main

Intel's New Lineup

malebolgia   on 18 June 2004 - 15:27 · 21 comments & 884 views

Advertisement (Why?)
This weekend, Intel is expected to have one of their most important product launches to date. Intel will be launching six new desktop processors, and the 915/925 chipsets (Grantsdale and & Alderwood). The office debut will be on Monday June 21st. The two new chipsets (915 and 925) will both support DDR2 memory, with a total of three different chipset models being offered. The 915G will come with Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 900, the 915P is designed to work with 3rd party graphics cards (Nvidia & ATI), and finally the 925X will support PCI Express.

Intel will also be launching five new 775-pin Pentium 4 chips, which will be using Intel's new naming system. The five new chips are: 2.8GHz Pentium 4 (520), 3GHz Pentium 4 (530), 3.2GHz Pentium 4 (540), 3.4GHz Pentium 4 (550), and 3.6GHz Pentium 4 (560). It's also expected that Intel will show off another version of its Pentium 4 Extreme Edition clocked at 3.4GHz using a 775-pin seat. Though no clock speeds have been announced yet, Intel will also be launching new Celeron models. However, don't expect them to be available for a couple of days after the main products have been released (Pentium 4 and new chipsets).

Lately Intel hasn’t been winning too many battles. Ever since AMD released its Athlon 64 FX 51 Intel has been down and playing catch-up. Sure, they’ve launched the Pentium Extreme Edition, which although has been extremely competitive has come at a steep price. Designed to act as a good chip for competing with AMD’s recent chip releases, limited supply has acted as a bottle-neck for these plans. As time passes by, its probable that Intel will drop the Pentium Extreme Edition from its product line; with this new lineup of goodies Intel is hoping to get back on top. The introduction of new processors and new chipsets (Grantsdale and & Alderwood) might be a good indicator for things looking up for Intel. Do these new releases mean a return to the chip wars? We hope so! A good bit of competition between these two chip monoliths will only mean better prices and better chips for people in the long-run.

View: More info @ Reuters



Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 21 additional comments
#1 sadatkarim on 18 Jun 2004 - 15:49
Price vs Performance...waiting for that thing to be up...
(3 replies) #2 Radium on 18 Jun 2004 - 15:55
So only i925X will have PCI Express?

From what I have read... and understand.
i915P will be much like the i925X, except for some new performance technologies.

Other i915 chipsets, such as, G, GV and GL will lack some new features. Such as PCI Express x16, DDR2... and other things. The G will have integrated graphics and GL will have 533MHz FSB for future celerons.

I suppose.

Last edited by 52221 on 18 Jun 2004 - 16:12
#2.1 vetmalebolgia on 18 Jun 2004 - 16:07
QUOTE (#1.0)
So only i925X will have PCI Express?

I believe that 915 and 925x will both support PCI Express.
#2.2 xStainDx on 18 Jun 2004 - 17:22
i925X will be PCI Express Exclusive with DDR2 only.. and i915P Will be mixed PCI/ PCI-e and may come with DDR or DDR2.

Alderwood is Canterwoods Successor, it's going to be the new "Premium Chipset".
#2.3 Radium on 18 Jun 2004 - 17:47
Ah, so i925X will clean out all the old "trash"?
#3 absolutemaxpayne.co.uk on 18 Jun 2004 - 16:40
When are these babies coming to the UK?
(1 reply) #4 rocks1985 on 18 Jun 2004 - 17:07
QUOTE
Plus each chipset will have an integrated wireless access point


does this mean desktop will be able to connect to the internet wirelessly now? OR, does it mean that when you buy a desktop computer with this chip and plug ethernet into it, wireless internet will stream out of this computer?
#4.1 xStainDx on 18 Jun 2004 - 17:23
The Wireless Integration has been scraped until Q4 04:

http://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=179656

Last edited by 335 on 18 Jun 2004 - 17:59
(1 reply) #5 Gary_Player on 18 Jun 2004 - 17:21
So really only a 200mhz clock increase eh? tisk tisk
#5.1 gawdflesh on 18 Jun 2004 - 17:37
Haven't you people learned by now that more factors into overall performance than merely clock speeds?
#6 xStainDx on 18 Jun 2004 - 17:22
YAY!!!!
#7 rogerroger on 18 Jun 2004 - 17:47
QUOTE
Ever since AMD released its Athlon 64 FX 51 Intel has been down and playing catch-up.


AMD to Intel...... bend over and grab your ankles!
#8 xStainDx on 18 Jun 2004 - 17:59
(3 replies) #9 LLivingLarge on 18 Jun 2004 - 18:54
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator = Crap
#9.1 Jerry J. on 18 Jun 2004 - 21:06
Well its better than Intel Extreme Graphics 2.
#9.2 Radium on 18 Jun 2004 - 22:02
Nobody told you to buy the i915G.

Some people don't need anything faster.

Do you need a X880 XT for working with Microsoft Office and Oracle?
#9.3 tiwaris on 19 Jun 2004 - 04:27
Fully agree!!
#10 OptiPlex on 18 Jun 2004 - 19:49
omg i am wetting my pants
#11 SimplyPotatoes on 18 Jun 2004 - 22:09
competition good
#12 Octol on 18 Jun 2004 - 22:48
Hmm...haven't heard anything about the Prescott power and heat problems vis-à-vis these new processors. I wonder what the scoop is on that? I don't hear anyone complaining.
#13 jmarcinko on 19 Jun 2004 - 06:33
Article on Anandtech.com Intel 925X/915: Chipset Performance & DDR2

It was hard to resist being glib and titling this article, "Much Ado about Very Little". That feeling of disappointment comes from seeing so much new technology introduced all at once, and then finding out the real performance benefit is extremely small - if it exists at all.

http://www.anandtech.com/chipsets/showdoc.html?i=2088

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)