued.
"We are identifying substantial infringers and we're going to whatever entity is providing (Internet) service for that potential infringer," said Matt Oppenheim, the group's senior vice president of business and legal affairs. "From there we'll be in a position to begin bringing lawsuits."
A spokeswoman for the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts said the clerk's office here was "functioning more like a clearing house, issuing subpoenas for all over the country." Any civil lawsuits would likely be transferred to a different jurisdiction, spokeswoman Karen Redmond said.
Verizon, which has fought the RIAA over the subpoenas with continued legal appeals, said it received at least 150 subpoenas during the last two weeks. There were no subpoenas on file sent to AOL Time Warner Inc., the nation's largest Internet provider and also parent company of Warner Music Group. Earthlink Inc., another of the largest Internet providers, said it has received only three new subpoenas.
Depaul University in Chicago was among the few colleges that received such subpoenas; the RIAA asked Depaul on July 2 to track down a user known as "anon39023" who was allegedly offering at least eight songs.
There was some evidence the threat of an expensive lawsuit was discouraging online music sharing. Nielsen NetRatings, which monitors Internet usage, earlier this week reported a decline for traffic on the Kazaa network of one million users, with similarly large drops across other services.

wtf? 8 songs?
Even at 75 subpoenas a day it'll take over 700 years to stop the supposed 20 million kazaa users.
its too bad, but that's the way it is, deal with it.
Also, another example: if there weren't so many white people around and 17 year old white kids running the Internet we would be better off.
Ishmael
This is just another way for the RIAA to make money. The greedy RIAA *******s apparently aren't making enough off the song artists they literally rip off.
The only way to fight back is to not buy any artists cd that belongs to the RIAA. I don't share songs either, but have sympathy for anyone caught up in this crap.
We can also thank our wonderful congress for apparently giving the RIAA the authority to get supoenas without a judges signature/consent.
http://abcnews.go.com/wire/Entertainment/a...30718_1322.html
Yeah, it kind of rhymes.
er, riaa are taking steps so the software designers (like with k++) will take even more steps, like before. adding anonymousy has become a priority within p2p programs recently & they're all more than likely to gain some sort of anti-riaa software. maybe we'll even see a winmx update! (corrrr)
plus riaa sux0rz
Pirating music is indeed wrong, but the RIAA is going too far this time. I don't know why on Earth Napster has been created, but the only reason why price gouging is going on is that the constant pirating of music is driving up prices for the artists to make profits. If you think they're getting too much money, I somewhat disagree. They earn their cash through all those who appreciate their music, but I do have to criticize about the amateurs and mediocres who are earining the big cash. Music in general has been demoralized over the last ten years thanks to the blasted computer technology (People only pay attention to the visuals and the beat, not the lyrics). Meanwhile, for you Americans, use iTunes so you don't have to pay as much as the actual albums and for us Canadians, we'll have to wait till September before PureTracks is available. If we're going to continue this technological dishonesty, then everything will be jacked up in price that involves everything affected by piracy. Would you like it if you worked your heart out to produce a good song, movie, or computer program and everyone pirated it for nothing?
I'll be attending DePaul this fall
d'oh!
Yeah, go after some of the POOREST PEOPLE IN THE COUNTRY (college students) to get MONEY?!?!?! WTF? Um, yeah, I don't know of many college students that have $750 laying around, let alone $150k. Talk about scare tactics...
I have to ask you tho. If the Movie industry can push out thousands of dvd's with extra content and features that people gladly buy, why do cd's cost so much? It seems that the normal promotion for a dvd is much higher than anything done for music cd's.
If I could get a cd for $6 I'd be more likely to buy it. gimme a nice case and some pretty picures, and it's a shoe-in.
What the RIAA is going to find out is that the people who download and offer songs are, in many cases, casual listeners. Stopping P2P file sharing is not going to increase their sales significantly, if at all.
I wish I could celebrate that I saw this coming when they won that suit against Verizon.
What is this I'm hearing now about Metallica suing some band because of their aledged heavy usage of the E and F chords? Lars was quoted as saying something about how although they dont claim that they own the E and F chords, they were the band that popularized them and as such they deserve a share of the profits...
This was in the part of the interview AFTER he told everyone how much he enjoys it when James Hetfield bends him over and...
Last edited by 10547 on 20 Jul 2003 - 09:16
It'd take an extremely good lawyer to pull it off, but you could use a number of defenses in the form of them biasly targeting non-aol customers... bad example, but ya get the point.
RIAA should really concentrate on catching the groups that are releasing thousands of copied CD's into the market place, in some cases even selling them to unsuspecting music stores these pirated CD's are what is really hurting the music Industry.
I remember in the 70's (oh god I'm geting old) that the Music Industry whent ape over the new Recording tapes claiming that they were going to loose huge profits as people would no longer by albums and instead share copies with their friends (sound familiar) what they were able to do was force every Compact Cassette maker to pay royaties to the Music Industry just in case.
I would not be suprized if the recording industry did not request something similar from the major ISP's.
yeah, it can barely sustain itself.
<%
Dim RIAA,Slugheads,Consumers,Pirates,People
RIAA=PeopleWho.Price(GougeToHe11)
Slugheads=RIAA
Consumers=PeopleWho.CanAfford(CD)
Pirates=Consumers-PeopleWho.Have(UberAmountsOfMoneyFor(CD))
People=Pirates+Consumers
If RIAA <> Slugheads Then
World.CaveIn
Else
Music.Piracy.P2PNetworks(Increase*100)
End If
If Consumers(SpendMoneyOnCD) Then
Consumers.BankAccount=0
Consumers.Become(Pirates)
End If
If Pirates(DownloadSongs) Then
Who.Cares(?)
ElseIf RIAA.Blows(Up) Then
People.DanceMerrily
End If
%>
up yours, slugheads!
I don't know much VB, but I could at least follow the code.
They have to prove how much loss in each case, each song. Theres no support, wrapping or shipment involved, no physical ware stolen.
Who wuld afford a expensive CD after the internet service bill are paid? Arent we merely using a tool that another company loves to sell.
piracy are just ahobby, but riaa use methods reminiscent of the erstwhile Soviet Union. Unethiccal, music should be popular by how good it is, not how much its markeded. wich also inflates the price and no matter how much they sell, they dont bonus back on the customer.
The RIAA is made up of the major record labels,
and there aren't to many well known bands to be
found that arent on those labels.... if any.
Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!
Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.