main

Microsoft loses round in display patent case

malebolgia   on 29 January 2004 - 23:05 · 6 comments & 636 views

Advertisement (Why?)
An Arizona judge has ruled that Microsoft infringed on display and printing technology patents, which could result in a jury decision amounting to hundreds of millions of dollars, according to court documents obtained by Reuters.

Research Corporation Technologies, based in Tucson, Ariz., had alleged that Microsoft was using its patented technologies in its Windows and Office software products. The technology in question involve halftones, which are used to display images on computer screens and to print them without distortion. Senior U.S. District Judge William Browning ruled on Tuesday that Microsoft had infringed on four of RCT's patents. He granted a request for summary judgment by RCT, paving the way for jury trial. Microsoft had opposed the summary judgment motion. The world's largest software maker, a frequent target of litigation, said that it would fight the case in court. "We are disappointed in the ruling and believe there was no infringement of the technology in question, which was developed by Microsoft engineers," said Microsoft spokesman Jim Desler. "We will continue to contend that the patents are invalid."

News source: C|Net News.com


Gal Saloman, chief executive of Discretix, told The Register that 12-15 handsets feature its crypto technology. These devices include phones from Sony Ericsson and other manufacturers, some of which will be declared publicly during the forthcoming 3GSM conference.

Over the last year mobile operators have become more interesting in selling content over mobile phones, providing access to corporate calendaring and performing firmware upgrades over the air. This requirement has led to a need to hardware-based security from handset manufacturers.

Without improvements in security the industry risks repeating the cracks to games for Nokia NGage the accompanied the high-profile release of the integrated phone / gaming device last year, Saloman warned. NGage's protection technology was software based and therefore less secure than a hardware-based system, Discretix argues.

Discretix is a member of the Symbian Platinum Program and its technology also supports Linux. Saloman said Discretix is "still waiting for its first Microsoft customer".

"We'd love to help but we're not seeing much traction in the market," he added.

Discretix also provides security technology for PDAs and storage cards. By contrast to mobile phones this is an area where demand for Discretix' security technology for Microsoft-based devices is far more tangible.

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 6 additional comments
(1 reply) #1 isus on 29 Jan 2004 - 23:24
is it just me, or is every patent that ms loses to is invalid? i'm not saying ms is wrong, or the money-grubbing corps behind these patents are, but... just an observation.
#1.1 bluebsh on 30 Jan 2004 - 01:08
I'm starting to think the complaitant shouts out "ANTI-TRUST! *points like mad monkey to MS lawyers*" and the case is closed....
(2 replies) #2 WishX on 30 Jan 2004 - 04:52
QUOTE
"We are disappointed in the ruling and believe there was no infringement of the technology in question, which was developed by Microsoft engineers," said Microsoft spokesman Jim Desler.


Even if Microsoft engineers did develop a similar or identical technology on their own, that's no excuse for not reviewing other people's patents a little closer before releasing it. For example, if Microsoft develops a "3 prong whatsidoodle" and RCT makes a "3 prong whatsidoodle" and patents it first, Microsoft should have done more research and went, "Well crap... RCT already patented one of these..."

Makes sense, doesn't it?
#2.1 Gumboot on 30 Jan 2004 - 05:06
I don't know the exact details of the patent, but half-toning is a common technique which has been around for, oooh, at least 20-30 years. I doubt the guy who wrote the code even gave half a thought to the possible existance of patents.
#2.2 bluebsh on 30 Jan 2004 - 12:30
half toneing has been around pretty much since print was done in multi grayscale and CYMK...
#3 theh0g on 30 Jan 2004 - 09:27
Everybody can patent things including Microsoft, who is patenting everything. Don't think they won't sue you if you try using MS's patented technology. And law goes both ways (not so sure for US though).

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)