main

Microsoft: SP2 Will Not Install on Pirated Copies of XP

configure   on 11 May 2004 - 10:30 · 188 comments & 15583 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Thanks Cryton. Contrary to the remarks it made to the ComputerTimes, Microsoft now claims that it will not permit users who have obtained Windows XP illegally to upgrade to its latest service release. Instead, the software giant will continue to enforce compliance with its licensing.

In a nutshell, Microsoft group product manager Barry Goffe told ComputerTimes that Windows XP Service Pack 2 would not exclude pirated copies from upgrading, and that it was more important to keep user safe than to be "concerned about the revenue issue."

To clarify its position, a Microsoft spokesperson told BetaNews, "Press reports indicating Windows XP Service Pack 2 will install on pirated or illegal copies of Windows XP are not entirely true. Prior to installing, SP2 will check the OS' product ID (PID) against a list of known pirated PIDs. If a PID is found to be invalid, SP2 will not install."

BetaNews confirmed the accuracy of the spokesperson's statement with a source within the company.

View: Read more at BetaNews
View: Neowin - Everyone gets to upgrade to XP SP2 even cracked copies...
News source: BetaNews





Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 188 additional comments
(6 replies) #1 Ivand on 11 May 2004 - 10:33
WTF?? are the crazy?
#1.1 Frankenchrist on 11 May 2004 - 10:36
Oh, coming outta the closet are we?
#1.2 configure on 11 May 2004 - 10:38
They did that with SP1 - It's nothing new
#1.3 werejag on 11 May 2004 - 11:10
and that worked well didnt it!!! lol
#1.4 Jason on 11 May 2004 - 11:33
Yes it blocked the keys it intended to.
#1.5 mrk on 11 May 2004 - 13:53
hehehe, but what good is that when soeone creates a PID/key changer just like with sp1...

or an sp2 release with no pid checking (the end-user-runtime )
#1.6 Andareed on 11 May 2004 - 21:46
Most copy protections are designed to prevent newb's and casual copies; anyone who thinks their system is foolproof is very naive.
#2 Rivers on 11 May 2004 - 10:38
This news was established in the last news thread on SP2.. either the news itself or the comments.. (I forget now)..
But the point is... its already been said and its just common sense on Microsofts part.
No big deal at all!!

edit for example
Posted by Ytterbium on 10 May 2004 - 02:04
the key's blocked in sp1 are still blocked in 2


Last edited by 16807 on 11 May 2004 - 10:47
#3 Waqas on 11 May 2004 - 10:41
oh my god...
gimme a confirmed news :d
(1 reply) #4 DJ Prem on 11 May 2004 - 10:44
Excellent!!!
#4.1 werejag on 11 May 2004 - 11:12
so and this means what to illegal copies? nothing

(10 replies) #5 kiddingguy on 11 May 2004 - 10:47
Totally agree with MS!!
Why support/let other people illegally upgrade/update their Win XP??

Just buy the (OEM) version. I mean it's just 100 euros or so. Two nights not drinking and you're done .
#5.1 thornz0 on 11 May 2004 - 15:32
i agree too. People dont pay for it, they dont deserve support, simple as that.
#5.2 Surr3al on 11 May 2004 - 15:36
For home edition: $91
For professional: $140
#5.3 Fally on 11 May 2004 - 15:55
Sounds stupid, but if MS supported the pirated OS's they would be making the internet a better place. I think that they should be responsible for there software and it vulnerabilities. To me this even includes PC's with illegal copies. Because those vulnerable nodes on the net can be turned into an army of zombie MS boxes to wreak havok.

Besides, MS makes there cash from businesses with hundres of boxes, not from a couple of skuzzy pirates who can't afford the real thing.
#5.4 NateZ on 11 May 2004 - 20:11
QUOTE (#5.1)
they dont deserve support

first off, i must laugh at that statement. Support from windows? if you need help with windows...you might need help walking...or maybe reading. Second, if you are dumb enough to only be able to contact msft about their product and how to get support, please take a peek at my good friend www.google.com
#5.5 PseudoRandomDragon on 11 May 2004 - 20:28
That isn't fair. Using a computer isn't easy.
#5.6 thornz0 on 11 May 2004 - 21:53
yout taking it out of context to justify your ridiculous argument. Support includes patches, and since its commercial software, using a pirated version of the software does not entitle one to it. Simple as that.
#5.7 L0cke on 12 May 2004 - 00:43
QUOTE (#5.5)
That isn't fair. Using a computer isn't easy.

Using a computer IS easy if you have a high enough IQ.

Those people with double digit IQ's shouldn't get any special treatment, they are stupid.
#5.8 werejag on 12 May 2004 - 01:26
wow attack people that rather not pay Microsoft for buggy software. Microsoft gives away OSes everyday all you have to do is look.

the IQ of someone is not determined by them buying software!! it more like the opposite if you want a blanket statement
#5.9 keylay on 12 May 2004 - 03:26
I will never pay for a microsoft product, all the worms and wholes and viruses that get threw, etc etc, the product is not worth what they charge therefore i will not pay it. I will download acopy and crack it or find a cracked version and forgo the $191 as stated above. I do believe in paying for software that people make and feel it is important to pay people for their time, just not microsoft. I think bill gates has enought money and i will not pay for windows or office. Anything else i will gladly fork over some dough.

Nuff said.
#5.10 dotnetjunkie on 13 May 2004 - 01:47
People like you should be banned from Neowin!

It shows that you know NOTHING about the inner-workings of MS software, otherwise you would realise that it is totally worth the money, even more than they're asking for it.
(10 replies) #6 wstokeley on 11 May 2004 - 10:57
Ah, well, we'll just get a new list of serial keys and change it again. Keeping one step ahead of microsoft isn't a problem :p
#6.1 [saint dark] on 11 May 2004 - 11:09
you must be proud of yourself
#6.2 sheer on 11 May 2004 - 11:21
And all the software on your computer is legal..?
#6.3 Moe Szyslak on 11 May 2004 - 11:38
You don't deserve to have a PC. You deserve to be beaten repeatedly with a large stick.
#6.4 N_B on 11 May 2004 - 11:50
#6: hah! I actually read your name as 'wstolekey' at first glance.
#6.5 kairon on 11 May 2004 - 11:55
[LOSER ALERT]
#6.6 sdkaneda on 11 May 2004 - 15:07
half these chumps who put down software pirates probably have a nice beefy collection themselves and just need to feel better about themselves by riding a bandwagon and putting down others.
#6.7 DOCa Cola on 11 May 2004 - 15:30
QUOTE
#6: hah! I actually read your name as 'wstolekey' at first glance.

rofl
#6.8 aoeu on 11 May 2004 - 19:16
Funny, when you guys praise eMule and BT. You guys shoot yourselves in the foot by shooting piracy. Great thinking assholes.
#6.9 NateZ on 11 May 2004 - 20:15
QUOTE (#6.
Funny, when you guys praise eMule and BT. You guys shoot yourselves in the foot by shooting piracy. Great thinking assholes.

how so? Last time I checked, quite a bit of legitimate material is made available on BT, just about EVERY LINUX DISTRO and plenty of old time audio. If you can't be precise, don't bother attacking anyone, just sit back and get used to it. great thinking asshole.
#6.10 aoeu on 12 May 2004 - 05:00
QUOTE (#6.9)
how so? Last time I checked, quite a bit of legitimate material is made available on BT, just about EVERY LINUX DISTRO and plenty of old time audio. If you can't be precise, don't bother attacking anyone, just sit back and get used to it. great thinking asshole.

Yeah, that sure accounts for all the links to pirate BT sites that appear all over the neowin.net forums.

BTW, you dyslexic, or did you just forget to mention eMule? Oh yeah, it's legitimate because it has trial version of XP all over the ED2K network. My bad.
#7 cappuchok on 11 May 2004 - 11:02
Well, obviously my remark about Microsoft being intelligent enough to want to protect their legitmate users at any cost was premature.

(7 replies) #8 johnston on 11 May 2004 - 11:23
Im running a ilegitimate copy of windows xp, and am in the microsoft beta programme. On xp sp2 2120 now using illegal copy, and all i had to do to by pass the new authentication methods was change my serial to a new one before i installed, so this definetely wont stop any ilegitimate versions of xp upgrading to sp2.
#8.1 bogd on 11 May 2004 - 11:27
OMG!! U R 1337 HAX0R!
#8.2 kairon on 11 May 2004 - 11:54
WOW you should be proud of yourself. Loser.
#8.3 NinjaOfLove on 11 May 2004 - 13:45
Ass-kisser.
#8.4 mrk on 11 May 2004 - 13:54
hah wtf is up with everyone and their high horses now. jesus.

you lot donwload music but then shout when someone does not have a paid for xp...
#8.5 MikeS2k on 11 May 2004 - 14:46
I agree with 1.4, you see it everywhere, people are up their own asses now because they have a copy of XP they probably wouldn't have bought had it not come with their store-bought Dell's.

As for the story though, well you can hardly blame Microsoft for blocking keys, it's their OS after all
#8.6 MikeS2k on 11 May 2004 - 15:18
damn sorry double posted it

Last edited by 3809 on 11 May 2004 - 21:39
#8.7 L0cke on 12 May 2004 - 00:47
I am against people who call pirates losers. At least the pirates aren't stupid.

If you had a choice, which would it be:

1) to get something for no money at all

2) to pay insane amounts of money for something you can get for no money at all

Who cares about Microsoft support, if you have a triple digit IQ you should be fine. Google, Newsgroups, IRC Channels. SP2 keys will be easy to make, they broke it before. I doubt Microsoft even changed their encryption, they said they just blocked known pirate codes.

Of course, that's if your dumb enough to use Windows in the first place.
(5 replies) #9 PseudoRandomDragon on 11 May 2004 - 11:28
First they said no Palladilium with Longhorn, which was a lie. Now this is bull****. Be on the lookout for "too good to be true" stories like this.
#9.1 shao on 11 May 2004 - 12:18
what's too good about microsoft not making the life of pirates harder by forcing them at the very least to update software keys, and at worst be stuck with out of date software?

surely now they've confirmed the opposite it's better news?
#9.2 JaggedFlame on 11 May 2004 - 13:34
"Palladilium"? Wow.
#9.3 PseudoRandomDragon on 11 May 2004 - 19:14
Im not mad at MS, it is just that people are reporting false stories about MS.
#9.4 aoeu on 11 May 2004 - 19:17
QUOTE (#9.1)
what's too good about microsoft not making the life of pirates harder by forcing them at the very least to update software keys, and at worst be stuck with out of date software?

Ah, the joys of pirating...
#9.5 L0cke on 12 May 2004 - 00:49
Pirates rule. They aren't stupid enough to pay the ridiculous fees Microsoft charges for software. And palladium is just another word for Big Brother.
(1 reply) #10 musicmaster on 11 May 2004 - 11:32
well, i think MS made a mistake... maybe not install up the feature updates, but install teh security patches..
#10.1 incubusdaemon on 11 May 2004 - 16:00
you still can, if you install them one at a time.
(1 reply) #11 Jason on 11 May 2004 - 11:35
This is a non issue just buy the friggin software.
#11.1 Mean Mr Mustard on 12 May 2004 - 01:03
But even then, someone in the world may be purchasing a counterfeit without knowing it.
(5 replies) #12 Beast_4thHM on 11 May 2004 - 11:37
Why should they allow it to install on pirated versions? who are the dumb ass people that demands it? PIRACY = A CRIME , just accept it FFS!
#12.1 rezza on 11 May 2004 - 11:50
The reason people think they should allow the install on non-legal versions of XP is because otherwise, you'll get whole botnets building up around the unpatched holes on illegal versions, and these botnets will hit even ligitimate users with spam, DDoS, etc etc. Allowing illegal users to patch up is better for the legal users (and the whole rest of the internet who have no part in this, like Mac, Linux, Unix, BeOS, QNX users and servers).
#12.2 PseudoRandomDragon on 11 May 2004 - 12:03
Well, that is what they get for running illegal versions.
#12.3 vagari on 11 May 2004 - 13:30
no, it's what you get... that's the point of his point, the bad apples harm the good apples.
#12.4 Surr3al on 11 May 2004 - 15:44
Pirated copies should at the least only get critical updates. That way they don't harm the actual legit users. M$ is completely right on this issue, but I'm sure it wouldn't be a major problem to allow critical updates to get distributed freely. I'm not sure about the numbers, but already if you connect to the net with an unsecure computer you get attacked by various worms. The critical updates would make an unsecure new and legit computer safer and not a subserviant of some virus.
#12.5 obsolete_power on 13 May 2004 - 20:13
Wow, If I thought like you, I'd be throwing away money like an idiot. Instead of paying the thousands of dollars (net amount) on software, you could be adding to your kids' college funds or putting a downpayment on a car. I mean, think about it, you'd rather pay $1500 on Windows XP and Office just so you can say, I SUPPORTED MS YAHOOOOOO, or, thinking about the people that could give less of a **** about it, realizing that the industry is supersaturated with pirates and paying $0 for it. I mean, do you see my point here? Why should people support Microsoft's monopolistic ways? They only got where they are right now because it took a guy like Bill Gates to realize the potential back in 1975. Since then, many companies dared to compete with Microsoft and most of the ones that did, were brought down. Now, Microsoft rules the utility software market with billions of dollars in profit because of monopolistic competition. Don't get me wrong, I admire this company's monstrous success but I rebute on the fact that they make their profits the way they do.
#13 YaZoR on 11 May 2004 - 11:51
I'm sure the crackers/hackers will bypass it, like they did sp1.
(3 replies) #14 d.thornton on 11 May 2004 - 12:02
That'd be like giving free car insurance to car thieves.
#14.1 nmeu on 11 May 2004 - 14:04
so you're saying that you wouldn't mind getting hit by someone in a stolen car and not getting any insurance money for your wounds and damage to your vehicle??????
#14.2 KevinRGood on 11 May 2004 - 15:04
You won't get money from the thief's insurance, but you'll get money from the theif by sueing him.
#14.3 Andareed on 11 May 2004 - 21:53
If he's a thief, he probably won't have many assets or a job.
(3 replies) #15 johnston on 11 May 2004 - 12:02
The build 2120 has this feature in place, however it is easily bypassed already, so unless they put in more security features they arent blocking users at all. All that must be done is change your serial number to one that works, these serial numbers are already on the web and ive a list of over 50 of them.
#15.1 kairon on 11 May 2004 - 12:34
Good for you. You little pirate you.
#15.2 PseudoRandomDragon on 11 May 2004 - 12:43
If you roll your eyes too much, you might get cancer.
#15.3 mrk on 11 May 2004 - 13:55
he already has it !
(3 replies) #16 d.thornton on 11 May 2004 - 12:04
IF hackers would contribute to software developement instead of its degredation, we would have a much better society. Same with virus writers. These brilliant people should lend their abilities and talents to making software better, not worse. . .
#16.1 Andareed on 11 May 2004 - 21:54
Most virus writers are dumb-ass script kiddies.
#16.2 nuka_t on 11 May 2004 - 22:18
they should make software free. go opensource!!!one11. i thi nk im going to jump on the linux bandwagon.

hackers do contribute to software development. if they can break the anti-theft on the betas, ms would patch it up for hte final.
#16.3 L0cke on 12 May 2004 - 01:01
Most virus writers use the horrific language Visual Basic.

Programming shouldn't be easy.
(2 replies) #17 N_B on 11 May 2004 - 12:05
What's wrong with denying KNOWN PIRATED KEYS access to SP2/winupdate? It's not like they're blocking anything for people with legal copies..
#17.1 jdb264c on 11 May 2004 - 15:34
Eeh?
#17.2 Mean Mr Mustard on 12 May 2004 - 01:04
I'm not sure anyone is saying that it's "wrong"
(1 reply) #18 Razor_D on 11 May 2004 - 12:06
Ive already seen a keygen advertised which produces the -640- keys Sad, really.
#18.1 Mean Mr Mustard on 12 May 2004 - 01:06
Advertised? Wow! Now they're charging for KeyGens ???
#19 johnston on 11 May 2004 - 12:06
There are hundreds of keys and new ones leak out all the time so that wont work.
(1 reply) #20 johnston on 11 May 2004 - 12:07
QUOTE
Ive already seen a keygen advertised which produces the -640- keys Sad, really.


It doesnt have to be a -640- key to work on sp2. Mine is -642- and im on 2120 beta working fine, and my friend has a -643- and his is fine also.
#20.1 roadwarrior on 11 May 2004 - 15:56
Yep, one 643 and one 649 here on the same beta.
(4 replies) #21 scoult01 on 11 May 2004 - 12:13
What is incredibly funny is the people getting on their high horses about illegal software, and jumping down others throats for it, when those same people most likely also run illegal software.
Good on microsoft for trying to do something about piracy, but I fear yet again they are going about it the wrong way, lower the prices for the software, and most people will pay for it.
#21.1 NinjaOfLove on 11 May 2004 - 12:26
Exactly.
#21.2 Hova on 11 May 2004 - 13:46
I can't talk for everyone, but I have no illegal and pirated games or programs. Everyone needs money, the employees at Microsoft, the store where I bought my goods. I'm not willing to steal a product for my usage and not re-inburse someone who spent their time, money, and effort getting it to me.
#21.3 Chaos Whistler on 11 May 2004 - 13:54
QUOTE
lower the prices for the software, and most people will pay for it.


I doubt it. For some people it might be a money issue, but for other's it's just not wanting to pay for it. There's not much that can be done about those people, you can't get cheaper than free.
#21.4 nuka_t on 11 May 2004 - 22:24
i agree with you, i would pay for xp but my parents wont and i dont have any money. the only alternative is windows ME*shuddres.*

i have bought some MS software though. i bought encarta 20003 for 14 dollars at costco and they have version 2004 now for 10 bucks . i can download encarta from BT or kazaa or whatever, but at prices like that, there is no need to. and i dont feel like ive stolem something. if longhorn retails for fifty bucks, ill buy it. but im probably gonna buy it anyway at whatever price(within reason) cause im excited for it.
(1 reply) #22 Fubar on 11 May 2004 - 12:20
ok so does this go for XP corp then because you dont have to activate that
#22.1 stupidape on 11 May 2004 - 12:28
XP Corp has a cd key dont it so what do you think
(1 reply) #23 TheReaperMan on 11 May 2004 - 12:24
wrong, even if it was 10 pounds they would still nick it, thats just the nature of ppl
#23.1 Mean Mr Mustard on 12 May 2004 - 01:07
10 pounds of what?