Intel has gotten involved in the legal battle between the SCO Group and Linux, contributing money to a defense fund geared to protect users of the open-source operating system. The Open Source Development Labs, an industry consortium that employs Linux leader Linus Torvalds, is organizing the legal defense fund. OSDL plans to announce details of the fund on Monday. "It would be made available to some Linux customers that come under litigation from SCO," said the OSDL's executive director, Stuart Cohen. A subcommittee of the consortium's board of directors will decide how to allocate funds, he said.
Intel has been largely quiet in the legal case, but it and several other major computing companies are actively involved in the OSDL. OSDL hopes to raise $10 million, Cohen said. So far it's raised $3 million from a group of companies that includes IBM, MontaVista Software and Intel. The funding would be used to protect Linux users who are sued for Linux issues common across the industry, not for issues particular to that user or company, an OSDL representative said.
SCO, which claims to own several key Unix copyrights, argues that Unix software was illegally moved into Linux and is demanding that companies using Linux pay license fees or face legal action. Linux uses interfaces that are covered by SCO's copyrights, SCO has argued. Thus, the use of Linux "constitutes a violation of the United States Copyright Act," the Lindon, Utah-based company has said. Legal experts have advised Linux users to see what comes of court cases before agreeing to any license deals, however. SCO's legal actions so far have targeted IBM, though leading Linux seller Red Hat has brought a suit against SCO in return.
News source: news.com
Intel has been largely quiet in the legal case, but it and several other major computing companies are actively involved in the OSDL. OSDL hopes to raise $10 million, Cohen said. So far it's raised $3 million from a group of companies that includes IBM, MontaVista Software and Intel. The funding would be used to protect Linux users who are sued for Linux issues common across the industry, not for issues particular to that user or company, an OSDL representative said.
SCO, which claims to own several key Unix copyrights, argues that Unix software was illegally moved into Linux and is demanding that companies using Linux pay license fees or face legal action. Linux uses interfaces that are covered by SCO's copyrights, SCO has argued. Thus, the use of Linux "constitutes a violation of the United States Copyright Act," the Lindon, Utah-based company has said. Legal experts have advised Linux users to see what comes of court cases before agreeing to any license deals, however. SCO's legal actions so far have targeted IBM, though leading Linux seller Red Hat has brought a suit against SCO in return.
News source: news.com
OSDL isn't the first to offer protective measures in the legal domain. Hewlett-Packard indemnifies its Linux customers against SCO Group actions. And Red Hat has begun a legal defense fund of its own for open-source programmers.
They provide hardware, and they should not really care what OS you run on it, right? Let's say MS went under tomorrow or Linux went under tomorow, does not matter, they'd still sell their hardware and some OS would run on it, right?
I wonder if this is a sign that Intel feel that they are losing ground in Wintel space, and that Wintel is turning into WinAMD ?
They provide hardware, and they should not really care what OS you run on it, right?
That's not the point.
One would like to think that Intel is doing the right thing by contributing to fight an injustice—though that's really beside the point.
The point is that Intel knows this SCO thing is totally bogus, and it's in their self interest to try and help put it down. They know damned well that they could be next, and they would like to help send a message to all SCOmbags that bogus lawsuits don't pay.
The problem is that everyone in the world has access to Unix System V's source code and Linus Tovalds thinks that he can fix the problem by ending his distribution of it. Not happening. He and IBM have to pay SCO the licensing costs for 6 billion people, on SCO's terms (meaning they can legally charge $1 million per a license) as they didn't have permission to give it away for free in the first place.
Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!
Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.