main

MyDoom variant slams mailboxes, search engines

malebolgia   on 26 July 2004 - 19:10 · 48 comments & 2388 views

Advertisement (Why?)
A new version of the MyDoom worm has appeared (MyDoom.m/MyDoom.o). This worm has quickly flooded mailboxes, and has slowed down several search engines. Such as Yahoo, AltaVista, Lycos, and even Google. McAfee has labeled this worm a medium security due to how fast it's spreading.

A pesky new variant of the MyDoom worm slammed four popular search engines Monday and continued to clog e-mail accounts around the world.

The new version, variously dubbed MyDoom.m or MyDoom.o, was first detected early Monday morning and quickly went on a tear, flooding many mailboxes with hundreds of messages. It has also slowed Google, Yahoo, AltaVista and Lycos to a crawl because once it infects a PC, the virus automatically performs Web searches on those search engines.

E-mail screening company Message Labs said it had intercepted more than 23,000 copies of the variants in the first five hours of their existence. McAfee Avert, the virus-tracking squad at the antivirus-software maker, rated the worm a "medium on watch," or right below a high risk vulnerability. Tens of thousands of PCs have been infected by the worm, which was first detected just before 6 a.m. PDT. The biggest impact, however, has been on the search engines.

View: More Information
Download: McAfee's Removal Tool
News source: ZDNet


Previously, music purchased through RealNetworks' music download services could most easily be played on devices that supported its copyright protection technology. By the same token, the easiest way to get digital music onto the iPod player was through Apple's iTunes Music Store, which uses its own system. The same held true for devices that supported Microsoft's Windows Media Player anti-piracy technology.

Microsoft said it could not immediately comment on the system.


Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 48 additional comments
#1 mrk on 26 Jul 2004 - 19:14
sweet.


AVAST! just updated itself minutes ago :p
#2 divadiow on 26 Jul 2004 - 19:17
how long till we see headlines telling us how long the author will be spending in jail?
#3 Hurmoth on 26 Jul 2004 - 19:21
STINGER
#4 Ficman on 26 Jul 2004 - 19:22
Make it stop please...
#5 Riggs on 26 Jul 2004 - 19:27
Yeah, Google hasn't even been working at all this morning. And Yahoo has been slower than **** today.
#6 doubledragonxz on 26 Jul 2004 - 19:37
Google was working as fast as always during the morning, wonder what specific locations are having problems.
(1 reply) #7 Surr3al on 26 Jul 2004 - 19:38
Around 11:30 CST google went down for me, I had to use yahoo, and I got to realize yet again how cluttered and annoying yahoo.com really is.

Google is back for me now, hope it's back for you guys.
#7.1 masterren on 27 Jul 2004 - 01:19
Yahoo! Search really isn't that bad...it's just that no one knows where http://search.yahoo.com is.
#8 StaticFish on 26 Jul 2004 - 19:46
back for me too
#9 kainashi on 26 Jul 2004 - 19:55
pesky mydoom. at least google is back now.
(9 replies) #10 Colonel_Angus on 26 Jul 2004 - 20:01
At what point do we line up all the windows users and shoot them? This is getting ridiculous
#10.1 Nathan on 26 Jul 2004 - 20:32
Yes, blame the Windows users.. it's our fault.
Linux would get viruses if they had a market share - and no, I'm not an "ignorant ****" who thinks "open source is inherently less secure". We've had these debates. Anyone with a brain can tell you that currently nobody cares to write a virus for a small percentage of users, it doesn't do the same damage
#10.2 HellBender on 26 Jul 2004 - 21:54
Q: Are there less viruses for linux than windows?
A: Yes.

Q: Are there less exploits published for linux than windows?
A: Yes.

End of story. I don't need reasons.
#10.3 C_Guy on 26 Jul 2004 - 22:04
Wouldn't it be easier (and more ethical) to shoot the virus developers?
#10.4 Colonel_Angus on 27 Jul 2004 - 00:04
Who said anything about Linux?
#10.5 shed2069 on 27 Jul 2004 - 00:42
#1.2, Less exploits published yes, but less exploits actually available??

Any hacker knows he can break *nix just as easily as Window if he wants to.

Its not the end of the story.

I dont see why you dont need reasons to support such a ****ty post like that. Didnt hit home for me.
#10.6 STV on 27 Jul 2004 - 01:19
actually the main hole here are the noob windows users that dont know what to look for when an email comes in. it could be for any system, but since most noob users use windows, this virus will spread.

THE HOLE/VULNERABILITY IS THE USER, NOT THE OPERATING SYSTEM.

there are way more linux exploits for Linux found check out that linux security website.

STV
#10.7 Jon on 27 Jul 2004 - 11:00
Wrong STV. The lack of user skills is a constant that will never change, no matter how easy you find it to blame them. Maybe in the future some form of licensing will develope, but in the mean time it won't work. Blaming users is such a cop out.
(By that I mean it's best to work on the *assumption* that user skills will never change, whether they do or not we have a responisibility as scientists (we are though!) to make our technologies as safe as possible)

The 'hole' in this case is the lack of authentication by the SMTP protocol.

Colonel_Angus, you're an elitist idiot in my opinion, people like you really do give the IT community a bad name.

Last edited by 1061 on 27 Jul 2004 - 11:14
#10.8 insurektion on 27 Jul 2004 - 12:45
Im sorry he's an elitist for not turning into a Linux zealot? Well whatever you can go sacrifice yourselve to your penguin god or whatever you guys do. But this virus is not abotu Linux at all. It just so happened your important little self didn't like the google was slwo. Welcome to the harsh kick in the balls that is reality, get over it. And yourself.
#10.9 Shining Arcanine on 27 Jul 2004 - 13:42
QUOTE (#10.2)
Q: Are there less viruses for linux than windows?
A: Yes.

Q: Are there less exploits published for linux than windows?
A: Yes.

End of story. I don't need reasons.

Correction. There is an equal amount of exploits published for Linux and Windows according to studies and there will be more published if the user base increases.
(1 reply) #11 digitalslacker on 26 Jul 2004 - 20:28
give me 10 mintues in a room with the author, all i need is 10 minutes
#11.1 Steffan on 26 Jul 2004 - 21:08
10 minutes??!?!? man, you are slow

All I need is 30 seconds or less.

My work got hit by the virus and the entire network is slow because of it.
#12 Xtreme $niper on 26 Jul 2004 - 20:34
Google and Yahoo are working just as fast as they always do all day today.
(2 replies) #13 chacho on 26 Jul 2004 - 20:49
running no AV here, still havent gotten it or any other virus/trojan/etc. for that matter
#13.1 CaKeY on 27 Jul 2004 - 00:57
...and the world thanks you.


#13.2 MoRiA on 27 Jul 2004 - 02:59
Yeah, yeah, all well and good being uninfected with no AV but it's not exactly a huge price to pay for greater peace of mind. I, for one, get hundreds of those damned virus emails in my inbox and it annoys me no end. While Norton scans the emails it then seems to think I wanted to read the damned contents so I have all of these random crap emails with "Norton deleted attachment" attachments going on. Grrr
(1 reply) #14 VikingStorm on 26 Jul 2004 - 21:00
Sigh, why do e-mail worms still spread. Don't these people ever learn?
#14.1 BOOGSoftball™ on 26 Jul 2004 - 21:09
Sure, they learn....but new people are added to the interwebnet every day.
(7 replies) #15 xtremez™ on 26 Jul 2004 - 21:18
I really hate mydoom virus. I know whos the creator of this virus and im not gonna talk about it. I have seen the report on ABC7 just now and i wonder if the search engines will catch the virus again tommorow. I wish viruses werent made on the internet in the first place
#15.1 jerry on 26 Jul 2004 - 21:32
QUOTE (#15.0)
I know whos the creator of this virus and im not gonna talk about it.

if you are not gonna talk about it then why did u mention that ?
#15.2 DrIndianaJones on 26 Jul 2004 - 21:43
Hmmmm, I'm sure the FBI would be interested to hear about this...*reporting*
#15.3 SniperX on 26 Jul 2004 - 21:55
QUOTE (#15.0)
I know whos the creator of this virus and im not gonna talk about it.

We know, we know, it was your cousin, who is the Brother of the the Sister of the Wife's Husband's Mother's dog, right? You and a million others...
#15.4 xtremez™ on 26 Jul 2004 - 22:01
Someone felt for my tricks . U people really think i know who did it? Lol. U people make me laugh hard.

#15.5 Fubar on 27 Jul 2004 - 00:06
get out more maybe ?
#15.6 MoRiA on 27 Jul 2004 - 03:01
QUOTE (#15.0)
i wonder if the search engines will catch the virus again tommorow

The search engines never had it in the first place. The latest version of MyDoom just spams search engines with random searches. If a virus spreads by email then it needs to send itself to an email account. Yes, search engines have hundreds of them..
#15.7 insurektion on 27 Jul 2004 - 12:46
for example gmail.
(3 replies) #16 SniperX on 26 Jul 2004 - 21:47
Gotta love sensationalism...

"This worm has quickly flooded mailboxes"

Water floods, worms infect, I believe.

"slowed down several search engines. Such as Yahoo, AltaVista, Lycos, and even Google."

Even Google? Ah, were they hidden in an inpenetrable cave then, whilst the others were foolish enough to operate from offices?

"MyDoom worm slammed four popular search engines"

This one slams and floods huh? My, that is powerful...

"continued to clog e-mail accounts around the world."

As opposed to just those in the small UK town of Dorset then?

"The new version, variously dubbed MyDoom.m or MyDoom.o"

That's quite a variety then -- two.

"and quickly went on a tear, flooding many mailboxes"

Whoohoo, Now we're cooking, a tear and a flood! Hold on to your hats...

"virus automatically performs Web searches on those search engines"

Virus? It was a humble worm a moment ago. Must have been all that slamming and flooding...

"McAfee Avert, the virus-tracking squad"

lol Squad? Methinks someone is sniffing bad stuff while writing...

"thousands of PCs have been infected by the worm"

Obviously not enough slams, screams and floods. It's back to being a worm again...

In tomorrow's news: How a grain of dust wreaked havoc upon a DJ's turntable, leaving millions, no, billions of listeners rushing, no, screaming for their headphones.

#16.1 Xeron on 26 Jul 2004 - 22:21
QUOTE
small UK town of Dorset


Like the city of California.
#16.2 AV0X on 27 Jul 2004 - 00:30
LMAO, I love this guy! ( SniperX )
#16.3 STV on 27 Jul 2004 - 01:23
thanks for the laughs sniper.

STV
#17 StaticX on 26 Jul 2004 - 21:55
#18 Mister Lamar on 26 Jul 2004 - 21:58
here we go again...............
#19 FloydianOne on 26 Jul 2004 - 22:32
Do people really write these viruses so all they do is slow down search engines? I mean is that their point to like ping google.com and yahoo.com or does it just slow computer networks down in general and google.com just happens to be one of those networks? If I knew how to write these viruses, I would certainly come up with something better... perhaps ping georgewbush.com.
(3 replies) #20 toadeater on 27 Jul 2004 - 00:57
Microsoft does it again. Let's all thank Outlook Express, Internet Exploder and IIS for making this all possible.
#20.1 TGD on 27 Jul 2004 - 01:21
How about we thank the people that spend time looking for flaws in popular software instead?
#20.2 STV on 27 Jul 2004 - 01:27
i have another view. why dont we blame one of the two following groups:

1) noob web surfers
2) virus/worm writers

in this case (as with most viri, i assume), the virus/wordm writer is being just plain annoying and the nood web surfer is being a complete idiot. there should be some sort of class like drivers education, only using computers. that would stop a lot of this stuff from spreading.

THIS IS NOT MICROSOFT'S FAULT!!

STV
#20.3 MoRiA on 27 Jul 2004 - 03:06
Am I allowed to post web links here? Tough.
Do you have a license for that Athlon?

Computer licenses. Best idea ever
QUOTE
So computer use should be a privilege, not a right. Like driving. You can ride a bike without a license; people who don't have a computer license should be allowed to use some analogously less powerful kind of computing device, like a WebTV.
#21 donachello on 27 Jul 2004 - 07:57
No wonder customers were complaining to me about slow emails and browsing... made my day a lot harder...

Virus developers should be shot...

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)