Microsoft actually does learn from its mistakes, and the Netscape mistake was a huge learning experience. Microsoft learned that it really doesn't do subtle well, and that virtually any memo can, and likely will, be leaked to the press. As a result, while the company will attack Linux and open source directly from time to time, it actually can't -- and really has never been able to -- make the subtle moves that are being attributed to it.
I was chatting with a journalist a couple of days ago to help with background on a story on Microsoft designed to debunk one of the most common misconceptions surrounding the company. I started to realize there were a lot of them -- some I actually held myself -- that either were no longer true or never had been.
This came to a head the other day when an Apple advocate wrote to me that he would rather give his money to Apple than to Bill Gates. I spent some time pointing out that Steve Jobs is on the overpaid CEO list and Bill isn't. I also pointed out that, as an engineer, he would likely better identify with Bill, who lives and breathes technology, than with Steve, whose strength is more in creative marketing, particularly after his recent executive changes that clearly favored the iPod over the Mac. This got me to thinking that maybe it is time to look at some of these misperceptions, both recent and long-term, and put them back in perspective.
News source: TechNewsWorld
I was chatting with a journalist a couple of days ago to help with background on a story on Microsoft designed to debunk one of the most common misconceptions surrounding the company. I started to realize there were a lot of them -- some I actually held myself -- that either were no longer true or never had been.
This came to a head the other day when an Apple advocate wrote to me that he would rather give his money to Apple than to Bill Gates. I spent some time pointing out that Steve Jobs is on the overpaid CEO list and Bill isn't. I also pointed out that, as an engineer, he would likely better identify with Bill, who lives and breathes technology, than with Steve, whose strength is more in creative marketing, particularly after his recent executive changes that clearly favored the iPod over the Mac. This got me to thinking that maybe it is time to look at some of these misperceptions, both recent and long-term, and put them back in perspective.
News source: TechNewsWorld
The Benefits
-As a Related Community, your site or service will receive contextually relevant placement (a link and description) on the No. 1 corporate site and fourth largest Web site on the planet (according to Jupiter Media Metrics, 2003).
-You will have the opportunity to engage with a Microsoft Community Lead. A community lead is your personal, direct contact with Microsoft who can help you find answers to difficult questions, learn about upcoming events, and gain more insight into the product life cycle.
-You have the opportunity to include the Microsoft® Related Community logo on your community site or service.
-Your community site has the potential to be promoted to a Featured Community, receiving elevated exposure across Microsoft Web sites with your community site logo, link, and description. This is a great way to bring new traffic to your community site or service.
To Qualify
This program is open to contextually relevant community Web sites that meet all of the following base-level participation guidelines*:
-Predominantly devoted to peer-to-peer community features. Example: Newsgroups, discussion boards, chats, blogs, etc.
-Supports Microsoft products and/or services and technologies
Provides a visible reciprocal link back to the contextually relevant Microsoft community site home page
* If at any time your site does not meet all of these requirements, it may be pulled from the program. Microsoft will not include links to sites with inappropriate language, nudity/sexual content, violence, gambling/drugs/alcohol, etc.
Most of us MS bashers speak out of extensive experience with their products. I've worked in technical support and now I'm in inhouse software development and analysis.
Most Microsoft bashers are underage, semi-literate morons that spend their time spouting pointless anti-Microsoft slogans that they've picked up from other stupid trolls on the Internet. They bash Microsoft because it's fashionable, not out of any knowledge or experience with Microsoft's products, policies, or procedures.
I don't have the least problem with someone criticizing Microsoft for something that it has actually done. But drivel like "M$ are evil" or "Micro$haft sucks"—which comprises most of anti-Microsoft commentary posted here and elsewhere—doesn't qualify as "criticism".
Frankly, considering the overwhelming ignorance and stupidity of most Microsoft "bashers", I'd be embarrased to identify myself with them—no matter how many valid complaints I had against the company.
oh wait... I did the same...
Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!
Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.