main

Feds warn against Microsoft's browser

malebolgia   on 30 June 2004 - 21:18 · 134 comments & 10850 views

Advertisement (Why?)
In a surprise announcement today the U.S. Computer Emergency Readiness Team (CERT) issued a note saying that users shouldn't use Internet Explorer. Sounds to me like they got tired of all the security problems that IE has been popping up with.

Microsoft shares traded in the red Wednesday, but the software giant's stock appeared not to feel a significant negative impact from a government group's warning against using the Internet Explorer Web browser.

The U.S. Computer Emergency Readiness Team, known as CERT, issued a "vulnerability note" saying that computer users should not use the Internet Explorer browser because of security vulnerabilities that hackers can exploit to launch attacks on personal computers and corporate networks.

The security lapses can cause a Web site to make the browser think, in effect, that it is running a program that violates its security settings. The Web site can then be used to do anything from recording keystrokes, which make it easier to steal passwords and credit-card numbers, to installing pop-up-ad programs. CERT is suggesting that computer users take steps such as applying security updates to Outlook e-mail programs and maintaining antivirus software, and using alternative Web browsers.

News source: CBS MarketWatch


*Added for EU comparison; it appears its not just the UK getting ripped off.

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 134 additional comments
(10 replies) #1 stezo2k on 30 Jun 2004 - 21:20
don't blame them, i do the same myself, i don't really trust IE, maybe if it was a little more secure i'd go back to it
#1.1 stockwiz on 30 Jun 2004 - 21:24
I don't understand why Microsoft feels this need to dominate the browser market. Since Internet Explorer is free, they clearly make no money off of it. They need to make it a fully uninstallable componant of windows xp, instead of integrating it like they try to do with messanger, another tool they really don't make much money with. The majority of microsoft's revenue has, and will always, come from the sales of windows xp and office.

Although I believe the security concerns regarding internet explorer for users like us are minimal, they should never have left so many holes opened up for the average user... it's really just a matter of them setting the default security settings higher.

I'm on day three of using firefox myself, and I must say I'm impressed with the browser. I tried avant, didn't like it.. search was buggy, interface seemed too cluttered. Like the tabs, middle mouse feature, search bar for ebay, google, dictionary.com, etc .. extensions, ability to write an ad blocker right into the program itself.... overall impressed will probably stick with firefox.

All you IE fanbois that haven't at least tried it yet, you have nothing to lose. I use to be not a fanboi, but a defender of internet explorer, and while as a whole I don't think there is anyhing particularly bad about IE, it is stale, and needs new life. It also had a few annoying glitches that were getting to me, such as the cursor resetting in the address bar when I was trying to type in webpages.

Last edited by 1712 on 30 Jun 2004 - 21:34
#1.2 eris on 30 Jun 2004 - 21:26
This is going to get really funny. I am eagerly waiting for the IE zealots comments.
#1.3 NyaR on 30 Jun 2004 - 22:12
by using ie users develop a dependency on microsoft and also by making their startpage msn.com by default people see adds for which other companies pay.
#1.4 JaggedFlame on 30 Jun 2004 - 22:57
QUOTE
This is going to get really funny. I am eagerly waiting for the IE zealots comments.


I'm sure you are. Apparently, you have no other use for your time.
#1.5 Colonel_Angus on 30 Jun 2004 - 23:28
What's a browser? Is that like Internet Explorer? But why do I need another one when I already have Internet Explorer? Don't I have to use Internet Explorer to connect to the internet?
#1.6 Litespeed on 01 Jul 2004 - 00:32
God, I hope that was sarcastic.....
#1.7 Fowen on 01 Jul 2004 - 15:14
QUOTE
The majority of microsoft's revenue has, and will always, come from the sales of windows xp and office.

I do not believe this statement is right. Microsoft makes most of their money from businesses running their products. Anywhere from Windows Server, to Exchange Server, to SQL Server. Windows XP and Office for Home users is a SMALL part of where their money comes from.

QUOTE
All you IE fanbois that haven't at least tried it yet, you have nothing to lose.

I don't consider myself a "fanboi" but I use IE. I have tried Firefox, and Opera. I use them for a couple of days, and they have some nice features, but all I look for in a web browser is a piece of software to browse webpages, nothing complicated. It would take me days of doing nothing but configuring FF to make it work the way I like it, so I went back to IE, and With SP2 I don't use any External plugins.
#1.8 STV on 01 Jul 2004 - 17:07
well, i am a microsoft fanboy, and i dont see anything wrong with that. remember, being a fanboy is one thing, but being a fanboy with troll like qualities is another. i like microsoft because of their products, their practices may be questionable but the quality of their products speak for themselves.

im not exactly sure who microsoft gets all of their money from, but certain things are for sure:
- microsoft's main money makers are Windows and Office.
- microsoft's server products come in next
- then some other divisions like MSN (which finally started making money a year or two ago).
- then all of the divisions that lose money.

STV
#1.9 CaKeY on 01 Jul 2004 - 18:19
QUOTE (#1.
the quality of their products speak for themselves

They sure do.
#1.10 Grappa on 01 Jul 2004 - 18:54
QUOTE (#1.7)
It would take me days of doing nothing but configuring FF to make it work the way I like it, so I went back to IE, and With SP2 I don't use any External plugins.

Er... what exactly is it you need to change? FF works just like IE out-of-the-box.
#2 lothodon on 30 Jun 2004 - 21:25
i wonder if the mozilla servers are seeing a major uprise in traffic with this announcement.
(2 replies) #3 Chicane-UK on 30 Jun 2004 - 21:31
FireFox is pretty much ready for prime time.. i'm bowled over by 0.9.1.. absolutely top drawer piece of programming
#3.1 johnnyryle on 02 Jul 2004 - 09:41
firefox is fantastic! there's no other way to put it. it's faster, cleaner, and a heck of a lot safer than IE. i'll never go back!
#3.2 anakinsolois on 04 Jul 2004 - 04:13
I wouldnt say cleaner, it still has a lot of install/uninstall problems. But it is faster and more secure. at least for now...
(2 replies) #4 WishX on 30 Jun 2004 - 21:38
I imagine Microsoft will respond to this by offering a patch that doesn't fix the problem, but rather disables whatever is vulnerable. They've done this with so many other things. "Vulnerability with VM? Turn it off. Malicious code in attachments in Outlook? Disable them. ActiveX hole? Turn it off."

Pretty soon there will be a huge, bloated browser built into Windows with half the features it originally had because they'll be disabled.
#4.1 mrbester on 01 Jul 2004 - 10:19
QUOTE
"Vulnerability with VM? Turn it off..."

Nope, that would "We know our VM is crap, but we don't like Sun anyway, so we won't ask them nicely for their superior one, we'll just remove it from the OS without telling you and bugger up all those Java sites you got used to viewing. That way we can carry on taking over the world by making a gobload of developers [of competitive architecture] redundant because the most used browser in the world won't show their efforts."
When was the last time you viewed a Java applet on XP? Did you know you had to go to Sun and get the VM? Most don't.
#4.2 Fowen on 01 Jul 2004 - 15:25
Lets look at the three things they have "Disabled because of Security Holes".

QUOTE
"Vulnerability with VM? Turn it off.

I don't think they "Turned Off" their VM because it had a vulnerability. They "Turned it Off" because of law suits coming from sun microsystems.

This wasn't because of a security hole, it was because of a lawsuit.

QUOTE
Malicious code in attachments in Outlook? Disable them.

They didn't do this because of a security hole in outlook, they did this because there are WAYYY too many stupid users who open stuff up in a email client that they shouldn't be opening.

The security hole here is the user, not the program.

QUOTE
ActiveX hole? Turn it off."

When did Microsoft ever "Turn Off" Active X? It is still running in my browser.

So, I don't know where you get your information from, but next time, check into it before you post.


QUOTE
When was the last time you viewed a Java applet on XP? Did you know you had to go to Sun and get the VM? Most don't.

MOST new machines that are being built come with Sun Java. If you are capable of building your own machine then you should know where to either get Microsoft VM, or Suns VM, and if you don't, go back to buying OEM machines.

And if your argument is the small period of time that these machines were not shipped with Java, then when you try to view a java page a dialog box comes up asking you to install it. If you tell it to automatically do it, it will take you to This web page which has links to Sun's site, and explains how to get it.
(3 replies) #5 soldier1st on 30 Jun 2004 - 21:42
i find firefox alot slower than opera
avant is very slow and freezes alot
myie2 is very good but opera beats it hands down
basicaly firefox and opera are the ones to use
i used to love IE(i started using it way back when it was ie3 when netscape was too slow for us)But Now That Firefox and opera are around it's time to switch to better browsers
#5.1 Ized on 30 Jun 2004 - 23:05
I've also used Opera a long time ago, but switched to Firefox (or actually Firebird at the time). imho the browser is blazingly fast and can take on opera anytime. There's also bunch of tweaks you can try out to get more speed out of Firefox, check this one for example . Theres long threads on mozillazine forums about these, so check those for more info on the options. The settings file on the link is what I'm using currently. If you don't need some of the settings, just comment them out // or delete the lines.
Cheers
Ps. You can always do pretty good comparison on loading times with stopwatch.
#5.2 hotrod on 30 Jun 2004 - 23:05
you do realize that avant and MYIE2 are just wrappers for IE don't you? if you use either of them, you are still actually using IE also. they aren't stand alone browsers.
#5.3 Ized on 01 Jul 2004 - 10:31
I was talking about Mozilla Firefox. I wouldn't touch MyIE or any other IE engine based browser with a stick !
#6 un0 on 30 Jun 2004 - 21:54
Its a Firefox setup!
(5 replies) #7 Relativity_17 on 30 Jun 2004 - 21:55
Heh, Mozillazine's down because of traffic overload... Their current servers really can't handle what they've been getting for the past month.

Go alternative browsers, people need to wake up to the fact that IE is a piece of crap that they can't get rid of, and move on to better software.
#7.1 Sushubh on 01 Jul 2004 - 02:12
so why not the firefox users payback something to the software they are so ready to have their kids with? atleast they can get the servers and forums on servers that can handle the loads...
#7.2 Relativity_17 on 01 Jul 2004 - 03:13
People already do give donations there, bub. What do you think has been keeping the forums running for the past year?
#7.3 Sushubh on 01 Jul 2004 - 03:23
but if it has to compete with IE or handle the load of mass deployment, it perhaps need more than that... i am yet to see any release day which let me access the extension pages... it needs more servers mate. it need more support from the users.

just because they are giving u software for free does not justify the fact that you have to suffer the downtimes they have due to heavy server loads. genuine firefox lovers should be concerned and more forthcoming to help keep the reputation intact...
#7.4 markjensen on 01 Jul 2004 - 10:41
Sushubh,

Did you look at the Mozilla Mirrors page for Firefox?
http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/mirrors.html
#7.5 Sushubh on 01 Jul 2004 - 11:32
firefox for me is pretty useless without extensions and they are the one along with skins most inaccessible... are there mirrors for the latest versions of extensions and themes?
(1 reply) #8 thekid7590 on 30 Jun 2004 - 21:59


Go Mozilla !
#8.1 sadatkarim on 30 Jun 2004 - 23:02
hell yes!
(2 replies) #9 Mister Lamar on 30 Jun 2004 - 22:07
Oh man...poor Microsoft & Internet Explorer.
#9.1 StaticFish on 30 Jun 2004 - 22:12
Why poor them? If you buld buggy software, that dosnt conform to standards you deserve it
#9.2 Sushubh on 01 Jul 2004 - 04:02
they saved the world from the **** called netscape.
now we need firefox/opera to save us from the **** called IE.
(1 reply) #10 mrk on 30 Jun 2004 - 22:58
FIRE FOX HAD MY BABIES!
#10.1 Sushubh on 01 Jul 2004 - 04:00
so bad u need to have babies with binary...
(2 replies) #11 sdkaneda on 30 Jun 2004 - 23:12
aww. i was so hoping one of the IE fanboys woulda chimed in by now...
#11.1 hotrod on 30 Jun 2004 - 23:14
IE RAWKS!!!!!!
feel better now troll?
#11.2 sdkaneda on 01 Jul 2004 - 00:12
you say that like it's a bad thing!
(2 replies) #12 paulhaskew on 30 Jun 2004 - 23:24
ok... so now that the feds say something, is MS gonna fix this or what?
#12.1 dl0711 on 30 Jun 2004 - 23:41
LOL they will fix it but they will take there sweet ol time to fix it.
#12.2 Sushubh on 01 Jul 2004 - 04:00
and whether the fix fixes the problem, or simply creates more things that requires a fix is another question...
#13 Mister Lamar on 30 Jun 2004 - 23:24
 

Last edited by 37896 on 30 Jun 2004 - 23:31
#14 Jugalator on 01 Jul 2004 - 00:35
Why is this a surprise announcement?

So CERT have brains too? Wow, I could never have guessed.
#15 wd40 on 01 Jul 2004 - 00:38
Why can't anyone link to the source? Always rely on the source and not what a different website says.

Here is the source: CERT Vulnerability Note VU#713878
(7 replies) #16 MitchShrader on 01 Jul 2004 - 00:39
Got Firefox today.. and I am a Very stubborn sort, who resents the change, doesn't want to do the tweakage, wishes to HECK there was a one click packaged install without all the bluidy options.

In short, lazy. But *Not* Stupid. When CERT, which isn't exactly famous for supporting open source, Finally Admits IE is causing grief worldwide through exploitable holes.. and I see it's quite possible MY bank info is at risk, hey.. even I'll give in and wade the transition.

No, I don't want to use FF .. but I'm gonna. And when I hear the horror stories about Identity Theft and spyware infestations... that weeping you hear won't be me.
#16.1 Mister Lamar on 01 Jul 2004 - 02:50
Im about to download firefox now and see what the hype is about. Maybe I will get owned by it!!

so far im not impressed, Ill have to go to like this, but Ill test it.

Im still an ie BROTHER

Last edited by 37896 on 01 Jul 2004 - 02:57
#16.2 Sushubh on 01 Jul 2004 - 03:27
if u dont like firefox, try opera. if u dont like any of these 2, u deserve to use IE.
#16.3 STV on 01 Jul 2004 - 12:48
actually, if you don t know want to use firefox, opera, mozilla, netscape, and fail to understand the IE privacy and security settings, then and only then, do you deserve to use IE on the default settings.

STV
#16.4 tapo on 01 Jul 2004 - 17:58
Silly ol' STV, always trying to blame buggy, horrible software on user error.
#16.5 Mister Lamar on 01 Jul 2004 - 19:39
LOL@that
#16.6 STV on 01 Jul 2004 - 21:57
actually, tapo, if you have been reading my comments, you will see that i have blamed microsoft for the default settings, not the user.

Silly ol' tapo, always trying to shoot my posts with no proof.

STV

Last edited by 40230 on 01 Jul 2004 - 22:15
#16.7 STV on 01 Jul 2004 - 21:58
LOL@that

STV
#17 dark kyuubi on 01 Jul 2004 - 00:54
haha..people people people...when will you learn? switch to Mozilla.....it's the better way!
(9 replies) #18 STV on 01 Jul 2004 - 01:29
this is only a problem if you dont have your IE security setting set correctly.

i dont think that this is as big a thing as it is being made out to be.

the guide is very simple to follow: http://www.microsoft.com/security/incident/download_ject.mspx

STV
#18.1 OptiPlex on 01 Jul 2004 - 02:40
Yep. Set it up correctly and you'll minimize the risks.

Unfortunately 99% of the Neowinians cannot grasp this concept and go around bashing IE in the end.
#18.2 Sushubh on 01 Jul 2004 - 03:25
i can spend 1/10th the time downloading mozilla/opera than downloading patches for IE. Infact file sizes of opera and firefox (new version) are comparable to generic patches released by microsoft.

not everyone has broadband. not everyone has the time to waste looking for ms patches.
#18.3 JaggedFlame on 01 Jul 2004 - 03:45
Ever heard of Automatic Update?
#18.4 Sushubh on 01 Jul 2004 - 03:59
yeah. last time i told my office pc to download every update they had on windows update, i had to reinstall the windows OS.

and dont expect everyone to have a mbit broadband connection. it takes me 30 minutes to download firefox. i dont have the time/patience/bandwidth to patch a patch that was supposed to patch a security glitch in ie.
#18.5 twyst3d on 01 Jul 2004 - 05:27
QUOTE (#18.2)
not everyone has broadband. not everyone has the time to waste looking for ms patches.

about time the government did something. IE is sh*t i dont use it except for windowsupdate and to see how sites i design look in ie id rather download a newer version of firefox then download an IE patch thats just as big
#18.6 STV on 01 Jul 2004 - 11:23
QUOTE (#18.2)
i can spend 1/10th the time downloading mozilla/opera than downloading patches for IE. Infact file sizes of opera and firefox (new version) are comparable to generic patches released by microsoft.

it will only take long if you dont know what you are doing. IE will get better and thi whole discussion about how IE sucks will go away.

STV
#18.7 STV on 01 Jul 2004 - 11:25
QUOTE (#18.5)
about time the government did something. IE is sh*t i dont use it except for windowsupdate and to see how sites i design look in ie id rather download a newer version of firefox then download an IE patch thats just as big

so, the government did something "good" because you think it is "good". i think that it is rather irresponsible of the government to say things like this about a company's product. but in the end, it will only kick microsoft into making IE better. so i say, "good luck microsoft".

STV
#18.8 Sushubh on 01 Jul 2004 - 11:34
QUOTE (#18.6)
IE will get better

this is what we all want. I dont hate IE because its IE or it is from microsoft. i dont like it because i am forced to use it at times. and it is not good enough at the moment.
#18.9 STV on 01 Jul 2004 - 12:44
good, im glad that you said. it is good enough for me at the moment, but maybe you require moreout of a browser other than basic functions.

i can understand that.

STV
(4 replies) #19 Intelman on 01 Jul 2004 - 03:10
Yeah, well I think IE is just fine, especially IE 6 SP2. Just dont be stupid, simple as that.
#19.1 GuidZilla on 01 Jul 2004 - 06:07
Its not a matter of not being stupid, its the fact that so many holes are popping up that don't necessarily require user intervention. Also think of the fact that the average net user is not exactly savvy. They assume they can click whatever the heck they please and have nothing bad happen. Those are the people most at risk and obviously have the majority user base.
#19.2 Fowen on 01 Jul 2004 - 15:32
QUOTE (#19.1)
Its not a matter of not being stupid, its the fact that so many holes are popping up that don't necessarily require user intervention. Also think of the fact that the average net user is not exactly savvy. They assume they can click whatever the heck they please and have nothing bad happen. Those are the people most at risk and obviously have the majority user base.

So your saying the "Average Net User" can download and configure FF and make it work right with no issues? Riiiiggghhtt.
#19.3 tapo on 01 Jul 2004 - 17:52
Yeah, a lot of friends of mine have, hell, if they know how to install AIM they can sure as hell install Firefox. It's just a download and a double-click of the installer. Then it automatically imports everything from IE.

Would you suggest that I tell them to set their privacy and security settings to high, adding Microsoft.com as a trusted site, and clicking yes or no to every cookie that passes their way?

What about the friends that already have *random spyware toolbar* installed in IE? Should I guide them through Spybot, backing up their registry, and removing it and then doing the privacy/security settings?

I'm sorry, but a lot of the people I know just get so frustrated that they completely give up on IE.
#19.4 STV on 01 Jul 2004 - 22:15
the best way, is to teach them right the first time, how to use IE and that is it, no need to "switch". hopefully microsoft will get their act together and make better default settings.

STV
(21 replies) #20 CaKeY on 01 Jul 2004 - 04:31
What I dont understand is why people would use IE, 3 spywar/adware programs on top of their antivirus/firewall, deal with bug after bug, hole after hole... requiring patch after patch... and not even try a modern browser.
#20.1 bboy on 01 Jul 2004 - 08:39
Simple answer, people are resistant to change ( = lazy).

I will only use IE for Windows Update/Catalog and that is only because it won't allow me to use another browser to use WU.

The shame of it is that many sites are designed specifially for virus petri dish of a browser - IE (read: not following W3C standards!). Resultingly many sites do not format correctly nor function properly. Microsoft really did a bad thing by breaking away from the standards set forth by the W3C. This was obviously a monopolistic effort on Microsoft's part and now we are to suffer the results. Thanks Bill, you asshat.

feel free to use this on any IE users you know, from me 2 you:

I equate browsing the Internet with IE to having sex with a prostitute without a condom.
#20.2 mrbester on 01 Jul 2004 - 10:15
If you've decided to go for the $5 crack whore who doesn't care anymore. Working girls tend to insist on condom use so they don't get infected by your skanky dick.
#20.3 Ized on 01 Jul 2004 - 10:35
ROFL
#20.4 cdcase on 01 Jul 2004 - 10:37
#20.5 STV on 01 Jul 2004 - 11:32
QUOTE (#20.1)
Simple answer, people are resistant to change ( = lazy).

actually, you are being lazy by just giving up on IE at the sign of trouble. if the browser that you use right now had something similar, i bet that you would go to another browser. that is the "easy" way out. actually sticking with IE and managing it, is a little more work, but not by much if you actually know what you are doing.

many FF an Opera users obviously dont know how to set the security and privacy settings appropriately.

like i said before, this is something that has been blown up to be something that is not as big as many will have you think.

I dont have anyproblems with my security and privacy setting and they protect me. also, the fact that I also have a firewall increases my security.

STV
#20.6 Andareed on 01 Jul 2004 - 12:15
Let's compare browsers to a bank. If the bank you went to allowed thieves to rob your accounts, what would you do? Would you stick around, and wait for them to fix the problem? Or would you immediately switch? If mozilla/firefox had unpatched vulnerabilities and was constantly hacked I would switch.
#20.7 dcook32p on 01 Jul 2004 - 12:24
It is irresponsible of a security or systems administrator to not give up on Internet Explorer due to signs of trouble. There have been numerous exploits discovered in Internet Explorer over the past few weeks, and there will be more. Switching to a more secure browser protects you from future exploits that will be found in Internet Explorer.

Yours is the type of response I would expect from an irrational zealot. You feel some sort of "connection" to a piece of software and thus feel the need to evangelize it. I feel no need to evangelize my browser, which, for the sake of my argument, will not be disclosed. I will say that I do not use Internet Explorer.
#20.8 STV on 01 Jul 2004 - 12:42
if you have the security and privacy settings set, you wont have this problem. in my opinion, that is the only thing that microsoft has done wrong, in this respect. they let internet explorer out with horrible default settings.

The privacy and security settings are the condom.

STV
#20.9 djtaylor on 01 Jul 2004 - 14:26
Agree with STV 100% on this one. If either Microsoft would ship IE with better default settings or people actually bothered to configure their software, it'd be much more secure.

When I buy (or otherwise acquire, lol) a piece of software, one of the first things I do is to go through all the menus and options and find out what everything does and configure it to my liking/needs. Most people are either too stupid or too lazy to do this. I've known people to get really pi$$ed off with that $hitty 'MSN Today' b0ll0cks that keeps popping up every time they sign in to MSN Messenger and put up with it for as long as it's been out, when all they need do is to go into options and disable it.

Having configured IE so that it's more secure, I've never had any trouble with it whatsoever. I'm also behind 2 firewalls, 1 hardware (router) and 1 software, so that helps a lot too.

As for having to 'apply patch after patch', most patches are cumulative, which means that each one also includes all previous fixes (i.e. the June update will also contain fixes for issues addressed in the May update). Where's the hardship in downloading one patch a month?

As for IE not conforming to W3C standards, I've never noticed any problems with IE's rendering engine. In fact, I've found it to be the reverse: some DHTML elements that render fine in IE don't render properly in Netscape, Opera, Firefox...

I'm not claiming IE is perfect, but it's my preferred browser and always will be.

Last edited by 17021 on 01 Jul 2004 - 14:35