main

MPAA wins settlement in DVD copy case

malebolgia   on 10 August 2004 - 18:38 · 19 comments & 1716 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Today the Motion Picture Association of America has settled a copyright infringement against 321 Studios. A lot of good this does 321 Studios now. Since last Friday 321 Studios went bankrupt trying to afford all the expensive court fees.

Motion Picture Association of America has spared no legal expense with the infringement suit filed against 321 Studios Back in 2002. As now the company that offered DVD copying software for consumers is no more. The software in question was "DVD X Copy" which allowed consumers to make backup copies of their movies (in case the original got destroyed or scratched). The MPAA didn't see it this way at all. Instead it labeled 321 Studios software as a tool to undermine the copy protection mechanism that prevents DVD backup.

In some weird way I agree with the MPAA. That "DVD X Copy" did undermined DVDs copy protection mechanism, but shouldn't the consumer have the right to backup his/her purchase. I believe the consumer should have the right to backup their DVD. Apparently so does the MPAA now. Not to long ago the MPAA announced that they’re developing a DVD copying software. This was announced while the trial between 321 Studios and the MPAA was still underway. I find it messed up that the MPAA would seek to destroy 321 Studios "DVD X Copy" software, only to be making there own.

View: More Information


Atari
-Atari Classics

Atlus USA
-Caduceus
-Snowboard Kids DS
-Plus three additional titles in development

Bandai
-Meteos
-Mobile Suit Gundam Seed
-Plus one additional title in development

Capcom
-Mega Man Battle Network
-Viewtiful Joe
-Plus one additional title in development

Electronic Arts
-GoldenEye
-Madden NFL
-Need For Speed Underground
-Tiger Woods PGA Tour Golf
-The Urbz: Sims in the City

Hudson Soft
-Bomberman

Koei
-Dynasty Warriors (working title)
-Plus two additional titles in development

Konami
-Boktai (working title)
-Castlevania (working title)
-Dragon Booster (working title)
-Frogger 2005 (working title)
-Survival Kids (working title)
-Pro Evolution Soccer (working title - World Soccer Winning Eleven series)
-Vandal Hearts (working title)
-WINX (working title)
-Yu-Gi-Oh! Nightmare Troubadour

Majesco
-Moonlight Fables
-Nanostray
-Plus at least three additional titles in development

Namco
-New Mr Driller (working title)
-Pac 'n' Roll (working title)
-Pac-Pix (working title)

Orbital Media
-Four titles in development, including action-platformer, strategy roleplaying, combat racing and family games

Sega
-Project Rub (working title)
-Sonic DS (working title)

Square Enix
-A new story of Secret of Mana
-A new story of Slime Morimori Dragon Quest
-Dragon Quest Monsters series
-Egg Monster Heroes
-Final Fantasy Crystal Chronicles series

Summitsoft Corporation
-Air Assault 2
-Organiser Plus

Tecmo
-Monster Rancher
-Plus one additional title in development

Telegames
-Ultimate Brain Games
-Ultimate Card Games
-Ultimate Pocket Games

THQ
-SpongeBob SquarePants
-Plus five additional titles in development (one of which presumably will be a WWE title)

Ubisoft
-Asphalt GT
-Rayman
-Plus additional titles in development, including a major movie licence for early 2005

Vivendi Universal
-Robots

Dice says: WOW! Look at those games! I am most anticipating the Secret of Mana ones. What are your most favorites.

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 19 additional comments
(2 replies) #1 heffe2001 on 10 Aug 2004 - 18:56
Well, if I were 321, there'd be a 'leak' of all the source code for all their software... Make it open source, and they'd never stop it .

#1.1 Ehrihk on 10 Aug 2004 - 19:53
I agree! That would be cool.
#1.2 deiong15 on 10 Aug 2004 - 21:26
thats what i say flood the market with so many of them that the mpaa can no longer go after everyone they jsut have to sit back and lick its wounds and figure another way to rip the consumers off.
(3 replies) #2 werejag on 10 Aug 2004 - 18:59
beating your rival into backrupty is not willing the case. shutting down there supply of money and then claiming victory is low.

mpaa there are plenty of free apps that do a much better job. like the napster riaa case you are simplely missing the problem
#2.1 YaddaMe on 10 Aug 2004 - 22:04
QUOTE
shutting down there supply of money and then claiming victory is low


Nah, not in this case. The MPAA may not entirely get the point that basically shutting down one single company is going to thwart piracy in any way... but, if there was one company to go after, 321 was the ideal candidate. When backed up against the wall, Robert Moore started lying & scamming customers in a last ditch effort to line his pockets with cash before it ended.
#2.2 heffe2001 on 11 Aug 2004 - 12:50
Interesting, as they are willing to give refunds to anybody who asks (at least that's what their site said). I never really used it, I used DVDShrink & DVD2One, but it looked like a good product for the technically challanged... Just drop a DVD in, hit copy, put in a blank, and bam, done.

#2.3 scyphe on 12 Aug 2004 - 02:34
From what I remember, when napster was shut down, loads of new P2P-networks, more cunning and anonymous, popped up. MPAA and RIAA are trying to slay an immortal hydra, meaning they will just crap their own case by going about it like this.
(1 reply) #3 werejag on 11 Aug 2004 - 01:52
well let the piracy run rapid
#3.1 rogerroger on 11 Aug 2004 - 07:07
I do.
#4 CubanPete on 11 Aug 2004 - 07:45
The problem with the MPAA and the RIAA is that they dont listen to customers. Customers want to make backups of cds and dvd's because its so easy for them to get scratched, especially if the cd/dvd in question is actually good!! They want to try doing some market research on what people want from them, i.e. price reductions, ability to copy what they have legally purchased!!!!!!

As for them making their own dvd copier, i reckon i could count the number of users of that softwatre on one hand, who would possibly buy a version made by the MPAA??? They havent made it yet but you can bet it will have thousands of limitations in it!
Isnt their tactic monopolistic btw, lets destroy the competitor and make our own lol, The owner of 321 should file a anti-trust lawsuit against them
#5 Headcase2 on 11 Aug 2004 - 08:46
Funny thought....

a warez version of MPAA's DVD copying program....

(1 reply) #6 Starman on 11 Aug 2004 - 12:50
It's a shame. I never used it to illegaly copy anything - I used it to make copies of the kids' movies so that they wouldn't beat the originals to death.

Either way, there are free tools out now.
#6.1 budwizer on 11 Aug 2004 - 16:51
I never used it to copy illegally either however as stated before the MPAA (like the RIAA) misses the point. I actually bought the software and used to make backups of my purchased movies.

A NetFlix account and DVDShrink are looking more and more appealing. If the MPAA wants to screw the customer then what are you do?

I don't purchase movies that are easily scratched and destroyed so that they can dump loads of cash on lawyers to shutdown people that have good ideas. Yes the software was used for illegal purposes, like everything else in life is for illegal purposes. Maybe the MPAA should have approached 321 and tried to partner and fund them to help develop this new version the MPAA is wanting to implement.

Stop trying to destroy or control everything and work with people, that usually works out the best in the end. 321 knew what the majority of their customers wanted to accomplish and were not oblivious to this like the MPAA seem(ed)s to be.

#7 davidtb on 11 Aug 2004 - 14:31
The problem with the MPAA and the RIAA is that they dont listen to customers[QUOTE]

When you give an agency authority. They don't believe they have to listen anymore. They're striving for autonomy.

Inquisition,..anyone?

my 2˘
db.
#8 djesteban on 11 Aug 2004 - 17:21
QUOTE
I find it messed up that the MPAA would seek to destroy 321 Studios "DVD X Copy" software, only to be making there own


EXACTLY

THIS proves that the MPAA is just a freakin business and is only there to protect their money

f*** you RIAA... if this softwares die 5 other will appear... kill those 5... then 10 will appear...

you old retards
#9 eaglebtc on 11 Aug 2004 - 17:30
This article started off as News, but quickly devolved into an editorial. The author is attemting to try the MPAA in the court of public opinion, with a jury of his peers.

Sorry for the criticism, Deren. I agree with you, but the first rule of writing a "news" article is to be as objective as possible. No emotions, no opinions.

In other words, "Just the facts, ma'am."
#10 Ryster092 on 11 Aug 2004 - 18:47
What a bunch of hypocrites. They file a lawsuit against 321, and then announce they are making a product that does the same thing themselves...

That has got nothing to do with the potential illegal use of 321's product, their only motive was to kill off the competition. That stinks and I hope the MPAA themselves get sued to hell for this.

Also, just because something CAN be used to perform an illegal act, doesnt mean its the software companies fault... Cars can be used to run down pedestrians and ram raid shops, doesnt mean the car companies should be sued.
#11 scyphe on 12 Aug 2004 - 02:30
MPAA is just a bunch of old men getting money from all the big corporations to squash any kind of civil rights... it's all about money...
#12 Lezard on 12 Aug 2004 - 05:09
At this rate..corporations running the world of tomorrow is near

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)