main

Oracle to cut price on lower-end database

configure   on 31 January 2004 - 13:55 · 9 comments & 638 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Oracle Corp. on Tuesday plans to announce a price cut for a lower-end version of its database, part of an effort to lure potential customers away from Microsoft Corp.'s SQL Server software, according to a source familiar with the plan.

The 10g version of Oracle's Standard Edition One database, aimed at small and midsize companies, will be listed at $4,995, a $1,000 price drop, the source said. It will also allow customers to run the software on up to two processors. Currently, Standard Edition One is for use on only single-processor machines.

Oracle is also considering adding limited RAC (Real Application Clusters) capabilities to the Standard Edition of its 10g database, which is also aimed at small and midsize businesses, for no additional charge, according to the source. The company has positioned the technology, which lets companies run their database across a group of servers, as an important differentiator from its competitors.

An Oracle spokeswoman declined to comment on any planned announcements. The company has invited media to a conference call Tuesday morning to discuss "10g-related topics."

Oracle President Chuck Phillips alluded to the price cuts in a presentation to financial analysts this week. Having established itself as an ardent Linux supporter, the company is going to make more of an effort to promote its database on Windows in the hope of stealing some business from Microsoft, he said in a speech that was webcast from San Diego.

"This is the first time ever we've had the same list price per processor as Microsoft," Phillips said, apparently preempting Tuesday's announcement. Pricing for SQL Server 2000 starts at $4,999 per processor.

Microsoft did not immediately respond to requests seeking comment.

News source: InfoWorld - Oracle to cut price on lower-end database


It was unclear Friday whether Oracle plans to announce any pricing changes to the higher-end versions of its database. Oracle 9i Enterprise Edition is priced at $40,000 per processor.

While Oracle's database is known for performance and its ability to scale, the company has battled a reputation for complexity and high costs when compared to Microsoft, Phillips acknowledged in his speech. New ease of use features in Oracle 10g, combined with its pricing strategy, will help the company compete more effectively with Microsoft, he said.

Oracle's Standard Edition One database was released in October. A few months earlier IBM Corp. also released a version of its database software for the midmarket. It retails for $499 for the base server package plus $99 per user, and is available for one- and two-processor systems.

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 9 additional comments
(2 replies) #1 SimplyPotatoes on 31 Jan 2004 - 14:31
i really dont understand why people use oracle's **** after trying their compettors, oracle is far far away
#1.1 blackice912 on 31 Jan 2004 - 14:57
Have you even used Oracle's system?
#1.2 Zatko55 on 01 Feb 2004 - 18:18
Oracle is by far the best database system out there. I've used them all. DB2 is getting alot better, but Oracle still blows them and everybody else away in features and reliability.
#2 Jason on 31 Jan 2004 - 15:26
Bring on SQL 2004 (Yukon).
#3 L0KI on 31 Jan 2004 - 15:28
Oracle must really be feeling the heat to play a move like this.... it seems microsoft are really making inroads in the database market....

IMHO SQL Server is an excellent database... but Oracle (if you know what you are doing) is much better... just in reliability alone to my experience.... but it also has been very expenisve to license.
#4 acidsex on 31 Jan 2004 - 15:28
What i dotn understand is why Oracle thinks that after XYZ company has already spent $$$ on their current system that they are gonna go and switch and pay another $5k.

I have used Oracle and by far, that thing is slower than molasses.
#5 figgy on 31 Jan 2004 - 21:51
I used to be a Oracle fan.
But after using SQL Server I have no intention of working with Oracle.
I find SQL Server easier to use and faster for all of my db work.
#6 LordHatrus on 01 Feb 2004 - 03:49
SQL rulez!
I don't do DB work much anymore, but still.....
If I ever had to....
#7 mipra on 01 Feb 2004 - 20:42
It is time they do that...dont u think?

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)