main

IBM to round out iSeries Power5 server family

malebolgia   on 17 August 2004 - 14:45 · 9 comments & 609 views

Advertisement (Why?)
IBM has announced a new Power5 server aimed at midsize businesses with around 1,000 employees. The eServer i5 550 was created to fill the gap between IBM's other servers, such as the Power5 eServer i5 520 and the Power5 eServer i5 570. At $74,000 this midsize business server isn't going to be cheap, despite what IBM says.

The i5 550 server ships with two of its four processors "turned on". It may seem odd that not all of the i5 550 server’s processors are turned on, but in fact it's a pretty clever idea. By only turning on two of its four processors businesses can pay for what they need up-front, and in the future they have the option to have the other two processors "turned on" (at a fee of course). IBM will charge a $3,700 fee to turn on each processor, but considering the power these processors pack you probably won't be turning them for a while (depending on your business). In order to make sure you get the most bang for your buck IBM also includes software that allows its server to rum multiple IBM operating systems, such as IBM's UNIX OS AIX.

I don't think anyone can complain about the overall performance of IBM’s Power5 eServer’s. Yet alone the processor that's powering these bad boys, but with a price tag of $74,000 some companies may want to look else where, depending on their type of business.

View: More Information


What's New
  • Fixed Windows XP Service Pack 2 Automatic Update issues.
  • Made some cosmetic changes.

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 9 additional comments
#1 CubanPete on 17 Aug 2004 - 14:58
I Want One
(3 replies) #2 SVT on 17 Aug 2004 - 15:08
According to aceshardware.com, the POWER5 is the fastest processor ever built thus far, beating the pants off of the likes of Itanium2 and Opteron:

POWER5 Performance Brief (aceshardware.com)
#2.1 threedaysdwn on 17 Aug 2004 - 15:34
The Power5 is a very, very impressive unit, as was the Power4.

Though to be fair, it should be noted that the Opteron was never intended to compete with the likes of the Power series. But rather, to destroy the Xeon line and to with the side effect of offering a vastly superior alternative to Itanium for 64-bit migration (as the Opteron still trounces Itanium in 32-bit performance). It was also designed to be (relatively) cheap.

It would be nice to see AMD get into the super-ridiculous-godlike server processor market... but considering their goals and their "friendliness" with IBM, I don't think that's likely to happen anytime soon.

Also, the Itanium architecture fairs quite well when you're testing its speciality (64-bit FP and TPC). Personally I think there *may* be a future for Itanium, just not this generation.
#2.2 lexor on 17 Aug 2004 - 17:59
I don't know how you read it, but to me that review says that Intel's Itanium2 is a better processor, considering that it's practically 2 years older and still holds ground. With a new speed hike beening recently reached (which the article oh-so-conviniently doesn't mention) Intel still seems in the lead pefromance wise in high-end computing. And from what that article shows, Itanium2 is cheaper than Power5 for same power.
#2.3 Fally on 18 Aug 2004 - 15:40
It sounds to me that his knowledge isn't completly drawn from the above article... Maybe you should do some more research on the chip yourself.
(1 reply) #3 Thrawn on 17 Aug 2004 - 17:59
Leave two processors off??? What a waste of silicon.
#3.1 lexor on 17 Aug 2004 - 18:01
what a save of money for the companies.

Remember Server OS, Database (oracle, ibm's db2) etc. are priced based on how many processors you run them on. So more processors active = higher Software prices. this way companies save now, and then if they succeed and grow, they can simply turn more on and pay licence fees later, without buying new hardware.
(1 reply) #4 ev0| on 17 Aug 2004 - 18:32
QUOTE
Freeing up IT staff members means they can work on other projects, Johnson said.


Freeing up IT staff members means they can be laid off
#4.1 lare2 on 18 Aug 2004 - 07:29
agree

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)