main

Judge: RIAA can unmask file swappers

malebolgia   on 27 July 2004 - 21:45 · 47 comments & 970 views

Advertisement (Why?)
A federal judge has handed a preliminary victory to the recording industry by granting its request to unmask anonymous file swappers accused of copyright infringement.

U.S. District Judge Denny Chin ruled Monday that Cablevision, which provides broadband Internet access in Connecticut, New Jersey and New York, can be required to divulge the identities of its subscribers sued over copyright violations. Chin, in Manhattan, said that the implicit guarantee of anonymity in the Bill of Rights is an insufficient shield in this case: "Such a person's identity is not protected from disclosure by the First Amendment."

Lawyers following the case said it is significant because Chin's ruling is the most detailed so far in any of the many "John Doe" lawsuits brought by the Recording Industry Association of America. Chin said that while file swapping "qualifies as speech" to some degree, the RIAA's member companies had overcome the hurdle posed by the First Amendment and could compel "disclosure of the Doe defendants' identities."

News source: C|Net News.com


Key product features include:

Play as three different characters:

Alan - Youngest Tracy who dreams of joining his family's top-secret organization International Rescue. Although his intentions are always good, he tends to not think before he acts, which gets him into trouble at times.

Fermat - Alan's best friend and confidant. He's the brains -- not brawn -- in this group of heroic friends.

Tin Tin - The third member of their trio and an extremely adventurous girl who knows Tracy island like the back of her hand.

Visit International Rescue's secret island base, battle an oil well fire in Alaska, blast off to the Thunderbirds space station, explore the bottom of the sea, and more.

Race through dangerous terrain in Flight mode and complete missions and solve puzzles in Adventure mode.

Features the entire Thunderbirds fleet:

Thunderbird 1 - International Rescue's high-speed reconnaissance rocket designed to reach disaster zones quickly. This awesome silver gray spearhead craft is extremely maneuverable with top speeds exceeding 15,000 miles per hour.

Thunderbird 2 - Renowned for its power and strength, this massive green leviathan carries International Rescue's vital heavy-duty engineering and life-saving equipment, including the versatile mini-sub, Thunderbird 4.

Thunderbird 3 - This bright red inter-stellar rescue rocket of the International Rescue organization is used for extra-orbital missions and also transports supplies to Thunderbird 5.

Thunderbird 4 - The smallest of the International Rescue vehicles, this versatile mini-sub is primarily used for underwater emergencies and is discreetly carried aboard Thunderbird 2. Whether removing obstacles from the ocean floor or gathering deep sea eco-samples it's the ultimate underwater reconnaissance craft.

Thunderbird 5 - This Massive communications satellite in permanent geo-stationary orbit is vital to International Rescue's operations. The heart of the organization's communications network, it provides immediate data on all rescue situations and keeps constant vigil over the earth and all four remaining Thunderbirds.

Complete nine challenging levels packed with obstacles and enemies.

Availability and Pricing
Thunderbirds will be available in August 2004 on the Game Boy® Advance for a suggested retail price of $29.99, with an ESRB "E" rating. For sales and ordering information, customers can visit www.vugames.com.

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 47 additional comments
#1 Arcticflare on 27 Jul 2004 - 21:57
If I interpret this correctly, it applies directly to PRIVATE p2p filesharing and not instead simply broad distribution methods such as bittorrent which are already supposedly legal to prosecute over? I mean, I can't tell what specific things it applies to. I wish people would be clearer over these matters instead of simply trying to "scare" others into obedience.
#2 sumeet on 27 Jul 2004 - 21:57
****ing RIAA leave us alone
(2 replies) #3 Hekx on 27 Jul 2004 - 21:58


*Watches the RIAA Commercial again*

#3.1 Cube on 27 Jul 2004 - 21:59
how much did they pay that judge
#3.2 jerry on 27 Jul 2004 - 23:28
I second that ! How much did they pay f*ckin judge
#4 a1lthatremains88 on 27 Jul 2004 - 22:01
F*** the RIAA
(6 replies) #5 SBacklin on 27 Jul 2004 - 22:21
Well, I am not surprised. I really believe that the RIAA and it's cohorts will not stop until ALL KINDS of file sharing are outlawed and devices such as CD-RW, DVD-/+RW, VCR and ALL other recording devices are outlawed. The RIAA and it's cohorts are money hungry organizations. What is really stupid is that they use the singers, music stars, etc to say "you're taking our money" bullsh*t. The RIAA, the record labels get the vast MAJORITY of all profits. The singers get a VERY LITTLE share of the profit. It just turns out that records sell so much that even the stars get A LOT of money. Which brings me to another point, the singers complain by saying sh*t like "you're taking our livelyhood away from us" yet does anyone notice they kind of lifestyles they live and what kind of clothing and vacations these people have? I wouldn't mind if illegal file sharing was stopped IF they would put the price of CDs where they should be. I refuse to buy CDs when I have to pull out something larger than a $20 bill to buy 1 CD. That is bullsh*t. Until the price of CDs come down to where they should be, the RIAA and record lables can go f*ck themselves, the deserve it and the singers and music stars have more than enough money.
#5.1 mohennessey on 27 Jul 2004 - 23:04
can i get an amen brother backlin?
#5.2 helloalexb on 27 Jul 2004 - 23:27
AHMEN!
#5.3 MipScript on 28 Jul 2004 - 00:46
Amen to that!
#5.4 levithian on 28 Jul 2004 - 05:20
Hell yeah.

The RIAA is a dying cause, seeing as many people are choosing to use iTunes, Napster, Connect and Wal-Mart now.

So in my opinion, the RIAA can shove a CD up every one of their asses.
#5.5 Spitfire_x86 on 28 Jul 2004 - 06:07
Amen!
#5.6 kravex on 28 Jul 2004 - 11:23
Are Sony part of the RIAA? If so don't they make CD and DVD-RW themselves?
(5 replies) #6 C_Guy on 27 Jul 2004 - 22:24
Personally, I hate the RIAA.... They have no right to infringe on people's privacy like this. And I know people will flame me for saying this...
...but...

Its about time somebody did something. Piracy is piracy and there are consequences to breaking the law. People need to stop whining because they are getting caught and start taking responsibility for their actions.

Am I wrong or is it still wrong to steal????
#6.1 SBacklin on 27 Jul 2004 - 22:33
No, you're right. It is wrong to steal. However, the way I look at it is that the RIAA and the record labels are "stealing" from us. The price of CDs are outrageous. They ripping off consumers. So until they lower the price of CDs to more appropriate prices people should be allowed to swap. They rip us off, consumers should rip them off.
#6.2 Arcticflare on 27 Jul 2004 - 22:45
Of course it's wrong to steal in most cases. Any child over the age of 4 could tell you that. Stealing effects other negatively as a whole. However, there are some cases where stealing is a good thing. After all, there are two sides of the coin to every aspect of human life. I don't think we would have stories such as the escapades of Robin Hood and his merry men if the majority of people didn't think that in some cases, stealing can be a good action.

The RIAA may be the Sherrif of Nautingham, but pirates aren't the merry men of Robin the Hood. They are simply people out for their own interests. They have none of the concerns of others in mind, simply their own, which equates to "I personally am not going to pay for this".

If you want the music, turn on the radio. It's free. If your favorite band doesn't play on the radio, don't pirate them just to get the music for yourself... because if they aren't on the radio then the chances are that they aren't getting giant wads of cash in the first place and they need the record sales you can provide.

But back to the issue at hand, **** you RIAA. You have enough money already. As technology increases, so does your profit, not the other way around. The more you try to intimidate others into obeying you, the more people will flip you off and obtain music illegally. Why don't you try making money by dabbling in portable music devices? That way, the more people get music the ways you don't like, the more money you make.

Let's sum up this whole post : I hate pirates that try to escuse themselves with weak arguments. Shut up, you know you're wrong. I hate the RIAA even more. You suck, guys. Go buy a yacht and forget about your pursuit of greed for a month or so while you take vacation.
#6.3 MipScript on 28 Jul 2004 - 00:48
To me I'm just stealing 1's and 0's and since when was maths illegal
#6.4 shao on 28 Jul 2004 - 10:06
p2p's are the modern day robin hood's.. ;-)
#6.5 wulfshayde on 29 Jul 2004 - 01:26
Okay first let me clear something up... Piracy. There are entire ships being stolen in the Asian-Pacific by real pirates, and we don't give a stuff about that, however, we're willing to sue 10 year old girls for thousands of dollars, and the people we appoint to protect us are okay with this? Its okay to steal a multi-million dollar shipping vessel and have the "there is nothing we can do" attitude, but steal a 50cent song and look out, your ass is grass. This is ridiculous, I want to start a revolution, anyone want to join my cause?
(3 replies) #7 [moribundi] on 27 Jul 2004 - 22:49
I was more anti-piracy before I started watching Mtv Cribs and E! Its' good to be so-and-so specials. When I see an "artist" such as Britney Spears walking around sporting a 50 thousand dollar purse, and she can't even be bothered to actually sing her own vocals at a live show without lip-syncing, it's hard to feel broken-hearted when someone pirates her music. Yes, stealing is stealing...but a 13 year old girl sitting in her room on her computer downloading the latest Linkin' Park single so she can listen to it before her friends get it, then ends up buying it later on anyways...well, that's a bit different than someone getting car-jacked or held up at gunpoint at a convenience store. On my list of "bad things in the world", music piracy is pretty low.
#7.1 Arcticflare on 27 Jul 2004 - 22:53
Yeah, I tend to agree. It's very low on my list of terrible crimes against humanity as well.
#7.2 brianshapiro on 27 Jul 2004 - 23:18
there has always been the argument around that commercialization corrupts art, and that art would be better quality if people weren't producing art for money which people should consider when thinking about whether copyright laws are good as they are.
#7.3 Krill on 27 Jul 2004 - 23:19
I watched cribs on MTV this week and to be fair the stuff I was seeing was quite extravagant. Now I'm not saying they don't deserve the money but when Britney Spears spends $5000 an hour to send a jet plane to get her coffee from her favourite chain on the opposite side of the country I have to wonder about whether record bosses should look at what they are spending on the stars.
(1 reply) #8 helloalexb on 27 Jul 2004 - 23:28
oi, this sucks for me as well as my fellow optimum online users... one of the greatest ISPs availible =D... arg..

Last edited by 31461 on 27 Jul 2004 - 23:37
#8.1 OptiPlex on 28 Jul 2004 - 01:33
#9 soloredd on 27 Jul 2004 - 23:30
I look at it like this - the RIAA is putting their money into the wrong areas and blaming the consumer for it. They don't support up and coming artists - they support established artists because that is what makes them money. It's not a coincidence that we hear the same crappy songs hour after hour on the radio. I haven't listened to an FM station in 3 years because of that. If you notice, most unknown artists like file-sharing; it gets their name out there, people can sample the music, and the RIAA isn't affected. But, God spare us all, if we download that new Britney Spears album, we get sued.

#10 chaos945 on 27 Jul 2004 - 23:35
With the amount of energy spent on trying to stop piracy, a great deal of the world’s problems could be solved in no time.

I begin to wonder just what these corporations will do for fun when they have every single penny is in their pockets and the world is in servitude.
#11 Fubar on 27 Jul 2004 - 23:44
so much for the land of the free
#12 Rudy on 27 Jul 2004 - 23:54
go canada!!
(1 reply) #13 sinatosk on 27 Jul 2004 - 23:54
need an assasin to take out these people
#13.1 brianshapiro on 28 Jul 2004 - 00:00
contact me via PM

(j/k)
(1 reply) #14 =Indy-UK= on 28 Jul 2004 - 00:02
Its greed. Plain and simple.

If CD's weren't such a rip off, (specially in UK) maybe ppl would actually buy them.

But the fat cats want their fat wedge, so f**k 'em!
#14.1 Filicide on 28 Jul 2004 - 00:37
Just buy your music from www.play.com

Most new releases are £8
#15 cybershark on 28 Jul 2004 - 00:11
I hope that if any of the "John Does" are innocent, they'll start a defamation of character lawsuit.

I hope I'm allowed to say this: It's time for some one to do real damage to the RIAA's webserver
#16 SBacklin on 28 Jul 2004 - 00:17
AMEN!

Seriously though, I used to buy CDs all the time. I quit buying CDs because I had to start pulling out more than a $20 bill to buy 1 CD. I don't go for that crap. Hell naw. There is a bright side to all this though. It aint much, but its something. That is they RIAA and it's cohorts may very well slow down or stop file sharing, but we all know that will never happen. Here's an anology for this situation. Trying to think of ways to completely shut down or outlaw file sharing is the same as trying to make a network 100% secure; IT"S IMPOSSIBLE. They will NEVER be able to completely stop file sharing just as NO ONE can make a network 100% secure.
#17 devinlamothe on 28 Jul 2004 - 00:25
I love being Canadian.
#18 cdcase on 28 Jul 2004 - 00:46
fine. and I bet most of the "defendants" are teenagers. Must feel good to beat up on kids huh you stupid greedy ego-centric balding cigar smoking pale weak coffee drinking humps? I'll rot in hades before I buy another CD from a non-Indie label.

Have you guys listened to the indy stuff? Some of it is extremely awesome. Now THAT music I buy. Listened to samples on CDBaby, bought the CD, emailed the artist and complemented on how talented she was - and she RESPONDED. We actually had a "conversation". Very cool.

So RIAA - Kiss my WASP butt
#19 Ash on 28 Jul 2004 - 01:29
I still to this day find it rather humorous how these compnaies believe laws should be followed selectivly.

Ok, perhaps it wasn't the RIAA, but several record labels were found guilty of price fixing over a many year span, before the p2p networks were rampant. Maybe it wasn't the RIAA doing it, but perhaps the RIAA should have stepped in and told the companies not to price fix since they are soo huge on enforcing the law.

The mentallity of these companies is that you can do something illegal untill your caught, so i find it laughable that they expect the customers to follow all the laws themselves.
#20 traxx on 28 Jul 2004 - 07:07
I say we pick an RIAA employee out at random and subpoena his/her computer. Guarantee we'll find a few thousand "illegal" tracks on there. Plain and simple...music is much easier to manage on the computer than it is with a few hundred/thousand cds. Not to mention, when it has become faster to download an entire album than it is to rip purchased music to mp3, it's no wonder file sharing has increased.

My suggestion to the RIAA....give up on retail sales. Take all the cds and throw them up on ebay or amazon marketplace for a few bucks off the outrageous price you *******s put on the new albums. It's incredibly sad when I buy a CD from the store with that plastic crap on it for 18-20 bucks and see the same CD on Amazon barely used for like 5.95. Is shrinkwrap really that much of an endangered resource?
#21 Jugalator on 28 Jul 2004 - 08:33
Can someone explain to me why a company is granted more and more police powers?

OK, let's admit that it's illegal to share copyrighted material like this, but why is RIAA the company with the power here?
(3 replies) #22 BoneDog7 on 28 Jul 2004 - 13:28
First let's get something straight. The RIAA is not a publisher, it is a representitive agency. It is not their job to decide how much money to charge for CDs, pay stars, or create any market strategy. Their job is to represent and protect the rights of the music publishers. We should be pissed at the publisher's for CD prices being so high, and the publisher's for making non-piratable CDs. We should be pissed at the RIAA for being a$$holes and suing 13-year old kids who downloaded a song off the internet to edit into a home movie. Just remember, both the publisher's and the RIAA that represents them ONLY make money from selling CDs to us. It may seem like they're bullying us around, but they actually are really really hurting from people being fed up with them. They are consistantly losing profits (THIS IS GOOD) and are going to have to rethink their strategy very soon, because even they are starting to realize that spending all this money on anti-piracy is NOT profitable for them.
#22.1 SBacklin on 28 Jul 2004 - 14:27
Good point, has anyone else noticed that the RIAA and record labels complain about all this money that they are loosing and yet turn around and spend all that money suing people including elderly and little kids? Hmmmm. Makes you wonder.
#22.2 BoneDog7 on 28 Jul 2004 - 14:58
Yes, but they are making a crapload from those depositions.
#22.3 traxx on 28 Jul 2004 - 16:11
That's only because of the threat. If any of these things actually went to trial, the legal fees would definately offset the settlement. I say run it all the way, you can't pay what you don't have.
#23 Skyfrog on 28 Jul 2004 - 14:27
Didn't Alanis write a song about this?

QUOTE
"What it all comes down to
Is that everything's gonna be fine fine fine
I've got one judge in my pocket
And the other one is paying off a senator
(1 reply) #24 glitch409 on 28 Jul 2004 - 17:36
here it is again

#24.1 chacho on 28 Jul 2004 - 18:18

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)