main

Windows Longhorn Build 4051 Review

malebolgia   on 12 December 2003 - 20:36 · 19 comments & 1713 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Here’s another great review from Paul Thurrott on Microsoft’s upcoming OS.

In my original Longhorn build 4051 review, I focused on the events leading up to the Professional Developers Conference (PDC) 2003 and some of the more superficial changes Microsoft made between previous alpha builds and build 4051. I was originally going to follow that with an in-depth look at the various technologies exposed by Longhorn build 4051, but that portion of the review grew out of control. So here, a month later, I've reorganized. My full Longhorn build 4051 review will now be delivered in several parts, with the first two parts being made up of the original review.

In the subsequent parts, I am delving deeper into the technologies behind this build, and examining the crucial building blocks that will form the basis for the next Windows version. To understand or even discover some of these technologies requires experimentation with the Longhorn Software Development Kit (SDK), which exposes many of the features of this operating system programmatically, letting software developers create Longhorn compatible applications and services. So I've had to dust off some long-buried programming skills and get my hands dirty, so to speak, for the first time in several years. It's been an interesting exercise.

News source: Paul Thurrott


Wi-Fi radiates an Internet connection that multiple computers within 300 feet can share at fast speeds. Wi-Fi hot spots have cropped up over the last couple of years in coffee shops, hotels and airports in bigger U.S. cities.

Some small towns, including Half Moon Bay, Calif., and Athens, Ga., have started experimenting with Wi-Fi as a way to provide relatively cheap, easy access to high-speed Internet.

The 51,000 residents of Cerritos, located 26 miles southeast of Los Angeles, have not had DSL broadband access to the Internet because the city is too far from the telephone company's central office. Cable Internet access has not been an option, either, Hylton said.

Residents in Cerritos have asked city officials to find a way to bring broadband to the city for some time.

"We're pleased that our residents will at last have an option for broadband that will be more affordable than is currently available," Hylton said.

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 19 additional comments
#1 Sushubh on 12 Dec 2003 - 21:39
Ohh La La!
(3 replies) #2 hardgiant on 12 Dec 2003 - 21:42
It is going to be slow unless you have a 5 ghz machine
#2.1 Mav Phoenix on 12 Dec 2003 - 21:48
#2.2 Chouzan on 12 Dec 2003 - 22:11
Well, aren't you the funny one?
#2.3 Avi on 12 Dec 2003 - 22:20
QUOTE (#2.0)
It is going to be slow unless you have a 5 ghz machine

You are actually correct! This alpha OS works like **** even on my P4 2.8GHz... But don't worry, I'm sure that future versions (Betas, RCs) will be a WHOLE LOT better!
#3 .:: lebmike ::. on 12 Dec 2003 - 22:05
i wonder just how stable this build is...
#4 tcghost on 12 Dec 2003 - 22:17
I'm gonna wait until the official beta stage to try it...
(1 reply) #5 KelAog on 12 Dec 2003 - 22:46
Its funny how when a linux distro releases alpha stuff It still works decent, Longhorn sucks!!!!!!!!!!! * this comming from the 2 hours I used it.
#5.1 CheeseCow on 12 Dec 2003 - 23:11
Unless this was some kind of sarcasm, it's just a load of crap.

Unlike Windows GNU/Linux is made up by many different parts, and when a distro is in it's alpha stage, it is just because it isn't 100% tied together yet, there are hardly any distros that install alpha-grade software by default. And things like the kernel & xfree usually are tested time and time again on the distro, even before an alpha release.

And you should also know that Longhorn wasn't released to the general public, unlike the GNU/Linux distros.
(2 replies) #6 x2cube on 12 Dec 2003 - 22:47
I'm on the phone right now with microsoft support asking for help with microsoft longhorn, they say they can't provide me any and it should be on the documentation I recieved. I told em I downloaded it off kazaa and now I'm on hold =P

They wouldn't give me support no matter what, I was on the phone with them for 25 minutes

Last edited by 35496 on 12 Dec 2003 - 23:00
#6.1 slang123 on 12 Dec 2003 - 23:03
LOL, you have my respect!
#6.2 x2cube on 12 Dec 2003 - 23:37
I did a three way call again with my friend and I on the line with microsoft support. I said I got it in the mail and that my mom threw my CD and all that stuff away. He said that Microsoft wasn't giving away any betas for Longhorn. I told him I got it from betaplace and then he put me on hold, when he got me off hold my friend talked instead (he sounds really different too). Appearently he didn't notice the voice change, because he didn't ask about it. It was so hilarious though, my friend's sister starts talking to my friend and like 2 minutes later he's like "yeah my phone died sorry about that". I was laughing so hard, but I managed to cover up the microphone for the phone. That was the funniest call I've ever had, it made me laugh so much! If any of you have any suggestions for our next call just post here, I'll record it and host it =)
(1 reply) #7 wojdude on 12 Dec 2003 - 23:11
yes longhorn is slow, why? when do u think that longhorn will be released to the public! LONG after 2.8ghz machines r dead! by the time longhorn is released we WILL have 5ghz machines. Microsoft r usin god dam supercomputers now, by the time it is released (2005-2006) then we will have much better computers!
#7.1 kizzaaa on 14 Dec 2003 - 05:41
Not everyone can afford an upgrade every year.
(1 reply) #8 Sem82 on 13 Dec 2003 - 00:46
who this Paul Thurrott i keep hearing about
i know he runs a website and is a windows expert
but what makes him so special does he work for MS or something??

just wondering
#8.1 syphern on 13 Dec 2003 - 01:44
hes bill gates cousin
#9 XP_2003 on 13 Dec 2003 - 10:32
well better late then never
(1 reply) #10 matric on 13 Dec 2003 - 10:46
WTF is the point reviewing a product that is just an internal release? Designed to help developers develop the friggin product! It hasn't even reached Beta stage and it is already being "reviewed" every five minutes. All these "reviewers" complain of poor stability and poor performance. This is because it is not released. For god sake, get a life. Stick with the product that has been released. The one that is stable and performs well. If you aren't happy with that, go elsewhere. I'm sure the open source community will love to have you on board.
#10.1 JaggedFlame on 13 Dec 2003 - 17:15
Dude, will you read the review before you bash it? He is one of the aforementioned developers, is completely aware what the purpose of this build is, and reviews it quite nicely without complaining about its speed and stability.

Sheesh.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)