main

Intel, AMD accused of cooking the books

malebolgia   on 30 July 2003 - 18:37 · 11 comments & 360 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Joe C. Carson of Applelust has invited us to take a gander at an article he published last week in which he more or less claims that Intel cooks the books when reporting results benchmarketing results on its Pentium processors.

That follows an article posted here yesterday, in which senior analyst Peter Glaskowsky of the Microprocessor Report accused Apple of making claims at the launch of the G5 which were "simply not true". (See Senior chip analyst says Apple lying about PowerMac G5.)

According to Mr Carson, writing to the INQ today: "Every other 64 bit machine and processor on the market before the G5 were priced and marketed as workstations. This includes the Boxx machine and the AMD Opteron processor. Both are in fact priced and marketed as high end workstations, servers and processors, not desktop machines". He claims that Apple is the "first and so far only company" to market a 64-bit RISC machine as a desktop with prices to match. And, he adds, the Athlon 64 is a "dumbed down" relative of the Opteron.

News source: The Inquirer


    Please note that this Beta Release expires 30 days after product was installed.

    System Requirements

    --Pentium level CPU
    --IE 5.01 SP2
    --Windows 98, 98SE
    --Windows ME
    --Windows 2000 Professional, SP1 and up
    --Windows XP Home and Professional Edition, SP1


And from Norton AntiVirus 2004 Public Beta's Download page:
    If you have Norton Internet Security or Norton Personal Firewall installed on your computer, you will not be able to install this Norton AntiVirus beta version. Please uninstall any versions of Norton Internet Security and Norton Personal Firewall before installing the Norton AntiVirus 2004 beta build. The final version of Norton AntiVirus 2004 will not have this requirement.

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 11 additional comments
#1 David3k on 30 Jul 2003 - 18:50
he is frum an apple site. duh.

opteron cpus are just the chips. if they made chipsets and motherboards for it to be used as a desktop, then its a desktop.
(1 reply) #2 Krux on 30 Jul 2003 - 18:52
those "dumbed down" opterons will tear of the G5 and they know it.... lamers
#2.1 macrosslover on 30 Jul 2003 - 19:37
could i also say the g5 is a dumbed down power4?? kind of absurd for him to make that claim against the athlon64. basically he's a f%%king idiot.
(1 reply) #3 Ciderx on 30 Jul 2003 - 19:08
Joe: "Now to make it worse...*froth* The PPC 970 is only a relatively inefficient design when compared to its planned successor, the PPC 980. Already the PPC 980 is being developed and exists now in prototype form, being readied for introduction sometime late in 2004 according to current schedules. *wibble* The PPC 980 is supposed to have as much as four times the performance capabilities at matched clock speeds over the PPC 970. *unnatural tick* There is the planned PPC 990 to appear sometime by 2006 and reach clock speeds up to 10 GHz. *sticks pencil up nose, shouts WIBBLE* Then there is the recently mentioned PPC 9900...*starts rocking manically* Lordy! Does it ever end? *laughs like goat*

Yes, flibble, I detect the rank stench of The Smell of Fear rising from the piles of verbal manure being tossed around by the Wintel fanatics. The only reason that they have reacted so violently to the Veritest SPEC2000 benchmarks is that they know full well that they are real, and that reality spells the eventual end of Wintel!!!!!!!!!!!! *curls up into tiny ball*"

Nurse: OK, Joe, you've been overstimulated by the internet again, haven't you? Time for your medicine...
*locks Joe back into the "Unnatural Acts via Lusty Feelings For Computer" ward*
#3.1 Ciderx on 30 Jul 2003 - 19:15
actually, I just put "joe c carson" into Google. I'm starting to think that post of mine above isn't so much of a joke after all!
#4 AgEnTsMiTh on 30 Jul 2003 - 19:38
Hardware makers all do this, its nothing new.
#5 g33kb0y on 30 Jul 2003 - 20:46
*yawn*
(3 replies) #6 kairon on 30 Jul 2003 - 22:23
I posted this in BPN earlier.
#6.1 kuroneko on 30 Jul 2003 - 23:29
Good for you
#6.2 g33kb0y on 31 Jul 2003 - 00:08
omg...like...no way! Here's a cookie.
#6.3 kuroneko on 31 Jul 2003 - 03:21
What about the milk?

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)