main

Microsoft battle to stop EU fine

malebolgia   on 28 January 2004 - 17:06 · 7 comments & 663 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Microsoft is to embark on a last-ditch charm offensive over the coming weeks to avoid paying a multibillion-dollar fine to the European Commission, which is preparing to make a ruling on its long-running antitrust investigation into the US software giant. Executive and legal advisers from Microsoft are expected to hold several discussions with competition regulators working for Mario Monti, the EU’s Competition Commissioner, in the hope of reaching a settlement before the Commission delivers a ruling on the case. The Commission is circulating a draft decision that Microsoft broke European competition law and abused its dominant position in the market for computer operating systems. If made official, the decision could see the software company being fined as much as 10 per cent of its annual revenues, or about $3.2 billion (£1.75 billion).

Sources close to the discussions said that the Commission was hoping to make its ruling before May 1, when several nations join the European Union. Before then, they said Microsoft would intensify its efforts to reach a settlement. A Microsoft spokesman said: “This is a standard part of the process and Microsoft remains committed to working actively with the Commission towards an amicable solution.” Signor Monti has accused Microsoft of continuing to abuse its monopoly in the software market long after settling an antitrust battle with the US Department of Justice. That case lasted five years and ended with Microsoft agreeing to make concessions to rivals. During its own four-year investigation, the Commission gathered evidence from more than 150 companies in the high-tech industry. Based on what it has learnt, the Commission alleges that Microsoft continues to stifle rival products such as RealPlayer and Apple’s Quicktime by bundling its Media Player entertainment software with Windows.

News source: Times Online


Gal Saloman, chief executive of Discretix, told The Register that 12-15 handsets feature its crypto technology. These devices include phones from Sony Ericsson and other manufacturers, some of which will be declared publicly during the forthcoming 3GSM conference.

Over the last year mobile operators have become more interesting in selling content over mobile phones, providing access to corporate calendaring and performing firmware upgrades over the air. This requirement has led to a need to hardware-based security from handset manufacturers.

Without improvements in security the industry risks repeating the cracks to games for Nokia NGage the accompanied the high-profile release of the integrated phone / gaming device last year, Saloman warned. NGage's protection technology was software based and therefore less secure than a hardware-based system, Discretix argues.

Discretix is a member of the Symbian Platinum Program and its technology also supports Linux. Saloman said Discretix is "still waiting for its first Microsoft customer".

"We'd love to help but we're not seeing much traction in the market," he added.

Discretix also provides security technology for PDAs and storage cards. By contrast to mobile phones this is an area where demand for Discretix' security technology for Microsoft-based devices is far more tangible.

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 7 additional comments
(1 reply) #1 matric on 28 Jan 2004 - 22:01
They accuse Microsoft of being anti competitive? My God... Why is it only Microsoft being targetted. Apple has many bundled applications with its operating system, namely iTunes, iDVD, and iListgoeson. Not only that, they force you to use their proprietry hardware at ridiculous prices. To me, that is much more anti competitive than Microsoft bundling its excellent Media Player application with Windows. Maybe it is because Microsoft is the only one with the amount of money to pay out what they want?
#1.1 n3Mo on 31 Jan 2004 - 11:11
so true..
#2 Tiburon on 28 Jan 2004 - 23:19
This is bull ****, if companies spent half the time they tried to make Microsoft give up money for them not making the cut, they would actually have a chance. But nooo they spend all their time trying to get microsoft to pay them money for them not putting up a fight. And in the RealNetworks case, Microsoft should just use the defense that RealOne and **** just suck, because it does its infested with spyware and is a crime to humanity.

I don't love Microsoft, but companies need to start making money the conventional way instead of whoring Microsoft for what they've done.

Who's up next?
SBC?

Governments need to stop going after companies that do well, they are basically saying if you do to well your going to pay for it.
#3 shermang on 28 Jan 2004 - 23:20
The example of MS bundleing WMP with windows is ridiculous. WMP is wonderfully integrated and will only get even better and nicer to use because it's made by MS. If MS stops supporting WMP then the Windows OS will start having some of the problems Linux does, BAD INTEGRATION. I don't want to have some program that looks completely different from all my other programs and runs/behaves completely different, I want a package, a complete solution, not a jumble of programs from all different people with different goals in mind.
(1 reply) #4 warr on 29 Jan 2004 - 01:39
stupid enough comments above.

the lawsuit is not about integration
#4.1 matric on 29 Jan 2004 - 02:35
It comes down to integration, but these fools think it is something different - that they are being anti competitive. Integrating their products makes complete sense - it builds better products and that better together.
#5 matric on 29 Jan 2004 - 02:35
... Actually your exactly right. It isn't about integration, it's about trying to milk Microsoft for all its worth.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)