main

Security flaws could corrupt open source databases

WishX   on 21 May 2004 - 12:23 · 12 comments & 839 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Is this part of the trend of security attacks on Linux?

Flaws in two popular source code database applications could allow attackers to access and corrupt open-source software projects, according to a security researcher.

One vulnerability affects the Concurrent Versions System (CVS), an application used by many developers to store program code. The other flaw affects a newer, less widely used system known as Subversion, said Stefan Esser, the researcher who discovered the security holes.

The CVS software, in particular, is run by many large open-source projects to create servers that maintain the versions of a program under development. Groups developing the Gnome and KDE Linux desktops, the Apache web server and large Linux distributions, are among those that use servers with the source code databases.

These groups were notified of the security issues earlier in May and have already installed patches, said Esser, who is the chief security and technology officer at e-Matters, a German software company.

View: Complete Article
News source: Silicon.com


FROM: Varies (forged addresses taken from infected system).
SUBJECT: Re: (original subject)
BODY: Varies.
ATTACHMENT: The worm may be attached with one of the following file extensions:
  • EXE
  • SCR
  • PIF
  • CMD
  • BAT
When replying to unread Outlook or Outlook Express messages, the worm may be attached with a variety of filenames. Examples:
  • the hardcore game-.pif
  • Sex in Office.rm.scr
  • Deutsch BloodPatch!.exe

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 12 additional comments
(3 replies) #1 slapnuts_ox on 21 May 2004 - 12:26
this is the beauty of open source software....anyone can review the code so when a security hole is found they are patched within 24hours and the patch is distributed.
#1.1 markjensen on 21 May 2004 - 12:54
These kinds of quick responses can occur in the closed-source world, too.

Generally, any serious security flaw is addressed speedily (once identified). It is getting the users to patch that is the real challenge!
#1.2 kingius on 21 May 2004 - 13:47
QUOTE
this is the beauty of open source software....anyone can review the code so when a security hole is found they are patched within 24hours and the patch is distributed.


...except nobody knows when the variant of linux youre using will see its version of the same patch...
#1.3 Andareed on 21 May 2004 - 14:49
If you are running something inter-centric like apache, php, perl, etc..., you are probably best to build from sources. This way you'll be able to build the most up-to-date version.
(1 reply) #2 darksoul on 21 May 2004 - 12:55
<sarcasm>i bet the people finding the flaws are being funded my microsoft</sarcasm>
#2.1 Andareed on 21 May 2004 - 14:50
Finding security flaws is a GOOD thing. It means software is that much more secure (after patching).
#3 Andareed on 21 May 2004 - 14:50
Ignore
(2 replies) #4 miguelcanada on 21 May 2004 - 19:14
microsoft releases patches fast! when was the last time you sat around waiting a week for a patch... and oh yes.. CVS is patched.. what about all the spin off versions you have now... like CVSNT? lol... *you guys make me laugh* (open source people)
#4.1 Trajik 2600 on 21 May 2004 - 19:26
#4.2 markjensen on 21 May 2004 - 19:26
First off, you really need to look at what is going on:
http://www.eeye.com/html/Research/Upcoming/

You will see the vunderabilities that are being tracked, and how long they have been open.

Maybe you should spend some of that laughing energy directed elsewhere...
(1 reply) #5 miguelcanada on 21 May 2004 - 20:30
ur making me laugh even more, everyone has some bugs, its the high risk ones that are important.... these bugs are so small... do you even know what that bug is lol.. or who it affects... lol

QUOTE
A vulnerability in default installations of the affected software that allows malicious code to be executed, contingent upon certain user interaction.


do you even realize that this company is just trying to sell there software.... lol... this vulnerability is that the user is not prompted "correctly" according to them in ie when they are asked to download software... lol OH NO MAYBE FIREFOX HAS THIS HGE SECURITY HOLE!!!!

any of the big risks in the last year have had a fix months, at least weeks before any virus's even came out to exploit them.
#5.1 markjensen on 21 May 2004 - 21:59
So those problems aren't real?

And this
QUOTE
Description:
A locally-exploitable vulnerability that allows unprivileged code to subvert all operating system or third-party security measures, providing the attacker with privileges greater than SYSTEM.

falls under your "these bugs are so small" category? This is the most serious local exploit possible!

Now I see that you are just a troll, putting out worthless comments without any basis on fact.

Goodbye.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)