main

Microsoft's New Security Road Map

Tom Warren   on 15 September 2003 - 13:39 · 2 comments & 466 views

Advertisement (Why?)
With all of the attacks on Microsoft software the past few months, it is increasingly hard to chalk it up to the fact that Microsoft products are the most widely used in the industry, and are therefore the prime target for black hatters. Are Microsoft's coding practices and product-development teams just not as attuned to security as they should be?

If they have not been in the past, they will be if Microsoft's new security road map is successful. Besides changing new software that already is written -- to batten down the hatches when it comes to default features -- Microsoft also is trying to plug holes in legacy products. But to do that requires the cooperation of its customers, and patching can be a tough sell. Is Microsoft doing enough to secure its software? Industry experts are not so sure.

In the short term, Microsoft is resigned to the fact that all software is going to have security flaws. But the company is taking steps to try to stymie attackers. It has changed its organizational structure to create a security business unit and has retrained developers in security best practices.

The Security Business Unit is responsible for training developers to write secure code, creating and enforcing security goals for Windows product groups, and developing security best practices. In 2002, the software giant stopped development for two and a half months to educate more than 9,000 of its employees in writing more secure code. In the last 18 months, Microsoft retrained 18,000 developers, instituted an array of new, more secure development practices, and provided its developers with enhanced tools.

News source: Newsfactor.com


The cost per message has yet to be finalised, but SITA spokeswoman Brigitte Renaud said that pricing would be commercially agreed between the airlines, with SITA taking into consideration what passengers are prepared to pay.

The service will be supported through SITA's Aircom satellite which links via Inmarsat satellites into the company's SMS service.

According to Renaud the service will not interfere with any vital flight systems.

"It is only going to be a software upgrade, with no additions to the existing airborne configuration, so there is nothing to worry about," she said.

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 2 additional comments
#1 Grappa on 15 Sep 2003 - 18:34
And it only took them 10 years to acknowledge that security is an issue.

G
#2 OptiPlex on 15 Sep 2003 - 19:12
Can't wait for the amount of anti-MS posts to show up made by non other than Linux/Mac hardcore users

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)