main
Report a problem

Judges rule file-sharing software legal

malebolgia   on 19 August 2004 - 19:42 · 81 comments & 8606 views

Advertisement (Why?)
A federal appeals court has ruled that file-sharing software is in fact legal. The panel noted that file-sharing companies simply provide the software for individual users to share information. Therefore, they cannot be held accountable for what users share, be it a word document or copyrighted material.

While developers of file-sharing software are rejoicing about the federal appeals courts ruling, the RIAA and MPAA are steaming mad. This ruling has dealt a serious blow to the two industries, but they have vowed to continue the fight. They have urged a re-examination of the law, and will undoubtedly proceed with an appeal. However, they still face the same old problem : unlike Napster, new file-sharing networks don't have central servers where computer connect to access copyrighted material. This technique makes file-sharing networks like Sharman and Stream cast even harder to shutdown.

If this ruling had not gone through (i.e. the RIAA / MPAA won), several file-sharing developers would have had to face the possibility of further legal action. Right now, those file-sharing developers (Grokster Ltd, Stream cast Networks Inc. and Sharman Networks Ltd.) are in the clear. The situation is such that the RIAA & MPAA won't stop until file-sharing is a thing of the past : read - they'll never stop. Problem is, you can't shut down file sharing networks with legal action.

View: More Information
View: Final Decision (PDF) | EFF Commentary

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 81 additional comments
#1 vetbangbang023 on 20 Aug 2004 - 12:44
They seem to fail to realize that this file sharing is only promoting them more. Any and all albums I have, are because I heard the band first via downloaded music. The two concerts I paid $50 a piece, this summer, to go see were for bands I found out about through downloaded music. All in all, downloading free music has caused me to spend more money that I would ever have.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)