main

Intel set to unveil new Wi-Fi chips, say analysts

Unknown   on 24 August 2004 - 10:57 · 12 comments & 1004 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Intel this week is expected to introduce a chip that adds support for a relatively obscure version of Wi-Fi, analysts said Monday, a move that could help ease congestion on wireless networks. Endorsement last year by the world's largest chipmaker of the wireless communications technology known as Wi-Fi helped turn wireless networking into a must-have for notebook computer users. But as wireless networks have popped up in homes, businesses and public places, some network administrators have begun to warn of network traffic jams.

In a press briefing scheduled for Thursday, Intel is expected to announce the availability of a "tri-mode" Wi-Fi chip that supports the two most popular wireless data technology varieties--802.11b and its speedier cousin, 802.11g--and the less-used 802.11a. Intel's current chips support only the "b" and "g" varieties. Intel would say only that Thursday's announcement is "to introduce its latest wireless technology for Intel Centrino notebooks."

Analysts, however, said the news was likely to be the new Wi-Fi chip, as Intel has said previously it would have the product ready in the second half of the year. "The only new thing that's upcoming is the tri-mode chip," said JMP Securities analyst Krishna Shankar.

View: The full story
News source: new.com


The following Support Tools have been updated in Service Pack 2:
bitsadmin.exe
extract.exe
httpcfg.exe
iadstools.dll
ipseccmd.exe
netdom.exe
replmon.exe

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 12 additional comments
#1 co0kie on 24 Aug 2004 - 11:07
Is there anything special with the 802.11a?

Dont see any point in adding the support for it, surely it cant harm anyone but why waste the time on that when you can invest valuable time on other things?
#2 The Land of Smeg on 24 Aug 2004 - 11:13
what a waste of time to start supporting unsupported technologies, it's not any faster than G and you can't get get 'A' adapters anymore. And 'A' compatable APs are twice the cost.

This might give people the idea that 'A' is better than b/g because it was implemented in Centrino, which it is not.
(2 replies) #3 feverish- on 24 Aug 2004 - 11:21
Glad you guys can read;

QUOTE
a move that could help ease congestion on wireless networks.


*That's* why.
#3.1 co0kie on 24 Aug 2004 - 11:23
To be honest, I dont think supporting older and less known technologies is the solution to "ease congestion on wireless networks" instead find a smarter and more effencient + beneficail (for Intel and the end user) soltion.
#3.2 mgleason007 on 24 Aug 2004 - 23:53
QUOTE
Glad you guys can read

Glad you can think with your own brain. Supporting 802.11a won't do a damn thing for congestion on existing wireless networks. This announcement is straight from the "who gives a damn?" department.
#4 kirk26 on 24 Aug 2004 - 11:32
Yawn, I thought it would be for a new 802.11x.
(1 reply) #5 Dessimat0r on 24 Aug 2004 - 12:50
I believe 802.11a is a good move, it can work over longer distances.
#5.1 lilmoonee on 24 Aug 2004 - 20:32
it would only be a temp. fix. as the 5.8ghz spectrum become more widely used (cordless phones for example) it would be the same if not worse than 802.11b/g (because higher frequencies cannot penetrate solids as well as lower frequencies can).
#6 unknownsoldier on 24 Aug 2004 - 13:47
a is only decent over los. put a wall in the way and the signal is fsked
(1 reply) #7 PsykX on 25 Aug 2004 - 03:07
Wow. I hope not every processor will become wireless, or I will not be able to have a computer anymore.

Just my 2.4 ghz cordless phones cause interference in my wireless network on my computer, so much that I used to always lose the Internet. ow I'm down with the good ol' Phone networking technology
#7.1 noyb on 25 Aug 2004 - 15:33
I had a similar problem, just change channel.
#8 angrybrit on 25 Aug 2004 - 19:12
Weren't they gonna include Bluetooth in the new Centrino?

Now that Mac users made it work and introduced it to the general population, shouldn't the low-risks Windows companies include and push it.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)