main

Microsoft's response to broken Cumulative Patch MS03-032

Daniel Fleshbourne   on 09 September 2003 - 11:39 · 11 comments & 2045 views

Advertisement (Why?)
On the 20th August Microsoft issued the Cumulative Patch MS03-032 for Internet Explorer. It dealt with several issues:
  • A vulnerability that involves the Internet Explorer cross-domain security model
  • A vulnerability that occurs because Internet Explorer does not correctly determine an object type that is returned from a Web server
  • A vulnerability that was discovered in the BR549.dll ActiveX control.
  • A change has been made to the way that Internet Explorer renders HTML files to address a flaw in the way that Internet Explorer renders Web pages
On Monday 08 Sept 2003 Neowin reported that Security expert http-equiv on Full-Disclosure had managed to exploit the flaw that the MS02-032 patch was supposed to fix.

A Microsoft Spokesperson responded to the concerns raised by Neowin and other sites today in this statement she issued to Neowin. "Microsoft is investigating public reports that one of the vulnerabilities that was fixed in the original update appears affected. It appears there is a new variation of the vulnerability that has caused the scare".

She continued "There are no reports of user being affected by this problem, but Microsoft are committed to keeping customers data safe and are aggressively investigating these reports".

She also gave advice for customers and what they should do in response to this issue. "Microsoft continues to advise customers to keep there windows systems up to date using Microsoft Windows Update website, specifically customers should still install the Internet Explorer cumulative update ms-03-032 to help protect the original vulnerability, as well as the other issues addressed by that security update". She also assured us that [I] "Upon completion of our [MS] investigation we will take appropriate action to protect our customers." [Release another patch -Ed]

Microsoft has also updated the Security Bulletin MS03-032 to V1.3 (September 8, 2003) Microsoft has added information regarding reports that the patch provided does not properly correct the Object Type Vulnerability

Download: All version except Microsoft Internet Explorer 6.0 for Windows Server 2003
Download: Microsoft Internet Explorer 6.0 for Windows Server 2003
View: Microsoft Security Bulletin MS03-032
View: Windows Update
View: Neowin - Microsoft Patch for Internet Explorer doesn't fix problem


Microsoft originally issued this bulletin on August 20th, 2003. Subsequent to issuing the security bulletin, Microsoft received reports that the patch provided with this bulletin does not properly correct the Object Type Vulnerability.

"Microsoft also identified a problem that specifically affects Windows XP systems that are configured as web servers serving ASP.NET web pages and causes clients connecting to the web server to receive an error when they attempt to view pages on the site. This problem only affects Windows XP computers that have installed Internet Information Services (IIS) 5.1 (which is not installed by default) and configured with the .NET Framework version 1.0 to serve ASP.NET based Web pages--it does not affect other versions of Windows. Microsoft has published a knowledge base article 827641 that provides steps to work around this issue while maintaining the level of protection provided by the security patch.

Microsoft is investigating these reports and will re-issue this bulletin with an updated patch that corrects these problems."

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 11 additional comments
#1 DsnBehind on 09 Sep 2003 - 11:59
Cool! Party!
#2 Sickmyduck on 09 Sep 2003 - 13:34
Is this also part of their "Trustworthy Computing" initiative?
#3 patch-rustem on 09 Sep 2003 - 14:01
(4 replies) #4 MadDog on 09 Sep 2003 - 14:58
And when RedHat patches something you guys probably cheer at how wonderfully proactive they're being. There's a website for you guys... it's called slashdot.
#4.1 DELTA75329 on 09 Sep 2003 - 15:17
No Sh!t
#4.2 ph0enix on 09 Sep 2003 - 18:12
There's nothing to cheer about anything. If RedHat or any other distribution/vendor provides patches you're safe that these patches fix the problem. In this case even the second patch doesn't fix it (because they again patches the object element in HTML but not the dynamic version of that same element). How would you describe _expertise_ ?
#4.3 SomeDork on 10 Sep 2003 - 03:56
Safe?

I sense that you are either unaware of other vendors or blissfully ignorant.
#4.4 patch-rustem on 10 Sep 2003 - 12:04
You are so right.
I can't stand these linux zellots.
OpenVMS is the only safe route to the internet.
(2 replies) #5 un4given1 on 09 Sep 2003 - 21:38
When the other products make up a significant number of users on the net then you are free to complain. You know why those products are so "secure"? It's because no hacker cares about the 5% of the people who use it. Same reason Macs are more secure and Linux too. It's not that they really are, just that Windows is on 90% of PCs.
#5.1 Unforgiven on 10 Sep 2003 - 12:51
un4given1: haven't noticed you on Neowin before
#5.2 un4given1 on 10 Sep 2003 - 13:59
I don't do a whole lot of posting... I spend most of my time in other tech forums. But, I like to make an appearance every once in awhile...

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)