main

Microsoft to allow changes to Windows CE source

malebolgia   on 28 June 2004 - 15:47 · 10 comments & 1037 views

Advertisement (Why?)
On Monday Microsoft announced plans to share more of its Windows CE source code with device makers. This comes as great news for device makers and developers who have so far had pretty restricted options. Microsoft is also allowing others to change its source code, and then compile it for commercial use. Hopefully this move will give Windows CE a much needed kick start.

Hoping to boost the use of its Windows CE software in devices, Microsoft Corp. plans to announce on Monday that it will share more of the operating system's source code and allow device makers to make changes to that code. The announcement marks the first time that Microsoft will allow others to make changes to the operating system source code, compile the code for use in commercial products and not have to share their changes with Microsoft or anybody else, said John Starkweather, a product manager at Microsoft in Redmond, Washington.

Windows CE was developed for devices including consumer electronics, wireless routers, industrial controllers, handheld computers, set-top boxes, VoIP (voice-over-Internet Protocol) phones and thin clients. It competes with proprietary operating systems as well as with versions of the open source Linux operating system designed for embedded use. "The option to ship derivatives of Windows CE will give device makers another opportunity to innovate, thus we will see a further expansion of the types of devices that are powered by Windows CE," Starkweather said.

News source: InfoWorld


Would have set the other to no show, but it has 2 comments and this has none.

Marking : DUPE!

tom

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 10 additional comments
#1 theLANDofSMEG on 28 Jun 2004 - 16:00
It's still a win for open-source because it shows that you must have your source code availible to stay competitive in a market where software needs to run on any number of platforms.
(5 replies) #2 theMaxx on 28 Jun 2004 - 16:06
Why would a device maker use Windows CE with all the license restrictions and fees when they can use Linux and do just as good?
I guess cell phones and PDA's follows what users have on their PC... Windows..
But for a router for exemple...
#2.1 Varsity on 28 Jun 2004 - 16:53
Well, the situation you described suggests to me that WinCE is better than Linux for portable devices.
#2.2 theMaxx on 28 Jun 2004 - 17:20
QUOTE
Well, the situation you described suggests to me that WinCE is better than Linux for portable devices.


It is better because of a "locked in" syndrome and not because of overall features/quality. There is example of devices where Windows CE was used and the result was not better then a device using Linux. Like the Microsoft wi-fi routers... built around Windows CE. Linksys routers are in my opinion by far better hardware. And in fact, since popular ones like the WRT54G use open-source Linux based architecture, there is now a growing community offering modified firmware adding features not built-in by default.
#2.3 Varsity on 28 Jun 2004 - 17:51
So why is it more popular?
#2.4 eris on 28 Jun 2004 - 22:28
Because they have implemented features which are only available for routers which cost a lot more. google is your friend
#2.5 neufuse on 29 Jun 2004 - 01:20
"Like the Microsoft wi-fi routers... built around Windows CE"... too bad they arnt build around CE, the firmware on them is not made based around windows or any other OS variation, it's just a proparitory hard coded firmware specific for that router, the hardware wasnt even made by MS, they just build a flash that would fit into the OEM hardware they picked up.
#3 McG on 28 Jun 2004 - 17:08
CE is just nicer
#4 icecaveman on 28 Jun 2004 - 20:41
OMG Linux for devices is primative and does not compare to WinCE, most hardcore Linux users like yourself have installed Linux on their PDAs and regret it because of it's limited features compared to WinCE.
#5 nicedreams on 29 Jun 2004 - 04:56
Wait a second...

They are releasing more source code to developers? It sounds like they are kind of going in an "open source" way.

I thought they where just bashing open source and saying it's a bad way to go. Now they see that opening it's source code will unravel ways for the future.

Without Linux, there would be no future :::

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)