Alienware + Stardock Partnership
Posted by malebolgia on 11 June 2004 - 23:21 · 92 comments & 7440 views
- Advertisement
-
-
(6 replies)
#2 Posted by cal2002 on 11 Jun 2004 - 23:30
- What? Alienware, the high preformance PC maker right? 75% of the people who buy those machines what nothing running and taking up RAM, no?
-
#2.1 Posted by Mav Phoenix on 11 Jun 2004 - 23:46
- Wtf are you talking about?
-
#2.3 Posted by qoa on 12 Jun 2004 - 01:48
- It's not the year 1999. Running windows blinds is the same as running stylexp and a visual style in terms of ram/cpu load.
-
#2.4 Posted by Mav Phoenix on 12 Jun 2004 - 02:23
- Actually less, depending on the skin.
-
#2.6 Posted by Mav Phoenix on 12 Jun 2004 - 20:37
- ^2 shay!
-
(2 replies)
#3 Posted by CaKeY on 11 Jun 2004 - 23:41
- Yeah. I get the feeling the first thing most Alienware owners will do is uninstall windowblinds.
-
#3.1 Posted by divertom15 on 12 Jun 2004 - 21:52
- actually first thing i would do is reformat the hard drive to get rid of bundled crapware
-
(1 reply)
#4 Posted by threetonesun on 11 Jun 2004 - 23:47
- My guess is they did it so their own theme would appear. Makes sense, it would look stupid to own a Alienware and run the Windows classic theme on it.
-
#5 Posted by Liquid on 11 Jun 2004 - 23:48
- I always wondered if alienware would do this and now they are. COOL!
-
(1 reply)
#6 Posted by bangbang023 on 11 Jun 2004 - 23:51
- It's a pretty cool partnetship, if you think about it. Alienware has always been redesigning what a PC case should look like and Stardock has always focused on changing what the desktop looks like.
-
(2 replies)
#7 Posted by Adnan248999 on 12 Jun 2004 - 00:10
- Sounds fantastic and its also a big step forward for stardock marketing
long live alienware and stardock though i can't afford an alx
-
#7.1 Posted by bangbang023 on 12 Jun 2004 - 00:24
- cmon now, you don't need BOTH kidneys
-
(1 reply)
#8 Posted by mko on 12 Jun 2004 - 00:43
- A match made in heaven?
On on the basis that they are both overpriced considering you can DIY for much cheaper.i.e. build your own PC and download uxtheme.dll
I can just imagine the first time you turn on your computer "REGISTER WINDOWBLINDS TODAY! ONLY $20"
Also notice how they are using Stardock just to promote their own Alienware theme? Besides choosing WinXP default theme(which is already free) anything else might incur a cost. Sounds like a modified version of Windowblinds which probably will be half-registered i.e. if you use Alienware theme it won't nag you to register, but if you want to choose another theme you need to register anyway.
I just hope this doesn't add to the cost of an already expensive Alienware PC. I mean surely someone will rip this for registered Windowblinds Full users to use, possible even a conversion to visual style. -
#8.1 Posted by qoa on 12 Jun 2004 - 01:47
- My video card came with the version of windows blinds that will be on there more than likely. It's a crippled version that will only an Nvidia theme, complete with logos on the title bars and an evga theme, with logos everywhere. In this case it'll be the same thing with an ugly alienware theme.
-
(8 replies)
#9 Posted by Pas on 12 Jun 2004 - 00:59
- mko, you are nothing but a blabbering fool. if you don't want an alienware machine or the use of windowblinds, then don't buy the machine or the app. just because you don't want either doesn't mean you have to coem in here and degrade the two and the announcement of their collaberation. obviously, alienware thinks highly of stardock and the theme manager or this collaberation wouldn't happen. go troll elsewhere, dude.
-
#9.1 Posted by moeburn on 12 Jun 2004 - 01:28
- God forbid a discussion forum have anything to do with discussion
If you can't take the heat of someone disliking someone, I suggest you leave the internet. Now. -
#9.2 Posted by Mav Phoenix on 12 Jun 2004 - 01:50
- Pas is right, I guess you don't know what a troll is. Discussing is one thing but bashing is another. It's a matter of class.
-
#9.3 Posted by obake on 12 Jun 2004 - 02:00
- What the hell is wrong with you, Pas? mko was simply stating his opinion, and I, for one, agree 100% with him. I'm going to reiterate what moeburn said: if you can't take the heat of someone disliking someone, I suggest you leave the internet. Now.
-
#9.4 Posted by Pas on 12 Jun 2004 - 03:15
- no, mko was not expressing an opinion. he was trolling in every sense of the word. the only comments the dude makes concerning a skin or skin app is to bash stardock, it's apps, or anything to do with the company. if he wants to discuss the collaberation of alienware and stardock, discuss it and bring forth some value. bashing the companies involved is not discussing or expressing one's opinion. leave the internet, huh? that's a good one.
Last edited by 13583 on 12 Jun 2004 - 03:29 -
#9.5 Posted by mko on 12 Jun 2004 - 03:19
- ok ok I can admit perhaps when I said
QUOTE On on the basis that they are both overpriced considering you can DIY for much cheaper.i.e. build your own PC and download uxtheme.dll
Is a trolling quote. However as for the rest of what I've said I don't see any 'bashing'. I'm simply predicting what is going to happen. And I don't retract the above statement either, its simply 2 companies which are overpriced and which both are very much 'superficial' - Alienware being the more as I suppose Windowblinds IS a theming program however people still shop based very much on looks and not performance.
The internet is filled with trolls, much worse than you may ever see on Neowin. I suggest you grow and realize the internet isn't like a kids playground - your opinion isn't always the 'good' opinion and sometimes people are wrong. -
#9.7 Posted by frogworm on 12 Jun 2004 - 07:03
- no, what Pas wants is a Politically-Correct post on the internet that shows some positive feedback besides some possible negative ones. Sounds a lot like my speech teacher last semester. The internet does not have to have anal-retentive people who bark at a poster who just gives negative comments, it is possible they could not think of any positive ones. Let us have our opinions and not bash or censor us by calling someone a troll cause they just give a list of things they don't like. That does not nessisarily equal a troll...
P.S. some programs Stardock makes are half-decent and some products Alienware aren't exactly overpriced if you compare them with other companies so whoopty-do. Buy what you want, it is called the power of the wallet.
Last edited by 10128 on 12 Jun 2004 - 07:28
-
(2 replies)
#10 Posted by moeburn on 12 Jun 2004 - 01:27
- I hate it when people spend $2000 of their ignorant parent's money to go out and buy an Alienware pc, and then play counter-strike on it at 640x480.
-
#10.1 Posted by Adnan248999 on 12 Jun 2004 - 01:39
QUOTE (#10.0) I hate it when people spend $2000 of their ignorant parent's money to go out and buy an Alienware pc, and then play counter-strike on it at 640x480.
lol very true-
#10.2 Posted by divertom15 on 12 Jun 2004 - 21:57
- or the people who play quake 3 on it with the a** textures @ 640x480 so they can get a 500fps framerate for braging rites.
-
(5 replies)
#11 Posted by phiberoptik on 12 Jun 2004 - 01:30
- Nice.
I can now get my Alienware PC all hooked out with the spinners on it, so that I can finally run Object Desktop with all the options on high and not have to worry about using over 500mb of ram. hmmm... noooooooooo...
-
#11.1 Posted by Mav Phoenix on 12 Jun 2004 - 01:51
- Yeah, because we all know it takes that much RAM now.
-
#11.2 Posted by Ivand on 12 Jun 2004 - 02:43
- All Stardock's apps use A LOT LESS ram than the previous versions, and those words come from a uxtheme.dll user....
-
#11.3 Posted by demorgoron on 12 Jun 2004 - 03:59
- my wb skin is taking up 500k of ram only,intead of the 6 or 12mb of the
-
#11.4 Posted by CheeseCow on 12 Jun 2004 - 09:07
QUOTE (#11.2) All Stardock's apps use A LOT LESS ram than the previous versions, and those words come from a uxtheme.dll user.
There is no point in talking about a previous version, unless you name it; right?
I am pretty sure it uses a lot more RAM than the 1.3 version I first bought, since it only skinned fewer controls. And RAM usage surely isn't the problem with any of these applications - and finally they don't use much memory just to be "loaded", it is first when you start up applications it will need memory to paint the controls. I did tests with this over at DA a long time ago, and it is the size of the individual processes (viewable in task manager) that increases with WindowBlinds and the uxtheme.dll hack.
By how much depends on the theme used, and when I did the test, which is starting to be a couple of years ago, stylexp used considerably less, even when compared with one of the minemalistic skins that came with WindowBlinds.
But I am sure you do know what you are talking about right, you wouldn't mislead people out of ignorance?
-
(1 reply)
#12 Posted by norky on 12 Jun 2004 - 02:14
- cool. now stardock can move all their tech support to guatemala too.
-
(4 replies)
#13 Posted by bangbang023 on 12 Jun 2004 - 02:23
- There just has to be a bridge somewhere around here because damn there are a lot of trolls
-
#13.1 Posted by werejag on 12 Jun 2004 - 09:11
- just becuase you dont like the comments doesnt mean its trolling. dont read its your right
-
#13.3 Posted by Pas on 12 Jun 2004 - 20:11
- would somebody, anybody, please post a link to a thread or news article concerning an msstyle skin or anouncement concerning tgtsoft or any of it's affiliates where a stardock user has trolled? i'd really like to see if the trolling goes both ways. i want to see a post where a stardock user says 'this skin would be better if it was a wb skin' or a news article concerning tgtsoft apps where a stardock user flames the app. i've never seen any of either, to be honest. it may have happened, i just have yet to see it.
-
(3 replies)
#14 Posted by AthleticTrainer1981 on 12 Jun 2004 - 03:09
- It still amazes me how immature some people are in this community. IF YOU DON"T LIKE IT, THEN DON'T USE IT OR BUY IT.
But damn people lay off the trolling
-
#14.1 Posted by werejag on 12 Jun 2004 - 09:09
- just becuase you dont like the comments doesnt mean its trolling.
-
#14.2 Posted by CheeseCow on 12 Jun 2004 - 09:11
- a) There really isn't much trolling going on here
b) Neowin has admins to clear out the goo
So please stop flashing your badge, we are allowed to don't like the partnership if we so please.
I would much rather install the junk I want by hand than getting it pre-installed, but then again I would rather build my system from scratch too. So it makes the Alienware systems less interesting for me, but I am sure there are others who doesn't see it that way.
-
(3 replies)
#15 Posted by mko on 12 Jun 2004 - 03:21
- And if you don't like my opinion... don't listen?
-
#15.1 Posted by AthleticTrainer1981 on 12 Jun 2004 - 03:26
- It's not your opinion that people find annoying....it's the way you present your opinion.
-
#15.2 Posted by werejag on 12 Jun 2004 - 09:10
- he can express it anyway he wants. get over it and dont read it
-
#15.3 Posted by Mav Phoenix on 12 Jun 2004 - 20:40
- ^He doesn't have to.
-
(1 reply)
#16 Posted by imtoomuch on 12 Jun 2004 - 03:29
- "Additional new themes will be made available for Alienware fans as either free downloads or for a small fee, depending on the theme."
Does this mean that the Alienware format will not be normal .wbas or does this just talking about the premium themes available for WB?
Also, is it the full version of WB installed or is it the shareware version? -
#16.1 Posted by greenreaper on 12 Jun 2004 - 16:25
- It means that they will be special WBAs that will work the Alienware version of WindowBlinds. And it means either Alienware will pay for them or the customer will. If they want to use all WB skins, they can pay for WB. If not, they get the program for significantly less and only pay for the skins they want.
-
#17 Posted by |CiN|FuL on 12 Jun 2004 - 04:13
- What if someone tries to port the theme to a visual style? Some user is bound to not want WB and might want to do that...?
-
#18 Posted by Lain on 12 Jun 2004 - 05:55
- that's cool that they are doing this....but i can't afford one of their pc's but it's cool none the less!
-
#19 Posted by [a fire chronicle] on 12 Jun 2004 - 06:50
- thank god i didnt but my alienware yet. i can now.
-
(3 replies)
#20 Posted by WishX on 12 Jun 2004 - 06:53
- Have I been living in another world? Since when has anyone "paid a small fee" for themes? Maybe I'm just spoiled by the Completed Visual Styles thread here at Neowin.
-
#20.1 Posted by Sawyer12 on 12 Jun 2004 - 16:19
- Wasnt there an instance of some bloke selling themes on EBay that he stole from here ?
-
#20.3 Posted by ghos on 13 Jun 2004 - 22:30
- I guess you don't feel good artists deserve some compensation for their hard work. Although I haven't seen anyone offering premium msstyles anyway. Windowblinds has them, and mostly by single artists or well known companies like The Skin Factory. I haven't personally paid for any styles myself, but I see the value in it. I suppose there aren't any msstyles that charge a small fee, because that format is more limited than Windowblinds.
-
(1 reply)
#21 Posted by Varsity on 12 Jun 2004 - 07:00
- They should team up with a uxtheme patcher instead.
-
#21.1 Posted by Mav Phoenix on 12 Jun 2004 - 20:40
- I'm sure MS would love that.
-
#22 Posted by jedimasterk on 12 Jun 2004 - 07:04
- No comment!. UNIX/Linux user!.
-
#23 Posted by aaron901 on 12 Jun 2004 - 07:16
- pretty cool if you ask me.

-
#24 Posted by WitCh-Fire on 12 Jun 2004 - 07:54
- Pretty cool to see a Hardware company make in-roads with a software company. Business-wise....thats a pretty nice step. Regardless of what people think, creating partnerships is a good stride for just about any company to take.
-
(2 replies)
#25 Posted by Alien Venom on 12 Jun 2004 - 09:02
- This is indeed a step in the wrong direction for Alienware, being partnered up with a company whose responsible for BLOATware.
I mean seriously, ObjectDesktop -- you can get the same functionality with freeware tools and ones that use way less resources.
It doesn't make sense to me, for a company who specializes in releasing massive, OEM machines who are stategically built to maximize FPS in games; I can't see how ObjectDesktop and other software by Stardock would help. -
#25.1 Posted by Mav Phoenix on 12 Jun 2004 - 20:41
- No, you are wrong.
-
#25.2 Posted by Danrarbc641 on 12 Jun 2004 - 21:40
QUOTE I mean seriously, ObjectDesktop -- you can get the same functionality with freeware tools and ones that use way less resources.
Less resources? Prove it!
-
(3 replies)
#26 Posted by icexswipe on 12 Jun 2004 - 10:42
- uhhh alien venom, windows blinds uses same resources as visual styles
and i dont know what u mean by 'bloatware', there are many minimal skins and many visual styles are ported to wb, and also theres skin studio, with which u can port them urself easily.
most people on this board are afraid to try windows blinds coz they are afraid it might be better and not as bad as they thought, u can ask this to the people who have actually switched over. just try it, no harm.
obviously the users will be able to choose if they want to use the alienware skin or not, but im sure they would use it, if they had the knowledge that windows blinds uses the same resources as windows visual styles. -
#26.1 Posted by elliot on 12 Jun 2004 - 13:51
- I can't speak for other people but i've tried it twice now, and each time i've uninstalled it within the hour
-
#26.2 Posted by Alien Venom on 12 Jun 2004 - 20:16
- Same here. Every time I've tried it, there was always a window or two (like the display properties window) that had no visual style applied.
The program cheats visual styles. I'm not at all saying that it uses more resources than Microsoft's engine. I use classic anyway. -
#26.3 Posted by greenreaper on 12 Jun 2004 - 23:07
- Skinning display properties is an option. Stardock knows that some people want to feel safe in being able to go back, so they leave it unskinned so that people don't think, "Oh, if it crashes all my windows, Display Properties will crash too and I'll be doomed, doomed!" - and yes, some people are like that. Maybe you think those people shouldn't be skinning their computer, but they're still people who have money so Stardock has to cater to them.

You can enable it from the bottom of the Basic Options screen in the WB config program (Display Properties/Appearance/WindowBlinds/Basic Options)
-
#27 Posted by AthleticTrainer1981 on 12 Jun 2004 - 13:31
- I posted a similar comment over in a firefox thread, but I think it applies here also:
I have been doing a lot of thinking on this matter. And I may have figured out why we have so many msstyles/windowblind fans here.
It is because it is something different, something that we chose to use. Since there is little choice in choosing the OS (and I by no means dislike the alternatives), we want a choice in how the OS looks and feels
Just my thoughts. It's not whats faster/better/easier to use/more stable....it's what appeals to us. So for some it's windows classic, others it's Luna, and for some it's a complete alternative.
-
#28 Posted by stncttr908 on 12 Jun 2004 - 14:05
- Eh, good for them. Still shouldn't really give anyone a reason to buy an Alienware.
-
#29 Posted by V_F on 12 Jun 2004 - 14:53
- Great to hear this for Stardock, Alienware and The SkinsFactory, I do hope its a big success for them which I'm sure it will be.
-
#30 Posted by nanackle on 12 Jun 2004 - 15:27
- bloat bloat bloat
-
(3 replies)
#31 Posted by Frogboy on 12 Jun 2004 - 16:24
- The whole bloat thing is just bizarre.
So Windows XP with Luna isn't bloated. But change the visual style to somethign else and it magically becomes bloated?
In the bigger scheme of things, there's nothing bloated about visual styles and skinning. Heck, my last Dell came out of the box with so much crap being loaded into my system tray that if it didn't hide most of them my system tray would be bigger than my taskbar! -
#31.1 Posted by Dark Warhawk on 12 Jun 2004 - 20:14
- Lol, point taken, although it’s not that bad with dell, but valid point. The thing is this though that this version of WB will be crappy use one skin otherwise you will have to buy it. Seems sucky to me after paying over 2 k for a pc and the type of people that would buy one would be hardcore gamers and I can a sure you they will not want this and will just uninstall it anyways just like I uninstalled most of dell’s crap. Gamers don’t want anything taking up ram that don’t need to be regardless how little it may be. And trust me when you play a game like Far Cry you need every bit of ram you have.
-
#31.2 Posted by Alien Venom on 12 Jun 2004 - 20:19
- $2k? That's it? I guess you haven't seen PCI Express machines. Anyway if I am going to pay $4000+ on a computer , and it's from an OEM company, like Alienware, I sure as hell better get a crap load of software (in addition to the bloated crap that comes from Stardock) for free too.
-
#32 Posted by gawdflesh on 12 Jun 2004 - 20:43
- Ok...could someone tell me where exactly the idea that Alienware will be including a crippled or shareware version of WindowBlinds, as some of you seem to be inferring? Because I sure as hell can't find anything in the above two paragraphs that would lead me to believe that. Yeah, it says "Additional new themes will be made available for Alienware fans as either free downloads or for a small fee, depending on the theme.", but that doesn't mean that you can't add themes you download on your own. I get that they mean Alienware-created themes from Alienware might cost something. However, I'm not saying that I believe either way, because honestly I don't care, since I'm (#1.) not big into theming, and (#2.) I'll never own an Alienware. I just find it really crazy that people read something a certain way, come up with their own details out of the blue, then freak out about it. Wait until more details about this deal come out, then bitch to your hearts content if you want. But at least get your panties in a wad over something factual that has been confirmed.
And the whole concept of bloat is retarded. We're talking about systems in excess of $4k in some cases, with outlandish, garish-looking cases and system stats pushed to the limits. I don't see the problem with a little skinning app taking up 10-20 megs of memory out of the probably 1.5-2 gigs they'd have available.
-
(2 replies)
#33 Posted by jack_canada on 13 Jun 2004 - 00:22
- they need a cool skin to match a cool computer!!!!!
-
#33.2 Posted by Danrarbc641 on 13 Jun 2004 - 02:48
QUOTE Give me performance over looks anyday
Luckily Windowblinds offers both, especially with the video cards Alienware includes (hardware acceleration in WB)
-
#34 Posted by TasT on 13 Jun 2004 - 03:06
- Jeeezh folks, I have used WB since Ver 1.3 and yea 1.3 was kinda buggy.
Now with version 4.3B running I have experienced no proformance degration or any other problems. However just like with msstyles a bloated theme could slow things dowm a tad. 99 percent of the time I use skins that I have developed myself and have had no problems. and by the way did anyone notice that Stardock is now a Microsoft Gold Certified Partner. I know MS is the devil and all but why would they certify a software maker that "slows down their OS?"
As far as the Alien ware thing goes I think it pretty cool and definatly good for both parties.
-
#35 Posted by Valkyre on 13 Jun 2004 - 08:52
- And this is why I build my own computers. No bundled crap.

To be fair, I purchased WindowBlinds and I like it, but I always want third party stuff to be OPTIONAL.
-
(1 reply)
#36 Posted by sorlag on 13 Jun 2004 - 12:41
- Stardock should fix that bug that blacks out scrollbars when resizing windows...

Uninstalled it, cause it has blackout bugs and it crashes min once a day...
-
#36.1 Posted by ghos on 13 Jun 2004 - 22:36
- Perhaps you used a badly written skin. I have used WB since version 2.xx and have never seen the scrollbars blackout like you describe. Nor since using WB on XP have I ever had it crash on me due to WB. I suspect you have some other program that doesn't play nice with WB. Often times there may even be an option in WB that will help it work better for you, but people don't seem interested in finding an answer, they just drop the program.
-
#37 Posted by smoke on 13 Jun 2004 - 20:33
- I think it's cool that they are doing this. But whenever someone even mentions stardock in a news post there usually is a ton of comments mostly arguments. I think it's ridiculous... it's as if there is a group of people who have a vendetta against stardock. I myself use what fits my requirements best and that means a mix of freeware and stardock stuff. I use litestep (barebones) with desktopX, objectbar and mobydock as my desktop, and then windowblinds to skin my windows. This whole thing about stardocks products being bloat though is not true. As I should know because I run all that on a comptuer MUCH less powerfull than an alienware. With as much money as you spend on Alienware computers and how they tout them as the most high perormance systems you would think that you could run any customisation program even if it's bloated and not get a performance hit. I'm sure with an alienware you can afforrd under 2mb of usage for a WB skin and pretty much 0 cpu utilisation.
malebolgia
Submit to reddit
Submit to blinklist
Bookmark on del.icio.us
Add to furl
Share on Facebook
Add to Windows Live
Under the terms of the partnership, Alienware will pre-install Theme Manager from Stardock on all their new systems. Theme Manager allows users to change the Window’s visual style, icons, wallpapers, in short the entire appearance of the Windows desktop with just one click. Alienware users will be able to choose from a special Alienware theme, a second theme that celebrates Alienware’s new line of ALX computers and of course the default Windows XP theme. Additional new themes will be made available for Alienware fans as either free downloads or for a small fee, depending on the theme. Users will also be able to buy additional Stardock customization products.
Hello All,
We are currently looking to recruit trialists, for a trial of a new Internet Browser Toolbar. The trial is scheduled to begin around the end of June and will run until everyone has completed their script.
There are however a couple of requirements you need to be aware of:
*We only require trialists who have Windows 2000 or XP (if you have
anything different please advise)
*We are only looking for 100 trialists mixed across all tiers, so
recruitment will be done on first come basis.
I hope you would like to participate in the trial, and if so, please reply to this mail to advise.
thanks
NTL