main

Microsoft open to open source

malebolgia   on 25 June 2004 - 15:28 · 39 comments & 704 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Microsoft is considering turning over some of its programs to open-source developers. So far Microsoft has only released two software development tools, but Microsoft isn't stopping there. The very process of making Microsoft products open source contradicts what Microsoft has been saying about the open-source community. No doubt Microsoft is feeling the pressure from Linux and developers, but don't expect to see the source code from Microsoft’s cash cows like Office or Windows.

Microsoft Corp. says it is looking to turn over more of its programs to open-source software developers, playing a greater role in a process that the Redmond company has criticized strongly at times in the past. Money-makers like the company's Windows operating system and Office productivity suite aren't on the table -- or anywhere near it. But the company has so far released two software-development tools to the open-source community, and it wants to continue the practice, a Microsoft platform manager told an industry group this week.

"There's more of that on the way," said Microsoft's Stephen Walli, who oversaw the process of releasing those tools under open-source licenses. "And it's not just about developer tools. There's other things that we can be looking at when you actually look at the breadth of source code that we have, the breadth of software that we have that isn't actually core (to Microsoft's) revenue stream." Walli's comments during a panel discussion by the WSA technology trade association Tuesday night underscored the dual nature of Microsoft's approach to open-source software, in which large and small groups of volunteers produce and improve upon computer programs, making the results of their work and the underlying software code available for use and modification by others.

News source: seattlepi.com


Robert Guillaume - Dr. Eli Vance
Robert Culp - Dr. Wallace Breen
Lou Gossett, Jr. - Vortigaunt
Michelle Forbes - Dr. Judith Mossman
Merle Dandridge - Alyx Vance
Mike Shapiro - Barney Calhoun
Mike Shapiro - G-Man
Harry S. Robins - Dr. Isaac Kleiner
Jim French - Father Grigori
John Patrick Lowrie - Citizens/Misc. characters
Mary Kae Irvin - Citizens/Misc. characters
Ellen McLane - Overwatch voice

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 39 additional comments
(1 reply) #1 Jugalator on 25 Jun 2004 - 15:34
No, this is bad because Microsoft is behind it!
It isn't *good* open source!

... at least that's the essence from comments I've herard by many OSS fans
#1.1 eris on 25 Jun 2004 - 15:53
iirc there are some licence problems.
And yes what they are doing is boring. Kinda like opening paint or wordpad. Opening the .doc file format would be interesting.
#2 vetMr magoo on 25 Jun 2004 - 15:51
Although slightly lacking in the article, there is a difference between Microsoft's shared source and open source
(20 replies) #3 oVerboosT on 25 Jun 2004 - 16:13
Why do people bash M.S. every time they do something, damn. Everything they do is wrong to people with just grow an "Anti-Microsoft" feeling or something.

They don't agree with Open Source > Bashing.
Then, MS Says ok here is some our or products source > Bashing.

Security Problems Because of there sloppy, quick jobs > Bashing.
Then, MS announces a delay on the release of SP2 to make sure of it > Bashing.

They Release Operating Systems in to short time and/or fillers (Think ME) > Bashing.
*I Can agree with the ME thing, but just follow for the point...

Then, MS Says ok we are working very hard on the next release, amazing, tonne's of new features, but the release will be estimated around 2006/2007. > Bashing.

Come on now, I don't see how MS can be making mistakes in your eyes. But, it is your opinion, and I respect that of you and others. I just wanted to state mine.
#3.1 eris on 25 Jun 2004 - 16:33
Then, MS Says ok we are working very hard on the next release, amazing, tonne's of new features, but the release will be estimated around 2006/2007. > Bashing.
Those are ms customers eagerly waiting for it.

Security Problems Because of there sloppy, quick jobs > Bashing.
Then, MS announces a delay on the release of SP2 to make sure of it > Bashing.

Those are ms customers because it is annoying and costly. And they paid for it so they have every right to do so.
Those are ms customers eagerly waiting for SP2.

Why do people bash M.S. every time they do something, damn. Everything they do is wrong to people with just grow an "Anti-Microsoft" feeling or something. Come on now, I don't see how MS can be making mistakes in your eyes. But, it is your opinion, and I respect that of you and others. I just wanted to state mine.
Sure i respect your opinion. However you might want to investigate in ms history and its business practices.
#3.2 Tom Servo on 25 Jun 2004 - 17:37
So tons of linux weasels on the Internet (on sites like here, OSNews or Slashdot) are MS customers? Sure.
#3.3 supersaiyanjericho on 25 Jun 2004 - 19:36
it's part of the Linux culture
#3.4 eris on 25 Jun 2004 - 19:52
You really seem to know what you are talking about.
#3.5 STV on 26 Jun 2004 - 07:53
QUOTE
Sure i respect your opinion. However you might want to investigate in ms history and its business practices.

business is one thing, software is another. he was using examples that were about software. i dont condone what "may" have happened a long time ago, but that was then, and this is now. i belive that most of it was just hear-say and then posted on some website that very few people know of. once people like you see that MS are trying, then MS will never have a chance to change is "undeserved" image.

STV
#3.6 eris on 26 Jun 2004 - 11:28
Then get the facts dude. Read a few books. And they have not changed the way they do stuff. And this stuff is not hear-say.
#3.7 STV on 26 Jun 2004 - 12:20
eris, you dont know that for sure. just because there is a bunch of stuff about microsoft flying around, it doesnt mean that it is true. unless they do something that is extremely disgusting and WRONG, then my positive view of MS will never change. I have read webpages, books, and articles that target MS in various ways. I have read enough to know that blame is always placed on microsoft becasue they are microsoft and that they have a lot of money and power.

i would rather give them the benifit of the doubt, than always be bitter towards them. do you feel better because you have this perception of microsoft? your perception and views are respectful and they are your own. my views and perceptions are my own. why do you feel the need to try and convert people to our way of thinking? you are looking at microsoft from a different angle than I am. just because you hate/dislike them doesnt mean that I have to adhere to what you say.

i have made up my mind after all that I have read, that I like microsoft and have respect for them and the software that they produce.

STV
#3.8 markjensen on 26 Jun 2004 - 14:14
STV,

Before you go around claiming that things that Microsoft did are just heresay written in blogs on the web, you might want to talk to some adults who have actually lived a few years through Microsoft's emergence.

I started on computers back in the days where CPM and DOS were the two major Operating Systems. Microsoft really did a lot of unscrupulous things. They helped bring about a common platform, which is nice. But they have, and continue to, lock everyone else out in their attempt to completely dominate any potential competition.

The desire to lead isn't the problem. It has been the unethical and illegal methods used.
#3.9 STV on 26 Jun 2004 - 15:49
QUOTE
But they have, and continue to, lock everyone else out in their attempt to completely dominate any potential competition.

and that is why linux and frefox have the share that they do have. i dont think that this is unethical or illegal, but that is open to interpretation and perception of the situations brought to light.

i think that the reason MS has what it has today, is because the people chose them, by buying their software. if you are looking for someone to blame, blame the shareholders.

microsoft has done nothing to hurt me, so i dont really have a reason to dislike them. im sorry that i like and respect them.

STV
#3.10 eris on 26 Jun 2004 - 18:06
STV just shut up and troll somewhere else.
RTFA
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft#Controversy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_criticisms_of_Microsoft

You have no idea what you are talking about STV. Stop making a fool out of yourself.
#3.11 markjensen on 26 Jun 2004 - 18:25
eris,

There is nothing wrong with STV sharing his opinions. Just as there is nothing wrong with you, or I, or anyone else sharing opinions.

The only problem is when people get hostile and flame, or when troll comments are made (like all the childish "DIE DIE DIE" comments that seem to be so common).

I don't have anything against Microsoft's products. It is their illegal monopolistic actions that I have issue with. STV may be too young to have personal knowledge of this, so his opinions are based more on Microsoft's current public actions. He may be correct, and Microsoft may have totally shed many, many years of subsersive activities. I doubt it. But, there again, that is just an opinion.
#3.12 eris on 26 Jun 2004 - 20:06
I definetly agree with your comments markjensen. However STV seems to be practicing active ignorance. He totally ignores what we say instead of thinking oh they might be right so i should do some research. But no he continuous saying ms is the best company in the world. (exaggerated) Kinda like someone who thinks environmental protection is a total waste of money but has never seen the actual damage done to nature because he lives in a city although his lungs are compareable to the ones of a person who smokes.
#3.13 markjensen on 26 Jun 2004 - 20:10
Oh, I agree. STV is a solid pro-Microsoft person. He said so, himelf. But, I also see Linux (and other OS) users with a similar attitude about their choice of Operating System.

Just as nothing anyone can say will shake the faith of a extreme Pro-Linux, or Pro-Mac supporter, nothing will shake the faith of an extreme Pro-Microsoft supporter.

The rest of us try to live in the middle somewhere, and let it go after it reaches an impasse.
#3.14 eris on 26 Jun 2004 - 20:35
100% ack

Anyone should be pro whatever he wants to however ignoring the facts is silly.
#3.15 STV on 27 Jun 2004 - 02:41
eris (3.10): i am sorry that you feel that way, but pushing your anger on me will solve nothing. and will only cause conflict.

markjensen (3.11): thanks for saying that everyone has an opinion (that is what i was trying to say as well). I am 18 and as such your analysis of me is somewhat correct. I dont have personal knowledge of this, but I have read stories about "the past". people can see an action from many different angles. many of these stories include commentaries and opinions of the situations that occured. there should be a place that objectively says what happened and allow ME to make my own opinion of the situation. it seems that many people have the same exact opinion about microsoft because they all read the same opinionated article or book.

eris (3.12): I dont think that I am practicing any type of ignorance. i may be naive, but i am not ignorant. I like and respect MS, but i dont think that they are the best company in the world.

markjensen (3.13): you are right, i am a "solid pro-Microsoft person". you are correct in what you say about the similar attitude, except for one thing. I am not trolling this board, I may be to one extreme, but an i really trolling? am i putting other opertating systems down? area91, is an example of a pro-microsoft troll, and i dont think that I am one (not even close). just because i like and try to defend microsoft doenst mean that i am a troll.

thanks for all of your comments,
STV

Last edited by 40230 on 27 Jun 2004 - 02:50
#3.16 eris on 27 Jun 2004 - 12:05
stv: making competitiors products crash or fake error messages on purpose is bad. Obviously you should do some research which you appear to not have done and you also might want to look up the defenition of ignorance. I think my environmental protection comparison fits this situation quite well.
#3.17 STV on 27 Jun 2004 - 13:52
QUOTE (#3.16)
stv: making competitiors products crash or fake error messages on purpose is bad. Obviously you should do some research which you appear to not have done and you also might want to look up the defenition of ignorance. I think my environmental protection comparison fits this situation quite well.

well, eris, that is your opinion and you are entitled to it, like i have said many times over. i just dont understand why it is so important that you get ME to dislike microsoft? if you look at something and expect it to be bad, then that is what you will find, because that is how you want to inerpret it. the same goes for me as well as everyone else on the planet.

i have not seen or heard of any cases where your claim "making competitiors products crash or fake error messages on purpose" is a PROVEN fact. the only thing that they may be responsible for is with holding knowledge of certain APIs.

i wish that you would stop forcing your own views on me. and again i ask, is it so important that you get ME to dislike microsoft?

my opinions of microsoft, are my own and as such, you dont have any weight in my view of microsoft or what they do.

i propose a stale-mate, because it seems obvious that i cant convince you that they are not bad, in very way that you cant convince me that they are bad.

have a nice day,
STV
#3.18 eris on 27 Jun 2004 - 15:51
I am not forcing you to do anything. If you think the world is flat and that is your opinion ou are entitled to it. Just dont expect people to take you seriously.
#3.19 STV on 28 Jun 2004 - 01:59
so let me get this straight. if someone doesnt believe what you believe, then they are wrong?

STV
#3.20 eris on 28 Jun 2004 - 13:18
Believing and facts are two seperate things. If you believe in god that is fine with me because we cant prove whether it exists or not. If you ignore facts you are wrong. But do whatever suits you best.
(1 reply) #4 Andareed on 25 Jun 2004 - 16:19
This makes perfect sense for MS. Let's say the have some "unmaintained" project They just throw it on sourceforge and let "the public" develop it for them. So they get better product for almost $0.
#4.1 BeeJay on 25 Jun 2004 - 18:31
The tools they have released so far are tools which their developers have built for their internal use. I think it is wonderful that those developers have convinced the bosses to allow them to share those tools - many of which would have not been available otherwise - with the world!

That said, I suspect the developers who convinced them to do this sold them on the idea that by doing this they will make more friends in the developer community. Who can blame them for wanting to build stronger relationships with the developers who spends thousands of dollars on their development tool, operating systems, business software, and MSDN (Developer Network) subscriptions every year?
(2 replies) #5 DJ Prem on 25 Jun 2004 - 17:00
I posted this yesterday in Backpage News for a moderator to bum it up in2 frontpage http://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=182236
#5.1 Mav Phoenix on 25 Jun 2004 - 18:43
It happens.
#5.2 noll3095 on 25 Jun 2004 - 20:04
Well better kill yourself then, no point in living.

I guess if you can't get the attention by having your name in the post you have to do it by complaining in the comments...

(Sorry, just a pet peeve)
(6 replies) #6 mentas on 25 Jun 2004 - 21:27
Open Source its an sh**!!!

Linux Fans are kidsssssssss!!!

No go to Open s**** Microsoft.... Kill Linux and Open Source!!!

Kill Kill Kill Kill Kill Kill Killlllllllllllllllllll Kiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiilllllllllllllllll!!!

Linux are died!
#6.1 Andareed on 25 Jun 2004 - 23:17
If you're going to bash something, you should at least:

1) Speak proper and understandable English.
2) Have a reason for your bashing.
3) Have an IQ > 50
4) Learn not to hold down keys for longer than 1/2 second.

Your grade: 0/4 - better luck next time
#6.2 SimplyPotatoes on 25 Jun 2004 - 23:53
andareed you make him seem like a "smarte guy"
#6.3 Soleen on 26 Jun 2004 - 02:28
I wonder how with his IQ he managed to register at Neowin to post this comment.
#6.4 STV on 26 Jun 2004 - 07:48
mentas' post is so stupid, that he is probably joking. i dont think you should get bent out of shape because he is either 1) kidding or 2) really doesnt understand anything. either way, the post is stupid and should not be taken seriously.

anyway, i think that this is a good thing. at least they are trying to be more open minded. remember, people usually attack something that they dont understand. they are probably learning a lot from OSS and the community, that they are willing to test the waters. i dont think that this can be considered a bad thing. unless you are too close minded to see that MS may actually be changing.

STV
#6.5 werejag on 26 Jun 2004 - 09:12
stv please tell what microsoft is trying to do? im curous.
#6.6 STV on 26 Jun 2004 - 12:08
my guess is as good as any. but if i had to guess, i would say that they are trying to connect with their customers and the community that has formed around their platform(s). this release, any future releases, as well as the other ones are a sign of what i stated in my previous post. I also think that they are trying to make good, but find it hard to because of share holders and all that other crap that public companies go through. not everything is simple, there are different ways to look at something, it just so happens that you are looking at microsoft from another angle.

just my $0.02.

STV
(1 reply) #7 mentas on 26 Jun 2004 - 17:00
I hate linux!


Die by MS hand

Kill Kill Kill Kill Kill
Kill Kill Kill Kill Kill
Kill Kill Kill Kill Kill
Kill Kill Kill Kill Kill
#7.1 supersaiyanjericho on 27 Jun 2004 - 00:50
dude...you're not funny anymore
#8 paxa on 27 Jun 2004 - 23:23
riiiiiiiiiiiiight microsoft an adept of open source!!!!! that day will only come when hell freezes

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)