main

Microsoft To Cut Costs by $1 Billion

malebolgia   on 07 July 2004 - 19:29 · 42 comments & 3525 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer sent a memo to his employees today. The memo goes on to tell about the rising expenses that Microsoft is facing. To trouble shoot this Steve Ballmer plans on make cuts in the advertising department, events planning, and customer-relations activities. All together this would save the software giant $1 billion dollars.

Microsoft Latest News about Microsoft is hoping to save US$1 billion from its operations and streamline the management of its 57,000 employees, according to an internal memo from CEO Steve Ballmer. Expenses have risen faster than revenues for the last three years, Ballmer points out in the memo, which is the latest in a series of annual communications to staff. "This is obviously not a trend we can continue," he notes.

Saving a Billion

Microsoft is looking to make cuts in advertising, events planning and customer-relations activities to shave $1 billion off its total operating expenses. These were $22,642 billion for the year ended June 30th 2003, compared to $20,093 billion for the previous year. Microsoft also is reviewing employee benefits, such as healthcare Latest News about healthcare, new-employee vacations and bus passes. Employees have seen perks -- such as free towels -- disappear, and they now have to pay for some drugs that previously were available for free under the company's health plan.

News source: NewsFactor


Building on the success of the Warcraft® series, Blizzard hopes to expand the MMORPG genre by creating a deep, immersive, user-friendly experience that will appeal to both veteran gamers and casual players alike. World of Warcraft™ takes place three years following the aftermath of Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne™, when a great tension has settled over the ravaged world of Azeroth. As the various races begin to rebuild their shattered kingdoms, new threats, both ancient and terrifying, have arisen to plague the world once again. Players must explore the lands of Azeroth, forge fellowships with other players, and build their strength in order to prevail. World of Warcraft™ will be fully localized into French, German, and English in Europe.

Best known for blockbuster hits including the Warcraft, StarCraft, and Diablo series, Blizzard Entertainment (www.blizzard.com), a division of Vivendi Universal Games, is a premier developer and publisher of entertainment software renowned for creating many of the industry’s most critically acclaimed games. Blizzard’s track record includes eight #1-selling games and multiple Game of the Year awards. The company’s free Internet gaming service Battle.net® reigns as the largest in the world, with millions of active users.

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 42 additional comments
#1 KeR on 07 Jul 2004 - 19:33
it's the end of the world as we know it.......
(2 replies) #2 DjTeriyake on 07 Jul 2004 - 19:34
QUOTE
and they now have to pay for some drugs that previously were available for free


that explains sooo much....
#2.1 theh0g on 08 Jul 2004 - 07:58
LOL
#2.2 Magallanes on 08 Jul 2004 - 13:59
Explained a LOT.


#3 JohnO on 07 Jul 2004 - 19:34
omfg no more free "these arent bugs, theyre features!" towels
(1 reply) #4 KevinRGood on 07 Jul 2004 - 19:42
I guess Pres. Bush is going to have to work harder on the economy now.
#4.1 cdcase on 07 Jul 2004 - 21:50
MSFT != economy
#5 Intelman on 07 Jul 2004 - 19:44
It is pretty sad. Hopefully money problems wont ever destroy big companies like Microsoft...but you never know.
(2 replies) #6 Steffan on 07 Jul 2004 - 19:46
they can save some money by cutting the extra line of coding out of their programs.
#6.1 JohnO on 07 Jul 2004 - 19:48
they had code in their program?
#6.2 kingius on 08 Jul 2004 - 11:55
they have lines in their programs?
(5 replies) #7 Colonel_Angus on 07 Jul 2004 - 20:08
I blame the money-sink known as the xBox.
#7.1 JohnO on 07 Jul 2004 - 20:27
first of all it's called money pit and 2nd they knew they were going to lose money on xb 1 they wanted market share

with xb 2 itll pwn and make sony cry while nintendos in the corner sucking it's thumb
#7.2 deadmonkey on 07 Jul 2004 - 20:34
You are right about one thing. Microsoft wanted market share in the gaming area however when XBOX2 (XBOX Next whatever it is to be called) comes out it won't destroy Sony or Nintendo. Sony will take a long while before people leave them. They are now in a position where they don't need the most powerful console as they have a good reputation. Nintendo has similar. Microsoft does not really have this yet. It still needs to show the goods with Xbox and Xbox Live. They will probably loose money on the next Xbox as well however with the way there business model is it isn't a problem. Microsoft has a very good business design with Xbox and Xbox Live. They loose a lot of money on the console however they make bucket loads from games and advertising and Xbox Live.
#7.3 mbg on 07 Jul 2004 - 22:38
I don't think XBox losses would be classified as "operating expenses"...?
#7.4 obake on 08 Jul 2004 - 00:43
deadmonkey-

I disagree with a bit of your statement. I think Microsoft is in a clear position to destroy Nintendo, in the US, anyway. I have all three systems (PS2, Xbox, GC), and I've got to say that I have been extremely disappointed in Nintendo's offering. There are a few games on there that are, no doubt, amazing (Zelda, Metroid), but otherwise, there's not much. I haven't bought a GC game in months, whereas I've bought Xbox and PS2 games as recently as a couple of weeks ago. I'm sure other people feel the same as I do.

Is there still a place for Nintendo? Sure, but they need to do a couple of things: first, get more games exclusive to GC, at least for some period of time. RE is a good start, but they need more titles that are innovative and appealing, which leads into my second point. They need to grow up. Everytime I go to EB Games, I see games like "Full Spectrum Warrior" on Xbox, "Grand Theft Auto" on PS2, and "Mickey Mouse and the Magical Mirror" for GC. I look at the new releases. Whereas Xbox and PS2 have a good variety of titles, GC has Harry Potter, Mickey Mouse, and Pokemon taking up the shelf space. It's getting to the point where buying things for GC is embarassing, unlike Xbox and PS2, which are, if not cool, acceptable by everyone's standards.
#7.5 l0g0ut on 08 Jul 2004 - 00:48
xbox2 will not be compatible with xbox1 games so it is not about market share. it's their intention to make money off the games.
#8 Mister Lamar on 07 Jul 2004 - 20:23
If Microsoft wouldn't have showered employees with all this lavish stuff, then now they wouldn't have to cut back to save dollars. Besides these people can bring their own towels and sodas. Im sure they are paid more than enough $$ and well as have saved plenty of dollars.
(1 reply) #9 deadmonkey on 07 Jul 2004 - 20:30
It is stanard for businesses to do this when things change. Things go up and down so they make cutbacks at times. Steve never said that MS was in a dangerous position however he is correct, you can't continue to spend more than you are making as over time you will end up with nothing. Also this is a good time for them to cut back on advertising costs, etc. Longhorn isn't due out until 2006 so I doubt a new Office suite will be out before then. This is the three biggest areas for Microsoft Clients and Servers (Longhorn) and Office Produts (Office Suite) so they should easily be able to save money there.

Microsoft has a lot of money but it is not infinite. People act like it is but they are getting hit pretty hard at the moment especially with the EU fine which they just put into escrow.

We saw Xerox do similar things back in 2000 when they had some serious issues. Now they are doing pretty damn well if you look how much they have turned things around in the past 4 years! Microsoft are just taking precautions. No company is 100% and with Firefox and Linux picking up more and more users they need to be that little bit more careful than they were back in 1999.
#9.1 slapnuts_ox on 07 Jul 2004 - 22:46
agreed
(1 reply) #10 Blax on 07 Jul 2004 - 21:30
They already cut out the bus passes and a bunch of other things...
#10.1 pballsim on 08 Jul 2004 - 17:24
They only cut them for vendors and contractors.

Full-time employees and interns are not affected.
(3 replies) #11 cdcase on 07 Jul 2004 - 21:49
lol

how about not doing things that get you sued into paying fines and hobbling your business model?



#11.1 slapnuts_ox on 07 Jul 2004 - 22:47
i agree with this also
#11.2 SniperX on 07 Jul 2004 - 23:03
The most sensible post made. Try following the law before you start hitting the employees.
#11.3 pballsim on 08 Jul 2004 - 17:26
What about the Eolas case? Eolas has been suing Microsoft for 1/2 billion dollars that the W3C, Mozilla, AOL, etc. state is a bogus lawsuit/patent.

People will always go after the people w/ the money. There are companies that just patent things and sue other people for infringing on their patent. This is why Microsoft has been aggresively patenting everything it can - to prevent lame lawsuits.
(2 replies) #12 coolstuff2003ca on 08 Jul 2004 - 01:16
$22,642 billion = 22,642,000,000,000......wouldnt that be 22.642 trillion? I don't think microsoft spends 22 trillion a year.
#12.1 Dieot on 08 Jul 2004 - 01:31
I believe NewsFactor is a european news source, and in europe they use commas to seperate decimals instead of dots. So
$22,642 billion = $22.642 billion

I hope this helps.
#12.2 coolstuff2003ca on 08 Jul 2004 - 02:33
Ok thanks....that makes much more sense.
#13 DodgeViper on 08 Jul 2004 - 01:35
I don't think it's MS fault their getting sued, the law suits are stupid. I think they got sued for something like including messenger and media player in XP, what's that all about, it's an OS so it will obviously come with software otherwise why are we paying that much for it.

I still think windows is far from perfect, it uses too much resources and has too many services running which might be necessary but not all of them, after a while it becomes slow with so much junk. There's also a huge problem with security but SP2 is the answer to that.
(2 replies) #14 denzilla on 08 Jul 2004 - 03:32
They could save millions by cutting the development of anti-piracy techniques. They aren't doing a damn thing but making us pay more for windows and giving people in Hong Kong new brain puzzles.
#14.1 Juguard on 08 Jul 2004 - 07:50
as much as this is correct, the anti piracy will never stop. The only way it will stop, is when 666 is put into action.

...
alothough this is a religious believe, what that means, is that 666 is a chip, or some type of scan code under your skin, with wich you buy things, and register things, without it, you will not be able to use anything, your computers, telephones, buying anything, etc. The goverment has you then. Oh, and this is in the bible, and you dont believe it, I'm not debating it, but dont you think that this is possible with the future technology? I think it is.

But anyways, the point is about piracy, not about religion.
#14.2 tiwaris on 08 Jul 2004 - 09:06
I like your comment
#15 Himosan on 08 Jul 2004 - 09:07
STV,

Sorry to hear about the towels man.

your pal
Himosan
(3 replies) #16 Jerry J. on 08 Jul 2004 - 11:05
Is a billion $1.000.000 or $1.000.000.000?
#16.1 theyarecomingforyou on 08 Jul 2004 - 11:40
Britain and Europe(?) technically regard a billion as 10,000 million, the US is 1,000, but 1,000 million is used in the business world and the British standard is not used much/at all.

So a trillion is 1,000 billion, etc.
#16.2 Jerry J. on 08 Jul 2004 - 13:51
So its $1.000.000.000?
#16.3 pballsim on 08 Jul 2004 - 17:27
1,000 Thousand
1,000,000 Million
1,000,000,000 Billion
1,000,000,000,0000 Trillion
#17 stockwiz on 08 Jul 2004 - 12:16
Everybody wants a piece of the corporate pie in america, but the lawyers are the only ones who ever make real money off these types of lawsuits. Too many lawyers in america.
(1 reply) #18 slimy on 08 Jul 2004 - 14:16
these people that are losing there jobs will be making the viruses in 2 years against microsoft
#18.1 chacho on 08 Jul 2004 - 17:50
uh...no they wont.
#19 Randall_Lind on 08 Jul 2004 - 14:20
I bet if they would learn how to get software out on time and not delay every product 3 or 4 times they would save money. I bet eveytime a product is delayed that is costing money.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)