main

Lindows: Microsoft settlement site stays

malebolgia   on 30 September 2003 - 20:10 · 37 comments & 1794 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Linux seller Lindows.com said Tuesday that it will continue to help Californians process legal claims against Microsoft, despite a challenge by the software giant.

An attorney representing Microsoft sent Lindows a cease-and-desist letter late last week objecting to the company's MSfreePC site. The site offers to process claims on behalf of current and former California residents who qualify for proceeds from the settlement of a class-action lawsuit against Microsoft. Microsoft attorney Robert Rosenfeld said claims submitted by the Lindows service won't qualify under the terms of the settlement and demanded that Lindows remove the site.

In a letter sent to Microsoft Chairman Bill Gates, Lindows CEO Michael Robertson said the MSfreePC site performs a valuable service for consumers and will remain in operation. He challenged Microsoft's objections to the service, particularly the assertion that claims need a physical signature to be valid. "You seem to have no objections when digital signatures are used to attempt to build Microsoft's profits, such as with MSN, Expedia or .Net," Robertson wrote. "I would also point out that Microsoft uses digital signatures to bind people to their restrictive end-user licensing agreements. It is hypocritical for Microsoft to endorse digital transactions to bolster your business but resist them whenever it may negatively impact your bottom line."

News source: C|Net News.com


"We think that wireless is clearly a big deal in mobile computing with 802.11," said Dell.

"In the enterprise market we are very much believers in the scale-out technologies with clusters or grids of servers; two-way and four-way servers.

"The market for larger servers - four-way and eight-way - is going down and the projections for two-way and four-way are going up. In the overall market for servers, about 99 per cent of the volume is for two-way and four-way."

The company is also branching out into new consumer areas, adding an online music service to rival Apple's iTunes, and building flat screen televisions, although there was no indication of whether this would be globally or just for the US market.

Like many of its rivals, Dell is pushing hard into the services sector, with the launch of Dell Managed Services and Dell Professional Services.

Unisys is providing the bulk of the services for Dell, and has to date signed deals with the likes of Axa and Cable & Wireless.

It is targeting those services that are becoming commoditised, such as desktop outsourcing and managing upgrades. Dell confirmed that the company would not be touching the more difficult custom application or development services.

Jon Collins, senior analyst at Quocirca, commented: "Dell has been missing out on this market because it sells direct, so it's an opportunity to have almost a reverse channel arrangement.

"It can use the systems integrators without saying that it is changing its business model."

Using third-party suppliers to provide the services gives Dell more chance of success, added Collins, because it does not have to go through a learning curve in this sector.


Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 37 additional comments
(2 replies) #1 JaggedFlame on 30 Sep 2003 - 20:28
QUOTE
"You seem to have no objections when digital signatures are used to attempt to build Microsoft's profits, such as with MSN, Expedia or .Net," Robertson wrote.


That's why we have these magic things called credit cards.
#1.1 bluebsh on 30 Sep 2003 - 21:15
i don't think the guy even knows what .NET is...
#1.2 roadwarrior on 30 Sep 2003 - 23:56
Heck, most people don't know what .Net is, even people within Microsoft, which is why last year they went around naming everything ".Net" but started dropping it from stuff earlier this year.
#2 kairon on 30 Sep 2003 - 20:38
Lindows leeches off Microsoft's success. Therefore to lindows.
#3 slapnuts_ox on 30 Sep 2003 - 20:50
Im finally glad that companies are starting to stand up to Microsoft. Personally I don't like or use lindows but I feel they have their place.
#4 bluebsh on 30 Sep 2003 - 20:56
I don't know about you, but this to me seems a little anti-competative also... it's using someone else to make your product be pulled to the front... and putting strings on it also if you raed all the fine print... to me, i'd rather see the money and buy quality products then get forced into buying something that really is open source and can be downloaded for free in other forms...
(3 replies) #5 JohnSK on 30 Sep 2003 - 21:00
If I recall, MS has always been rude and that is the key to success.. so I don't see any problem with Lindows doing the same thing,especially to MS.And I think they should deserve a praise - they encouradge people to use Linux,the more there are, the better..
#5.1 JaggedFlame on 30 Sep 2003 - 21:29
Oh, come on. A business motivated entirely by hatred of Microsoft? That's really pushing it. That's not a key to any type of success.

Of course, if this somehow magically does bring Microsoft down, Robertson's business goes down the tubes with nothing left to clutch to. He doesn't care; he's already rich up the ass. Who gets screwed? Guess.
#5.2 werejag on 01 Oct 2003 - 05:35
no body becuase no one uses lindows.
#5.3 JaggedFlame on 01 Oct 2003 - 12:14
You don't think Lindows is giving Linux a bad image? I think so. I know lots of people who shy away from Linux just because of what this retard has pulled.
#6 devilotX on 30 Sep 2003 - 21:08
If people use lindows and enjoy it, and either stick with lindows or move on to a different distro, its good for linux, whether or not the Nix Zealots like it or not, Lindows is moving Nix to the desktop
#7 Avenger on 30 Sep 2003 - 21:41
MS can always make good on their threat of legal action, since Lindows didn't take the site down.
#8 CoCoLUS on 30 Sep 2003 - 21:42
Although i don't like constant ms bashing, i think robertson has the right attitude. he doesn't care how large ms is or how many attorneys they have, he stands up against them. Maybe some of his selling/marketing tactics/actions are a little provocative, but he wouldn't be a good salesman/manager, if they weren't.
The only way to make real money out of linux is the way he does it, with "n00b-conversion" and aggressive marketing. Even Red Hat, although they have quite a good reputation, has a commercial touch to it, with their 2-times-a-year release schedule and their red hat network.
(3 replies) #9 Dave_Clements on 30 Sep 2003 - 21:44
**** linux and all of its variations in the ass. I couldn't give two ****s for it. I hate the damn thing. MS Windows is far from perfect but having been a user of both, and grown out of my geek status, i have to say, the hassle of getting a stable and supported linux system is years and years away. it's even further from perfect than windows. I CANT use ANY of the type of software I use for a living on Linux. None of the art software I use to create my work is available on linux, and probably wont be, at least for many, many years. And none of the alternatives are in the league of what i use. so, stop whinging and just buy a copy of windows. believe me, when you grow up, you will realise that linux is more hassle than its worth.

[Edit: Please do not attempt to get around our profanity filter again. Thanks - Cara (Global Moderator)]

Last edited by 14112 on 30 Sep 2003 - 22:16
#9.1 Panorama on 30 Sep 2003 - 21:57
Well... Everyone's allowed an opinion but I think you could have proved your point without the need to use harsh words. For Linux you can use WINE to run Windows programs and WineX to run some Windows games. Indeed I'm using XP Home and love it and if I were to run Linux, it'd probably be on another computer. However, Linux isn't as bad as it looks. I've used RedHat 9 and it's pretty slick (got Slackware 9 lying on the ground but I've been to lazy to install it).
#9.2 Chicane-UK on 30 Sep 2003 - 22:52
Dave_Clements,

You are entitled to your opinion.

However I am also entitled to disagree with you. I'm not going to turn this into a flame thread, as nothing annoys me more when discussions disolve into name calling and such. But simply put Linux doesn't do the job for you - age, 'maturity', or graphics packages have anything to do with it. It just doesn't do the job for you.

Linux wouldn't be used by increasingly large development studios for high end CGI processing - I believe Pixar use Linux extensively to name just one company. And do we even need to discuss the use of Linux in government and nuclear research facilities? I couldn't imagine them powering one of their clusters on Windows, assuming it could even scale that well.

I'll agree that Linux on the desktop has a long way to go - I gave up on that notion some time ago, and use Windows at home and Mac OS at work. It just doesn't do the job for you - but it does do the job for countless thousands of other people.

Oh.. and trying to get Linux 'stable' doesn't really require much effort. You just install it.
#9.3 slapnuts_ox on 30 Sep 2003 - 23:45
Dave_Clements,
In every post I have seen you make you act like a child towards anything that isn't windows. Then you tell others to grow up? I think you need to take a good look in the mirror and stop being so closed minded. Its people like you that I laugh at so cheers for making yourself looking like a moron.
(1 reply) #10 Ely on 30 Sep 2003 - 21:57
The whole Lindows crap is all bull, It's a LAME LAME OS, Michael Robertson is an IDIOT and he is just taking advantage of another company to promote his sh**y OS, He criticizes Microsoft because supposedly MS wants to get too much money all the time, however he IS the one actually getting money out of people by selling an Operating system that is actually offered for FREE to people on the internet! He is the one actually lying to consumers, His sh***y OS which he claimed would support most Windows applications has turned out to a lame Linux distro which can hardly run MS Office.

MS has a really good operating system, stable as a rock and has good products, if they charge too much, that's their choice, its THEIR software, whether people buy it or not its THEIR choice, so Michael Robertson should SHUT the F***K OFF and start doing a real OS not claiming he is doing something HE DIDN'T do or trying to get money out of something that is offered for FREE to consumers.

Come on Michael Robertson, you were not original, NOT EVEN on the name of your SH*****TY OS grow up and do something useful!
Just my two cents.
Ely

Last edited by 2344 on 30 Sep 2003 - 22:09
#10.1 xpablo on 01 Oct 2003 - 04:39
Well Said !
#11 paulhaskew on 30 Sep 2003 - 22:00
hmm, i differ on that...

linux is wonderful for server enviroments... i use it for a web/mail/ftp server...

its extremely handy... windows has a good platform too...

my saying...

IF IT WORKS FOR YOU GREAT... IF NOT TRY SOMETHING ELSE
(1 reply) #12 Captain Crunch on 30 Sep 2003 - 22:07
u heard about the new lindows? its called eckspee
#12.1 Krome on 01 Oct 2003 - 02:29
LOL ... you smart mouth
(1 reply) #13 ExtremeXDude on 30 Sep 2003 - 23:08
Well i like Microsoft technology better sometimes dunno but im always interested in there designing and stuff, but the only thing i dont like is why they dont get comments from the public from all kind of countrys so there software is more enjoyable . I the thing that Lindows has done is copyed Linux and Windows into one *COPYED* lol , L=Linux and indows=Windows = Lindows
#13.1 devilotX on 01 Oct 2003 - 03:00
You do mean Copied right?
(4 replies) #14 memodude on 30 Sep 2003 - 23:41
1. The moron doesn't know what he is talking about. Since when have they required you to buy a digital signature from VeriSign and send it to them before you can accept a EULA?

QUOTE
I would also point out that Microsoft uses digital signatures to bind people to their restrictive end-user licensing agreements.


2. That MSfreePC site is just horrible. They are just encouraging people to mooch off Microsoft.

Last edited by 25569 on 30 Sep 2003 - 23:49
#14.1 roadwarrior on 01 Oct 2003 - 00:05
Actually, what he is referring to is the fact that when you click "I agree" on a license agreement, you just signed a contract with a digital signature (nothing at all to do with Verisign). The courts have been rather clear on this. Microsoft wants to have it both ways, they want digital signatures to be valid when it benefits them, but not when it hurts them.
#14.2 JaggedFlame on 01 Oct 2003 - 03:56
He said they use digital signatures to make a profit on MSN, Expedia, and .NET. This is clearly false, because there is other information involved in the transaction.

And they don't even make money off of .NET by selling it to consumers other than selling Visual Studio. What the hell is he smoking?
#14.3 werejag on 01 Oct 2003 - 05:38
jagged flame .

now you claim eula is fake? i rember you stating that its legal binding!!! i pointed out it was not legal. guess you switch sides when ever bill tells you.
#14.4 JaggedFlame on 01 Oct 2003 - 12:17
What the hell are you talking about? Did you read what I said?

Yes, there is an EULA, but "there is other information involved." When you buy something from Microsoft, you do sign an EULA, but you also give them your credit card information, so they know it's actually you. When you do the same thing with Lindows, you can do whatever you want. You can pretend you're an 80-year-old geezer who lives in California and acts in porn movies. And you get a copy of Lindows.

You people complain about how Microsoft "dumps" its product on the market, yet this is completely okay with you? What hypocrites.
(1 reply) #15 johndotcom83 on 01 Oct 2003 - 01:53
i want to kick that robertson dumbass square in the gonads. He knows nothing, he makes a profit of selling Linux, last time i checked, linux was open source aka freely distributed to the public. Well in his Lindows Utopia crap, he sells is, he's made no real innovation or anything groundbreaking or earthshattering to the tech community
#15.1 devilotX on 01 Oct 2003 - 03:02
Free as in Free speach, not free beer man....

You are free to do what you please with Linux as long as you abide by the GNU license.

It does not mean that they give it away, only the souce is given away and you can have proprietary items in a linux Distro, such as YAST
(2 replies) #16 nhut on 01 Oct 2003 - 03:01
If you have to take advantage of another company to sell, then your product ain't worth anything.

Down with Lindows. Go Windows. Go Linux distros. Real Linux distros, not some ripoff.
#16.1 johndotcom83 on 01 Oct 2003 - 05:48
I totally agree, hes making the linux community look bad, i like linux and windows, they both have great features to them, i dont see other linux distro's CEO's attacking microsoft
#16.2 roadwarrior on 01 Oct 2003 - 09:52
Maybe they should, since Microsoft has been on the attack against Linux for the last few years.
#17 MitchShrader on 01 Oct 2003 - 11:18
may killer gophers crawl up the giants' legs and bite 'im inna gonads.. yaay gophers. i just LOVE a fair fight..
#18 MitchShrader on 01 Oct 2003 - 11:19
oops. I meant, no doubt our fair and impartial court system will create justice and equity according to the highest judicial standards. I don't know HOW i made that silly typo..
#19 antsy on 01 Oct 2003 - 12:01
Stop putting these Fukcing wasters in the news

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)