It's time again for another article from I, Cringely
Back in January, I moved from the California Wine Country to Charleston, South Carolina, trading my 47 acres of ticks and foxtails for a 152 year-old Victorian House with vintage termites. The wonder of the move is that after five months, hardly anyone has noticed. Charleston is precisely nowhere in the geography of high tech, but it really doesn’t matter because I’m more or less virtual. When I moved the 100 miles from Silicon Valley to Santa Rosa in 1999, only my area code changed. This time, thanks to VoIP, not even that happened: It was easier to make my old numbers ring in Charleston than to tell my 3,309 friends a new number. Back in 1999, I worried that not being IN Silicon Valley would hurt my work, but it didn’t. I averaged one day-trip down per month. Now I make a similar monthly trip, only it is a 5,600 mile round trip, and I stay for two to three days. So moving to Charleston has actually meant I spend more time, not less, in Silicon Valley. And I was in California this week when Apple Computer announced a reorganization I find to be especially significant, and which suggests dramatic changes at Apple that have yet to come.
The news, broken Wednesday by the New York Times, was that Apple was creating a separate iPod division because the little music players are such a huge success. Conventional business school wisdom also says that starting a separate division is a way of isolating startup costs, making them more obvious to Wall Street and thus minimizing negative impacts because of course, even Apple has to spend money to make money. Or, like 3Com did with Palm Computing (and even Apple once did with Claris before changing its mind), you can structure a division to spin-off or have a separate IPO. This all makes sense on the surface, but then I recalled something I was told more than 20 years ago by a much younger Steve Jobs. Back then Apple had three divisions – Apple II, Lisa, and Macintosh. Why have separate divisions? “Because it’s easier to shut one down,” said Steve.
News source: I, Cringely
Back in January, I moved from the California Wine Country to Charleston, South Carolina, trading my 47 acres of ticks and foxtails for a 152 year-old Victorian House with vintage termites. The wonder of the move is that after five months, hardly anyone has noticed. Charleston is precisely nowhere in the geography of high tech, but it really doesn’t matter because I’m more or less virtual. When I moved the 100 miles from Silicon Valley to Santa Rosa in 1999, only my area code changed. This time, thanks to VoIP, not even that happened: It was easier to make my old numbers ring in Charleston than to tell my 3,309 friends a new number. Back in 1999, I worried that not being IN Silicon Valley would hurt my work, but it didn’t. I averaged one day-trip down per month. Now I make a similar monthly trip, only it is a 5,600 mile round trip, and I stay for two to three days. So moving to Charleston has actually meant I spend more time, not less, in Silicon Valley. And I was in California this week when Apple Computer announced a reorganization I find to be especially significant, and which suggests dramatic changes at Apple that have yet to come.
The news, broken Wednesday by the New York Times, was that Apple was creating a separate iPod division because the little music players are such a huge success. Conventional business school wisdom also says that starting a separate division is a way of isolating startup costs, making them more obvious to Wall Street and thus minimizing negative impacts because of course, even Apple has to spend money to make money. Or, like 3Com did with Palm Computing (and even Apple once did with Claris before changing its mind), you can structure a division to spin-off or have a separate IPO. This all makes sense on the surface, but then I recalled something I was told more than 20 years ago by a much younger Steve Jobs. Back then Apple had three divisions – Apple II, Lisa, and Macintosh. Why have separate divisions? “Because it’s easier to shut one down,” said Steve.
News source: I, Cringely
By caching in real-time at shutdown all of Windows active drivers and boot-up files into a temporary image partition, Instant-On™ allows computers to reboot from a successfully pre-boot "snapshot" in the very same manner that a PDA or a PocketPC device wake-up from an Off state. Equally, a reset option allows for a full "standard" system boot-up, often obligatory when new applications or hardware are recently installed or modified, requiring a first time registration of drivers and mandatory system files. Finally, a complete Hardware shutdown, similar to what a hard reset is on a PDA device, allows for a complete hardware memory resident digital imprints, in cases like a BIOS update or major hardware change occurs. Instant-On™ technology blends ultra-high performance memory, disk components and code. These elements are tuned together for ultimate performance in the long-due overhauling of booting, re-booting and shutdown operations in personal computers.
If they did switch, it would be to the Cell processor.
Now, as long as Apple keeps its keen eyes on genius money-tree, it will survive. If Bill Gates had took Tony Fadell in, today might be a different story. Now you stupid Cringely, how is that for an analysis?
Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!
Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.