main

Microsoft on Track to Offer Anti-Virus Software

malebolgia   on 15 June 2004 - 20:56 · 40 comments & 2333 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Late Monday Microsoft announced that it’s still on track to deliver its own anti-virus software. Mike Nash (Microsoft's chief of security business unit) said that this anti-virus software will ship separately from Windows. This comes as good news for those who were worried that Microsoft would abuse its monopoly, and include it into Windows. Still Microsoft has a lot of ground to gain in order to catch up to its competitors who have already established themselves as the top guns in the anti-virus market.

Microsoft Corp. is still on track to offer an anti-virus product that will compete against similar software offered by Symantec Corp. and Network Associates Inc., the world's largest software maker said late on Monday. Mike Nash, chief of Microsoft's security business unit, told reporters that Microsoft is developing software to protect personal computers running Windows against malicious software, the worms and viruses that have plagued users with data loss, shutdowns and disruptions in Web traffic in recent years.

"We're still planning to offer our own AV (anti-virus) product," Nash said. Asked if that would hurt sales of competing products, such as Network Associates' McAfee and Symantec's Norton family of products, Nash said that Microsoft said that it would sell its anti-virus program as a separate product from Windows, rather than including it in Windows. Redmond, Washington-based acquired anti-virus technology from GeCAD Software Srl., a Romanian software company, last year to develop its own software.

News source: Reuters


Additional note; the store only accepts Mastercard, Visa, Solo and Switch. A strange move to ignore the ever popular electron card, a card mainly used by the music listening youth that Apple would be more than wise to tap into. The store also requires a credit card (or one of the above) to register an account for the service.

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 40 additional comments
(2 replies) #1 Yvo on 15 Jun 2004 - 21:01
How long will Microsoft stick with this. Microsoft is known for its software & hardware disasters. If Microsoft doesn't get even a little market or they feel a little heat they seem to pull out.

Examples:
Microsoft Tax Software they released in 2001
Microsoft Photodraw they released in 2000
Plenty of Multimedia software apps

Microsoft's Network Products
Microsoft's USB speakers from the late 90s
Microsoft's "Digital" Phone that would connect with your PC & Telephone line

See people will buy this, but if there aren't enough people, or Microsoft thinks there aren't enough people... they stop development. Which is a waste since Microsoft has plenty of $$$ to support its products.
#1.1 neufuse on 16 Jun 2004 - 02:51
i sure hope you heard of "Testing the market" in your life
#1.2 brianshapiro on 16 Jun 2004 - 03:29
Microsoft Sound System
Microsoft Printing System
Microsoft PhotoDraw
Microsoft Image Composer
Microsoft Entertainment Pack?

...
#2 Colonel_Angus on 15 Jun 2004 - 21:02
So, the less secure they make Windows, they more money they can make on their antivirus solution.

How is this not a conflict of interest?
(3 replies) #3 PseudoRandomDragon on 15 Jun 2004 - 21:03
QUOTE
Nash said that Microsoft said that it would sell its anti-virus program as a separate product from Windows, rather than including it in Windows.


Translation:

"We aren't going to use or OS monopoly to get rid of the competitors this time, but rest assured we will be invading and profiting from a new market"
#3.1 moeburn on 15 Jun 2004 - 21:13
hahahahahaha
#3.2 McGazza on 15 Jun 2004 - 21:40
Lmao!! Man you couldnt be soo right LoL I would not be surprised if symantec end up suing microsoft lol
#3.3 DOGglee on 16 Jun 2004 - 04:28
yeah microsoft rulez!
(3 replies) #4 Midnight Mick on 15 Jun 2004 - 21:36
I wonder how many security patches MS will have to issue out for their AntiVirus program?!
#4.1 spidoinkel on 15 Jun 2004 - 23:33
probably no more than norton does which is fairly regukarly. troll.
#4.2 werejag on 16 Jun 2004 - 00:04
nice one, just becuase you dont like what he said now he is a troll.

#4.3 gren99 on 16 Jun 2004 - 01:36
the truth hurts, doesn't it?
(4 replies) #5 Mav Phoenix on 15 Jun 2004 - 21:51
Oh the trolls!
#5.1 divertom15 on 15 Jun 2004 - 22:05
yep its a shame
#5.2 werejag on 16 Jun 2004 - 00:05
the opinions contray to microsoft are not troll. why dont you prove them wrong.
#5.3 Mav Phoenix on 16 Jun 2004 - 01:18
Prove what wrong?

This is a good move for MS and a way to secure people.
#5.4 GNU-L0cke on 17 Jun 2004 - 06:59
You know, and along with everybody else that Microsoft is only selling this anti virus software because norton, mcafee, etc would all file a class action anti trust suit if it came bundled or was free for users of windows.
#6 Jason on 15 Jun 2004 - 22:31
I will use this as it will integrate better than any third party AV software.
(5 replies) #7 Mav Phoenix on 15 Jun 2004 - 22:45
They are just trying to protect the cheap skate who wouldn't pay for AV to begin with.
#7.1 werejag on 16 Jun 2004 - 00:06
right keep telling yourself that. its nothing of the sort
#7.2 MorganX on 16 Jun 2004 - 00:30
Actually I think he may have a point. It's in Microsoft's long-term best interest to secure as many Windows installations as possible. MS can't give the AV away in Windows or they will be seen as anti-competitive. If they sell and basic low-ball product they may reach those that are "too cheap" or just can't afford commercial antivirus software. All Windows installations need AV. If they can't bundle it to make sure everyone gets it, sell it separately; the AV for the rest of you.
#7.3 PseudoRandomDragon on 16 Jun 2004 - 00:42
News flash:

AVG antivirus is free.
#7.4 bangbang023 on 16 Jun 2004 - 01:14
I use AVG but even I know the it's spotty at best. There are many tests it fails.
#7.5 Mav Phoenix on 16 Jun 2004 - 01:19
QUOTE (#7.1)
right keep telling yourself that. its nothing of the sort

Then explain it if you have all the answers.
#8 McGazza on 15 Jun 2004 - 23:03
Yes thats true max, infact they have done it with the firewall lol
(2 replies) #9 Notsnarc on 15 Jun 2004 - 23:20
ok, now basically if your connected to a network or the web you need anti virus software, so shouldn't it be built into OS's?

It should be an option when you install windows, and you should be able to totally remove it easily (unlike ie), but having to pay for it seperatly is stupid, and basically shows that microsoft doesn't care about stopping virus from spreading they just want to make a quick buck
#9.1 STV on 15 Jun 2004 - 23:50
i think that when it comes to the OEM versions, they should just leave it the way it is (no microsoft AV bundled). but i think that if you do buy a copy of windows XP, you should at least get the AV bundled with windows.

STV
#9.2 PseudoRandomDragon on 16 Jun 2004 - 00:43
If they bundle AV with windows, hello lawsuit.
(2 replies) #10 bangbang023 on 16 Jun 2004 - 01:16
With the anti-MS bandwagon whore, it's a catch-22 for MS. They, for once, don't include something in their OS that would eliminate all competition and people bitch that it's not included and will have to be paid for. If they did include it, these same people would complain that they are abusing their market share.

I, for one, am interested to see how this turns out. Who knows how to best integrate with Windows better than the owner of the source code? After the terrible 2004 offerings from Symantec and McAfee, I am wide open to new options.
#10.1 gren99 on 16 Jun 2004 - 01:40
i suspect MS AV is more of a sweetheart deal for folks doing largescale rollouts of a MS family of products -- it will allow them to consolidate their bulksoftware purchases somewhat and it allows MS the luxury of pushing a AV solution into medium and large IT shops who REALLY need to isolate themselves from the next big 'net worm.

i think you'll see a lot of 'if you buy 200+ licenses of XP, we'll give you AV for $5 extra per license' or some stuff like that.
#10.2 PseudoRandomDragon on 16 Jun 2004 - 20:25
It is good that MS didn't include AV with Windows, but we all know why.
#11 VikingStorm on 16 Jun 2004 - 02:18
If MS keeps RAV as it is (the entire GeCAD company functioning without messing it up), they will have a pretty viable product.
#12 midway40 on 16 Jun 2004 - 04:59
No thanks, I will stick with Trend Micro IS.
(2 replies) #13 DWZ on 16 Jun 2004 - 06:35
QUOTE
Mike Nash (Microsoft's chief of security business unit) said that this anti-virus software will ship separately from Windows. This comes as good news for those who were worried that Microsoft would abuse its monopoly, and include it into Windows.
It would be a hell of a lot better if it were shipped with Windows. Finally idiot users would not open their email and think "wow! a cute screensaver from a person I've never heard of before! I must open it!" then of course unknowingly causing a DDOS attack on all the sites we enjoy, not to mention sending out a few million spam emails on the side.

To hell with Symantec and the others, let them go broke, I don't care, it would finally protect idiot users, and more importantly, the Internet at large.
#13.1 deadmonkey on 16 Jun 2004 - 07:49
I suspect they will sell a bundled version so you just install it and it is there also.

I think it is a great idea as Microsoft will be able to put pressure on AV companies to really innovate, the virus writers are but the av companies are not. Look at the different between NAV 2003 and 2004! It was awful, and I used to do work for Symantec. When I saw that I just thought "to hell with it" and looked around for an alternative. I settled with AVG7 Pro as it was the overall best (IMO).
#13.2 GNU-L0cke on 17 Jun 2004 - 07:02
Idiot users shouldn't have a computer in the first place.

Good if these viruses bomb microsoft sites.
#14 b0m8er on 16 Jun 2004 - 09:19
I would most certainly use it. Microsoft rules!
#15 StepASide on 17 Jun 2004 - 01:02
-Where are the Goblins?
#16 Renfrew-guy on 17 Jun 2004 - 08:25
Shipping with Windows would put Microsoft back in front of the DOJ. I'm sure if MS could ship this for free with Windows it would. However, I'm sure that their legal representation would advise against this. It is finally close to ending all major outstanding litigation against it. Opening the door for more will only make customer perception worse - something Microsoft is desparately trying to turn around.

It will be interesting to see just how comprehensive the AV suite released by MS is in comparison to the competition in the market place. If it is a good offering and received well in the IT press it may well indeed gain good market share. I could see Microsoft including this as an optional cost as part of its enterprise licensing agreement program. Customers don't want to go to multiple vendors to obtain technologies that will make the Windows installed base secure .......
#17 GwaRGuITaR on 17 Jun 2004 - 16:58
i'd buy it!
i'd also buy a full featured firewall from them to which did crc32 checksum checks and outbound traffic.

yep!

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)