main

Hackers Crack Latest Windows Flaw

Daniel Fleshbourne   on 18 November 2003 - 12:05 · 42 comments & 2397 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Computer code that exploits a critical new software vulnerability in the Windows XP and Windows 2000 operating systems is circulating on the Internet, according to security experts. Two examples of "exploit" code for a buffer overrun in the Windows Workstation Service were posted to security-related Internet discussion groups on Friday and Saturday. Both exploits have been tested and work, according to Dan Ingevaldson, director of X-Force at Internet Security Systems.

The Workstation Service vulnerability was disclosed by Microsoft in Security Bulletin MS03-049, which was released on November 11. The service is turned "on" by default in Windows 2000 and Windows XP systems and allows computers on a network to connect to file servers and network printers, Microsoft said.

Both the CERT Coordination Center at Carnegie Mellon University and ISS issued advisories last week regarding the Workstation Service vulnerability, warning that it was easy to exploit and well suited to use by self-spreading Internet worms.

View: The full story
News source: PCWorld.com


"It is moving from the early adopter to the mass market phase and will ramp up quickly. [Butler Group's] advice is that you want to be asking whether your new equipment is PoE-enabled."

Using the chip, switches with 44-48 ports currently requiring about 1,500 components will now need only 200, or three external components per port.

This could bring dramatic reductions in space needed on the motherboard, labour costs in manufacture and design effort, said Igal Rotem, PowerDsine chief executive and co-founder.

PoE technology can bring big cost savings to companies by eliminating installation of power cables, outlets and uninterruptible power supplies for IT-related equipment.

IDC has estimated that the market for PoE will double to $200m next year and ultimately exceed $1bn.

There are around 36 PoE-enabled switches now in development from all major and second-tier switch makers. This compares with only about five last year.

Of these, the vast majority use PowerDsine technology. But other companies, including Texas Instruments and Linear Technology, are entering the market.


Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 42 additional comments
(6 replies) #1 YaZoR on 18 Nov 2003 - 12:08
QUOTE
Hackers Crack Latest Windows Flaw


and why doesn't that surprize me?
#1.1 sinatosk on 18 Nov 2003 - 12:16
QUOTE (#1.0)
and why doesn't that surprize me?

it's microsoft. what do you expect?
#1.2 tmaxxtigger on 18 Nov 2003 - 12:40
It's not so much that it's Microsoft, is that the flaw runs on the most used OS in the world, so to create an exploit is to gain 'respect' in the hacking circles...
#1.3 kingius on 18 Nov 2003 - 12:57
losers!
#1.4 ryuh3d on 18 Nov 2003 - 17:17
Yeah great post.

Lets see. Microsoft publishes a patch on Nov. 11 and explains what it protects against.

Then hackers 6 to 7 days later break those computers without the patch.

Real hard? That is why you MUST update after a patch is posted. Once a patch is posted then Hackers know what to attack.

Slammer and the like all came out AFTER security patches were RELEASED. Not before. It is real easy to start hacking after MS announces where and what the problem is.
#1.5 cq107 on 18 Nov 2003 - 18:11
QUOTE

Slammer and the like all came out AFTER security patches were RELEASED. Not before. It is real easy to start hacking after MS announces where and what the problem is.


haha, hackers always know first... they don't mean to "cause harm," its to make a point. you know with the accsess that the Slammer worm had, they could have erased your HD....
#1.6 SomeDork on 18 Nov 2003 - 20:36
Apparently, cq107 knows all the hackers, knows all the vulnerabilities, and is a complete ass for not revealing them to the vendor for an appropriate fix.

If it were Linux I'm sure you'd have done your diligence.
(1 reply) #2 VikingStorm on 18 Nov 2003 - 12:35
They are kind of late
#2.1 Rivers on 18 Nov 2003 - 13:13
they are kind of sad
#3 SimplyPotatoes on 18 Nov 2003 - 13:14
i disagree you dont crack a flaw you exploit it
#4 Sub on 18 Nov 2003 - 13:21
Lets watch and wait for the virus. Then see how many people didnt update their computers this time. I imagine its around the same numbers as blaster.
(3 replies) #5 Eversurf on 18 Nov 2003 - 13:28
How Do i protect myself from it. Is it just a patch or do I need to turn off the service
#5.1 g33kb0y on 18 Nov 2003 - 14:04
"The Workstation Service vulnerability was disclosed"
If you're not part of a network, or are part of a network, but don't need to connect to servers and networked printers, sounds like you can disable this service to protect yourself.

[Edit] Like #6 said, I wouldn't worry about it so much. PCWorld also pointed out that the code that takes advantage of these vulnerabilities is quite immature, for the time being. The exploits aren't robust enough to really cause any problems, yet.[/EDIT]

Last edited by 11783 on 18 Nov 2003 - 14:10
#5.2 rogerroger on 18 Nov 2003 - 18:47
That is quite immature g33kb0y. According to some "other" forums, the article was referring to some early builds of an exploit. There exist much better ones at the moment.

Patch or die is our motto!
#5.3 g33kb0y on 18 Nov 2003 - 21:08
Ya, g33kb0y...that's quite immature! Oh, wait...
(2 replies) #6 mrk on 18 Nov 2003 - 14:02
you protect yourself from it just klike you would any exploit or virus etc

common sense and stop being so paranoid! being paranoid (like my dad funily enough!) makes life a really boring....thing
#6.1 Prelude76 on 18 Nov 2003 - 14:55
i people werent paranoid of, say the Germans, we'd let Hitler march right into our towns with open arms. or if people weren't paranoid of how bad the earth is getting polluted, we wouldnt have new innovations such as hydrogen fuel cells, solar power, wind power, etc..

Human Paranoia is great and keep the world on its toes. i say "BRING IT ON!" , let's have a full internet shutdown with a windows flaw.
#6.2 mrk on 18 Nov 2003 - 15:08
dude!- mixing germans and computer technology is wrong ok, and what's war got to do with exploiting exploits in the most exploited software in the world?


*THWACK*
#7 Jon on 18 Nov 2003 - 14:10
Aside from this 'news' (should be called inevitables really), I was thinking earlier was playing some mariokart DD, I wonder how many of the neowinians who constantly slag of MS are actually beta testers. Ironic dont you think? If they were as 'l33t' as they all seem to think, then they'd be constantly feeding back improvements, and help make MS software great. I think that says a lot about them as people.
#8 darkmark327 on 18 Nov 2003 - 14:30
Firewalls and regular patching are always the way to avoid these things.
(1 reply) #9 Twisted Maniac on 18 Nov 2003 - 15:04
if u have an active firewall you should be fine........f*cking M$ allway security bugz
#9.1 SomeDork on 18 Nov 2003 - 20:38
Actually, most OS vendors have security "bugz". Are you bad talking them all?
(6 replies) #10 Latka on 18 Nov 2003 - 15:28
Best patch to fix this is FreeBSD
#10.1 SomeDork on 18 Nov 2003 - 20:43
Really. Will my software, the software that I need for my business, work on it?

Not much of a "patch" then is it? Sounds more like a "Complete Reinstall and Entire Software Reassessment".
#10.2 DsnBehind on 19 Nov 2003 - 05:01
Don't forget "Get the FireBird, n00b!"
#10.3 nookadum on 19 Nov 2003 - 10:26
QUOTE (#10.0)
Best patch to fix this is FreeBSD

Really now? And how do you expect to run Windows software on it (without using crappy WINE)?
#10.4 mr_da3m0n on 19 Nov 2003 - 12:24
If you wanted secure, i'd be more tempted to answer OpenBSD...

But anyways, some people _need_ windows.
#10.5 Latka on 19 Nov 2003 - 15:10
Crappy Wine? Then it seems you haven't used it in a while, or you don't know it.
Im not bashing Windows, by making the statement i did, im saying its not secure, and not at all superior.

Of course people need Windows, i need it at work, because they wont let me install anything else, but still, i know its needed. That doesn't make it better.
#10.6 SomeDork on 19 Nov 2003 - 22:35
That doesn't automatically allow you to make cheap shots either.

OpenBSD and Windows 2003 have about the same number of patches anyway; overall everyone needs to recognize that while Windows may have visible vulnerabilities, there isn't any OS that is 100% superior. Noone uses OpenBSD as a client, so you can't compare oBSD to XP.
(1 reply) #11 kioria on 18 Nov 2003 - 15:49
Well, there is no "perfect" in this software industry. But MS Exploits should become more rare than now, and I think it should soon, perhaps 5-6 years? Haha although it wont be perfect then, at least better than now. n I belive professionals would protect their computer even if there is an exploit, and I also belive that MS should make things much more easier for n00bs.
#11.1 SomeDork on 18 Nov 2003 - 20:47
Microsoft vulnerabilities are becoming more rare, while Linux vulnerabilities continue at the same clip.

This is neither good nor bad... rather, it should be accepted that some sort of auto-update process become the norm for any platform except for explicitly managed servers.

99% of all client vulnerabilities would have been fixed simply by allowing the auto-update process to do its work rather than to be paranoid.
#12 figgy on 18 Nov 2003 - 16:07
These people must be looking at the patch provided by Microsoft and must be reverse engineering it to create the exploit.

This is so pathetic. I wish they had spend their time on more productive things.
#13 radixvir on 18 Nov 2003 - 16:53
this wont become a big problem unless its included in a script program like sub7. lets hope that doesnt happen or i will have to fix my sisters computer again
#14 Mr. Black on 18 Nov 2003 - 17:27
Can't these people find something better to do with their skills then exploit the flaw, and cause damages to peoples computers?
(1 reply) #15 lardboy on 18 Nov 2003 - 19:46
Interestingly I've checked my services list and Workstation isn't listed anymore

Anybody got any idea why?

Do you think I managed to clear it out during one of my system streamlining sessions?

#15.1 Godzilla on 18 Nov 2003 - 21:10
Maybe theres an anti-worm
#16 beatlesdb on 18 Nov 2003 - 21:55
Let's not forget that thse guys make a living finding exploits in Windows - some of the exploits can only be carried out on the local network with administration rights. The also mention that: it was easy to exploit if that is the case then why did they only find the problem now? I mean windows 2000 has been out for 4 years!
(1 reply) #17 Quick Reply on 19 Nov 2003 - 00:04
[QUOTE] #1 Posted by Quick Reply on 12 Nov 2003 - 08:03
next blaster? (nb: I said it first ) [/QUOTE]

I beat you all! I predicted it first! mwhahahahaha somebody please pass me a medal
#17.1 Jon on 19 Nov 2003 - 16:19
1) You didnt predict it first, you posted it first
2) It wasn't even a remotely 'off the wall' or 'inspired' prediction
3) This is a tool that exploits it, not a worm. Tools rarely turn into worms, they are different beings.

Jumping on a bandwaggon wont get you medals, predicting codered may have, but now every clown is screaming 'worm!' as soon as MS bugs are mentioned.

<End mini rant>
#18 mr_da3m0n on 19 Nov 2003 - 12:26
The next one that says "Hehehehe it's microsoft, what do you expect? Vulnerabilities!" gets shot in the knees. And god knows I am a Linux zealot.

All I am interested in, is is there a patch already -- and if so, how long will it take before it gets applied.
#19 MitchShrader on 21 Nov 2003 - 05:00
Of course I use windows, i Paid for it.. i wouldn't have unless i meant to use it.. and MS is doing a better job this year of patching than last year.. i DO wonder if their timing has anything to do with marketing.. does seem to me that new product releases conveniently follow major exploits.. just a thought for all the bashers and conspiracy theorists.
#20 aphex_2k on 21 Nov 2003 - 14:06
im well aware that windows isn't the most secure piece of software in the world, and i dont need a "hacker" to tell me it's not perfect.

how would one of these "hackers" feel if i jumped thru a window in their house to highlight how insecure their windows are?

hackers... get some clearasil, and a life.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)