main

Utah judge freezes anti-spyware law

Toxicfume   on 23 June 2004 - 08:14 · 20 comments & 701 views

Advertisement (Why?)
A Utah judge has granted an injunction to adware maker WhenU.com to temporarily halt the state's new anti-spyware law from going into effect.

New York-based WhenU, whose software is the subject of several lawsuits, filed a lawsuit in April to challenge the nation's first anti-spyware statute, called the Spyware Control Act, on the grounds that it is unconstitutional. The suit, filed in the 3rd Judicial District Court in Salt Lake County, Utah, was filed shortly before the law was set to go into effect in May.

"This is an important decision for the entire online advertising industry," said Avi Naider, CEO of WhenU. "Spyware is a problem and we want to put an end to it. WhenU supports anti-spyware legislation at the federal level, but Utah's act unfortunately impairs legitimate online advertising as well."

Representatives for the state were not immediately available for comment.

Utah is the first state to pass a law regulating spyware and other advertising software. "Spyware" and "adware" are rarely clearly defined, but the terms typically refer to software that tracks computer users' actions online or uses a computer's resources to pop up advertisements or other messages.

View: Complete Article
News source: CNet


We've now had this story twice :)

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 20 additional comments
(1 reply) #1 tiagosilva29 on 23 Jun 2004 - 08:27
wtf?

Kill spammers!
#1.1 chacho on 23 Jun 2004 - 16:28
that is totally offtopic. spammers != spyware
#2 eaglebtc on 23 Jun 2004 - 08:35
I've said it before, and I'll say it again:

Kill all the lawyers!

No, seriously, just kill the slimy defense lawyers.
#3 aStRaLgOd on 23 Jun 2004 - 10:28
This world is sooooooooooooo screwed!!!
#4 HoochieMamma on 23 Jun 2004 - 10:42
Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
(2 replies) #5 LLivingLarge on 23 Jun 2004 - 10:55
Utah is so warped...

Anti-broadband and pro-spyware.
#5.1 chacho on 23 Jun 2004 - 16:29
QUOTE
Utah judge freezes anti-spyware law

how is it pro-spyware?? just because a judge temporarily postponed the effects of the law?
#5.2 Dr.Jones on 23 Jun 2004 - 22:56
Yes
(1 reply) #6 Porthos SG1 on 23 Jun 2004 - 11:13
unconstitutional my arse!!!
#6.1 chacho on 23 Jun 2004 - 16:30
care to elaborate?
#7 JohnSK on 23 Jun 2004 - 11:29
I love spyware - it keeps my PC clock synchronized, while surfing it gives me websites with similar content, popup windows inform me of great offers.. it's just soooooo lovely - NOT

Die spyware!
(2 replies) #8 YaddaMe on 23 Jun 2004 - 11:41
I hate spyware & adware just as (if not more) than everyone else... but to those of you complaining... have you read the bill? are you 100% sure it's written accurately to do what it is supposed to do, while at the same time, not impeding on legitimate usage?

Each of the following have asked the governor to veto the bill. That's one impressive list. While I haven't read the bill & dont know the details, the list below seems to imply something isn't right with the bill.

AOL, Amazon, the Association for Competitive Technology, AT&T, the American Electronics Association, the Business Software Alliance, c|net, the Computer & Communication Industry Association, eBay, Google, the Information Technology Association of America, the Internet Commerce Coalition, Intraware, MCI, Microsoft, NetCoalition, Novell, Orbitz, the Software & Information Industry Association, Verizon, and Yahoo

They list their reasons & make a pretty good case. Teir letter can be read here. Hats off to Utah for at least trying to do something about the problem... but if you are going to do it, best make sure you do it right.

Last edited by 10547 on 23 Jun 2004 - 11:47
#8.1 JohnSK on 23 Jun 2004 - 11:47
QUOTE (#8.0)
Each of the following have asked the governor to veto the bill. That's one impressive list. While I haven't read the bill & dont know the details, the list below seems to imply something isn't right with the bill.

AOL, Amazon, the Association for Competitive Technology, AT&T, the American Electronics Association, the Business Software Alliance, c|net, the Computer & Communication Industry Association, eBay, Google, the Information Technology Association of America, the Internet Commerce Coalition, Intraware, MCI, Microsoft, NetCoalition, Novell, Orbitz, the Software & Information Industry Association, Verizon, and Yahoo

I see a list of money hungry corporations and companies - that's why the bill isn't fit for them.. or am I wrong?
#8.2 YaddaMe on 23 Jun 2004 - 11:57
QUOTE
that's why the bill isn't fit for them.. or am I wrong?


I think you are wrong. The bill, as written, would impede certain network communication, hamper security. and has a definition of spyware that could be interpreted to even classify MS's Windows Update as spyware.
(1 reply) #9 McGazza on 23 Jun 2004 - 12:39
I cant believe this dumb company WhenU managed to halt a bill, or the silly Utah judge, its obvious why he was bribed
#9.1 chacho on 23 Jun 2004 - 16:31
QUOTE
A Utah judge has granted an injunction to adware maker WhenU.com to temporarily halt the state's new anti-spyware law from going into effect.
#10 warwagon on 23 Jun 2004 - 12:59
They should be taken out back and shot, Personally I don't get any adware or spyware anymore for reasons i'm not saying, or i'll be called a troll, but I do clean alot of it off other peoples computers. The most being 1,200 some on a windows 98 machine from a Spybot search and destroy scan.
#11 Daffy_Duck on 23 Jun 2004 - 13:15
Guys, this is a well intentioned but poorly written bill. Don't shoot the messenger (WhenU.com).
#12 puredeath on 23 Jun 2004 - 16:19
Utah, figures. Another useless state. Just how many of Utah "farmers" have anything resembling a typewriter [I'm not even talking about a computer]? I don't think they've produced anything of value in a long time. The judge probably associates 'spyware' with James Bond gear. That old fart!
#13 saralk on 23 Jun 2004 - 17:47
you dont need laws to stop spyware, u just need awareness.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)