main

GPS device thief caught by GPS

Toxicfume   on 01 September 2003 - 19:12 · 24 comments & 925 views

Advertisement (Why?)
To track down this alleged thief, all police had to do was flick on a computer. A 40-year-old man was arrested Wednesday and charged with stealing a computerized tracking device that uses a global positioning system to keep track of jail prisoners on home detention. "He apparently didn't know what he had because he would be awfully stupid to steal a tracking device," said correctional officer Thomas Roth, who runs the home detention program at the Rock County Jail.

The $2,500 device was temporarily placed outside a home by a woman serving home detention. The device, which is a little bigger than a brick in size, has a built-in GPS satellite receiver. Prisoners wear a transmitter about as big as a cigarette pack on the ankle, and it acts as a 100-foot tether to the portable tracking device.
By the time the prisoner called to report the theft Monday night, the device had automatically notified the jail that it had been taken outside the prisoner's home area. Roth then tracked the device through the Internet on his home computer. A trail of electronic dots led authorities to an apartment building, where the suspect was captured.

News source: CNN/Tech


Compatibility - Packages and patches authored for MSI 2.0 are fully supported on the MSI 3.0 engine. By just installing MSI 3.0 users will be able to benefit from its many servicing improvements. MSI 3.0 patches have additional data tables which are necessary to completely exploit the new features. It is important to note that MSI3.0 patches can be installed by MSI 2.0 – the engine will just ignore the new tables and the associated functionality.

Patch Removal – MSI 3.0 provides native support to remove small and minor updates (patches). Any patch installed by the MSI 3.0 engine is eligible for removal. The removal of a patch is the functional equivalent of never installing the patch. The state (files, regkeys, etc…) of the product when a patch (or patches) is installed and removed is identical to its state where the patch (or patches) was never installed. Patches can be removed in any order. Patches are removed using the command line or the calling the MsiRemovePatches API.

Sequencing – The new MSI 3.0 patch sequence table enables authors to provide explicit instructions for the order in which updates should be applied on target machines. Updates will be applied to target products in a consistent and predictable order regardless of the order in which they are physically provided to the target machine. By adding the patch sequence table authors can reliably update un-versioned files. Patches without the sequence table will be applied in the order in which they are provided to the engine.

Performance – Patches installed with the MSI 3.0 engine will take substantially less time to apply as compared to previous versions. Patching no longer implies a full product reinstall, so the engine does not have to examine all product files during patching operations. MSI 3.0 makes a distinction between product repair and patching and will use a lighter weight reinstall mechanism that only updates the files affected by a patch. MSI 3.0 also reduces needless file copies during patch application to further speed up patching.

Source List API – MSI 3.0 provides significant enhancements for system administrators to manage the list of sources for products and patches. New APIs will enable full static management of the product sources including network, URL and Media sources and enable access to read, edit and replace the MSI source lists from an external process.

Multiple Patching - MSI 3.0 allows more than one patch to be installed (or removed) in a single installation transaction with integrated progress, rollback, and reboot behavior. Patches installed together in a single transaction can still be uninstalled individually. If one patch in the set obsoletes, supersedes, or touches the same files as other patches in the set, MSI will take this into account. MSI 2.0 patches are fully supported, and there are no additional authoring requirements to enable this functionality.

Inventory APIs – MSI3.0 supports rich product, feature, component and patch inventory queries. Privileged accounts can use the new inventory APIs to enumerate across user and install contexts.

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 24 additional comments
(1 reply) #1 idbuythatforadollar on 01 Sep 2003 - 19:19
some people should be castrated as not to allow their offspring to spawn and increase the number of complete retards on this planet.
#1.1 CTM on 01 Sep 2003 - 19:29
No kidding...

It's hard to get any stupider than that.
#2 jaffa_sinas on 01 Sep 2003 - 19:25
LOL
#3 Mando on 01 Sep 2003 - 19:50
heheheh thats a classic ROFL
#4 xpablo on 01 Sep 2003 - 19:50
A candidate for the "mullett of the year award"
#5 Fedr0 on 01 Sep 2003 - 20:16
LUUUUUUUUUUUUUUSEEEEEEEEEEEER!!!
#6 Danrarbc641 on 01 Sep 2003 - 20:48
This is perhaps the funniest stupid criminal story I have ever read
#7 Tech001101 on 01 Sep 2003 - 21:01
ROFLMFAO what a clown.
#8 lammmetak on 01 Sep 2003 - 21:03
omg i thought my brother was stupid lol
(1 reply) #9 wzoo1 on 01 Sep 2003 - 21:04
ROFL!!! Now can anyone get STUPIDER than that? LOL...!
#9.1 Octol on 02 Sep 2003 - 00:43
Well...uh...as a matter of fact, YES!

Check here.
#10 Instant Mash™ on 01 Sep 2003 - 22:02
how dumb is this guy? Ha!
#11 phen!x on 02 Sep 2003 - 01:56
Good
#12 OptiPlex on 02 Sep 2003 - 02:29
STOOPID PHR34KIN N00B!
(1 reply) #13 system32 on 02 Sep 2003 - 02:32
This guy should definitely be nominated for a Darwin award.
#13.1 werejag on 02 Sep 2003 - 06:05
darwin award is where the noob would die in the act of getting the award
#14 Avi on 02 Sep 2003 - 05:07
Ironic.
(3 replies) #15 YaddaMe on 02 Sep 2003 - 06:20
lol... you ppl are acting like this guy knew what he was stealing.

Granted, ya have to be a fool to steal, just for the sake of stealing (esp when you dont even know what it is you are stealing)..... but again, it's not like this guy knew what he had.
#15.1 JaggedFlame on 02 Sep 2003 - 12:30
Why would you steal something when you don't know what it is? I still say he's pretty damn stupid.
#15.2 YaddaMe on 02 Sep 2003 - 14:16
Thats what I stated..... but most here are calling the guy an idiot for stupidly stealing something that would track him down.
He's definitely stupid, but for different reasons imho.
#15.3 JaggedFlame on 02 Sep 2003 - 15:25
How do you know? Everyone's just saying "LOL" and "ROFL." Maybe they're laughing at him for something else.

Alright, I'm just nitpicking now. You're right.
#16 lucasvanos on 02 Sep 2003 - 11:05
lol, how stupid can you be.
#17 Lancing on 02 Sep 2003 - 16:25
Someone near me was trying to carjack people, but left his cellphone on the scene and that led them to catch him. He will be charged with multiple robberies. That's pretty stupid too. Lol..
#18 plasnray on 04 Sep 2003 - 13:03
When will they put GPS devices in panties. Sometimes my wife come late from going out grocery shopping and I get worried sometimes!!!

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)