main

WMP 10, New MSN Music

Mr magoo   on 01 September 2004 - 18:22 · 181 comments & 54653 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Microsoft was a bit late to the game in the online music download market. Apple managed to grab a sizable chunk of the market with their popular music service, iTunes. However, this could very well change with the launch of MSN Music.

The new site (currently in preview, expected to be launched live with WMP 10) allows users to download music from a variety of artists for 99 cents per song, $9.90 per album. Content wise, the site does not pass the infamous Beatles test (context: neither do any others), yet a notice can be seen suggesting that the Beatles will soon be added. They claim to have licensed over 1 million songs, substantially more than other online outfits, from “major music labels, independents, and even undiscovered artists". When Apple came to the UK, they had (and still are) problems securing contracts with Independent labels. Microsoft appears to have used its significantly larger financial clout to solve these issues; The Beatles, for example, were only going online with a company that would offer them a lot of money.

To compare with iTunes; the site is intended to be used via WMP 10, but can be viewed in browsers (link below). The site appeared usable in non-IE browsers, yet had a few minor quirks, as is to be expected. The price is similar to iTunes. In terms of DRM / format efficiency, the site claims that the music can be played on 70 devices - i.e. WMA enabled devices – and is encoded at 160kbps WMA; iTunes uses 128k AAC encoding (FairPlay DRM). Microsoft have been quite generous in terms of rights, with the site reporting that the "MSN Music allows you to play your music on up to five Windows PCs, burn play lists to CD up to seven times, and transfer to an unlimited number of portable audio devices." iTunes purchased music can be played only on PC/Macs & iPods. MSN Music also has reviews, ratings, and album information in a similar fashion to iTunes. The site will have celebrity recommendations, ala iTunes, and ‘expertly’ themed playlists. All in all, the site compares very well, in some areas coming out clearly on top.

The site requires a passport account for use. Asides from hosting music, the site also offers cinema information, a variety of radio stations, and TV listings for the USA. No word on whether the site will be offering localised information when it is launched proper.

The site is slick and well designed, arguably slick enough to compete well with iTunes. It might be added, however, that it is not difficult for Microsoft to promote it's own services (e.g. IE default homepage -> msn.com) and tunnel its Windows market share elsewhere. That aside, the site will undoubtedly enjoy success in its own right. The service looks well thought through and is easily accessible. You can check it out at the link below; the site is expected to go live with the launch of Windows Media Player 10, which is expected as soon as tomorrow. If you can't wait, you can download the WMP 10 Public Preview, here.

Update : We've got a un-confirmed report that WMP 10 will ship with a high quality MP3 encoder, something that Microsoft have not done before. Read more on the forums here. Further, it would appear that the final build has leaked out of Redmond before tomorrow's official release; the final build number is 10.00.00.3646. More info and screenshots, on the forums, here.

View: MSN Music | Forum thread | The MSN Music team | About MSN Music
Screenshot: Main Page | Login (artist themed background) | Artist page | Site viewed in WMP 10
Screenshot: WMP 10 | Other music services offered by WMP


The Sorting Office has a new flow chart style front end, which really simplifies the management of message filtering.

The Bat! 3.0 includes new Virtual Folder technology to help you organize your email even more effectively. This allows you to create lists of messages gathered as a cross-section from anywhere in your email database using a comprehensive filtering system.

The new Mail Chat feature allows you to communicate with your correspondents instantaneously using regular e-mail messages as an underlying technology. The strong point of this approach is that unlike other instant messenger programs, The Bat! mail chat doesn’t compromise the safety of your computer. Communication takes place through your trusted mail servers, and in addition the chat messages are checked by Anti-Virus and Anti-Spam filters.

The Bat! 3.0 has a Bayesian filtering plug-in as a part of the default installation. Bayesian filtering is one of the most effective spam detection algorithms available nowadays. The BayesIt! plug-in also detects URLs used in spam messages, making filtering even more efficient. First, you must train the plug-in by feeding it spam and non-spam messages, then it will do the job for you.

You are now able to connect to Microsoft Exchange Servers using The Bat! via native MAPI protocol to fetch or send messages.

The Bat! 3.0 now has a new MSI-based digitally signed installation package. You can verify the digital signature before installing The Bat! to make sure that the program comes from a trusted source and hasn’t been modified in transit. System administrators now have the ability to deploy The Bat! easily throughout their networks.

The Bat! web site

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 181 additional comments
#1 Colonel Sanders on 01 Sep 2004 - 18:33
The layout isn't very appealing...
(5 replies) #2 loc[a]lhost on 01 Sep 2004 - 18:37
MS should hire a new design team FAST
the look of the new WMP doesn't even match their own Luna
#2.1 chacho on 01 Sep 2004 - 18:44
yea, it matches the glassy look of royale better.
#2.2 loc[a]lhost on 01 Sep 2004 - 18:53
right, but the stupid thing is that Royale has not been released and i dont think it will ever be, so currently it doesn't match anything
#2.3 Overlord368 on 01 Sep 2004 - 19:18
yeah they should honestly sit down and look at all thier themes they've made (luna, corona, royale, slate...well mabye not slate yet) and think about them for awhile. mabye a theme pack to unify all of microsoft's products may be a good idea (mabye something like their new homepage?)
#2.4 Zirus1701 on 02 Sep 2004 - 00:59
AWESOME IDEA! I would love to have a theme pack... basically port some of the other themes into windows. Make them all compatible. That would rock.
#2.5 PsykX on 02 Sep 2004 - 01:37
Forget it guys. You've seen it it the past and it's not ready to change before 2006, really.

MS doesn't care about the layout/design/GUI of their programs.
#3 chacho on 01 Sep 2004 - 18:39
they know what they need to do to take a chunk of itunes' userbase, so let's see how they do
(10 replies) #4 Krankerz on 01 Sep 2004 - 18:54
Why are MS such assholes? It's not even Mac compatible. Apple was kind of enough to give their software to MS, why not the other way around? What a piece of junk.
#4.1 AV0X on 01 Sep 2004 - 18:57
Apple wasn't kind enough to do anything... they HAD to make it Windows compatible.
#4.2 chacho on 01 Sep 2004 - 18:58
QUOTE
Apple wasn't kind enough to do anything... they HAD to make it Windows compatible.

eeeeeexactly.
#4.3 vetMr magoo on 01 Sep 2004 - 18:58
Please be polite. Apple weren't "kind enough" to offer itunes to Windows; they realised they could make more money off of it - in fact- they realised that would be the only way the product would be widely sucessful.
#4.4 NetRyder on 01 Sep 2004 - 19:02
There was a Mac-only version of iTunes for a long time before "hell froze over" and it was released for Windows. Besides, Apple didn't do it because they were kind enough - the sole reason was to promote the sale of iPods due to the seamless integration between iTunes, iPod and iTMS.
At this point of time, MS probably sees no such incentive to release a Mac version. If they foresee some kind of profitability, they will do it in the future.
#4.5 Overlord368 on 01 Sep 2004 - 19:08
well lets take into concideration that apple has a relitively small marketshare on computers (anywhere from 2-8% from what ive read) so it would be stupid not to make it pc compatable... turn things around, how many mac people would use wmp10 instead of iTunes?
#4.6 pogz on 01 Sep 2004 - 21:58
haha, Apple "gave" iTunes to Microsoft? Okay...

Besides, few Apple users would even consider buying music from "evil" Microsoft
#4.7 Cyranthus on 02 Sep 2004 - 00:52
thats why its called WINDOWS Media Player! DUUUUHHHH!!!!!
#4.8 Krankerz on 02 Sep 2004 - 02:42
Dumbass...educate yourself. Windows Media Player is on the Mac! DUUUUHHHH!!!!
#4.9 Jugalator on 02 Sep 2004 - 07:01
QUOTE
Apple weren't "kind enough" to offer itunes to Windows; they realised they could make more money off of it - in fact- they realised that would be the only way the product would be widely sucessful.

MS would make more money by releasing this on the Mac.
Not as much as Apple got from supporting Windows, but more.
#4.10 kether2012 on 02 Sep 2004 - 08:40
are you sure. enough money to justify the development costs??? few MP3 players are compatible with the Mac. It's the kind of no-brainer decision that leads you to buy an ipod... it really is the only MP3 player worth thinking about (for ease of use). the ipod can't play wma and what's the point of competition... itunes will win hands down and they'll offer exactly the same music. Personally I'm not spending a penny on download sites till i own the right to own the music in any format... not just one copy-protected low bitrate AAC file.
(6 replies) #5 AV0X on 01 Sep 2004 - 18:56
Go to the Black Eyed Peas page, click on the play button near a song. That's great! It just...plays. No pop-up window, fast start time... it just starts.
#5.1 jagedEdge on 01 Sep 2004 - 19:03
They accomplish that through ActiveX. Not quite so great when you're using Firefox or any other browser that's not IE.
#5.2 gameguy on 01 Sep 2004 - 20:02
What are you talking about? It doesn't use ActiveX. I never installed any components and I could view the site and play all the samples just fine.
#5.3 aaaaa0 on 01 Sep 2004 - 20:48
It uses WMP. WMP is an ActiveX. The reason you don't see a component install is that WMP is already installed on your computer.
#5.4 frod on 02 Sep 2004 - 06:09
why are you so excited about this? heh. have you ever used the itunes music store? does the same thing.
#5.5 aaaaa0 on 02 Sep 2004 - 10:29
Uh, no. He was commenting that you don't need to run a seperate WMP to use the music store.

Just directly go to beta.music.msn.com in IE, and click on a song. It will just play right in the browser, and you can buy straight from the browser.

To use iTunes, you have to run a seperate iTunes program.
#5.6 vettimdorr on 07 Sep 2004 - 23:12
Straight from your music player to the music store
Straight from browsing to the music store

The 1st seems to make more sense for me. Luckily, that's in WMP. However, you act as though a browser is a cruical part of the computer and should be opened at all times. You're still running the music store inside a program. Unless you can get MSNmusic.exe or iTMS.exe on your desktop, it's a very invalid point...
(2 replies) #6 supersaiyanjericho on 01 Sep 2004 - 19:01
just wondering, what format does Apple use for their music?
#6.1 NetRyder on 01 Sep 2004 - 19:03
128k AAC (FairPlay DRM)
#6.2 vetMr magoo on 01 Sep 2004 - 19:05
thanks for that
(2 replies) #7 XanDaMan on 01 Sep 2004 - 19:03
I do like the design of MSN music. Very slick...
#7.1 nX07 on 02 Sep 2004 - 00:04
Agreed, simple and effective and very attractive!
#7.2 midway40 on 02 Sep 2004 - 04:59
It seems to blend well with my Modplex 2 visual style
#8 NetRyder on 01 Sep 2004 - 19:06
Looks great. Let's see if this will be able to switch me over from iTunes/iTMS.
#9 angrybrit on 01 Sep 2004 - 19:07
It's very ugly. I wish MS would fix the UI.
(13 replies) #10 aristotle-dude on 01 Sep 2004 - 19:07
Minor correction. Your article made it sound like iTMS music can only exist on PC/MAC or iPod. They have licenced with Motorola to allow their phones to play iTMS music and you can burn iTMS songs to audio CD's an unlimited amount of times.

You also receive rights to use the songs in your personal multimedia such as home DVD's and Movies.

I wonder if you can use the songs from the MSN service in other applications.
#10.1 jagedEdge on 01 Sep 2004 - 19:12
You can probably use them in that great program called Windows Movie Maker.
#10.2 NetRyder on 01 Sep 2004 - 19:18
QUOTE
I wonder if you can use the songs from the MSN service in other applications.

Since songs purchased from the music store would be DRM-protected, I doubt they would play in any other app. Then again, only iTunes can play the AACs purchased from iTMS.
#10.3 jagedEdge on 01 Sep 2004 - 19:23
Yes, iTunes is the only software jukebox that can play songs from the iTMS, but the iApps (iPhoto, iDVD, iMovie, etc.) and Pro (Soundtrack, Motion, Final Cut Express/Pro, etc.) apps can also use the songs.
#10.4 guppydrop on 01 Sep 2004 - 19:38
Thats wondeful for the 3% of the computer population that has iLife available to them.
#10.5 noyb on 02 Sep 2004 - 00:48
Guppy as usual you have used a valid point as a way to get at Apple. He was using the iTunes example of being able to use purchased music in other apps, i for one will be suprised if the MS music store purchased songs won't work on the windows equivalent apps (eg Movie Maker).

In the future why don't you look at the point that someone was trying to make instead of making a worthless dig at Apple. We all know about your prejudice and im sure im not the only one thats sick of hearing it.
#10.6 guppydrop on 02 Sep 2004 - 02:13
The pain of truth must cut deep. Don't like what I said about Apple in a WMP 10 thread? Too bad. As a past Apple owner several times over, I feel that I can say whatever the hell I like about them. Can't handle it...too bad...don't read what I say.
#10.7 noyb on 02 Sep 2004 - 02:37
No my point was your not that bright, you didn't get the point of the statement he made. The point is that people would like to use purchased music in their projects like home movies and so on and so forth, the itunes point was only raised as an example.

And all you are actually doing is spamming, and don't make out your only doing it in MS topics because i saw a few comments in the imac thread from you to. Please grow up and conduct yourself better.
#10.8 guppydrop on 02 Sep 2004 - 03:28
I'm not too bright? Please...you insult my intelligence simply because I hurt your tender little feelings when I made a mean comment about your little 'puter friend. Boo hoo. Just because some people can't get it through their thick skulls that everyone doesn't want some douchebag blathering on about Apple in every single thread on here, I'm spamming. I'll grow up as soon as you get over yourself. Until then, blow.
#10.9 noyb on 02 Sep 2004 - 05:55
No, someone with a brain in their head would debate comments, discuss comments in an orderly fashion. Not simply parade themselves with worthless spamming.

Instead of spamming with things like "Nobody cares about a platform with 3%" or "Ill never buy a mac" why don't you lay foundation to what your saying and dispute peoples arguments with real facts or give reasons why Apple fails to live up to MS.

I use both systems by the way, i am in no way a fan boy for either. But i am willing to debate their strengths and weaknesses in a mature manner.
#10.10 tRr on 02 Sep 2004 - 08:40
ANY app can play iTunes Music Store files, with one catch– it has to use QuickTime to play them (or at least convert it to something else first). QuickTime does all the authorizing stuff for "free", including if the computer isn't authorized a little dialogue box that will ask you for your password.

I'd have to assume this is the same on the PC but I haven't actually tried it.
#10.11 guppydrop on 02 Sep 2004 - 10:39
Proof why Apple fails to live up to MS? I'd say a dwindling 3% is the proof, genius. And when Mac is further buried by even Linux, hopefully that fact will be a little clearer. And I consider what you're doing to be just as much spamming...but I doubt you'll feel the same way. Now, can we get back on topic...which is, btw, the MSN Music Service and WMP10, in case you've not noticed, and -not- about Apple.
#10.12 shao on 02 Sep 2004 - 11:08
i'm with guppy on this one. Getting sick of apple users more than willing to make snide digs at any software they want without any fear of comments to argue the cause back, but if anyone does dare respond and defend something non-apple they are insulted.

apple's drm policies may be lax, and more in tune with peoples' oft out dated views of fairplay, but if another solution offers a better drm solution AND because of it is able to offer a larger product base (you don't think the tigher drm controls have anything to do with the likes of beatles, and other independants coming across to a fledgling service). Really, honestly, when you come to terms with reality, what percentage of people want to download a song off itunes and then put it into god knows what i'gay name' application.

the whole argument of apple supports pc, do microsoft support mac? well, do i get the same amount of 'freedom' of drm when it comes to using itunes' songs in windows apps?

my personal taste? itunes is overbloated, a horrible screen real estate waste of space, and crap at organising my music when i already have it logically organised. I understand people like it, but equally there're people that don't as well. To that end it's good that consumers are finally getting a real choice (excuse the bad pun) when it comes to where they buy their music. Choice = competition = lower prices and better service.

we're all winners.

Last edited by 25229 on 02 Sep 2004 - 12:43
#10.13 tRr on 02 Sep 2004 - 17:41
Since market-share is such good indicator. I could say the United States at 4% of the World's Population isn't influential... but that wouldn't make sense, but I guess if you base everything on users...

Get on topic? The topic on hand is WMP10 and a Music store– it would be perfectly on topic to discuss it's competition, one of which is Apple. Don't believe me? Look at how many times Apple was mentioned in the news clipping...

shao:
Where is the dig? Mentioning you can use Apple's files in other Apps constitutes a dig?

As I mentioned even on the PC it should be no problem for any Application that wants to access the files. Here is further proof that it should work:
http://www.winamp.com/plugins/details.php?id=137828
#11 jagedEdge on 01 Sep 2004 - 19:11
Unless the grip the iPod has on the market falters I don't see this store really taking off.
#12 TGD on 01 Sep 2004 - 19:13
The design looks good to me. WM10 doesn't really fit with the XP default, but I like the store. Clean.
#13 lwebster_2000 on 01 Sep 2004 - 19:19
so how does it work for the incredibly small percentage of the world that doesnt live in the US? do we have to wait for a local (UK in my case) version to be released or do we just purchase and the price is converted from cents to pence without charge from the visa companies?
(7 replies) #14 deiong15 on 01 Sep 2004 - 19:20
the Beatles yuck. how many times does one need to buy the same damned songs over and over again. plus teh fact that they sucked but then so did elvis wonder why ms decided to drop the rent a music file idea they originally came up with.
#14.1 kylmcg on 01 Sep 2004 - 20:17
Your taste in music must be incredibly bad. It's one thing to say you personally don't like the music the beatles made, but to say they just plain suck is ignorant and plain retarded. Go listen to 50 cent.
#14.2 yert* on 01 Sep 2004 - 20:37
Shutup...Why do you care what he likes, you don't even know him. Not that it would matter.
#14.3 theyarecomingforyou on 01 Sep 2004 - 22:00
QUOTE
Shutup...Why do you care what he likes, you don't even know him. Not that it would matter.


No-one cares what music they like... it's just that people don't like other people randomly slating one of the most influential bands in the history of music (that is indisputable). It's perfectly acceptable to dislike the songs and the band, but to say that they sucked is immature and weak.

QUOTE
Go listen to 50 cent.


lol...
#14.4 nic on 01 Sep 2004 - 22:45
QUOTE
plus teh fact that they sucked


Man, are you off. Why don't you try turning off the Britany Spears and actually listen to some good quality music .
#14.5 supersaiyanjericho on 01 Sep 2004 - 23:12
Metallica ownz the Beatles
#14.6 sebaz on 01 Sep 2004 - 23:28
sure they do *pats u in the head*
#14.7 denzilla on 02 Sep 2004 - 04:05
People (including myself) don't like paying for sh*t they cannot keep.
(1 reply) #15 Puma on 01 Sep 2004 - 19:33
The design and skin of WM10 look like a browser from MS to me. I"m going to stick with WM9 and besides that, I don't use WM much. Winamp 5.x is a way to go with.
#15.1 Jugalator on 02 Sep 2004 - 07:04
Agreed

Media Player Classic + ffdshow + Winamp 5 = mmm...
(7 replies) #16 haisdeaks on 01 Sep 2004 - 20:06
microsoft is again copying the guys at apple
just because apples music store took off they want a peice of the market too. when will microsoft come up with something of there own and let the underdog apple catch up.
im not a mac user but i like apple, and im really starting to not like microsoft.
oh yeah and WMP 10 looks like one ugly peice of software- just like WMP 9.
#16.1 lare2 on 01 Sep 2004 - 20:11
QUOTE
microsoft is again copying the guys at apple


Apple didn't invent this. They just made it in a better way.
#16.2 macrosslover on 01 Sep 2004 - 20:22
MS was planning a music store for a long time. they were going to release it before Apple released theirs but decided not too...which might end up being a smart decision.
#16.3 PsykX on 01 Sep 2004 - 20:34
Microsoft will always be copying Apple.
I don't really agree on WMP9 being an ugly piece of software, but I have to say that these square buttons were something very ugly. It was not a nice design at all...
Winamp5 on the other hand has a MUCH better design, and introducing a new feature to buy songs online should not be called a new version 10...

WMP10 is very ugly though. They tried to copy apple but they failed.
#16.4 kitchenutensils on 01 Sep 2004 - 21:31
i here what you say completely and have to completely agree - the only things i miss in iTunes are video, skin and a system tray mode - wmp already has two of these but we'll have to see which gets the system tray first. winamp was first there but iTunes sorts out my music brilliantly so i have no need to change as of yet.
#16.5 macrosslover on 02 Sep 2004 - 05:25
wmp already has a task bar sort of function, that's probably the closest they'll come to system tray functionality anytime soon.
#16.6 Crayon on 02 Sep 2004 - 06:59
wmp has always had the ability to minimize to tray if that is what you mean, just d/l the wmp powertoys
#16.7 jagedEdge on 02 Sep 2004 - 12:25
Here you go. iTunes Sidekick minimizes iTunes to the system tray: http://www.ipodlounge.com/ipodnews_comments.php?id=2195_0_7_0_C
(7 replies) #17 kylmcg on 01 Sep 2004 - 20:15
"MSN Music allows you to play your music on up to five Windows PCs, burn play lists to CD up to seven times, and transfer to an unlimited number of portable audio devices."

copy the music to many different music devices and you've got yourself many more cd burning and computer transfer times.
#17.1 aristotle-dude on 01 Sep 2004 - 20:41
That's not how it works. When you transfer between PC's, the DRM log goes with it counting the number of burns.
#17.2 Dayon on 01 Sep 2004 - 21:13
Sooo...burn to a CD-RW and then rip at high quality?
#17.3 nX07 on 02 Sep 2004 - 00:08
Yeah its not that big of a deal
#17.4 nX07 on 02 Sep 2004 - 00:14
Yeah its not that big of a deal
#17.5 frod on 02 Sep 2004 - 06:15
oh yeah nothing like taking a lossy file and re-encoding it with a lossy codec.
#17.6 CheeseCow on 02 Sep 2004 - 06:38
I am sure 160kbps WMA is at least like 224kbps MP3, and if you are aiming for something like 128kbps anyways, I am sure you will hardly notice the transcode.
#17.7 winmacguy on 02 Sep 2004 - 07:12
The more times you compress and recompress a file the more information the codec continues yo strip away, much like scanning and rescanning an already scanned image- the more you do it the worse it gets. You cant improve something digitaly when the information isnt there to "improve" the quality of the file.
(3 replies) #18 lare2 on 01 Sep 2004 - 20:21
IMHO, A lot of people says they love Google because of the simplicity on the use and the design of their site. Contrary to Microsoft wich creates "graphical heavy" sites (eg. msn.com).

Now that Microsoft is finaly trying to simplify the design of their sites, first with "msn video" and now with this music one. People are saying that they dislike this site layout.

IMHO. I like "google" simply because it works, and not because of it's layout.

BTW Let me repeat, " this is only my OPINION "
#18.1 yert* on 01 Sep 2004 - 20:54
You're probably get flamed anyway; those stupid flamers...
#18.2 lare2 on 01 Sep 2004 - 21:27
At leat I tried to avoid them
#18.3 XML on 01 Sep 2004 - 22:27
hey i like the site's design and wmp10 too, to me itunes interface looks alien in windows
(2 replies) #19 PsykX on 01 Sep 2004 - 20:31
WMP10's design is much more ugly than WMP9 Series' one... even though I hated these square-buttons in WMP9 Series
They are trying to do these loved Mac OS X buttons.... pity it looks bad like that.
Mac OS X has these nice buttons....
And NO, I am not a Mac lover, I actually own a PC with Windows XP. I'm just saying that Microsoft's graphic designers do a really really bad job.
#19.1 theyarecomingforyou on 01 Sep 2004 - 22:04
QUOTE
WMP10's design is much more ugly than WMP9 Series'... I'm just saying that Microsoft's graphic designers do a really really bad job."


No... it is a vast improvement. The default colour scheme is pretty poor, but if you reduce the colour levels then it looks really nice. Much better than any previous WMP version...