main

New Linux Security Hole Found

malebolgia   on 15 June 2004 - 17:26 · 23 comments & 1482 views

Advertisement (Why?)
A new security hole has been found in Linux. All it takes is a C program and shell access (to upload and run the program). Not only did this young program find the bug, but he has also released patches to fix this bug for kernels 2.4 & 2.6.

A Linux bug was recently uncovered by a young Norwegian programmer that, when exploited by a simple C program, could crash most Linux 2.4 or 2.6 distributions running on an x86 architecture. "Using this exploit to crash Linux systems requires the (ab)user to have shell access or other means of uploading and running the program—like cgi-bin and FTP access," reports the discoverer, Øyvind Sæther.

"The program works on any normal user account, and root access is not required," Sæther reported. "This exploit has been reported used to take down several 'lame free-shell providers' servers. [Running code you know will damage a system intentionally and hacking in general] is illegal in most parts of the world and strongly discouraged." Along with the code needed to use the exploit, Sæther also posted several patches to 2.4 and 2.6 kernels that will keep the exploit from crashing systems.

News source: eWeek


Additional note; the store only accepts Mastercard, Visa, Solo and Switch. A strange move to ignore the ever popular electron card, a card mainly used by the music listening youth that Apple would be more than wise to tap into. The store also requires a credit card (or one of the above) to register an account for the service.

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 23 additional comments
#1 mleonc on 15 Jun 2004 - 17:43
And we are still wating for the IE hole's fixes. Good for the penguin!!!
(2 replies) #2 Huezo on 15 Jun 2004 - 17:56
It requires shell access, so I guess it's not THAT bad.

It's neat that he released the patch along with the exploit.
#2.1 OptiPlex on 15 Jun 2004 - 20:34
QUOTE
root access is not required
#2.2 eris on 16 Jun 2004 - 00:16
lol @ optiplex
#3 raid517 on 15 Jun 2004 - 18:04
Yeah those crazy Linux hackers... they spend all their time looking for security holes - and then they when they find them they fix them.. What's the deal with that?!?!

GJ
(1 reply) #4 noll3095 on 15 Jun 2004 - 18:31
Wait, a young program found the bug? Nice AI it has there!
#4.1 HellBender on 15 Jun 2004 - 19:17
rofl, thinking the same thing
(4 replies) #5 eris on 15 Jun 2004 - 18:36
Before the bashing starts you might want to read this.
#5.1 Milliamp on 15 Jun 2004 - 18:54
It still requires local physical access to the box and enough privileges to begin with to install a hex editor, debugger, and other tools needed to perform the attack. Linux and windows are screwed if you have local access to the box, all you have to do is boot up to a CD rom that can write to the file system, and null out or edit the administrative or root password.

The posted exploit is different, becase it only required an account on the computer and not physical access to it. As is the case with about 90% of all web hosting packages.

As for the patch being released with the exploit, releasing a patch or workaround for the exploit is standard reporting procedure industy wide. Fixing the vulns is the easy part, finding them is by far the more difficult of the two.
#5.2 eris on 15 Jun 2004 - 20:12
Maybe the trolls are sleeping. Lets be quiet so they dont come out of their holes.
#5.3 OptiPlex on 15 Jun 2004 - 20:35
[QUOTE]Maybe the trolls are sleeping. Lets be quiet so they dont come out of their holes. [/QUOTE]

OMFGGG LINUXSSS IS TEH 5H17!!@#!#!#! MS WINDOW RULZZE!@#!

That's right I am back.
#5.4 eris on 15 Jun 2004 - 21:10
OptiPlex is such a species i was reffereing too. What fine example he is.
(1 reply) #6 markjensen on 15 Jun 2004 - 18:56
No one is bashing. I think that everyone can see that it is a matter of a local user making a C program that forces an exception to loop and crash the system. No escalation of privelege or remote exploit (unless you have a user that normally is allowed to shell into a bo.

For the most part, Neowinners are a reasonable group.
#6.1 c242 on 15 Jun 2004 - 20:11
<!--NeoquoteBegin--><center><table width=90% border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=1><tr><td><font class=darkfont>QUOTE (#1.0)</font></td></tr><tr><td><table width=100% bgcolor=white border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=3 style="border: 1px solid #B4BDC7"><tr><td>For the most part, Neowinners are a reasonable group.
</td></tr></table></td></tr></table></center><!--NeoquoteEnd-->
Haha, good one.
#7 mr_da3m0n on 15 Jun 2004 - 20:32
Bleh. I hope a few updated kernel sources pop in the gentoo portage tree.
I tried it and it did crash my Gentoo-Dev-Sources-2.6.5-r1 based kernel.
(1 reply) #8 supersaiyanjericho on 15 Jun 2004 - 23:47
well well what do we have here? a bug in Linux? that's not right! I thought (according the Linux users) that ONLY Windows has bugs. Is there a typo on the title? I think someone should check in on that...

sorry just had to troll once here
#8.1 tapo on 16 Jun 2004 - 00:14
Nah, you see, Linux has bugs, Windows has a LOT of them.
(3 replies) #9 Shining Arcanine on 16 Jun 2004 - 01:13
I wonder if this will ever be patched on the majority of Linux servers. And people complain about Windows...
#9.1 Huezo on 16 Jun 2004 - 06:06
QUOTE (#9.0)
I wonder if this will ever be patched on the majority of Linux servers. And people complain about Windows...

Yes. I complain about Windows. Why? Because if I pay for the Operating System I expect it to work. If I use a free one I use it at my own risk. That's why. If Windows fails and I paid for it I have the right to complain.

(Not trying to bash or anything)
#9.2 Shining Arcanine on 17 Jun 2004 - 00:32
And Microsoft has the right to make mistakes.
#9.3 GNU-L0cke on 17 Jun 2004 - 06:50
#1.2 - Doesn't mean they should. If they don't want to be known for gyping people.

#1.1 - I agree. If you pay for something you expect to get a working product. If it's something you get for free you are already taking a risk and if it has problems theres always the "oh well, at least i didn't pay huge licensing fees for it".
(1 reply) #10 StepASide on 17 Jun 2004 - 00:57
-Even Linux has BUGS!

lool
#10.1 GNU-L0cke on 17 Jun 2004 - 06:52
Everything has bugs

Big deal

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)