main

Microsoft's EU court date set for September

malebolgia   on 27 July 2004 - 16:17 · 6 comments & 922 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Microsoft will face off against the European Commission on Sept. 30 in a European Union court in Luxembourg, seeking a suspension of sanctions against it for several years, the court announced on Tuesday.

The Commission found that Microsoft abused its dominance of PC operating systems and in March ordered the software giant to make changes by mid-June to create a more level playing field for rivals. Microsoft appealed and asked the Court of First Instance to suspend the sanctions until the case is completed, probably three or more years from now.

"The President of the Court of First Instance has set the 30 September-1 October as the date for an oral hearing concerning Microsoft's request for suspension of the Commission's decision and other interim measures," the court said in a statement. The EU says that if the remedies are suspended they will become irrelevant by the time the case is over, years from now, while Microsoft says the sanctions will damage the company in ways that cannot be undone.

News source: C|Net News.com


You take control of John Vattic, a man who wakes up in a medical facility with no memory - but the ability to manipulate objects using only his mind. Throughout the early stages of the game you're awarded with more and more abilities. You can heal yourself, make yourself invisible and use psychic attacks that throw the enemy back with a blast of energy. Using these powers, it's up to you to figure out how, and why, you came to be like this. And it's here that the game starts getting all clever.

Levels alternate between the present and flashbacks to the past. In the present-day, John is trying to regain his memory while escaping and then avoiding those out to get him whereas, in the past, Vattic is assisting a special forces team that's trying to infiltrate a military base to locate a deranged scientist. Initially, each time period offers distinctly different playing styles - with the present-day, psychic John Vattic having to rely on his mental abilities and stealth to get ahead, while the levels that take place in the past present you with more aggressive gun battles. Quoted all from GR.

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 6 additional comments
(4 replies) #1 slapnuts_ox on 27 Jul 2004 - 18:38
this is basically MS saying we did something that we knew we'd get in trouble for from past experience (integrating IE) but we did it anyways and if you make us remove media player from the OS then its going to damage our company so shame on you. I can fully understand bundeling IE or Media player with windows but integration is just too far. I really hope that MS is forced to remove it from the OS. I don't care if its included, i just would want to be able to uninstall it.
#1.1 Billprozac on 27 Jul 2004 - 18:55
I understand your point, but you have to think like the programers would have. When they started the whole integration, they were trying to do things involving web based content throughout the OS, such as active desktop and web content in windows explorer. It is for this reason that IE is integrated, cause it was in the begining. Now the OS has been built on this concept, that removing it totally is almost out of the question.
#1.2 slapnuts_ox on 27 Jul 2004 - 19:05
agreed that it will be really bad but they made the choice to do this in the first place. It may have seemed like a good idea from a programming perspective but that doesn't make it right. i just feel they should be held fully accountable for what they did.

FYI before I get flamed by any fanboys I feel that WMP is the best media player available in the windows environment but still take this policy.
#1.3 C_Guy on 27 Jul 2004 - 19:44
I fully support Microsoft's innovation. I think it was Bill himself who explained that an operating system is designed to give Users access to information and functionality. In the old days DOS gave you access to floppy drives, hard drives, and with the right drivers, other hardware like mice and printers. As Windows evolved it was able to allow Users to do more and more things. Internet Explorer simply gives Windows the ability to connect to the Internet, why should that be a separately installed thing? A lot of people these days want to be able to turn a computer and make it go without installing a bunch of components.

As for those who don't like Internet Explorer or the principle of innovation they have always been (and always will be) free to install third party software for that functionality without any degrade in Windows' performance. In fact, Microsoft released a Windows update called 'User Access & Defaults' so novice Users could easily decide what web browser, media player, and instant messenger they wanted to use.

Just because the Internet Explorer icon is there on the desktop doens't mean it has to be used and it takes less than a second to remove it if you really don't want to see it.

If Media Player should be removed then why not messenger, the fax service, native hardware driver support, the firewall, compressed file (ZIP) support, networking support, plug & play support, Net Meeting, ScanDisk, Disk Defragmenter, etc. All these innovations could be removed so Users are forced to download, install, or purchase them but then what motivation does Microsoft have to innovate its software?

If Microsoft's competitors were as innovative as they were, their products would be in higher demand and people would have a stronger desire to install them and use them instead. Seriously, stop whining and start innovating.
#1.4 slapnuts_ox on 27 Jul 2004 - 20:13
I dont feel that these products shouldn't be offered with the os but they shouldn't be required to be installed. Just because IE is hidden doesnt mean its still not taking up space in your ram. Lets compare this with a car here. It would be like saying yea your free to customize the car, but the hood is bolted close and you can only modify things such as the inside or the exhaust. I don't think that car would fair very well. Thats not innovation but more locking people into using one thing as much as possible. I feel that during a windows install the user should be given the option of installing wmp or IE like they used to and then go from there. If MS wanted to innovate they should write software and publish specs so any 3rd party media player or browser could be used instead of IE and WMP the way that mono lets you use mozilla for IE related materials or apachie for mysql related things.
#2 wildduck on 28 Jul 2004 - 12:09
only 1 of 10 win an appeal in European Union court in Luxembourg - its going to be difficult for microsft.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)