main

Spam Influx Reaches New Heights

Daniel Fleshbourne   on 11 September 2004 - 08:26 · 9 comments & 883 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Spam--unsolicited, usually dubious commercial e-mail messages--accounted for 82 percent of all the inbound e-mail processed during August, and made up 90 percent of all mail sent during one spam-filled day last month, according to e-mail security firm FrontBridge Technologies. The company says the latest flood of spam was spurred by back-to-school specials and political pitches.

According to FrontBridge, it blocked 2.5 billion spam messages in August, of 3.1 billion messages processed during that month. The e-mail storm reached a peak on August 30, when 90 percent of all the messages processed by FrontBridge were spam. FrontBridge, which offers e-mail management and security services for companies, compiled its data from more than 2200 global customers and 15,000 e-mail domains.

View: The full story
News source: PCWorld


woops :D

i

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 9 additional comments
#1 tiagosilva29 on 11 Sep 2004 - 11:33
I weep for my children...
(2 replies) #2 Octol on 11 Sep 2004 - 12:40
I'm sure glad the US Government passed the CAN-SPAM Act to save us from all those nasty spammers!
#2.1 Shining Arcanine on 11 Sep 2004 - 17:24
It would be worse now if they had not passed the CAN-SPAM act. Some major spammers are either out of business or being sued thanks to the CAN-SPAM act.
#2.2 Octol on 11 Sep 2004 - 22:09
QUOTE
It would be worse now if they had not passed the CAN-SPAM act.

If you really believe that, I've got some really nice swampland in Florida for sale. Also a great bridge in Brooklyn.

But please, make sure you bring cash to the sale—preferrably in small untraceable bills!
(4 replies) #3 mcovey on 11 Sep 2004 - 15:55
who's getting all this spam? morons who won't censor their email addresses so it's john $@$ doe %.% com? That's easy enough to copy and paste, and decode. Companies can use form-mail for user input rather than mailto: links as well.

I get nearly no spam. Only one of my 4 email addresses returns any result in google, and it's an old one I was dumb enough to post back when I used tripod.
#3.1 stupidape on 11 Sep 2004 - 19:22
Quite simply one of the dumbest comments i have ever read.
#3.2 Octol on 11 Sep 2004 - 22:11
Ditto.
#3.3 SunnyB on 12 Sep 2004 - 17:21
What is so dumb about his statement? Munging an email adress is an accepted way to ward off email harvesters and spam. I also get very little spam and of those few none of them are adderssed directly to me. They are bcc or to a specific web mail that I use for posting to forums and usenet.
#3.4 8-n-1 on 13 Sep 2004 - 13:21
You're assuming that the people involved ever posted to a newsgroup or forum. I haven't with several of my accounts and they still get spam.

It's more a case of unethical vendors selling your e-mail address to other companies, who in turn sell it to others as well.

Don't ASS-U-ME.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)