Neowin.net

Your last statement made me understand, but DO NOT call me a troll, child.

QUOTE (#1.4)

Your last statement made me understand, but DO NOT call me a troll, child.

Shush troll, some of the new nvidia drivers are a lot better than the official ones, plus it is our freedom to do what we want

The use of the word 'troll' is somewhat lame. It was my assumption that 'troll' was used to describe someone who intentionally posts something unrelated and inflammatory in order to incite an argument - and not just as a general term to fling around whenever someone does not share the same view as the vocal majority.

I've witnessed increasing instances of this, particularly through the homo ms-bashing threads (where anyone not jumping on the 'LOL M$ suxX0rz!1!' bandwaggon is labelled as a 'troll') and also throughout anything firefox related.











Retards.


The guy had a valid point. Try posting comments with when your brains are actually in gear, and school has finished.

*awaits child-like attacks*

lol. People bitching about using betas. It's not a sin, you know.

QUOTE (#1.3)

Stop trolling...

What was so trollish about asking that?

It's a legitimate question in my opinion, especially since all beta testers take greater risks in doing it than others.

REMOVED

Last edited by monkeyman_67156 on 28 Oct 2006 - 01:57

erm, quite.

If you think for one second that I'm going to waste my coffee time by arguing with you over a definition of some retarded word, then I'm afraid you're wrong squire.

And *if* God didn't want people to rip the piss out of the mentally handicapped, then I'm absolutely positive that he wouldn't have allowed them to axx the internet and post their brain-damaged drivel.


Oh, and if you 'initially' agreed with my points, then surely the fact that I referred to retards as 'retards' shouldn't change anything. And therein lies my point entirely; someone posts something that one of the utter ****sticks in here doesn't like/agree with, and magically, their opinion becomes disgarded as worthless and the troll insults begin.

Lame, lame, lame. Grow the **** up.

REMOVED

Last edited by monkeyman_67156 on 28 Oct 2006 - 01:57

Obviously you don't realize that by making overtly aggressive statements like: "Lame, ... Grow the **** up." you highlight the inherent hypocricy of your post.

- 1st up, learn what hypocracy means, *then* argue about it. My post was initially made in order to express my absolute contempt for those who merrily cast the 'troll' insult based on nothing other than a varied viewpoint to their own. If I'd have then used the same (gay) insult to everyone else, then that would have been 'hypocratic'.

i.e. QED, bitch.



...You once again attempt to gain some kind of moral high ground by calling me a child....

- no. The day I try to take on the moral highground with any of the idiots to which I'm referring is the day I set out to mentally baffle my dog.

....But instead go on to make immature and completely pointless statements....

- Just trying to fit in around here

....You are the one acting like a child.....

- I suggest you read some of the other comments; hardly mature imo.

...Obviously, I'm the one the needs to grow up. Now is there really a need for you to call everyone in a "retard"? That's the kind of insult a pathetic 15 year old kid would use....

- If a cat's a ****ing cat, I'll (correctly) label it as a cat. Similarly, when people act retarded, posting retarded, ill-informed, play-to-the-audience sheep-like crap, then I'll label that accordingly.

...You obviously lack the mental capacity, rather than coffee time, to argue with me. You know that I am right and that you are a pathetic person who feels the need to insult others (poorly) in order for you to feel better about yourself....

- Riddle me this, batman. Observe.

...I was about to agree with your statements. I feel that people should use the word troll when it would be appropriate....

Sooooo..... you disagree with my use of the word 'retard', and thus, you no longer feel that people should use lame insults appropriately? Hmm. Forgive me for my lack of concern. AFAIK, agreeing with someone doesn't need the pre-requisite of liking them.

If I thought I lacked the mental capacity to argue with anyone on the net, I'd gouge my eyes out. I could take almost anything you type apart and tear it to pieces. Which I'm 100% certain you could not, nor have done, with anything of mine. So I guess that means that about as far away from 'knowing you're right' as I possibly could be.

Carry on gents.

REMOVED

Last edited by monkeyman_67156 on 28 Oct 2006 - 01:58

Wow, I just can't get through to you can I? You're an amazing tool who doesn't know when to shut the hell up and you don't even realize it.

- Thank the lord we're off the 'troll' insults.

How could you possibly think that you are correct?

- Partly because I think I am, but mostly because I am.

I looked up your post history and every post that I've read is your same stupid-ass rants about how your opinion is always correct and that other people are wrong regardless.

- Funny that. I tend not to post about things unless there's a point, it'd be a bit self-depreciating to post about things I was completely unsure of

You're a self-absorbed asshole. You act as if somehow you're more intelligent than I am and then post comments that don't even contain real words or, much less make any freaking sense.

- It's difficult to refrain from being self-absorbed whilst being orbited by chronically brain damaged morons with net axx. My posts make perfect sense.

I think it would be rather "Hypocratic" of you to do that, oh wait, Hippocratic isn't a freaking word....

- Either's 'hypocricy', a word you conjured up in reply 1.11. I was taking the piss.

You mean hypocritical, I take it?

- You win the prize!

Or are you referring to the Hippocratic Oath?

- No, but way to go on your terrifying display of knowledge squire. I'm impressed. Really I am.

Your sentence doesn't even make any sense even if you use a real word. WTF are you talking about? How does your comment remotely address my inference that you a hypocrite for calling others children and then acting like one yourself? Yes, QED indeed, that was a solid proof there, now wasn't it ace? Good going.

- If this was a conversation, I'm happily repeat myself in simpler terms in case you'd missed it. As is, it's a page of text, so scroll up, read, re-read then possibly understand.

Your second comment doesn't make much more sense than your first. Why exactly are we trying to "Mentally baffle" your dog? Are you even able to understand my posts?

- ahahah. Yeah dude, that's exactly what I said. Fairly ****ing moronic that you claim it's me who has questionable problem-solving skills. I'm pretty damn sure that almost every other organism with more than a couple of mangled chromosomes understood that part perfectly well.

I'm saying that it's *painfully* obvious to everyone who isn't you that you're trying to act superior to the rest of us,

- Not. ****ing. Difficult. Believe me.

...but in the end you sink down to the level of a child yourself. You once again fail to address my accusations and cover your own inferiority with a thin, yet ultimately pathetic, veil of insult.

- Fail to address your accusations? Aho.. where? Although I must confess I've refrained from proclaiming to the faceless internet people that 'noooo! eye dunt liv undar a brij. Eye am knot a troll '' Retard.

On to your third comment, "Just trying to fit in around here" Wow, that's a good one now isn't it. You lash out against the pointless comments that are posted in these threads, but then go and make some yourself. But then, when your idiocy is pointed out to you, you claim you are just "Fitting in” I feel, once again, that your hypocrisy is self-evident.

*sigh* Once again.... I have not outspoken against those who hurl insults. I have however expressed my contempt for those who instantaneously label anyone with an opinion differing from their own as a 'troll' (gah), as being a ****ing retard. If I was then to post again after someone (eg. you) disagreed with me, and call them by the same insult, then that would have been hypocritical ****onaut. The 'fitting in' part was also, funniily enough, aka 'taking the piss'.



.
.
.

and it continues. Jesus Christ, your posts give me seizures.

Ahh, how often you encounter these types on the internet. How could you expect less from one named Wolfy_Nailedyourmother. Hes got the sarcastic highschool outcast humor down, must have taken practice.

Example : Poster 1- Though I respect your right to have an opinion, I disagree with your point of view and the way in which you use inflammatory language like homo to describe something you dont like

Witty Highschool Outcast Humor from Wolfy - Man, its like Im arguing with a toaster, or my mentally handicapped dog. You are all stupid. Everyone on the internet is stupid. I rock.

That takes talent. The way you break down the argument into a line by line in order to avoid arguing its intent, and instead attack tiny segments with a humurous quip is astounding. This way you dont need to be able to write, and it makes it possible for you to seemlessly drop any argument that you dont feel like addressing (because no one will notice).

You should seriously consider a career writing Goth Poetry. You can take as many coffee breaks as you want to use volatile language, and it would really put your skills and wit to good use. Being the epitome of the pseudo-intellectual, you would really fit in.

I am wolfy
I am better than you
Ill gouge my eyes out because I am the smartest man alive
the world sucks



Last edited by 62803 on 16 Jul 2004 - 18:22

REMOVED

Last edited by monkeyman_67156 on 28 Oct 2006 - 01:58

Ahh, a cunning strategy from an equally cunning tactician. You realize that my points are correct and that you don't have the ability to counter them

Jesus H Crist. I tear the ****e out of more than 50% of your reply, become bored, then post that comment, mostly because I couldn't be arsed to waste *more* time by doing the same to the remainder.

Hmmm. Not quite in line with your theory, Sherlock.

Your newest reply deals mostly with errors in grammar. Wowzers.




Annnyway...

I've shown you time and time again that you are wrong and that you should just stop posting this kind of pathetic drabble. I can't wait for your next amazingly insightful comeback....

This entire page does not contain one hint, one example, one sentence which qualifies that statement. Not one. Nowhere. At all. Is this getting through? Man, your stupidity scares me.


Christ, conversing with you is a total waste of time and effort. I systematically piss all over every single one of your points (read the above for countless examples of this) yet somehow... somehow in your world, the opposite is true.


I'll leave you with the final example of your terrifying idiocy. This is possibly your finest hour; the pinnacle of your debate. Pay particular attention to the sense of (misplaced) pride which is painfully apparent.

Now onto my favorite part...Ahh, the expected attack by an amazing genetic engineer. "You're dumb because you have fewer chromosomes" That's a great one. I hope you go a long way with your keen scientific insight. You do realize that having more chromosomes causes a condition known as Down Syndrome? ...How about instead of lashing out ....You shut the hell up.

Allow me to highlight the most important part of your stunning 'crucifixion' of myself.

"You're dumb because you have fewer chromosomes" That's a great one

Bravo Sherlock, bravo. A human has 46. A lentil has 14. A mosquito has 6. A dove has a lot more. The number isn't all that important, but I'm fairly certain the number of 'mangled' ones probably is.
Ooh, looks like you've beaten me again, eh?


It's generally a good idea to be at least almost sure about something before lamely attempting to take the piss in such a condescending manner. Then you don't look quite as ****ing stupid.



.
.
.

I'm sure that somehow, you'll manage to convince yourself that despite all of the above, you've ...

(a) Managed to out-think me.
(b) Caused me to sidestep all of your accusations and points.
(c) Been 100% correct all along.
(d) Never had any form of constructive comeback for any of your ****e.
(e) Triumphed.

.. and that sir, is the most amusing part.

Enjoy

Last edited by 57914 on 17 Jul 2004 - 10:06

REMOVED

Last edited by monkeyman_67156 on 28 Oct 2006 - 01:59

where's fett when you need him?