Microsoft is considering turning over some of its programs to open-source developers. So far Microsoft has only released two software development tools, but Microsoft isn't stopping there. The very process of making Microsoft products open source contradicts what Microsoft has been saying about the open-source community. No doubt Microsoft is feeling the pressure from Linux and developers, but don't expect to see the source code from Microsoft’s cash cows like Office or Windows.
Microsoft Corp. says it is looking to turn over more of its programs to open-source software developers, playing a greater role in a process that the Redmond company has criticized strongly at times in the past. Money-makers like the company's Windows operating system and Office productivity suite aren't on the table -- or anywhere near it. But the company has so far released two software-development tools to the open-source community, and it wants to continue the practice, a Microsoft platform manager told an industry group this week.
"There's more of that on the way," said Microsoft's Stephen Walli, who oversaw the process of releasing those tools under open-source licenses. "And it's not just about developer tools. There's other things that we can be looking at when you actually look at the breadth of source code that we have, the breadth of software that we have that isn't actually core (to Microsoft's) revenue stream." Walli's comments during a panel discussion by the WSA technology trade association Tuesday night underscored the dual nature of Microsoft's approach to open-source software, in which large and small groups of volunteers produce and improve upon computer programs, making the results of their work and the underlying software code available for use and modification by others.
News source: seattlepi.com
Microsoft Corp. says it is looking to turn over more of its programs to open-source software developers, playing a greater role in a process that the Redmond company has criticized strongly at times in the past. Money-makers like the company's Windows operating system and Office productivity suite aren't on the table -- or anywhere near it. But the company has so far released two software-development tools to the open-source community, and it wants to continue the practice, a Microsoft platform manager told an industry group this week.
"There's more of that on the way," said Microsoft's Stephen Walli, who oversaw the process of releasing those tools under open-source licenses. "And it's not just about developer tools. There's other things that we can be looking at when you actually look at the breadth of source code that we have, the breadth of software that we have that isn't actually core (to Microsoft's) revenue stream." Walli's comments during a panel discussion by the WSA technology trade association Tuesday night underscored the dual nature of Microsoft's approach to open-source software, in which large and small groups of volunteers produce and improve upon computer programs, making the results of their work and the underlying software code available for use and modification by others.
Robert Guillaume - Dr. Eli Vance
Robert Culp - Dr. Wallace Breen
Lou Gossett, Jr. - Vortigaunt
Michelle Forbes - Dr. Judith Mossman
Merle Dandridge - Alyx Vance
Mike Shapiro - Barney Calhoun
Mike Shapiro - G-Man
Harry S. Robins - Dr. Isaac Kleiner
Jim French - Father Grigori
John Patrick Lowrie - Citizens/Misc. characters
Mary Kae Irvin - Citizens/Misc. characters
Ellen McLane - Overwatch voice

It isn't *good* open source!
... at least that's the essence from comments I've herard by many OSS fans
And yes what they are doing is boring. Kinda like opening paint or wordpad. Opening the .doc file format would be interesting.
They don't agree with Open Source > Bashing.
Then, MS Says ok here is some our or products source > Bashing.
Security Problems Because of there sloppy, quick jobs > Bashing.
Then, MS announces a delay on the release of SP2 to make sure of it > Bashing.
They Release Operating Systems in to short time and/or fillers (Think ME) > Bashing.
*I Can agree with the ME thing, but just follow for the point...
Then, MS Says ok we are working very hard on the next release, amazing, tonne's of new features, but the release will be estimated around 2006/2007. > Bashing.
Come on now, I don't see how MS can be making mistakes in your eyes. But, it is your opinion, and I respect that of you and others. I just wanted to state mine.
Those are ms customers eagerly waiting for it.
Security Problems Because of there sloppy, quick jobs > Bashing.
Then, MS announces a delay on the release of SP2 to make sure of it > Bashing.
Those are ms customers because it is annoying and costly. And they paid for it so they have every right to do so.
Those are ms customers eagerly waiting for SP2.
Why do people bash M.S. every time they do something, damn. Everything they do is wrong to people with just grow an "Anti-Microsoft" feeling or something. Come on now, I don't see how MS can be making mistakes in your eyes. But, it is your opinion, and I respect that of you and others. I just wanted to state mine.
Sure i respect your opinion. However you might want to investigate in ms history and its business practices.
business is one thing, software is another. he was using examples that were about software. i dont condone what "may" have happened a long time ago, but that was then, and this is now. i belive that most of it was just hear-say and then posted on some website that very few people know of. once people like you see that MS are trying, then MS will never have a chance to change is "undeserved" image.
STV
i would rather give them the benifit of the doubt, than always be bitter towards them. do you feel better because you have this perception of microsoft? your perception and views are respectful and they are your own. my views and perceptions are my own. why do you feel the need to try and convert people to our way of thinking? you are looking at microsoft from a different angle than I am. just because you hate/dislike them doesnt mean that I have to adhere to what you say.
i have made up my mind after all that I have read, that I like microsoft and have respect for them and the software that they produce.
STV
Before you go around claiming that things that Microsoft did are just heresay written in blogs on the web, you might want to talk to some adults who have actually lived a few years through Microsoft's emergence.
I started on computers back in the days where CPM and DOS were the two major Operating Systems. Microsoft really did a lot of unscrupulous things. They helped bring about a common platform, which is nice. But they have, and continue to, lock everyone else out in their attempt to completely dominate any potential competition.
The desire to lead isn't the problem. It has been the unethical and illegal methods used.
and that is why linux and frefox have the share that they do have. i dont think that this is unethical or illegal, but that is open to interpretation and perception of the situations brought to light.
i think that the reason MS has what it has today, is because the people chose them, by buying their software. if you are looking for someone to blame, blame the shareholders.
microsoft has done nothing to hurt me, so i dont really have a reason to dislike them. im sorry that i like and respect them.
STV
RTFA
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft#Controversy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_criticisms_of_Microsoft
You have no idea what you are talking about STV. Stop making a fool out of yourself.
There is nothing wrong with STV sharing his opinions. Just as there is nothing wrong with you, or I, or anyone else sharing opinions.
The only problem is when people get hostile and flame, or when troll comments are made (like all the childish "DIE DIE DIE" comments that seem to be so common).
I don't have anything against Microsoft's products. It is their illegal monopolistic actions that I have issue with. STV may be too young to have personal knowledge of this, so his opinions are based more on Microsoft's current public actions. He may be correct, and Microsoft may have totally shed many, many years of subsersive activities. I doubt it. But, there again, that is just an opinion.
Just as nothing anyone can say will shake the faith of a extreme Pro-Linux, or Pro-Mac supporter, nothing will shake the faith of an extreme Pro-Microsoft supporter.
The rest of us try to live in the middle somewhere, and let it go after it reaches an impasse.
Anyone should be pro whatever he wants to however ignoring the facts is silly.
markjensen (3.11): thanks for saying that everyone has an opinion (that is what i was trying to say as well). I am 18 and as such your analysis of me is somewhat correct. I dont have personal knowledge of this, but I have read stories about "the past". people can see an action from many different angles. many of these stories include commentaries and opinions of the situations that occured. there should be a place that objectively says what happened and allow ME to make my own opinion of the situation. it seems that many people have the same exact opinion about microsoft because they all read the same opinionated article or book.
eris (3.12): I dont think that I am practicing any type of ignorance. i may be naive, but i am not ignorant. I like and respect MS, but i dont think that they are the best company in the world.
markjensen (3.13): you are right, i am a "solid pro-Microsoft person". you are correct in what you say about the similar attitude, except for one thing. I am not trolling this board, I may be to one extreme, but an i really trolling? am i putting other opertating systems down? area91, is an example of a pro-microsoft troll, and i dont think that I am one (not even close). just because i like and try to defend microsoft doenst mean that i am a troll.
thanks for all of your comments,
STV
Last edited by 40230 on 27 Jun 2004 - 02:50
well, eris, that is your opinion and you are entitled to it, like i have said many times over. i just dont understand why it is so important that you get ME to dislike microsoft? if you look at something and expect it to be bad, then that is what you will find, because that is how you want to inerpret it. the same goes for me as well as everyone else on the planet.
i have not seen or heard of any cases where your claim "making competitiors products crash or fake error messages on purpose" is a PROVEN fact. the only thing that they may be responsible for is with holding knowledge of certain APIs.
i wish that you would stop forcing your own views on me. and again i ask, is it so important that you get ME to dislike microsoft?
my opinions of microsoft, are my own and as such, you dont have any weight in my view of microsoft or what they do.
i propose a stale-mate, because it seems obvious that i cant convince you that they are not bad, in very way that you cant convince me that they are bad.
have a nice day,
STV
STV
That said, I suspect the developers who convinced them to do this sold them on the idea that by doing this they will make more friends in the developer community. Who can blame them for wanting to build stronger relationships with the developers who spends thousands of dollars on their development tool, operating systems, business software, and MSDN (Developer Network) subscriptions every year?
I guess if you can't get the attention by having your name in the post you have to do it by complaining in the comments...
(Sorry, just a pet peeve)
Linux Fans are kidsssssssss!!!
No go to Open s**** Microsoft.... Kill Linux and Open Source!!!
Kill Kill Kill Kill Kill Kill Killlllllllllllllllllll Kiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiilllllllllllllllll!!!
Linux are died!
1) Speak proper and understandable English.
2) Have a reason for your bashing.
3) Have an IQ > 50
4) Learn not to hold down keys for longer than 1/2 second.
Your grade: 0/4 - better luck next time
anyway, i think that this is a good thing. at least they are trying to be more open minded. remember, people usually attack something that they dont understand. they are probably learning a lot from OSS and the community, that they are willing to test the waters. i dont think that this can be considered a bad thing. unless you are too close minded to see that MS may actually be changing.
STV
just my $0.02.
STV
Die by MS hand
Kill Kill Kill Kill Kill
Kill Kill Kill Kill Kill
Kill Kill Kill Kill Kill
Kill Kill Kill Kill Kill
Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!
Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.