main

Microsoft Unveils New Copyright Software

Toxicfume   on 03 May 2004 - 13:27 · 29 comments & 4085 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Microsoft Corp. is unveiling copyright protection software to allow rented songs or movies to be used on portable players, cellular phones and other devices.

The company's latest "digital rights management" software, code-named Janus, was released Monday. It will give songs and videos purchased through subscription services a sort of digital expiration date that works even when the data is transferred from a computer. The technology also protects the content against piracy.

The goal is to make it easier for companies who want customers to rent songs or videos, rather than own them, to also let those users play back the content on portable players.

For example, with the new technology a user could rent several movies for a long trip, download them onto a portable player and then watch the movies until the rental expires a month later. A user also could rent songs for a set period and play them back on a portable player.

"At the moment the current subscription models that are out there are so hobbled by the fact that they cannot be taken away from the computer," Microsoft spokesman Jason Reindorp said.

The new technology will work only with newly developed portable players, which Reindorp said are expected to hit the market in the next two to three months.

Companies including The Walt Disney Co. have said they are interested in using the new technology for their content.

News source: AP - Yahoo! News


What's New:

  • Feature 'Scan of files inside archives'.
  • It supports the module 'CD Images'.
  • Module "Audio/video files": processing of non-standard IDv3 tags.
  • The analyzer of the search expressions is rewritten. Refer to help file for detail.
  • Graphics module. Import embedded thumbnails from CorelDraw files (.CDR,.CDT,.CLK).
  • Compatibility with Win9x is improved.
  • Function "Add files in catalogue" allows to multiselect files.
  • Minor bugs is fixed.

  • Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 29 additional comments
    #1 PseudoRandomDragon on 03 May 2004 - 13:36
    Yay, now I can watch a movie on my cellular phone!
    (1 reply) #2 Athlon7 on 03 May 2004 - 13:42
    Rent a song?? Hahahahaha.... Whatever.
    #2.1 idbuythatforadollar on 03 May 2004 - 13:56
    lol
    (5 replies) #3 xGarrett on 03 May 2004 - 13:43
    I could have swore, at first read, it said they code named the project "Jesus"

    Hrm.
    #3.1 epple on 03 May 2004 - 14:18
    I got that too.
    #3.2 markjensen on 03 May 2004 - 14:19
    You would think that Microsoft (whom everyone seems to enjoy scrutinizing for ulterior motives) would have picked a better name than "Janus". This was a two-faced god (literally).
    #3.3 MegaManXcalibur on 03 May 2004 - 23:06
    QUOTE (#3.2)
    "Janus". This was a two-faced god (literally).

    Maybe they are trying to tell us something
    #3.4 dp123 on 03 May 2004 - 23:35
    Janus was also the God of Gates and Doors... which is the connection they are trying to make here, I think.

    Of course, they think that's clever, but I would imagine everyone else finds that just as ridiculous and ironic.... How pissed do you think people would have been if they had codenamed it : GATEKEEPER ?
    #3.5 Skyfrog on 04 May 2004 - 06:58
    Are they recycling code names now? Janus was the code name for Windows 3.1 if I'm not mistaken.
    #4 Waqas on 03 May 2004 - 13:46
    no wonder
    #5 Bwizzel-B on 03 May 2004 - 14:02
    M$FT..... bringin' law to the lawless, just like Judge Dredd's boss.
    (4 replies) #6 insurektion on 03 May 2004 - 14:26
    I give em 1 month to crack it .
    #6.1 xGarrett on 03 May 2004 - 15:11
    Less.
    #6.2 icecaveman on 03 May 2004 - 15:26
    No they won't crack it in a month, Windows Media hasn't been cracked since few years ago when WMP 7 series was new. Since that time DRM protection has improved extremely much.
    #6.3 Fally on 03 May 2004 - 15:34
    You don't need to crack it... You can always play it in their crappy player and record it into another at the same time, then save it in any format you want.

    I don't believe that hampering the users to try to stop the hackers is a good way to deal with this or anything. It will push the users to become hackers so they can freely use the content they purchase.

    I already have had friends tell me that the free services limited what they could do with what they bought so badly that they are back to downloading through KaZaA. If that is the case, why the hell would they go and use something more limiting? It doesn't make sense people! Where are our digital rights!!!
    #6.4 icecaveman on 03 May 2004 - 16:06
    Well if you use Windows XP you kind of have to use another device to record it as DRM protected files in Windows XP are directly passed through to the sound card by WMP9, allowing no programs to record it, but you can ofcourse put a cable into "line-out" and then the other end into "line-in" but that resaults in audio quality loss plus it takes far more time to do, so many people don't have time to bother with pirating it.
    #7 thenay on 03 May 2004 - 17:43
    It will be cracked eventually, one month, 3 years, well see now won't we
    (3 replies) #8 cal2002 on 03 May 2004 - 18:14
    You guys are stupid. DRM v9 hasnt been cracked. Since this is based upon it why do you think this would be? It makes no since!
    #8.1 icecaveman on 03 May 2004 - 18:53
    Cal because they are dumb asses
    The DRM technology that was used in 8 series wasn't even cracked, then 9 series added even stronger DRM. Why hasn't even 8 series been cracked? it's few years old, Apple's FairPlay was bypassed few months after they started to use it in iTunes, why hasn't Microsoft's DRM been cracked yet, it's way older than FairPlay?
    #8.2 dp123 on 03 May 2004 - 23:30
    ...because no one's buying DRMed WMA files, maybe?
    #8.3 STV on 04 May 2004 - 06:03
    i buy "DRMed" wma files, so what. dont try to turn this into a format war. if you have nothing constructive to say, just dont say it, it is that simple. just because you dont believe that WM files are useful, it doesnt mean that everyone else feels the same way as you. you are not the authority!!

    but anyway, i think that this is a good thing for content vendors such as disney. I would rather have a DMRed WM file than a dvd (dont dvds die after a few years because of oxidation?)

    STV
    #9 cal2002 on 03 May 2004 - 23:59
    @dp123, Yet another moronic comment by a stupid person... Are you really retared enough to think companies keep using downloads if ppl don't buy them? You think PlayFair was cracked b/c more people purchase from iTunes then MusicNow, Napster, MusicMatch, and about 10 others? That's stupid. I sure as hell don't pay for any music online. Buy the CD and do whatever you want with it. Better quality and the label isn't telling you what you can and can not do with the files.
    (1 reply) #10 dp123 on 04 May 2004 - 00:12
    cal, are you trying to make a point? Yes, I think FairPlay was cracked because iTunes has 70% of the market and 14 others carving up 20% of the market doesn't amount to many people actively trying to crack MS's DRM.

    What does your buying CDs have to do with it? So do I. And?

    The simple fact is: I know many people who have purchased from the iTMS, and I do not know a single person who even has a single DRMed WMA file except for those that got packaged with uncompressed files on a CD but were never even touched.
    #10.1 STV on 04 May 2004 - 06:07
    its kinda like that whole pepsi, coke thing. some areas favor pepsi, and some areas favor coke. just because they are not in your little circle, it doesnt mean that they dont exist.

    at this point, with all of these cracks in fairplay, and none in ms drm, since when? wm7/8? the content providers want their content to be protected and therfore may go with wm on this. but then again, i could be wrong.

    STV
    (4 replies) #11 sandman45654 on 04 May 2004 - 06:23
    When its made by Microsoft it doesn't need to be popular for people to want to crack it, they want to crack it because Microsoft made it. The reason DRM hasn't been cracked is largely due to the fact (IMO) that Microsoft did a damn good job.

    Whether you like Microsoft or not you have to admit they are really starting to get their sh*t together. I've been running Windows Server 2003 since the day it came out. It just turned one year old and in that time my system has crashed once. Windows Server 2003, Office 2003, Msn Explorer (9), and Msn Messenger are just some of the excellent apps Microsoft has released recently.
    #11.1 STV on 04 May 2004 - 07:17
    thanks for putting that into words.

    STV
    #11.2 sandman45654 on 04 May 2004 - 08:22
    My pleasure
    #11.3 dp123 on 04 May 2004 - 16:11
    Actually I do disagree...

    Microsoft hasn't put out anything worth while in close to 2 years. Win Server 2003 is nice, but it is still a pain in the ass to support when we are not able to migrate most of our apps to it.
    #11.4 sandman45654 on 05 May 2004 - 08:45
    I suppose we will have to agree to disagree. In my opinion, one company’s inability to migrate to a product (on its own) does not reflect the quality of the product, let alone the other products released by the same company. Sometimes forward thinking breaks backwards compatibility. While this is unfortunate, Microsoft cannot be expected to support every app ever released.

    Microsoft has released quality products in recent years. Whether you can (or need to) use them may be a different story. You discredit Windows Server 2003 because you are unable to use it, at least how you need. What about other programs released by Microsoft? Have you tried Office 2003? There isn’t a better office suite available on any OS (IMO). Included features like speech and optical character recognition may be overkill for many users but I use them often. Another small, yet impressive program included with Office 2003 is the Office Picture Manager. As a test, I created a folder with 10,000 images in it. The smallest image was 300x450 and the whole folder weighed in at 489 megs. Office Picture Manager was able to create and display 10,000 (resizable) thumbnails without crashing or stalling. A lesser program running on a lesser OS would likely choke on such a demanding request, both Office 2003 and Windows Server 2003 took it in stride.


    Last edited by 39412 on 05 May 2004 - 09:56

    Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

    Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

    Advertisement (Why?)