main

Microsoft's Tokyo offices raided

Jedimark   on 26 February 2004 - 09:36 · 9 comments & 687 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Officials from Japan's fair trade watchdog have raided Microsoft's Tokyo offices on suspicion that the US giant violated Japanese anti-monopoly laws.

A Microsoft spokeswoman confirmed that the Fair Trade Commission had inspected the company's Japan headquarters, but denied any wrongdoing. The commission said it believed the US giant had attached unfair conditions when signing software deals.

It said Microsoft sought restrictive contracts with Japanese computer firms.

View: Complete story at BBC News
News source: BBC News UK


Changelog:

  • Almost all components starting from some 0.7 beta SDK still work, though recompilation with new SDK is recommended to take advantage of new features
  • "Open" dialog now lists supported file types
  • File modification time tracking, goodbye "reload file info"
  • File size tracking
  • New menu item config, massively improved menu system
  • Improved matroska component (fully extendable through third-party components, improved speed, etc)
  • Fixed UI glitch in masstagger
  • Masstagger scripts can be now exported to files
  • New diskwriter
  • New albumlist
  • Replaygain shows total progress
  • Toolbar menu now completely fakes regular menu behaviors
  • Found a way to get rid of dreaded beep when pressing alt+key
  • Various minor UI tweaks, improved playlist tabs
  • Fixed multimedia keys displayed in shortcuts page
  • AIFF input fixes
  • FLAC input fixes
  • SDK side change: all uppercase/lowercase character conversion had to be moved to utf8api, some string8 methods are missing (replaced with utf8api functions)
  • New icons, thanks to picmixer
  • Improved drag&drop support, thanks to foosion
  • Improved commandline handling (wildcards, relative paths, etc)
  • Integrated commandline tagger in foo_masstag.dll, run foobar2000 /tag:help for info

  • Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 9 additional comments
    #1 SecretAgentMan on 26 Feb 2004 - 10:12
    Everybody wants a piece of Microsoft it seems.
    #2 frankchn on 26 Feb 2004 - 10:19
    does this warrant a raiding?
    #3 Shining Arcanine on 26 Feb 2004 - 11:04
    They want Microsoft's money. Now they are going to try to fine Microsoft an absurd amount of money. -_-
    (1 reply) #4 Grappa on 26 Feb 2004 - 15:39
    Right, because M$ couldn't possibly have a monopoly...


    #4.1 kirk26 on 26 Feb 2004 - 16:17
    #5 redFX on 26 Feb 2004 - 16:39
    This is not about having a monopoly, its about MS using that monopoly to bully everyone
    (1 reply) #6 rogerroger on 26 Feb 2004 - 21:35
    Is this in the in thing for companies these days? Microsoft, Sharman Networks, and a couple others recently. Wow, is there a sign up process for this? A list to get on?
    #6.1 EnderDX on 26 Feb 2004 - 22:05
    Sharman yes

    Microsoft yes

    Whos next? hopefully SCO
    #7 BonkedProducer on 26 Feb 2004 - 23:24
    Right, you sheep are great - you honestly believe that Microsoft doesn't try to muscle it's third-party developers into not supporting other OSs... I guess the world would be a better place if we only had Microsoft to rely on. That way when someone finds a flaw - they can hurt everyone and cause cascading failures throughout the Internet.

    Of course that whole cascading failure thing is much harder to achieve when you have a set of standards that allow othe manufacturers to develop interoperable software, but don't have all the same flaws (no software is perfect) and therefore help prevent rapid spreading failures due to flaws/attacks.

    RTFA - they are accused of possibly violating Japanese law (something I'm sure most of you have no idea about, I lived there for 6 years, and it's not the US) regarding anti-competitive actions.

    Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

    Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

    Advertisement (Why?)