main

AOL launches 'Lite' client

Unknown   on 18 May 2004 - 09:46 · 33 comments & 6444 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Thanks to netlooks for the heads up...

Monday, America Online launched it's next test client based on 'AOL 9.0 Optimized', to beta testers (currently in Alpha status, codenamed AOL Strauss). This new client, labeled 'AOL 9.0 LE', is targeted for users with less RAM and overall inadequate specs to the modern surfer. The most noticeable changes include no 'Welcome Screen', no AOL man greeting you with 'You've Got Mail' or 'Welcome', no AOL Companion, no AOL ads, no channels bar, and an icon free toolbar. That is a very long list, as AOL is sometimes known to add features, while yielding to remove the aspects labeled as nuisance' by subscribers.

AOL explained the future of Strauss [briefly] in its' beta central area, "Initially, Strauss' user experience is limited in some areas by design. The testing you do will provide baseline performance information that will be used to make development decisions for the future of Strauss. Also, the feedback you provide will be used to guide the overall evolution of the Strauss service. As the test progresses, more and more features will make their way into the Strauss experience."

Even to the most advanced user, this should come as a reason to end protest, detest, and discontent over the advancements made by AOL. And maybe, just maybe, respect them for changes long overdo, and the striving to accommodate users of all levels. But hey, its' just something to think about.

Just last week, AOL released its' last beta client, Tahiti (now labeled AOL 9.0 SE), boasting a more delux client with an array of added features targeting the high-speed user. The SE upgrade is now available through the AOL.COM download area.

News source: AOL


What's NEW :

Version 3.70 ( 15 May 2004 )

  • NEW Automatic Channel Scanning 'by frequency', where you can choose the frequency interval and the step (0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1.00, 2.00, 5.00, 7.00, 8.00 mhz) of the automatic scan.
  • Improved the automatic channel scanning 'by channel number' and 'by channel table'.
  • Added the option to schedule audio (radio&tv) recording tasks - only in Professional Version.
  • MSI TV @nywhere Cards are fully supported now, for more details on configuring check ChrisTV forum
  • The recording module has been optimized and all known bugs have been removed.
  • In order to help our users to find the solutions to common problems we have added a new Settings Window - ChrisTV Tips & Troubleshooting.
  • ChrisTV Settings Window has been reorganized.
  • Added the option to hide the ChrisTV Takbar button if TV Window is set "Always on Top".
  • ChrisTV Driver Settings Window has been reorganized.
  • Added the option to reInitialize the WDM Driver on ChrisTV start, in order to fix some problems related to : noise (or no proper sound) - Medion TV Cards,no channel detection on channel autoscan or wrong video standard used on ChrisTV launch.
  • Added the option to use a special channel frequency tunning for some TV Cards, like MSI TV @nywhere Cards.
  • Improvements and fixes in the Zoom Module, on some cases the zoom wasn't set corectly after ChrisTV restart when Deinterlace Filter or Image Processing filter was enabled.
  • You can now Zoom to the center of the image by holding down CTRL key and using mousewheel in order to zoom in or out.
  • Added the option to Disable Video Renderer while using Radio Mode, so the CPU ocupancy will be lower, but the channel switch time between TV Mode and Radio Mode could increase.
  • Added the feature to export and import the ChrisTV Channel List to *.chl files.
  • Added the option to hide the channel number in the popupmenu channel list and in the TV OSD.
  • Added the option to choose the Clock Time Format for the OSD Clock.
  • Sleep Timer/Shutdown Function should work properly on all PC's configurations now.
  • Other small fixes and improvements.

  • Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 33 additional comments
    (7 replies) #1 qwertyuiop1 on 18 May 2004 - 09:51
    I can't understand why people use AOL.?
    #1.1 shift on 18 May 2004 - 10:38
    some people wouldn't like there little boy or girl surfing the web and finding 'FREE XXX ANIMAL ****ERS CLICK HERE FOR FREE VIDEO' with a nice graphic that leaves nothing to the imaginaton.

    giving kids 100% free access to the internet means any wierdo could contact them.
    #1.2 x2cube on 18 May 2004 - 10:48
    why not? I'm guessing the parents want the children to have a more active imagination... is that why?
    #1.3 Toxikk on 18 May 2004 - 11:03
    if you cannot, then do not make an ass and make a stupid post.

    people use it CUZ THEY WANT TO USE IT. it is NOT being forced on any computer you may buy... it is there for someone to try, and use.

    so... stop acting like aol is taking over the world. obviously they are doing something right, if they still have all these little haters.
    #1.4 Toxikk on 18 May 2004 - 11:05
    QUOTE (#1.1)
    some people wouldn't like there little boy or girl surfing the web and finding 'FREE XXX ANIMAL ****ERS CLICK HERE FOR FREE VIDEO' with a nice graphic that leaves nothing to the imaginaton.

    giving kids 100% free access to the internet means any wierdo could contact them.

    its called aol guardian.
    it sends you a report of all of the places and things your child tried to do. if they talked to someone on im and that person sent them to a website and your son clicked it, you would know from that report.

    it is not 100% access. KOL and RED are both very safe for children to use.

    ps, STILL #1!!!!
    #1.5 shift on 18 May 2004 - 11:15
    QUOTE (#1.2)
    why not? I'm guessing the parents want the children to have a more active imagination... is that why?

    wtf? i'm guessing you don't have kids. there's enough crap in the world already, aol tries to make the internet a safe as you want it to be for your kids.

    for the record, i don't use aol, never have, never will, but there has to be a market for this. why else would it sell so well.
    #1.6 tapo on 18 May 2004 - 12:12
    QUOTE
    I can't understand why people use AOL.?


    That's like asking why people use Windows. Although there are better things available,

    1. It comes bundled.

    2. It's easy to use.
    #1.7 Galley on 18 May 2004 - 14:28
    Because newbies have been brainwashed by the TV ads. Most of them assume it's the ONLY way to get online.
    #2 HoochieMamma on 18 May 2004 - 10:02
    Me either
    #3 TheReaperMan on 18 May 2004 - 10:02
    becuase they think its cool due to the ads etc maybe?? or they find it easy to use??
    I do not know
    (4 replies) #4 Avi on 18 May 2004 - 10:15
    Cuz it's one of the easiest newbie programs to use...

    BTW, try the following (really really funny **** my friend made): http://www.k2xl.com/games/aolhater.html (password is dannyiscool)
    #4.1 HoochieMamma on 18 May 2004 - 10:20
    LOL very nice
    #4.2 x2cube on 18 May 2004 - 10:51
    lol that was hilarious
    #4.3 Mav Phoenix on 18 May 2004 - 17:09
    #4.4 NPGMBR on 19 May 2004 - 16:06
    That was funny. You guys arent gonna win any AOL buddies with that site. LOL
    (3 replies) #5 Toxikk on 18 May 2004 - 11:02
    you guys are so so so funny. anyone remind you of that?

    watch. next thing msn10 will have a lite client.

    f all you hatas!
    #5.1 AquaDex on 18 May 2004 - 11:03
    lol
    #5.2 Trade Wind on 18 May 2004 - 11:21
    If so, the MSN Client team would have been working on such a project for some time. At any rate, to stay on topic...I think AOL has done a pretty good job executing with their Client over the last year. Either way, MSN's main competition isn't AOL anymore...it is Yahoo! & Google.

    You're a hoot to read too, Toxikk. ;-)
    #5.3 Toxikk on 18 May 2004 - 12:00
    QUOTE (#5.2)
    You're a hoot to read too, Toxikk. ;-)

    thx

    all these people that have never even used the service sit there and bash on it... it just gets to me.

    its not like its the only alternative.

    if you dont use it, shh. if you use it and hate it, thats different... but instead of whining on a website, send an e-mail and tell them the issue.
    #6 LE3 on 18 May 2004 - 11:25
    cant wait for v3 AOL LE3
    #7 ben_b on 18 May 2004 - 13:07
    lamo.... MSN all the way!
    (1 reply) #8 MoRiA on 18 May 2004 - 14:21
    Until AOL give users the ability to remove the client altogether they're gonna lose customers IMO... You can still only use AOL on one PC (no router support etc) and that client, however much RAM it doesn't use, is still a pain in the arse... ¬_¬
    #8.1 VikingStorm on 18 May 2004 - 21:39
    I use AOL without the client, and use a router for 3 PCs connection...
    (AOL-DSL, which is no longer offered)
    (3 replies) #9 BOOGSoftball on 18 May 2004 - 14:22
    All you AOL haters make me laugh. You probably haven't even seen/used it since 3.0 was out.

    I have had AOL for over 10 years. 9.0 is by far the best system yet. I get more spam mail at my corporate (Fortune 500 company) e-mail system which supposedly has the best spam blocking capabilities out there.

    How much AOL spam do I get? Zero. None. Not a one.

    Bottom line? Don't comment on things that you don't know about, just to 'fit in' with the rest of the ignorants.
    #9.1 Galley on 18 May 2004 - 14:30
    My sweetie has AOL, and it's the biggest steaming pile of dog poo on the planet. The e-mail "client" is a frikkin' nightmare!
    #9.2 BOOGSoftball on 18 May 2004 - 15:40
    Nightmare in regard to what? I have no problems with it.
    #9.3 slimshady165000 on 18 May 2004 - 16:03
    QUOTE (#1.0)
    All you AOL haters make me laugh. You probably haven't even seen/used it since 3.0 was out.

    guilty.....I did use 3.0 when it was first offered. It was still 19.95 for unlimited from what I remember.
    (1 reply) #10 MoRiA on 18 May 2004 - 17:27
    I used AOL 7 and 8. I got out of the 12-month contract as soon as I could. I have two main problems with it:

    1) You have no choice but to load their client which takes time and uses space on the taskbar, memory, etc.

    2) There is no ability whatsoever to connect with more than one computer via AOL so it's useless for networking.
    #10.1 BOOGSoftball on 18 May 2004 - 18:22
    #2 is changing...networking will be available...
    #11 nic on 18 May 2004 - 18:18
    QUOTE

    ...no AOL ads...

    thats sounds good.

    All the big ISP's and their clients seem to be focused around shoving as much advertisements as they can down your throat. (to be fair, I've only seen: Compuserve, AOL, and MSN).

    That is why I personally don't use them. I don't have any real content over the products to just hurl insults at them. Some of the people I work with use Compuserve and AOL simply because there are access numbers all over the world. When you travel the world over for work, and need to be able to access your email at any given time, services that are world wide come in handy .
    (1 reply) #12 tapo on 19 May 2004 - 07:20
    Wait a second, you guys hate AOL because it's crappy and unstable, yet easy to use and comes bundled with the computer, so everyone flocks to that. You can't believe why anyone but a newbie would bother with using it.


    ....yet you use Windows.

    #12.1 NPGMBR on 19 May 2004 - 16:18
    Crappy and Unstable is highly subjective.

    I for one, consider Windows XP to be the most stable MS OS I have ever used. You can literally leave the PC running for weeks and not have to reboot.

    My subjective comment, counters yours!
    #13 NeoSoft on 25 May 2004 - 15:19
    AOL sucks! MSN rocks compared to AOL ... but in my opinion, stop with all the damn software for dial-up and get DSL (cable rocks)

    Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

    Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

    Advertisement (Why?)