Posted by Michael Stanclift on 16 June 2004 - 06:34 · 4 comments & 809 views
More than a year after its debut, AMD is gearing up for some core shifts to its 64-bit processor families.

The Sunnyvale, Calif.-based semiconductor maker said it has completed the design of its first dual-core 64-bit, x86 compatible chip, which it expects to debut in servers in mid-2005. A dual-core desktop version for high-end client PCs is also in the works and due out in the second half of 2005, the company said in a statement Monday.

The development is one in a string of advancements that AMD is touting this month to its server and desktop processors in an attempt to tighten up the gap in market share against rival Intel.

As for its roadmap, AMD said it will continue to enhance its AMD64 processors this year with a transition to 90-nanometer (nm) process and low-power technology. AMD said it is also working with IBM to build chips based on 65-nm processes in mid-2005. Those smaller processors are due out in products in 2006.

News source: InternetNews


Affected Software:

  • Microsoft Windows NT® Workstation 4.0 Service Pack 6a
  • Microsoft Windows NT Server 4.0 Service Pack 6a
  • Microsoft Windows NT Server 4.0 Terminal Server Edition Service Pack 6
  • Microsoft Windows 2000 Service Pack 2, 3, and 4
  • Microsoft Windows XP and Microsoft Windows XP Service Pack 1
  • Microsoft Windows XP 64-Bit Edition Service Pack 1
  • Microsoft Windows XP 64-Bit Edition Version 2003
  • Microsoft Windows Server™ 2003
  • Microsoft Windows Server 2003 64-Bit Edition
  • Microsoft NetMeeting
  • Microsoft Windows 98, Microsoft Windows 98 Second Edition (SE), and Microsoft Windows Millennium Edition (ME)


  • There are 4 additional comments
    Advertisement
    Quote this comment Reply to this comment #1 Posted by divertom15 on 16 Jun 2004 - 07:05
    dual core "denmark" seems to be the one im going to get
    Quote this comment Reply to this comment #2 Posted by oik on 16 Jun 2004 - 15:08
    i wonder who will make it to market first: ibm/apple or amd?

    Last edited by 51938 on 16 Jun 2004 - 15:28
    Quote this comment Reply to this comment #3 Posted by paulhaskew on 16 Jun 2004 - 21:07
    um, I thought it was ibm/amd... and ibm/apple... playing best of both worlds...
    Quote this comment Reply to this comment #4 Posted by sentio on 16 Jun 2004 - 22:52
    I'm very pleased with the results of AMD labs as of late. I only upgrade cpu/motherboard every 1 1/2 yrs, with 3mnth upgrades in between, but so far, I've never looked back. Each Amd purchase I've made has satisfied my every need, with the outdated pcs reliably folding in a farm.
    [1]

    Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

    Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.


    Scroll to the Top
    ....
    My Preferences
    ....
    Communicating with server
    Loading
    Please Wait...
    ....
    Loading
     X 
    ....