main

Why Microsoft needs IBM this time around

malebolgia   on 22 September 2003 - 18:26 · 5 comments & 493 views

Advertisement (Why?)
It's a rare and momentous occasion when IBM and Microsoft share a stage to announce a new joint venture.

As far as anyone can recall, the last time the bitter rivals came together--prior to this week--was more than a decade ago, just before the two companies had a legendary falling out over PC operating systems. You might remember OS/2, which the two computing giants hyped relentlessly as the future of the industry back in the late 1980s. Famously, Bill Gates once wrote that OS/2 was "destined to be the most important operating system, and possibly program, of all time."

IBM, which once paid its software programmers per line of code written, needed Microsoft's more limber development team to make OS/2 a success. But not long after Gates wrote his words of support, his company dropped OS/2 development like a bad habit, and instead poured its resources into the development of Windows NT. That sealed OS/2's fate as a historical footnote and set the stage for Windows' eventual dominance. So what are we to make of Wednesday's joint commitment by Gates and IBM software chief Steve Mills to cooperate on so-called advanced Web services standards?

News source: C|Net News.com


2.21.56 Version - 20/09/2003

  • The display picture and the other new settings of Messenger 6
    are now saved properly, all the time.
  • By default, the "auto away" feature now changes your status
    online when it is Online or Idle. If you want to keep the way the feature
    worked before, use the AutoAwayAlways registry setting
  • The ResetNameTag registry setting has been added if you want to
    keep your name tag when you sign-out/sign-in.
  • Some translations have been updated.


Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 5 additional comments
(2 replies) #1 Coolme on 22 Sep 2003 - 19:04
QUOTE
IBM, which once paid its software programmers per line of code written


Holy cow, that's a lot of lines...
#1.1 ricknl on 22 Sep 2003 - 19:35
This explain the inefficiency of OS/2. Too many unnecessary code lines
#1.2 roadwarrior on 23 Sep 2003 - 04:58
What people tend to forget is that tons of code from OS/2 is still present in Windows NT, and thus in Windows 2000, XP, and Server 2003 as well.
#2 SimplyPotatoes on 22 Sep 2003 - 21:16
i wonder if this standard will help browsers other then ie maybe they can access windowsupdate then
#3 dougkinzinger on 24 Sep 2003 - 19:37
Microsoft don't need no stinking IBM. IBM just needs to get it's head out of you know where.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)